Urgent Tillari board meet demanded over land denotified for casino firm
Panaji:
The members of the Tillari Irrigation Development Board have called for an immediate Command Areas Development (CAD) board meeting to discuss state govt's decision to denotify 3.3 lakh sqm of the Tillari command area at Dhargalim.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Govt's decision will pave the way for Delta Corp Ltd, a casino company, to set up an integrated resort.
But residents of Dhargalim have strongly opposed the decision and have demanded its revocation.
The Tillari irrigation project is an interstate initiative involving Maharashtra and Goa, built at a huge cost, and Goa govt has notified 14,521ha of land under the Goa Command Area Development Act, 1997.
At a CAD board meeting held on Sep 27, 2024, the insistence was voiced to approve the scheme and have it notified, which the board did.
So the scheme, prepared under Section 17, was finally notified under Section 18(2) of the Goa Command Area Development Act.
'The consequences of this notification are provided in Section 19 of the act, which clearly prohibits the diversion of such land,' CAD board member and MLA Carlos Alvares Ferreira said.
'I am at a loss to understand how the Goa cabinet could bypass the statutory powers vested in the CAD board and agree to denotify such a huge tract of notified Command Area Development Authority (CADA) land.
This is without jurisdiction and totally illegal,' Ferreira said.
He added, 'When we finished approving the scheme, what can be the rationale or the justification, that too, within a span of about six months from the date of its notification, to denotify it as CADA land? Just because a casino has applied for it?' Ferreira said.
Irrigation command areas directly relate to notified command areas, meant to enhance the agricultural produce in Goa.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Thus, this matter also falls in the domain of the WRD minister and the agriculture minister. And yet, this decision appears to directly contravene the state's agricultural policies and Command Areas Development Act, Ferreira said.
'Based on this set of concerns and the urgency of the matter, I write to request to convene an immediate meeting of the CAD board to discuss the issues raised by me and to enable govt to come clean on the issue in the larger public interest,' a letter sent to the member secretary of the CAD board said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Urgent Tillari board meet demanded over land denotified for casino firm
Panaji: The members of the Tillari Irrigation Development Board have called for an immediate Command Areas Development (CAD) board meeting to discuss state govt's decision to denotify 3.3 lakh sqm of the Tillari command area at Dhargalim. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Govt's decision will pave the way for Delta Corp Ltd, a casino company, to set up an integrated resort. But residents of Dhargalim have strongly opposed the decision and have demanded its revocation. The Tillari irrigation project is an interstate initiative involving Maharashtra and Goa, built at a huge cost, and Goa govt has notified 14,521ha of land under the Goa Command Area Development Act, 1997. At a CAD board meeting held on Sep 27, 2024, the insistence was voiced to approve the scheme and have it notified, which the board did. So the scheme, prepared under Section 17, was finally notified under Section 18(2) of the Goa Command Area Development Act. 'The consequences of this notification are provided in Section 19 of the act, which clearly prohibits the diversion of such land,' CAD board member and MLA Carlos Alvares Ferreira said. 'I am at a loss to understand how the Goa cabinet could bypass the statutory powers vested in the CAD board and agree to denotify such a huge tract of notified Command Area Development Authority (CADA) land. This is without jurisdiction and totally illegal,' Ferreira said. He added, 'When we finished approving the scheme, what can be the rationale or the justification, that too, within a span of about six months from the date of its notification, to denotify it as CADA land? Just because a casino has applied for it?' Ferreira said. Irrigation command areas directly relate to notified command areas, meant to enhance the agricultural produce in Goa. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Thus, this matter also falls in the domain of the WRD minister and the agriculture minister. And yet, this decision appears to directly contravene the state's agricultural policies and Command Areas Development Act, Ferreira said. 'Based on this set of concerns and the urgency of the matter, I write to request to convene an immediate meeting of the CAD board to discuss the issues raised by me and to enable govt to come clean on the issue in the larger public interest,' a letter sent to the member secretary of the CAD board said.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Medigadda a major ‘financial conspiracy': V&E report
1 2 Hyderabad: A detailed report by the vigilance and enforcement (V&E) department has uncovered what it termed a "major financial conspiracy" in the construction of the Medigadda barrage, which is part of the state's ambitious Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project. The report covers construction activities from April 2015 to Oct 2023 and alleges a series of 'intentional' violations, procedural lapses, and unauthorised financial decisions. Senior officials in the irrigation and command area development (I&CAD), and finance departments are accused of colluding to push through flawed approvals and irregular payments, resulting in serious structural failures and significant losses to the public exchequer. The V&E report listed 18 major lapses, highlighting how assurances made during chief minister-level review meetings were misused to justify estimate revisions, design changes, and unapproved payments. A key example is a CM-level meeting held on Dec 9, 2017. Though its instructions were recorded and circulated by the principal secretary of I&CAD, the department failed to verify or adhere to these directions while processing revised estimates (RE), the report alleged. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like People Born 1940-1975 With No Life Insurance Could Be Eligible For This Reassured Get Quote Undo Both the I&CAD and finance departments were found to have negligently circulated and approved files related to RE-I and RE-II without proper scrutiny, leading to major financial implications. According to the report, these deviations were deliberate and not accidental. Project officials used govt approvals to push contractor-favourable proposals, benefiting the contractor, L&T-PES (Private Limited and Engineering) JV, the report alleged and said these were fast-tracked without evaluation, opening the door for misappropriation of public funds. Engineering violations At the project execution level, the report alleged serious breaches of standard engineering protocols. Initial investigations and surveys failed to meet standards set by the Central Board of Irrigation and Power (CBIP). Foundational designs were reportedly compromised due to the use of incomplete geo-technical data, which field engineers and the chief design officer alleged to have accepted without question. A major concern was the construction of secant piles, critical for the barrage's stability. According to L&T's own construction protocol, secondary piles should be placed within 1-2 days of primary ones. However, this was delayed by up to 45 days, and the quality control team had failed to intervene. The superintending engineer allowed the work to continue without verifying the agency's qualifications, the report alleged. Another serious lapse was the removal of cofferdams and sheet piles—a task contractually assigned to the contractor. Instead of ensuring this was completed, officials included a post-facto ₹61.2 crore provision for cofferdam works in RE-II, after the barrage had already been inaugurated. This move enabled illegal payments, the report said. Cofferdams were also not dismantled to pre-construction levels, disturbing the natural flow of the Godavari river and putting the barrage at further risk. The report categorised this as criminal negligence requiring legal action. Further negligence was noted in the failure to remove overburden upstream of the barrage, despite warnings from 2D and 3D model studies by the Telangana State Engineering Research Laboratories (TSERL). This oversight changed the river's flow dynamics and contributed to structural damage downstream, the report highlighted. Undue financial advantage Some of these violations not only reflect administrative failure but also suggest deliberate attempts to extend undue financial advantages to the contractor at the state's expense, the report alleged. The V&E department concluded that the missteps taken from the start of the redesign in April 2015 to the barrage's structural failure on Oct 21, 2023, reflected a pattern of deliberate negligence, policy breaches, and financial misconduct. The report also called for strong disciplinary and legal action against the principal secretaries of the I&CAD and finance departments, chief engineer, and all subordinate officials involved throughout the project's planning, approval, and execution phases. Can go as gfx or box Alleged violation of financial sanctions Hyderabad: The V&E report highlighted a pattern of financial violations that reportedly harmed the state's interests in the execution of the mega project. Some of the points raised by the department include: Retention bank guarantees were released prematurely to the contractor, before project completion. This deprived the state of a financial safeguard and caused a direct loss of ₹22.9 crore in interest. The chief engineer violated a GO (dated Feb 20, 2016) by unilaterally approving deviations of up to 15% without informing the govt. A completion certificate was issued for ₹3,348 crore, even though ₹238 crore worth of work remained incomplete. An additional ₹367 crore was paid for new or excess items beyond RE-I, without any formal govt approval. A total of ₹259 crore was approved above RE-I's sanctioned ₹2,933 crore, also without proper permission. These payments were processed even before RE-II had been formally sanctioned. A ₹39 crore claim was made under the pretext of excess dewatering.
The Hindu
5 days ago
- The Hindu
Medigadda Barrage collapse: 17 officials to face criminal charges and 33 disciplinary action
The State Vigilance Commission has advised the government to initiate criminal proceedings against some 50 serving and retired officials, as well as the contracting agency L&T Precision Engineering Systems (L&T-PES) blaming them for the collapse of the Medigadda barrage of the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project. The suggestions were based on the Vigilance Report dated March 5, 2025, submitted by the DG, Vigilance & Enforcement (V&E), Hyderabad, highlighting lapses in design, supervision, quality control, and execution of the Medigadda barrage works. The sinking of Block No. 7 of the barrage resulted in massive financial losses to the State exchequer and also political slugfest. The Commission directed the Irrigation and Command Area Development (I&CAD) department to initiate major disciplinary proceedings against 33 officials, including engineers and Finance department officials, for procedural and supervisory lapses. They include Bhupathi Raju Nagendra Rao, Todupunoori Srinivas, V. Phanibhushan Sharma, Mohd. Ajmal Khan, Kotte Sudhakar Reddy, Sudagoni Sathyanarayana, B. Venkata Ramana Reddy, Sardar Omkar Singh, Ch. Thirupathi Rao, Banothu Nanda, Ajmeera Suresh Kumar, P. Shravan Kumar, K. S. S. Chandra Sekhar, H. Baswaraj, Thoutam Hemalatha, Ankilla Ravikanth, R. Vijay, G. Gangadhar, G. Saicharan, M. Prasad, Merugu Raju, B. Ganesh, Md. Ismail Sajid, P. A. Venkata Krishna, K. Devender Reddy, M. Raghu Ram, B. Kiran Kumar, A. Krishna Mohan, G. Krishna Reddy, E. Sukumar, P. Shravan Kumar, L. Bheema Raju, Vali Shaik and Boge Srinivas. Penalty proceedings should be initiated against seven retired senior officials under the Telangana Civil Services (Conduct and Appeal) Rules, the Commission said. They include Cheeti Muralidhar, Engineer-in-Chief (General) (I&CAD), N. Venkateshwarlu, Engineer-in-Chief, Kaleshwaram Project, Gajjela Hari Hara Chary, Deputy Chief Engineer, Kaleshwaram Project, B. Venkateshwarlu, Chief Engineer, Quality Control & Inspection, I&CAD, Chatla Gangadhar, V. Ajaya Kumar and A. Narender Reddy. Criminal proceedings were suggested against 17 officers and the Agency L&T-PES, whose action led to the sinking of the Medigadda barrage, as well as causing huge financial loss to the Government exchequer. The 17 are among the 33 already picked up for disciplinary and penalty proceedings. The contractor, L&T-PES, has also come under scrutiny for violating key terms of the supplemental agreement and for faulty execution of secant pile foundations, which directly led to the sinking of the barrage structure. The Commission said that the L&T-PES agency will be liable to bear the full cost of replacing Block No. 7. The agency was also accused of claiming project completion despite glaring deficiencies, and failure to meet safety and structural norms. The Commission also called for accountability of higher officials, including Principal Secretaries of the I&CAD and Finance departments, who approved deviations and financial proposals during the period of redesign and execution from April 2015 to October 2023. Suggesting reforms for such dealings in the future, the Commission issued directives to the I&CAD, Finance department, and GAD. They include scrupulous adherence to norms and contract conditions, mandatory joint inspections, revision approvals for design changes, comprehensive model studies by third-party experts, record-keeping on contractor equipment deployment to counter false claims and enforcement of work insurance provisions aligned with updated estimates.
