logo
Taxes on Social Security benefits were not eliminated despite what you've heard

Taxes on Social Security benefits were not eliminated despite what you've heard

USA Today17-07-2025
All the misleading buzz about Social Security and tax cuts for seniors in "one, big, beautiful bill" foreshadows one ugly scene after another at tax preparation offices next year.
It's not going to be pretty when many ill-informed retirees file 2025 tax returns. "What do you mean I'm paying taxes on my Social Security benefits?" some will no doubt ask.
Already in July, I've spotted social media posts by tax professionals who dread the day when they will have to say "welcome to reality" to clients.
"'Yes, your Social Security is still 85% taxable. Yes, I know that's what Trump's still saying. But pay attention to what he signed, not what he says,' he yelled for the 792,682,314th time into the void," posted Adam Markowitz, an enrolled agent in Florida, on X.
What's sparking confusion for retirees about taxes
The White House proclaimed, once again, "NO tax on Social Security" on July 4 when President Donald Trump signed what he calls "The One Big Beautiful Bill" into law. It's not an accurate statement. He also sent a mass email on July 12 making the same point.
The Social Security Administration sent a gushy, questionable email July 4 to millions of people collecting Social Security benefits and others. Soon afterward, I heard from some retirees who couldn't believe how a federal agency was doing a hard sell about the supposed benefits and creating even more confusion.
"The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy," Social Security stated in its email and online.
Ninety percent, really? More on that one later.
At one point, the email seemed to suggest that retirees were getting two tax breaks.
"The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned," according to a copy of the email forwarded to me.
Additionally? There is no "additionally."
The tax cut is an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older. That's it. The law doesn't eliminate the risk that some will pay taxes on their Social Security benefits.
The Social Security blog online now refers to a correction without saying what was wrong.
"Correction Notice: This blog was updated on July 7, 2025. The second sentence of the fourth paragraph originally read, 'Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.''
The word "additionally" is no longer in the copy.
Instead, the paragraph in the online blog at SSA.gov now reads: "The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. It does so by providing an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they earned."
Clear as mud, as one of my relatives might say.
How does the 'senior bonus' work?
A new, temporary "senior bonus" deduction of up to $6,000 will apply to taxpayers who are 65 and older in 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028. It ends after that without congressional action.
Tax professionals call this a "special personal exemption" that aims to reduce the tax bill for many seniors. In general, seniors with high incomes would not qualify; lower income seniors who do not pay taxes would not benefit, either.
"As a deduction and not a refundable credit, it will not help seniors who already owe no income taxes," said Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois.
Luscombe explained that higher income seniors receive a smaller tax break or no tax break because the deduction starts phasing out for those with a modified adjusted gross income of $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for joint filers.
And, yes, there are plenty of other rules but, oddly enough, you do not have to be receiving Social Security benefits each month to qualify.
It will not pay to be young — no matter what your income.
Taxpayers who are 62, 63 and 64 at the end of a tax year do not qualify for the "senior bonus" deduction. They could still pay income taxes on Social Security benefits, if they're collecting benefits and hit certain income thresholds, without any offsetting bonus deduction.
Here's a breakdown of some more rules that you'll need to know when filing a 2025 return:
The National Association of Tax Professionals, which has 23,000 members, offered an example for a 70-year-old retiree who is single and has a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of $90,000.
In this example, $15,000 of MAGI exceeds the $75,000 threshold for a single tax filer.
Take out your calculator and multiple $15,000 by 6% to hit $900.
The maximum $6,000 senior bonus deduction is then reduced by $900 in this example to reach a senior deduction of $5,100.
Taxes on Social Security were never eliminated
Believe me, you're not doing your friends any favors now by insisting that there are no taxes on Social Security benefits. Some people still need to withhold taxes on their Social Security benefits, if they have other significant sources of income.
At no point did the House bill or Senate version, which was later passed by the House and signed into law by Trump, ever include a provision to eliminate the tax on Social Security or provide a deduction for Social Security income, according to a summary of the massive reconciliation bill provided by Wolters Kluwer, an information services company.
Trump famously proposed making Social Security income tax free during his 2024 campaign. But such a change could not be part of the budget reconciliation process. One provision of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 prohibits Senate reconciliation bills from including any measure that changes Social Security benefits or taxes.
"It's fair to frame this new deduction as an attempt to fulfill the spirit of the president's campaign proposal consistent with the limits imposed in the reconciliation process," said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.
"But selling this politically as exempting Social Security from income tax is not accurate and will confuse or upset the seniors who end up paying tax on some benefits," Watson said.
The senior bonus deduction, Watson points out, applies to any source of taxable income that a taxpayer who is 65 or older has and may not necessarily eliminate all tax on Social Security benefits.
Social Security benefits began being taxed at the federal level in 1984 to shore up the Social Security trust fund, which was facing insolvency.
At best, the new tax break means many seniors will save some money on taxes over four years.
"Despite the SSA claims, most would see their income taxes on Social Security benefits reduced, not eliminated," wrote Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
More: Grosse Pointe Farms wants bitcoin ATM crackdown after scam surge
In an online report July 9, Gleckman wrote that the biggest beneficiaries are seniors making between about $80,000 and $130,000. The senior bonus deduction would for that group would amount to an average tax cut of about $1,100 or roughly 1% of their after-tax income, he said.
The tax deduction of up to $6,000 would benefit fewer than half of older adults, according to the Tax Policy Center estimates.
How much a senior who qualifies for the "senior bonus" will save on taxes will depend on their taxable income, which determines your marginal tax rate.
At a 12% marginal tax rate, for example, the $6,000 deduction for a single taxpayer who is 65 or older would result in $720 in tax savings, according to Watson.
For a single taxpayer, the 12% tax rate applied on taxable income from $11,926 through $48,475 in 2025. Annual inflation adjustments can be made to marginal tax brackets.
Hype, complexities and more can get your head spinning
All this begs the question: How can Trump say there will be no taxes on Social Security benefits?
Well, retirees will need to treat this one as one of those Trumpisms where, maybe, you need to study the fine print first.
"The president often seems to try to put as positive a spin as possible on an issue without being totally consistent with the facts," Luscombe said.
The 90% number used in the email sent by the Social Security Administration appears to track a 90% figure used by the White House. It is misleading.
Many people did not have to pay taxes on Social Security benefits based on their income before the mega tax bill was signed into law July 4.
About 40% of people who get Social Security currently pay income taxes on their benefits, according to an earlier report issued by the Social Security Administration in 2025.
Other estimates, though, suggest that a bit more than 50% currently pay taxes.
The Tax Foundation did not estimate the portion of seniors who would not pay tax on benefits under the new deduction. But noted that roughly half of all Social Security beneficiaries did not pay federal income tax on their Social Security benefits before the new tax law.
Gleckman, at the Tax Policy Center, told the Detroit Free Press that the 90% figure being used by the Social Security Administration isn't close to reality. In his online blog, Gleckman said the administration apparently came up with its 90% estimate by "assuming all tax deductions, including the new senior deduction, are used only to reduce Social Security benefit taxes."
"But, of course, older adults pay taxes on all their taxable income, including from sources other than Social Security," Gleckman wrote.
The Tax Policy Center's estimate is that about half of all recipients will pay at least some income taxes on their Social Security benefits, Gleckman wrote. "That is, they face higher tax liability than they would if benefits were not taxable.
"The Social Security system is complicated, and, in many ways, its complexity is terrifying for older adults, many of whom rely on its benefits to pay living expenses in old age. The latest SSA communication does not help and indeed may make matters worse," Gleckman wrote.
How Social Security benefits are taxed will remain a complex headache for many people aged 62 and up.
Based on Social Security data, nearly 23% of men and 24.5% of women who claimed retirement benefits in 2022 were age 62.
The earliest age that you can claim Social Security retirement benefits is 62. By collecting as early as possible, though, you'd receive a reduced monthly retirement benefit that is cut by a small percentage for each month before your full retirement age.
The full retirement age is 67 now for those born in 1960 and after. For those born earlier, the full retirement age varies and is less than 67 based on when you were born.
More: Trump's Social Security tax cut unlikely, but seniors may get $4,000 'bonus' deduction
More: A bigger tax break could be ahead for many people 65 and older: How it could work
How Social Security benefits are taxed
Unfortunately, it doesn't take much extra income to get hit with some taxes because income thresholds that trigger the tax on Social Security benefits do not adjust for inflation.
For single filers, the threshold for paying taxes on up to 50% of Social Security benefits applies when your combined income is between $25,000 and $34,000 a year. Once the combined income is higher, up to 85% of benefits may be taxable.
Couples filing a joint return face taxes on up to 50% of their Social Security benefits if their combined income is between $32,000 and $44,000. If the couple's combined income is higher than that, up to 85% of benefits would be taxable.
Combined income is your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest, such as interest on certain bonds, plus half of your Social Security benefits received that year.
As a result, someone who is working while collecting Social Security benefits would need to take their earnings from a job into account. The same's true for someone who is retired and taking taxable withdrawals from traditional 401(k) plans.
All that tax complexity isn't going to vanish.
O'Saben, of the National Association of Tax Professionals, said he's frustrated by how the senior bonus deduction is being marketed. He heard a news story on the radio that implied that Social Security benefits were no longer taxable and he found himself yelling at the radio while driving.
"There is no provision making Social Security benefits tax free," O'Saben said.
Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@freepress.com. Follow her on X @tompor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump fires BLS commissioner after July jobs report
President Trump fires BLS commissioner after July jobs report

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

President Trump fires BLS commissioner after July jobs report

President Trump said in a social media post Friday afternoon that he directed members of his administration to fire Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, after the BLS on Friday published the July jobs report that contained what it called "larger than normal" revisions to data from May and June. The July jobs report published Friday morning showed the US economy added 73,000 jobs last month, fewer than expected while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%. The most notable number to emerge from the report, however, was a downward revision to job gains in May and June which that saw 258,000 jobs taken away from what had been initially reported. May's job gains were revised down to 19,000 from 144,000, while June's additions were cut to just 14,000 from the 147,000 initially reported. In its release on Friday, the BLS said these revisions, "result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors." Economists on Friday were near-unanimous in their view that July's jobs data and the revisions to May and June reflect a labor market that is far weaker than had been suggested by recent data and characterizations by some officials, notably Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. "The 'solid' state of the labor market described by the FOMC earlier this week looks more questionable after the July employment report," Wells Fargo senior economists Sarah House wrote in a note Friday. Job gains over the last three months have now averaged just 35,000 after Friday's revisions. This is breaking news, more to come...

Trump Taps Banks For Fannie, Freddie IPO Ideas
Trump Taps Banks For Fannie, Freddie IPO Ideas

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Taps Banks For Fannie, Freddie IPO Ideas

Trump pulled in big-bank CEOs to pitch how to turn Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) back into public companies, and the market reacted fastafter-hours the two mortgage giants popped about 15% and 6% on light volume. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with FNMA. The conversations are wide open and informal: Jamie Dimon has already been in the room after years of cool relations, David Solomon was slated to meet Thursday, and Brian Moynihan is up next. Other banks are likely in the mix too as the White House crowdsources ideas on structuring a major public stock offering that would monetize the government's stake. Both GSEs have been in conservatorship since 2008, but the pitch is leaning on the narrative that they've rebuilt capital, paid back federal support, and could be shifted toward private markets. The meetings are exploratory, and there's no clean roadmap yet officials have signaled that conservatorship isn't suddenly ending, so any shift would take time and political alignment. That ambiguity is why the pop feels part hope, part speculation. The talks put a long-dormant privatization story back into play and give investors a reason to price a potential regime change. The next few days of follow-up meetings and any clearer White House signal will tell if this is groundwork or just noise. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Apple and Amazon earnings should end tech stock bubble fears: Opening Bid top takeaway
Apple and Amazon earnings should end tech stock bubble fears: Opening Bid top takeaway

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple and Amazon earnings should end tech stock bubble fears: Opening Bid top takeaway

A weak jobs report with a side of hot tech earnings and fresh tariffs. The US economy created 73,000 jobs in July, falling short of estimates for 100,000. And there were large downward revisions to May and June jobs numbers! The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%. Investors are likely to wonder if the Trump administration's tariff policy — including new levies on goods from Canada and other top trading partners today — is beginning to weigh on hiring plans and the economy. Queue those Trump rate-cut posts on Truth Social. The economic read comes on the heels of strong earnings from Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN) last night. The duo capped an impressive earnings week for large caps, with Meta (META) and Microsoft (MSFT) being the other standouts. Even second-tier Big Tech names in Roblox (RBLX) have crushed expectations (watch CEO Dave Baszucki's interview above). Most importantly, Amazon, Apple, Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL), Microsoft, and Meta all put to bed one fear: Lofty valuations supported by hopes for AI-driven growth may not be lofty enough. Zoom in: Large-cap tech earnings quiet the naysayers Not only did Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft show strong growth throughout their giant businesses, but execs also conveyed that AI is unlocking new avenues of growth for the quarter to come. Their bottom lines also easily eclipsed Wall Street forecasts. Reports were generally embraced (save for Amazon, where investors opted to lock in on an OK outlook rather than a blowout outlook). "As the main engine of US equity profitability for the last few years, 2Q25 results from Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft suggest that growth momentum is intact," Barclays strategist Venu Krishna said. It's a point well taken. Apple's services growth tallied 13% last quarter and is expected to increase at a similar pace in the current quarter. Quarterly iPhone sales increased 13% from the prior year and improved in every geographic market. The company had the saddest story to tell on the AI front, but CEO Tim Cook still did enough on the earnings call to temporarily ratchet down worries that Apple will be a nonentity in AI. The company has spent $15.5 billion in capital expenditures in the first half of the year, up from $11 billion a year ago — underscoring its AI investment roadmap. AI rollouts by big companies continue to feed Amazon's lucrative AWS cloud business. Second quarter sales for AWS rose 17.5% from last year, accelerating from a 16.9% growth rate in the first quarter. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said on the earnings call that demand for AWS is outstripping supply. "We highlight several potential catalysts in the intermediate-term that could possibly offset some near-term uncertainty, including (1) more meaningful improvements in cost to serve driven by deeper automation and robotics, (2) commercialization of new AI capabilities in Alexa, (3) monetization of Project Kuiper which could begin late this year, and (4) an expected increase in Prime Subscription prices in 2026," Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said. The same vibe was seen at Microsoft as sales at the Azure cloud business accelerated 4% sequentially. Azure's growth "further validates Microsoft's share gains and leadership in monetizing AI," Citi analyst Tyler Radke said. Then there was the report of the week out of Meta. On top of a 22% sales increase, the company signaled that the good times will keep on rolling as it plows deeper into artificial intelligence. AI investments are beginning to pay off in terms of driving more sales growth, execs told the Street. Perhaps more important than the sales increase is that operating profit margins rose despite megaspending on AI projects. KeyBanc analyst Justin Patterson said, "Meta's 2Q results reinforced that AI is driving positive impacts on engagement and advertising, which enables Meta to invest more in AI capacity." Given the strength, one has to wonder if these stocks are actually cheap despite their above-market multiples. The answer to that may be yes — it's hard to see what squashes their financial momentum over the next 12 Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store