China is watching India's response to Pahalgam. And appreciates its strategic restraint
Chinese analysis presents India's retaliation as measured, favouring diplomatic and economic tools over military escalation. Many have interpreted this approach as strategic restraint , while others take it to be a sign of underlying vulnerabilities.
Chinese media and online forums have portrayed India's response as firm yet punitive, with particular focus on its alleged humanitarian fallout for Pakistan. Headlines such as 'After the shooting, India 'cut off water,' 'blocked roads,' and 'drove people away' to Pakistan' and 'Pakistan pushes back against India's water cut' frame India as exacerbating regional instability .
The recent terror attack in Pahalgam has drawn widespread international attention, including from China, where online discourse has been active and revealing. While Chinese commentary remains varied, a clear tilt toward Pakistan is evident. Repeated use of the term ' India-controlled Kashmir ' instead of 'Kashmir' signals alignment with Pakistan's narrative.
'The attack stems from deep-rooted political and religious tensions in Kashmir,' wrote Liu Zongyi, a senior research fellow at the Center for South Asian Studies of the Shanghai Institute for International Studies. 'India's response is unsurprising; it has long blamed Pakistan for such incidents. This could further strain India-Pakistan ties and increase regional instability. The Narendra Modi government may also try to leverage the crisis politically.'
Liu also linked the attacks to the abrogation of Article 370. 'The revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status fuelled local resentment by curtailing rights and encouraging demographic changes. This discontent, exploited by extremist groups, is evident in the targeting of male Hindus during the attack,' he added.
Another commentator noted: 'Kashmir is no longer normal. The insistence on a 'return to normalcy' is perhaps the most regrettable aspect of this administration's Kashmir policy.'
Also read: Striking back at Pakistan is full of risks. India must master choreography of escalation
A cautious Beijing
Chinese analysts broadly view the international response, especially from the United States, as favouring India. One common framing on Chinese platforms is: 'The West stands with India, and Pakistan turns to us for support'.
A commentator remarked: 'The US and Israel have openly sided with India, supplying weapons and ammunition, effectively endorsing Modi and preparing India for a full-scale war. But they underestimate the preparedness of the Pakistani army.'
On Baidu, a user wondered about China's role. 'With the US and Russia both backing India, and Pakistan increasingly isolated, how can China continue to support its long-standing ally without jeopardising its own interests?' he wrote. India's growing importance in the US Indo-Pacific strategy is widely seen as narrowing China's regional manoeuvrability, even as Russia signals increased openness to Pakistan, he added.
Meanwhile, Chinese scholars are stressing regional stability. 'Restraint and rationality between India and Pakistan are key to South Asia's stability. The international community must encourage both sides to de-escalate,' noted a researcher at Fudan University's Institute of International Studies.
Wang Shida, Executive Director and researcher at the South Asian Institute of the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, called for a calm and measured response. He urged against the temptation to satisfy domestic nationalist demands at the risk of regional stability. Notably, he also wrote that in the sabre-rattling between India and Pakistan, the latter should not be perceived as showing weakness.
While some Chinese voices recall past troop mobilisations along the China-India border as symbolic support for Pakistan, few expect any direct involvement now. Most anticipate that Beijing will maintain a diplomatic posture—advocating calm, protecting its interests, and avoiding direct provocation.
A Baidu commentator argued that China's current caution on Kashmir is a way to maintain balance between its relations with India and Pakistan. He suggested that Beijing could take on a more active role through the Belt and Road Initiative, facilitating dialogue while strengthening its own border infrastructure.
Also read: IWT suspension is lawful and morally right. India isn't weaponising water, but ending charity
Support for Pakistan
While commentary on platforms like Baidu and Guancha remains relatively measured, Weibo and WeChat reflect stronger pro-Pakistan sentiment. One Weibo post described Pakistan as 'irreplaceable' to China's strategic security, highlighting their 'all-weather' relationship, which is rooted in defence cooperation, nuclear partnership, and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Some users even speculated that in a wartime scenario, China could provide Pakistan with intelligence and material support.
A WeChat user accused India of trying to escalate tensions rather than identifying the perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack. He added that India has begun a 'water war' by controlling river flows, posing a grave threat to Pakistan's agriculture and economic stability. Another post took the conspiracy theory further.
'US Vice President Vance arrived in New Delhi on 22 April, a terrorist attack occurred the next day. Without any investigation, Modi immediately blamed Pakistan. Coincidence—or not?' the post read.
A user warned India against escalation, implying that China could step in to support Pakistan both diplomatically and militarily.
'We aim to support Pakistan and bring India to its knees. India, blindly following the US, is sabotaging China's transport routes and trying to sever our economic lifeline. It is a vicious wolf and a hungry tiger at our doorstep—aggressive, cunning, and poised to strike. Our goal should be to cripple India permanently, leaving it a deflated power incapable of rising again,' read a particularly hostile post.
Also read: Dhaka walls have Islamist Hizbut Tahrir posters. They are asking the military to take over
Strategic alignment
Chinese discourse has deliberately avoided holding Pakistan accountable for the Pahalgam terror attack. Rather than condemning terrorism, many Chinese voices blame India, express sympathy for Pakistan's diplomatic isolation, and call for deeper Chinese support. This is not neutrality; it is calculated alignment. Beijing continues to use Pakistan as a proxy to destabilise India and undercut its regional influence.
For decades, China has enabled Pakistan's anti-India agenda through diplomatic cover, military support, and economic aid. The result is a sustained campaign of cross-border terrorism that Beijing refuses to confront as long as it serves the goal of containing India's rise. China is deliberately ignoring Pakistan's state-sponsored terrorism, even as the threat mirrors the kind of violence it claims to oppose. India is not collateral; it is the target.
The irony is stark: China, too, has lost its citizens to terrorism in Pakistan. Yet, it chooses to dismiss India's security concerns, eroding the possibility of regional stability and exposing its calls for peace as hollow rhetoric.
This posture may yield short-term strategic gains for Beijing, but the long-term consequences are catching up. As global support and solidarity for India deepen, China's turning a blind eye to Pakistan's state–sponsored terrorism risks becoming a lasting liability.
Present Chinese discourse makes one thing clear: India is the target of state-sponsored terrorism, and Beijing remains complicit by design.
Sana Hashmi is a fellow at Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
LONDON, - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
39 minutes ago
- First Post
China clears rare earths export applications, not clear if Indian companies included
China's decision in April to halt exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets disrupted global supply chains, affecting industries from automotive and aerospace to semiconductors and defence read more Miners are seen at the Bayan Obo mine containing rare earth minerals, in Inner Mongolia, China. File image/ Reuters China said Saturday (June 7) it is prepared to accelerate the approval process for rare earth exports to European Union companies and will issue a final ruling on its trade probe into EU brandy imports by July 5. The developments come amid broader efforts to resolve ongoing trade tensions between Beijing and Brussels. Talks were held earlier this week in Paris between Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic, China's Commerce Ministry said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Price commitment discussions on Chinese-made electric vehicles exported to the EU have also reached the final phase. 'Efforts from both sides are still needed,' the ministry said. The ministry added that China 'was willing to establish a green channel for qualified applications to speed up the approval process' for rare earth exports. It also noted that Beijing recognised rising demand for rare earth materials across sectors including electric vehicles and robotics and that it 'was willing to further strengthen communication and dialogue with relevant countries' on the matter. Rare earths and trade friction China's decision in April to halt exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets disrupted global supply chains, affecting industries from automotive and aerospace to semiconductors and defence. The move has become a flashpoint in EU-China trade relations. The ministry said it 'attached great importance to the EU's concerns' and indicated it would work to resolve the bottleneck in a timely manner. Brandy duties under review China's anti-dumping duties of up to 39 per cent on European brandy, particularly French cognac, were implemented shortly after the EU imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. The Chinese measures have impacted major French producers including LVMH's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard's Martell, and Remy Cointreau. French President Emmanuel Macron previously accused Beijing of 'pure retaliation' over the duties. Beijing had initially planned to announce a final decision on the brandy investigation in January, later postponing it to April and now July 5. On Saturday, the Commerce Ministry confirmed that French firms and industry associations had submitted price commitment proposals and that investigators had reached agreement on key terms. 'Chinese authorities are now reviewing the complete text on those commitments and will issue a final announcement before July 5,' the statement said. Electric vehicle negotiations ongoing The European Commission said in April it was working with Beijing to consider a minimum price framework for Chinese electric vehicles in lieu of the tariffs imposed in 2023. China's Commerce Ministry said the EU also proposed examining 'new technical paths' related to electric vehicles, and that China was now evaluating those ideas. Wang also told Sefcovic that China hoped the EU would 'meet us halfway and take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard and promote compliant trade in high-tech products to China.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Chinese hackers, user lapses turn smartphones into 'mobile security crisis'
Cybersecurity investigators noticed a highly unusual software crash - it was affecting a small number of smartphones belonging to people who worked in government, politics, tech and crashes, which began late last year and carried into 2025, were the tipoff to a sophisticated cyberattack that may have allowed hackers to infiltrate a phone without a single click from the attackers left no clues about their identities, but investigators at the cybersecurity firm iVerify noticed that the victims all had something in common: They worked in fields of interest to China's government and had been targeted by Chinese hackers in the past. Foreign hackers have increasingly identified smartphones, other mobile devices and the apps they use as a weak link in US cyberdefences. Groups linked to China's military and intelligence service have targeted the smartphones of prominent Americans and burrowed deep into telecommunication networks, according to national security and tech experts. It shows how vulnerable mobile devices and apps are and the risk that security failures could expose sensitive information or leave American interests open to cyberattack, those experts say. "The world is in a mobile security crisis right now," said Rocky Cole, a former cybersecurity expert at the National Security Agency and Google and now chief operations officer at iVerify. "No one is watching the phones." US zeroes in on China as a threat, and Beijing levels its own accusations US authorities warned in December of a sprawling Chinese hacking campaign designed to gain access to the texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. "They were able to listen in on phone calls in real time and able to read text messages," said Rep Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois. He is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and the senior Democrat on the Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, created to study the geopolitical threat from China. Chinese hackers also sought access to phones used by Donald Trump and running mate JD Vance during the 2024 campaign. The Chinese government has denied allegations of cyberespionage, and accused the US of mounting its own cyberoperations. It says America cites national security as an excuse to issue sanctions against Chinese organizations and keep Chinese technology companies from the global market. "The US has long been using all kinds of despicable methods to steal other countries' secrets," Lin Jian, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry, said at a recent press conference in response to questions about a CIA push to recruit Chinese informants. US intelligence officials have said China poses a significant, persistent threat to US economic and political interests, and it has harnessed the tools of digital conflict: online propaganda and disinformation, artificial intelligence and cyber surveillance and espionage designed to deliver a significant advantage in any military conflict. Mobile networks are a top concern. The US and many of its closest allies have banned Chinese telecom companies from their networks. Other countries, including Germany, are phasing out Chinese involvement because of security concerns. But Chinese tech firms remain a big part of the systems in many nations, giving state-controlled companies a global footprint they could exploit for cyberattacks, experts say. Chinese telecom firms still maintain some routing and cloud storage systems in the US - a growing concern to lawmakers. "The American people deserve to know if Beijing is quietly using state-owned firms to infiltrate our critical infrastructure," US Rep John Moolenaar, R-Mich. and chairman of the China committee, which in April issued subpoenas to Chinese telecom companies seeking information about their U.S. operations. Mobile devices have become an intel treasure trove Mobile devices can buy stocks, launch drones and run power plants. Their proliferation has often outpaced their security. The phones of top government officials are especially valuable, containing sensitive government information, passwords and an insider's glimpse into policy discussions and decision-making. The White House said last week that someone impersonating Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff, reached out to governors, senators and business leaders with texts and phone calls. It's unclear how the person obtained Wiles' connections, but they apparently gained access to the contacts in her personal cellphone, The Wall Street Journal reported. The messages and calls were not coming from Wiles' number, the newspaper reported. While most smartphones and tablets come with robust security, apps and connected devices often lack these protections or the regular software updates needed to stay ahead of new threats. That makes every fitness tracker, baby monitor or smart appliance another potential foothold for hackers looking to penetrate networks, retrieve information or infect systems with malware. Federal officials launched a program this year creating a "cyber trust mark" for connected devices that meet federal security standards. But consumers and officials shouldn't lower their guard, said Snehal Antani, former chief technology officer for the Pentagon 's Joint Special Operations Command. "They're finding backdoors in Barbie dolls," said Antani, now CEO of a cybersecurity firm, referring to concerns from researchers who successfully hacked the microphone of a digitally connected version of the toy. Risks emerge when smartphone users don't take precautions It doesn't matter how secure a mobile device is if the user doesn't follow basic security precautions, especially if their device contains classified or sensitive information, experts say. Mike Waltz, who departed as Trump's national security adviser, inadvertently added The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to a Signal chat used to discuss military plans with other top officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols set up in his office so he could use the Signal messaging app on a personal computer, the AP has reported. Hegseth has rejected assertions that he shared classified information on Signal, a popular encrypted messaging app not approved for the use of communicating classified information. China and other nations will try to take advantage of such lapses, and national security officials must take steps to prevent them from recurring, said Michael Williams, a national security expert at Syracuse University . "They all have access to a variety of secure communications platforms," Williams said. "We just can't share things willy-nilly." (AP)
