The beloved Apple MacBook Air M4 crashes to $849 in Memorial Day sale
Right now, the MacBook Air M4 is down to $849 at Amazon (just be sure to click the $41.51 coupon for the full discount). This is one of the best Memorial Day laptop sales you can get for the holiday (it might even be the best overall, but that's open for discussion).
If you want even more deals, check out our Memorial Day sales live blog for all the latest savings as we find them.
The latest 13-inch MacBook Air M4 is Apple's most splendid offering yet. Its speedy performance is thanks to its M4 chip, and the upgraded 12MP webcam helps the laptop reach new heights of greatness. It's $100 less than its predecessor, and with that extra $150 off, you're getting one of the best laptops on the market at an epic price. Expect 16GB of unified memory and a 256GB SSD in the incredible laptop.
When we kicked off our MacBook Air M4 review, it quickly became part of our list of best laptops. We actually rated it as the best overall laptop on the market right now, and as someone who uses it every day, I can confidently say this is accurate.
It looks a lot like the MacBook Air M3, but the extra performance offered by the M4 chip makes a big difference in how fast you can get stuff done. If performance matters to you, the MacBook Air M4 might be the best option.
Now that it's $849, this laptop is a steal. With faster performance for under $900, you honestly can't go wrong.
As an everyday laptop, you can expect to blaze through multiple tasks at once, along with some photo and video editing.
Yes, it's even solid for gaming, though it won't replace these gaming laptop deals you can find for Memorial Day.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Google TV Streamer vs Apple TV 4K: Which streaming device wins?
The Google TV Streamer takes over for Google's long-lived Chromecast devices, offering a premium TV interface jam-packed with loads of free content and helpful features. The third-generation Apple TV 4K is a compelling mix of performance and specs built on the Apple ecosystem. While a bit pricey, this streaming device has tons of versatility and offers speedy load times. Streaming devices are a dime a dozen these days, but if you're looking for the absolute best performance built on the most versatile interface, the Google TV Streamer and Apple TV 4K are the ones to get. Deciding which of these two to buy can be slightly tricky. The Google TV Streamer is the newer of the two, taking over for the now-defunct Chromecast. Up against it is the third-generation Apple TV 4K, which first launched in 2022. While it's a few years older, it still remains one of the best streaming devices, offering blazing fast speeds and Apple's interconnected OS ecosystem. So which one should you buy? Google TV Streamer Apple TV 4K Ports USB-CHDMI 2.1aEthernet (10/100/1000) HDMI 2.1Ethernet (10/100/1000) Refresh rate 60Hz 60Hz Storage 32GB 64GB/128GB Resolution 3,840 x 2,160p 3,840 x 2,160p HDR HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision Smart TV software Google TV tvOS Price $99 $179/$199 Apple engineering tends to be at the forefront of design, offering products with minimalist aesthetics that normally don't stand out. This extends to the Apple TV 4K, which has a boxy look and glossy finish, sporting the Apple logo on the top. It comes in a black finish, unlike the original Apple TV, which was available in a glossy silver color. This is something I like about the Apple streaming device, as it blends in a bit more on your tabletop, making it a lot less noticeable. The Google TV Streamer takes a different approach: It comes in a porcelain white colorway, which extends to its included remote. The device itself looks almost like a ski slope or skateboard ramp, flowing downward in a way that allows it to tuck neatly under a TV. This makes it easy to hide the wires that protrude from its rear and it's easier to hide behind the screen if you want it out of the way. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. To make matters slightly confusing, the Apple TV 4K comes in two different models — one of which is 64GB while the other is 128GB and offers a few more features. These include an Ethernet port and Thread networking technology, both of which are available on the Google TV Streamer. The major difference in terms of I/O between devices is the USB-C port available on the Google TV Streamer. This input not only functions as its power delivery source, but can also be used for data transfers. The TV Streamer also has a button on its rear so you can easily find the remote if it ever gets lost in the couch. All in all, I find both devices to be particularly premium-feeling when it comes to design. While it might be nice if the Apple TV 4K had a USB-C port, I don't think it's totally necessary. A 32GB model at a cheaper price wouldn't hurt, though. Winner: Draw These two devices are neck-and-neck in the performance category. They largely offer similar speeds, though the Apple device does come equipped with two much-higher storage capacities. This means you won't have to worry about memory all that much, especially on the 128GB model. The Google TV Streamer and Apple TV 4K also support the full range of HDR specifications, wrangling Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR10, and HLG all in one package. Of course, the TV you use alongside the device will require compatibility with the spec first, but having that full range on hand is a big plus. They also both have Dolby Atmos support, so if you're looking to get the best possible sound out of these streaming devices, it's definitely in the cards. I'd recommend pairing your TV and streaming device bundle with one of the best soundbars like the Sonos Arc Ultra for the best sound quality. Speaking of content playback, while you will get Apple TV Plus content served up to you, it's not as in-your-face as the Google TV interface, plus navigation is slightly more convenient on the Apple device (in my opinion). Another thing the Apple TV 4K has is a clean, no-ad interface. That's truly hard to come by these days, as it feels like ads are plastered everywhere you look. Lastly, the Google TV Streamer only supports Wi-Fi 5, while the Apple TV 4K has access to Wi-Fi 6. You won't need that faster speeds or security of Wi-Fi 6, but the stability is nice to have if you've ever noticed signal dropout in your home. Winner: Apple TV 4K Google TV is one of our favorite TV interfaces, offering a plethora of free content to enjoy and simplified navigation that's just too hard to beat. But Apple puts in a sincere effort with its redesigned tvOS platform. The big new feature is karaoke support, referred to as Apple Music Sing. It's a fun feature that lets you use your iPhone as a microphone to sing along to millions of songs on Apple Music. Also new is the liquid glass look that definitely looks more polished, but adds little to the general functionality of the interface. The Google TV Streamer, on the other hand, offers both better smart home support via Google Home and boasts several improvements with Gemini, the greatest of which are stronger search functionality and recommendations. Voice controls are also greatly improved on the device, extending to smart home automations, news overviews, and the like. Apple's AI plans are still up in the air at the moment, so it's hard to say if the Apple TV 4K would ever get an upgrade to include Apple Intelligence. Seeing as the third-gen model uses the A15 Bionic chip, it's unlikely the device could even support it, but rumors are circulating that a new set-top box with the A17 Pro processor is in the works. While I do like the clean and less-cluttered (ad-free) look of Apple TV 4K's tvOS, I think you'll get far better mileage out of Google TV and Gemini. Winner: Google TV Streamer You can't go wrong choosing one over the other, as they both offer very similar experiences. But here's how I'd set them apart from one another. I think if you're looking to get the best streaming upgrade for your TV but are looking to spend as little as possible, the Google TV Streamer is the one to buy. You can find the Google TV Streamer for $97 on Amazon right now, which nets you about the same features available on the $199 128GB Apple TV 4K. You will have to contend with Google TV's ads and older Wi-Fi 5 standard, but I find these compromises tolerable given the price disparity. Plus, you get access to some incredible features built on Gemini. That's totally worth the $99 price of entry. If you use Apple products regularly, appreciate that functionality, and want to deal with absolutely no ads tossed your way (on the fastest possible interface to boot), get the Apple TV 4K instead. I personally use Apple's streaming box more often, but I think it'll be better when Apple finds its AI footing. When that might happen is still anyone's guess.
Digital Trends
an hour ago
- Digital Trends
Just days remain to save big on a Pixel 9a
On August 20th, the Google Pixel 10 will arrive. That's great news if you want the newest and latest phone. But, it actually means you're running out of time if you want a solid budget phone, at a further discounted price, that's been tested by the public for some time. And by this, we mean Google's deal on the Pixel 9a, which has only a couple days remaining. The deal takes the $499 unlocked Pixel 9a with 128GB of storage and gives it to you for $399 after a $100 discount. Tap the button below to see if the deal is still available, or keep reading to get a refresher about the Pixel 9a's capabilities. Why you should buy the Pixel 9a (or wait for the Pixel 10) By now in the Google Pixel 9 series cycle, if you've been interested in the phone you probably know exactly why. Here's a brief refresher only. In our Pixel 9a review we were blown away by the simplicity and joy of the phone's responsiveness, great battery life, and 'super slimline' body that does away with the camera bump. Comparing the Pixel 9a vs the Pixel 9 wasn't as cut and dry as expected either, and at the end of the day we called it a 'close call.' In our early assessment of the Pixel 9a vs the iPhone 16e (Apple's budget-tier phone of the same generation) we actually gave the award to the 9a for its 'beefier' battery, longer software support window (7 years), and it's lower standard price (only made sweeter by this deal). If you're ready for the Pixel 9a and want it at this great deal price, tap the button below. Again, it's going to be $499 for the long haul, but now is your last chance to get this introductory deal offer that takes $100 off the price and moves it down to just $399. If you decided that you don't want the Pixel 9a or missed the offer (it is ending really soon) you can check out these other phone deals or check back in a few days as we learn more about the Pixel 10.
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested Sony WH-1000XM6 vs AirPods Max in a 7-round face-off — here's the winner
The AirPods Max are Apple's finest set of headphones. They're also some of the most expensive, but will their superior build and unique design give them what they need to vanquish the Sony WH-1000XM6? Sony's latest pair of noise canceling over-ears come with a freshly sharpened set of tools with which to dispatch the AirPods Max. But how will the XM6 fare when they go head-to-head with Apple's flagship cans? Now that the Sony WH-1000XM6 have been out for a little while, I've had ample time to properly test them and put them up against their closest competition from Apple and Bose. With a refreshed design and a brand new sound signature, Sony's flagship is sailing into battle with confidence. But the AirPods Max won't make it an easy victory. They still have their unique design and solid ANC going for them, and that magic pairing with Apple devices is going to take something special to beat. So, which headphones should you buy in 2025? I've put the two head-to-head to see which you should take home. Sony WH-1000XM6 AirPods Max Price $449 / £399 / AU$699 $549 / £499 / AU$899 Colors Black; Silver; Midnight Blue Blue; Purple; Midnight; Starlight; Orange Size Not specified Not specified Weight 8.9 ounces 13.6 ounces Battery life (rated) Up to 40 hours Up to 20 hours Connectivity Bluetooth 5.3 with SBC, AAC and LDAC support Bluetooth 5.0 with SBC, AAC Special features Adaptive ANC, Ambient Sound Mode, DSEE Extreme Audio, Bluetooth multipoint, customizable sound, quick charge, passive mode, 360 Reality Audio ANC, spatial audio, audio sharing, Siri The Sony WH-1000XM6 snatch an early victory here — they're much more affordable than Apple's weighty aluminum cans. The XM6 come in at $449, which is more than the older XM5 model, but crucially less than the AirPods Max. One thing worth noting, however, is that XM6 haven't yet seen any healthy discounts. This might change with Black Friday or the next Amazon Prime Day, but as of yet, there has been little movement in their MSRP. Though you can occasionally find them on sale, AirPods Max have a higher MSRP — $549 to be exact — but thanks to their age, they've also seen some price drops. If your heart is set on the AirPods Max, you're best off waiting for Black Friday and Prime Day to get the best price possible. Despite those deal prices, the Sony WH-1000XM6 are going to take the win because they're a cheaper pair of headphones for most of the year. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Sony WH-1000XM6 have received some visual updates over the previous version, but they are few. The armature holding the earcups to the headband now folds so that they can be more compact, and the headband is slightly wider for a more comfortable fit. Otherwise, these look an awful lot like the model that came before them. The 1000XM6's case is much better than before, and also more protective than the AirPods Max's sleeve... thing. The 1000XM6's case is much better than before, and also more protective than the AirPods Max's sleeve... thing. There's space inside for your cables, and I'm more a fan of the magnetic clasp than I thought I would be. It works well, and makes opening and closing the case much quicker than the conventional zipper. Comfort is good, but not excellent. The widened headband can still dig in after long periods of time, and the earcups get very sweaty with wear. They also press on glasses and piercings. They're not uncomfortable, but there are better. Finally, let's talk about Sony's build. I think they're a bit non-descript. Their plastic is nothing to write home about, and the overall look doesn't scream "$449 headphones!" Perhaps that's a good thing — they're less likely to get stolen — but compare them to the AirPods and things don't look great for Sony's headphones in the looks and build department. The AirPods Max are just the nicer pair of headphones in hand. Those aluminum earcups feel extremely premium, and the fully metal build feels like you could run your car over them. Don't do that, obviously, but it's encouraging to feel such heft. Especially when you've spent $549. Comfort is better than Sony's out of the box as well, thanks to a nicer foam and more breathable materials in the earcups. Importantly, the earcups can be swapped out and cleaned, which is neat. There is a big 'however' waiting in the wings, unfortunately: The AirPods don't stand up to years of abuse, it turns out. My older AirPods with Lightning connector have lost the elasticity in their headband, so they're no longer as comfortable. They look really ratty now as well, with some staining on the headband and discoloration on the earcups. Make sure you keep them clean, or they'll end up looking pretty grim. The case is a letdown as well. The suede diaper thing that holds just the earcups does little more than prevent scratches, with the headband left to the outside world and potential damage. Overall, this one is a tie — the AirPods are nice looking and far more premium, but the case is bad and some bits of their build might struggle after years of use. Sony has opted for touch controls again with the XM6, and they're fine if you like swiping your earcups to change volume, skip and play/pause. I don't like them, because they're all to easy to nudge while adjusting my hair, and completely useless when it's cold and I'm wearing some gloves. The power button and the ANC button are easy to tell apart, though, which is always good. No more accidentally pressing the pairing key when I want to turn the ANC off, as I did many times with their predecessor. The AirPods Max, on the other hand, feature one of the best headphone control schemes around. The digital crown and button combo is super intuitive. The dial controls the volume, and the button controls the ANC. Pause your music with a press of the dial, and then skip and go back a track with one or two taps. They've stood the test of time incredibly well — in the last few years I can't think of a control scheme that I like more than the AirPods Max. The Sony WH-1000XM6 have a newly updated sound profile, now giving more emphasis on vocals. They're some of the clearest vocals we've found in headphones, which is great for a bunch of different genres. The XM6 sound good, don't get me wrong, but they're just not quite as impressive when you put them up against the AirPods Max. They're not perfect, however. That newfound focus let soundstage and spatial imaging slip to the wayside, making them feel slightly more restricted as a result. They also retain Sony's rather bassy low-end, which many really enjoy. Alas, it also has a habit of overpowering the mids and the highs. The XM6 sound good, don't get me wrong, but they're just not quite as impressive when you put them up against the AirPods Max. The AirPods Max have much better sound than the Sony WH-1000XM6. The soundstage is much wider, for one, which makes your music sound more open and airy. The bass is less overpowering, with great control and restraint on display than the Sony headphones. The overall soundscape is far more neutral and pleasant to listen to: All genres sound really good, and you're not going to miss any of the extra bass of the WH-1000XM6 when you hear just how good your music can sound out of the AirPods. They're also better at spatial audio. Sony's are good, but Apple's head tracking is more accurate and natural. I much prefer listening to spatial audio with the AirPods Max, although my final preference is still to leave it turned off. There are better out there for sound than both – the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3, for example — but the AirPods take the sound cake. Sony is always good at filling its headphones with loads of features, and the XM6 are no different. First of all, there's the Sony Music app, which is a very useful way of accessing the headphones' features. There are some settings and sliders hidden away in submenus, which is annoying, but you'll soon get a handle on where everything is. Inside the app is where you'll find the features. The noise-canceling modes dominate the first page of the app. There are levels you can set the ANC, beyond simply 'on' and 'off'. I don't really get it — I like my ANC all the way up whenever I want the outside blocked out. You can also select transparency mode here. Then there's the EQ, which is very robust. There are 10 bands you can adjust you can really dial in the sound of your headphones. There's a form of spatial audio on board as well, although it only works with Amazon Music Unlimited. I also don't like it, so I leave it turned off. The AirPods Max aren't quite so fully featured. They do have several noise-canceling modes to choose from, although again, I leave them on max. There's also Apple's Spatial Audio on board, which is much better than Sony's thanks to accurate head tracking. There's little in the way of sound customization, however, which is a shame. Thankfully, they sound fine without it. Things look up again for Apple with its ecosystem integration. Using any pair of AirPods if you have a selection of Apple devices is magical, and the AirPods Max continue that legacy. They connect incredibly easily, and can then switch between your iPhone, MacBook and iPad whenever needed. But that's only for Apple users. For everyone else, the Sony headphones have the superior feature set. The ANC of the Sony headphones is better than the AirPods Max in the long run, although their focuses are different from one another. Sony wants to make your commute more tolerable, blocking out the sounds of bus and train engines. Offices and libraries are silenced — but jet engines remain a small issue. That's what the AirPods are for — your business class seat on a cross-continent flight where the engine is just outside your window. They might not be quite as good in normal day-to-day use like the Sony WH-1000XM6, but they're perfect for the frequent flier or long-distance train traveler. Transparency modes in both are very good, and sound natural when you're ordering your McDonald's breakfast. Like me. The Sony XM6 are going to last you longer than the AirPods Max, without a shadow of a doubt. There are 30 hours of battery on tap here when you've got the ANC turned on, which rises to 40 hours when you turn it off. That's perfectly fine for battery life, although there are some that are better. The AirPods Max, on the other hand, do not have good battery life. They only last for 20 hours on a single charge. You'll be searching for a charger after a couple of days' use with the AirPods I found, which is less than ideal. After my period of comparative testing, I can say that the Sony WH-1000XM6 are the better pair of headphones. They last for much longer when it comes to battery life, and they've got more useful ANC along the way. They're not quite enough to take the top spot on our list of the best headphones anymore, but they're still an excellent set of cans. The AirPods Max have their charm, however. They sound much better, and they feel far more premium than the plastic Sony headphones. If you're an Apple user, they'll mesh with the rest of your devices super well too. I like the AirPods Max more — they've got more personality — but the WH-1000XM6 are the better pair of headphones. Yet still, there are alternatives I'd buy instead of either. Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 sound better and are more comfortable than both, while boasting a build that's similar to the AirPods Max. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. Sony WH-1000XM6 AirPods Max Price and value (5) 3 2 Design (15) 13 13 Controls (10) 7 7 Sound quality (25) 22 24 Active noise cancelation (20) 15 15 Call quality (10) 9 9 Connectivity (5) 5 5 Battery life (10) 8 3 Total Score (100) 82 78
