Trump says Fed renovation 'sort of is' fireable offense for Powell, floats removal with GOP lawmakers
CBS News reported Wednesday that Trump posed the question during a meeting in the Oval Office with House GOP members; that some lawmakers agreed; and several indicated he will do it.
Trump's latest comments and the new CBS report raise new questions about whether the president may in fact seek to oust the Fed chair, a move that would surely lead to a legal war with Powell, who has argued he can't be removed by law.
The president also appeared in his latest comments to narrow his choices to replace Powell. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is an "option," but not the top choice, 'because I like the job he is doing,' he said.
The Washington Post and Bloomberg reported this week that National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett is rising as an early front-runner in the race to replace Powell, although former Fed governor Kevin Warsh is also under consideration. Fed governor Christopher Waller is another possibility.
Bessent, though, is 'probably not that much of an option," Trump said Tuesday, citing what he views as his good performance as Treasury secretary.
"He's a very soothing force."
Trump has been hammering Powell for months over what Trump viewed as a refusal to ease monetary policy for political and personal reasons, referring to Powell publicly as 'dumb,' a numbskull,' a 'stubborn mule,' 'stupid,' a 'moron,' and a 'fool.'
Trump nominated Powell for the Fed chair seat during his first administration, and his current term is scheduled to run until May of 2026.
Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates?
Trump's allies in recent weeks have used another tactic to turn up the pressure on Powell: They have invoked a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters as a way to question the chair's management of the institution and whether he told Congress the truth about the project during testimony in June.
Trump said Tuesday that "the one thing I wouldn't have guessed is he would be spending two and a half million dollars to build a little extension onto the Fed."
When asked if it was a fireable offense, Trump said, "I think it sort of is, because if you look at his testimony ... he's not talking about the problem. It's a big problem."
One House republican, Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, posted on X Tuesday night: "Hearing Jerome Powell is getting fired! From a very serious source" and later added: "I'm 99% sure firing is imminent."
CBS also reported that some members of the House Financial Services Committee, which acts as oversight for the Fed, were planning to meet with Powell on Wednesday night, and that some want to reinforce his independence.
Top administration officials have sent mixed signals about how far Trump would go with Powell.
Hassett said Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does."
But Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Tuesday that the president "said numerous times he's not going to fire Jay Powell" and compared Trump's public pressure to former college basketball coach Bobby Knight "working the refs."
"President Trump seems to prefer the Bobby Knight school," he said.
Bessent also said Tuesday, "there's a formal process that's already starting" to find Powell's replacement. He also hopes Powell decides to leave the Fed board when his term as chair is up. His seat on the Fed Board of Governors is not up until 2028.
Trump, too, has sent mixed signals in recent months about whether he would seek to remove Powell, musing about it publicly before assuring he wouldn't do it.
Wall Street is paying close attention to the drama unfolding in Washington, D.C.
JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said Tuesday that the independence of the Federal Reserve is "absolutely critical" and warned that "playing around with the Fed can often have adverse consequences."
A firing by Trump could potentially open a new legal war with Powell, who has argued that his removal is 'not permitted by law.'
The only language in law pertaining specifically to the removal of Fed board members can be found in Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act. The law states that each member of the board shall hold office for 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President."
The statute doesn't have any language that specifically addresses the chair of the Board of Governors, nor does it detail what exactly constitutes "for cause." The term has been interpreted in legal rulings to mean "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance."
But Powell and the Fed could still have the backing of the Supreme Court, which made it clear in a May decision it might protect the central bank even as it allowed Trump to fire the board members of two other independent agencies: the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board.
The central bank, the court said, 'is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States.'
What Trump is trying to challenge is a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent limiting the power of the president to dismiss independent agency board members except in cases of neglect or malfeasance.
If that precedent eventually falls, a Powell firing may be easier to legally justify at the Fed.
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
17 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump says Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in iconic soft drink
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that Coca-Cola will use cane sugar in its iconic beverage. File Photo by Billie Jean Shaw/UPI July 17 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump has announced that Coca-Cola has agreed to use cane sugar in its iconic drink instead of high-fructose corn syrup, though the Atlanta-based conglomerate has yet to confirm the move. Trump, a known heavy consumer of Diet Coke, made the announcement on his Truth Social media platform on Wednesday. "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," he said. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them -- You'll see. It's just better!" High-fructose corn syrup is used as a sweetener in Coca-Cola in the United States. The move to cane sugar would align the U.S. product with Coca-Cola sold in other countries, including Mexico. Coca-Cola has not confirmed that it is adopting cane sugar for its U.S. drinks. In a statement, the company said: "We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca-Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon."


New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Is Doing Something No One Wants
Last week, the right-wing president of the United States wrote a pointed letter to the left-wing president of Brazil. With typical brio, Donald Trump threatened to impose steep tariffs as punishment for, among other sins, the prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, the former president who is facing criminal charges for his attempt to hold on to power after his electoral defeat in 2022. 'This Trial should not be taking place,' Trump wrote. 'It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!' It caused quite a stir. Yet lost amid the fracas was a much quieter, potentially more consequential document signed just a few days earlier in Brazil: an agreement between Chinese and Brazilian state-backed companies to begin the first steps toward building a rail line that would connect Brazil's Atlantic coast to a Chinese-built deepwater port on Peru's Pacific coast. If built, the roughly 2,800-mile line could transform large parts of Brazil and its neighbors, speeding goods to and from Asian markets. It was a neat illustration of the contrasting approaches China and the United States have taken to their growing rivalry. China offers countries help building a new rail line; Trump bullies them and meddles in their politics. The surreal first six months of Trump's second stint as president have offered up endless drama, danger and intrigue. By that standard his tussle with Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazil's president, seems like small beer. But it was a revealing moment, illuminating how Trump's recklessness compounds America's central foreign policy problem of the past two decades: How should the United States execute an elegant dismount from its increasingly unsustainable place atop a crumbling global order? And how can it midwife a new order that protects American interests and prestige without bearing the cost, in blood and treasure, of military and economic primacy? These are difficult, thorny questions. Yet instead of answers, Trump offers threats, tantrums and tariffs, to the profound detriment of American interests. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Fox News
17 minutes ago
- Fox News
Meet The Parents
AOC brings a communist pirate home to meet the parents, and now the entire house is divided. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit FOX News Radio