&w=3840&q=100)
Six-member board to regulate payment systems: RBI notification
The Payments Regulatory Board (PRB) will replace the Board for Regulation and Supervision of Payment and Settlement System (BPSS).
The five-member BPSS is also headed by the RBI Governor but does not include any government nominee. The other members are a deputy government concerned and three directors from the Central Board of the Reserve Bank of India.
The Reserve Bank has now notified 'Payments Regulatory Board Regulations, 2025'.
According to the notification, other members of the governor-headed Payments Regulatory Board (PRB) will be the Deputy Governor in charge of the Payment and Settlement Systems, one officer of the RBI to be nominated by the Central Board, and three persons nominated by the central government.
RBI Governor, Deputy Governor and the central bank official will function as "ex officio" members of the Board.
It further said the PRB may invite persons with experience in the fields of payment and settlement systems, information technology, and law to attend its meeting either as permanent or ad hoc invitees and the Principal Legal Adviser of the RBI shall be a permanent invitee to the meetings.
The Payments Regulatory Board shall ordinarily meet at least twice a year, the notification said.
Earlier, the government had set up an inter-ministerial committee headed by the economic affairs secretary to finalise amendments to the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. In its draft report, the panel suggested the creation of an independent regulator Payments Regulatory Board to deal with payments-related issues.
The Reserve Bank of India, in October 2018, released its 'Dissent Note' on the Inter-Ministerial Committee for the finalisation of Amendments to the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, objecting to the panel's recommendation of having a regulator for payment systems outside the RBI.
"The Payments Regulatory Board (PRB) must remain with the Reserve Bank and be headed by the Governor, Reserve Bank of India. It may comprise 3 members nominated by the Government and RBI, respectively, with a casting vote for the Governor to ensure smooth operations of the Board. The composition of the PRB is also not in conformity with the announcements made in the Finance Bill by the Honourable Finance Minister," the RBI's 'Dissent Note' had said.
According to the notification, each member of the Board shall have one vote.
"All matters for approval which come up during any meeting of the Board shall be decided by a majority of votes of the Members present and voting, and in the event of an equality of votes, the Chairperson, or in his absence, the Deputy Governor, who is a Member of the Board, shall have a second or casting vote," said the notification published on May 21 in The Gazette of India.
Commenting on the notification, Ranadurjay Talukdar, Partner and Payments Sector Leader, EY India said: "India has never seen payments regulated outside of the RBI. RBI oversight over the years has ensured stringent governance of systemic risks arising from the payments ecosystem -- setting up appropriate guardrails to protect consumer interests (such as grievance redressal and KYC guidelines) and infrastructural resilience (such as the cybersecurity framework for PSOs)".
However, the establishment of a PRB with the right industry representation can lead to greater innovation; whether by expanding tokenisation to enable device-based payments across schemes or by introducing newer entities like NUEs to balance ever-growing digital payments volumes, Talukdar said.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
GST reforms and inflation: Will Modi government's move pave the way for an RBI rate cut?
On August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a major Diwali gift for Indian consumers that could potentially revive sluggish consumption trends, ease inflationary pressures, and pave the way for further rate cuts by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Announcing the GST reforms in his Independence Day speech, the PM said next-generation reforms will be introduced under the GST framework. "This Diwali, these GST reforms will bring a double bonus to the people," said the PM. After the income tax relief announced in Budget 2025, the long-awaited GST reforms are expected to further lift the disposable incomes of Indian consumers. Experts believe the move will provide a strong boost to consumption and act as a major positive for the Indian economy. "The announcement of GST reforms is perhaps the most promising development. While monsoons have been favourable for three consecutive years, discretionary spending has not picked up to the extent seen in earlier periods of good rainfall. The proposed GST reform is a long-awaited move and could be a game-changer, as it would boost disposable incomes, thereby driving corporate earnings growth," said G Chokkalingam, the founder and head of research at Equinomics Research Private Limited. The proposal for a broad two-slab GST structure of 5 per cent and 18 per cent will simplify the GST regime, improve compliance, and, importantly, lower the prices of a range of goods and services. According to VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Investments, this overhaul of the GST system, along with the new income tax regime, drastically changes India's tax system. "This is, indeed, a game-changing tax reform with significant positive consequences for the economy. This fiscal reform, along with the bold monetary stimulus being provided by the MPC, sets the stage for demand revival and growth boost to the economy," said Vijayakumar. The proposed reforms will likely lower indirect taxation on goods and services, which could further soften inflationary pressure. However, the impact of these reforms needs to be seen in the context of government revenue. According to Sujan Hajra, chief economist and executive director at Anand Rathi Group, a portion of the GST rate reduction should be passed on to consumers, thereby helping soften retail inflation. However, the overall impact depends on revenue implications for the government. If reforms reduce revenue, Hajra said a lower tax collection would widen the fiscal deficit, which in turn could put upward pressure on retail inflation over time. If reforms are revenue-neutral, the creation of a new 40 per cent slab for sin goods and luxury consumption (in lieu of the existing GST cess) would offset the revenue loss from lowering rates elsewhere, said Hajra. In that case, the reform would essentially redistribute the indirect tax burden across consumer classes (as the cess was slated to expire from April 2026) rather than reduce it overall. Madhavi Arora, Lead Economist at Emkay Global Financial Services, believes CPI inflation could ease by nearly 50-60bps over a one-year period, depending on the pass-through. This decline in inflation would largely come from certain goods in the food and beverages (F&B) category moving to the 5 per cent slab from 12 per cent currently. However, Arora highlighted that the impending change in the CPI basket, likely from February 2026 onwards, is likely to reduce the weight of F&B in the basket, which may mitigate some of this impact. If inflation eases further, the RBI will likely shift its focus to support growth. In that case, it may go for further rate cuts. Chokkalingam believes the RBI may cut rates in its upcoming policy meeting, which would act as another significant tailwind for the markets. Hajra believes even without factoring in GST restructuring, there already exists space for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to cut policy rates by 25–75 basis points, depending on the trajectory of future inflation. "Since the likely effect is either modestly disinflationary or broadly revenue-neutral, GST restructuring does not provide any significant additional headroom for monetary policy easing," Hajra said. Read all market-related news here Read more stories by Nishant Kumar Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations expressed are those of individual analysts or broking firms, not Mint. We advise investors to consult with certified experts before making any investment decisions, as market conditions can change rapidly and circumstances may vary.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Free-AI: How well India adopts AI will shape its future
Rahul Matthan The Reserve Bank of India's Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI) has submitted its report. It has recommended an approach that enables innovation and mitigates risk. Contradictory as it sounds, it can be done. The Reserve Bank of India has constituted a Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI) Gift this article For the past six months, I served on the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI). It has been an enriching experience putting it together, and I am sure I speak for all members of the committee when I say that we are proud of what we produced. Now that we have submitted our report, I am glad to finally be able to write about it. For the past six months, I served on the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI). It has been an enriching experience putting it together, and I am sure I speak for all members of the committee when I say that we are proud of what we produced. Now that we have submitted our report, I am glad to finally be able to write about it. Unlike most artificial intelligence (AI) regulation frameworks, this is not one that is focused solely on risk. On the contrary, we have proposed a two-pronged approach—one that both enables innovation and mitigates risk. In my view, the weaving together of these two seemingly contradictory sets of objectives is what's novel about this report. To enable the use of AI in the financial sector, we centred our recommendations around three distinct pillars: infrastructure, policy and capacity. We proposed the establishment of the sort of data infrastructure that would be necessary for building AI models and, more generally, encouraging the use of AI in the financial sector. There is a lot of financial sector data in disconnected silos that, if organized, can be helpful for building models and developing AI applications. To that end, we have recommended an initial investment of ₹ 5,000 crore, with an additional ₹ 1,000 crore per annum over the next five years. We have also suggested setting up an AI innovation sandbox in which RBI-regulated entities, fintech firms and just about anyone interested in applying AI innovations to the financial sector can experiment. Since the general-purpose large language models (LLMs) that are currently available may not serve the specialized needs of our financial sector, we have recommended developing sector-specific models capable of catering to the country's linguistic diversity. In order to reward innovation in all these areas, we are hoping that RBI will institute challenge grants and innovation prizes designed to shine a light on noteworthy innovations. Finally, we believe that AI can and should be integrated into India's digital public infrastructure so that its reach can be extended even further than is currently possible. Under the policy pillar, we believe that the country needs a flexible approach that can adapt to keep pace with the evolution of technology. Regulators should periodically assess existing policies and not be afraid to review and amend them if new technologies so demand. We have suggested that RBI constitute a permanent multi-stakeholder committee for this purpose. We were also keen to encourage the use of AI to reach those otherwise excluded or underserved. The report encourages the use of AI to bring first-time borrowers into the country's formal financial system and recommends appropriate relaxation of existing regulations to enable that. Recognizing that AI systems are fundamentally probabilistic, we believe that it would not be appropriate to apply the binary lens we currently use to determine liability. While we need to ensure that customers are always protected, if we penalize AI developers for each small misstep, we will stifle innovation. To that end, we have recommended a graded approach to supervisory action under which the first instance of a failure will not automatically trigger full scope supervisory action, as long as the regulated entity has taken appropriate steps to mitigate harm and proactively remediates issues that have been identified. There is a need for capacity building in the sector, and for that we have recommended measures to improve the capacity of regulated entities as well as the regulators and supervisors responsible for the sector. We have also suggested putting in place a framework for sharing best practices so that the entire sector can benefit from everyone's experiences with using AI. As important as it is to incentivize innovation, we must make sure that the framework is designed to mitigate risk. To that end, we have proposed 13 recommendations across three broad pillars: governance, protection and assurance. Regulated entities are encouraged to establish board-approved AI policies and to ensure that data is protected across the entire AI lifecycle. They need to ensure that they have in place appropriate governance frameworks for the AI systems they use. Since most regulated entities already have product approval processes, we ask that they be modified to take into account the use of AI in their products and services. Beyond pre-release testing, we also recommend regular red-teaming to ensure that failures can be anticipated in advance. Customer protection is paramount, and regardless of how AI is used by users, regulated entities must ensure that they are protected at all times. This includes appropriate grievance redressal measures and awareness campaigns to keep customers well-informed while interacting with AI. To ensure AI availability, regulated entities are encouraged to put in place business continuity plans. We have also suggested the establishment of an incident-reporting framework with a good-faith approach to encourage timely disclosure of notable incidents. AI can prove transformational for India's development and we have to do whatever is necessary to allow this to happen. It calls for an entirely different approach to regulation than what we currently have—one that encourages responsible innovation and also mitigates risks. This, in sum, is the Free-AI approach. The author is a partner at Trilegal and the author of 'The Third Way: India's Revolutionary Approach to Data Governance'. His X handle is @matthan. Topics You May Be Interested In
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
UPI usage fee: No such plan by government; this bank charging...
UPI transaction fee has been a hot topic in the country for quite a while now and the government has clarified that there is no proposal to impose a fee on Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions, putting to rest speculation that individuals may soon have to pay for digital payments. As mentioned in a report by The Indian Express, in a written reply to the Lok Sabha on Monday, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said, 'Presently, there is no such proposal to impose transaction charges on UPI.' The clarification comes after comments from Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra sparked concerns that UPI may cease to be free. While users will not pay a fee for UPI transactions, some banks have already introduced charges for payment aggregators. (MINT) Government reaffirms position Addressing questions in Parliament, Chaudhary noted that the government has consistently supported free UPI transactions to boost digital payments. He highlighted that under the 'Incentive scheme for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low-value BHIM-UPI transactions', the government has already disbursed around ₹8,730 crore over the last four years to subsidise transaction costs. Mobile finder: Google Pixel 10 series launching this week The Indian Express further reveals that the finance ministry had also dismissed similar rumours in June, calling them 'completely false, baseless, and misleading.' RBI Governor's remarks stirred debate At the Financial Express BFSI Summit in Mumbai on 25 July, RBI Governor Malhotra remarked that while UPI being free had delivered 'good fruits,' any payment system had to be financially sustainable. His statement was widely interpreted as a hint that transaction charges could be introduced. However, at a post-monetary policy press conference on 6 August, he clarified his remarks. 'I never said that it cannot remain free forever… The government is subsidising it. Someone is paying the cost. But I never said users will have to pay,' he stressed. Banks begin charging aggregators While users will not pay a fee for UPI transactions, some banks have already introduced charges for payment aggregators. According to reports, ICICI Bank began levying a 0.02–0.04% fee per transaction (capped at ₹6– ₹10) from 1 August. The fee, however, does not apply if payments are settled directly into an ICICI merchant account. Private lenders such as YES Bank and Axis Bank are also said to have adopted similar practices. These charges target payment firms like Razorpay, PayU, and Pine Labs, who act as intermediaries between merchants and banks. UPI usage continues to surge Despite speculation, the popularity of UPI remains unmatched. In July 2025, India recorded 19.47 billion UPI transactions worth ₹25.08 lakh crore, reflecting a 35% increase in volume and a 22% rise in value compared to the same month last year. With digital payments now a cornerstone of India's financial ecosystem, the government's latest clarification assures individuals that UPI payments will continue to remain free, at least for now.
