Call for review over future of CalMac and CMAL in ferries revolution
There has been concern over the management of ferries being cocooned inside three levels of Scottish Government-controlled bureaucracy.
This features the Scottish Government agency Transport Scotland as funders, CMAL as state-owned ferry and port owner, service providers Calmac. Add to that Ferguson Marine, the shipbuilding company that came under the control of Scottish ministers in August, 2019 when it fell into administration under tycoon Jim McColl's control.
GMB says that the critics claim that the network has "failed to delivery for islanders or taxpayers"
It is understood that ministers have felt there was "merit" in a move to scrap CMAL to be merged into a new national body as part of a revolutionary culture change in the way lifeline services are provided by ferries.
It comes after an overview of a series of consultation meetings produced by the Ferries Community Board - formed as part of CalMac's franchise bid for the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services (CHFS) contract to be the voice of the communities - for the Scottish Government. It said that a strong case has been made for including the ferries division of the Transport Scotland agency into a new merged body involving CMAL and CalMac.
It has been suggested that would involve scrapping both Scottish Government-controlled ferry and port owner CMAL and the operator CalMac.
Alex Logan of GMB Scotland (Image: GMB) Now GMB Scotland has told the Scottish Trades Union Congress in Dundee today the expected award of a new ten-year contract to ferry operators Caledonian MacBrayne (CalMac) is an opportunity to deliver better services for islanders and secure Scotland's maritime and shipbuilding industries.
The call for change comes amid escalating concern over the age and reliability of the CalMac fleet and ongoing controversy over rising costs and delays to two ferries, the Glen Sannox, which is now in service, and Glen Rosa, which is still to be completed.
GMB Scotland, the biggest union at Ferguson Marine, the publicly-owned yard building the ferries, said the relentless focus on the troubled contracts has become a diversion from wider concerns around the organisations shaping Scotland's lifeline maritime transport links.
Ferguson Marine came under new fire as it emerged that is completing a revised build plan for a second already wildly delayed and over-budget ferry - leading to further concerns over soaring costs.
It comes a year after wellbeing economy secretary Màiri McAllan said nationalised Ferguson Marine considered the latest delays and costs forecasts - which had the ferry ready to use in September - was the "final position" after the firing of chief executive David Tydeman.
Glen Rosa and its sister ship Glen Sannox were both due to be online within first seven months of 2018, to serve Arran.
In the midst of the delays and soaring costs, Ferguson Marine, under the control of tycoon Jim McColl, fell into administration and was nationalised at the end of 2019 with state-owned ferry and port-owning agency Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd and the yard's management blaming each other.
Read more from Martin Williams:
Alex Logan, the union's convenor at the Port Glasgow shipyard, told delegates Scotland's ferry system should be restructured to protect island communities with Fergusons becoming 'a cornerstone of an industrial strategy to provide Scotland's publicly-owned ferry fleet.'
He said: 'There have been serious mistakes made with Rosa and Sannox but they were not made by the workers.
Ferguson Marine (Image: Newsquest) 'Our yard has been building good ships for more 100 years and, with vision and ambition, we could be building them for 100 more.'
Ferguson Marine failed to win a £175m contract for seven small CalMac ferries awarded to a Polish yard, Remontowa, last month despite the Scots yard building a third of CalMac's current 36-strong fleet.
Mr Logan said: 'In an island nation like Scotland, why is a publicly owned yard not building ships for a publicly owned ferry company?
'Why are ministers in Edinburgh allowing contracts to be sent to Poland when they have a skilled, capable and committed workforce along the M8?
'It is absurd but only the latest example of how our public procurement system works.
'There is no joined up thinking on our ferries as politicians outsource decisions to unaccountable quangos where islanders and workers struggle to be heard.'
GMB is calling for a review to establish if ferry operator CalMac should be merged with CMAL, which owns and commissions ferries and terminals, and take sole charge of the fleet while working closely with Fergusons to commission and deliver small ferries.
Logan, addressing delegates at the Caird Hall in Dundee, on the final day of the STUC Congress, said: 'There is a clear opportunity for Ferguson Marine to serve as a cornerstone of Scotland's manufacturing base and ferry supply chain.
'The workers who have been used as a political football for a decade now deserve that opportunity to be seized.
'It makes sense for our islands, for taxpayers and for the future of shipbuilding in Scotland.'
Delegates unanimously supported the GMB Scotland motion calling on the Scottish Government to make a direct award of the next small ferries to Ferguson Marine; reform procurement rules to ease the commissioning of ships from Scots yards; and review CalMac, CMAL and Transport Scotland to establish if restructuring could improve services for islanders and bolster maritime industries.
The responses to a Scottish Government-commissioned consultants' study into the future of ferries says that from a business perspective many felt that issues over the ferries were leaving many firms "unsustainable".
It calls for a single ferries board to be formed to oversee the function of ferry provision including the role of Transport Scotland.
The Competition and Markets Authority has previously expressed concern about the "potential risks" of state control over the way ferries are operated, run and paid for.
CalMac's £975m eight-year Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services contract expired in September 2024. It had previously won the contract for six years in 2007 – after ministers were forced to tender for routes to satisfy European competition rules.
It was given a year extension to the contract to allow a decision over the feasibility of a direct award approach to the contract from a financial, operational and legal perspective. The aim was to have the new arrangement in place by October 1 last year, but there has been a delay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why inflation has risen above expectations – and what it means for you
UK inflation climbed by more than expected in July, official figures reveal, as soaring air fares for summer holidays and food prices continue to rise. The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rose to 3.8 per cent last month, up from 3.6 per cent in June, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This marks the highest rate since January 2024, when inflation stood at 4 per cent. The ONS highlighted transport costs as the primary driver behind the increase, particularly a significant surge in flight prices. Air fares jumped by 30.2 per cent between June and July, the largest monthly rise recorded since data collection began in 2001, as families booked trips during the school summer break. Here's everything you need to know about the latest figure: What is inflation? Inflation is the term used to describe the rising price of goods and services. The inflation rate refers to how quickly prices are going up. Put simply, July's inflation rate of 3.8 per cent means that if an item cost £100 a year ago, it would now cost £103.80. Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged that there was 'more to do to ease the cost of living' following the latest figure. She said: 'We have taken the decisions needed to stabilise the public finances, and we're a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous government, but there's more to do to ease the cost of living. 'That's why we've raised the minimum wage, extended the £3 bus fare cap, expanded free school meals to over half a million more children and are rolling out free breakfast clubs for every child in the country.' Rail fares set to rise by more than expected Another lesser-known figure that tends to rise and fall in line with CPI is Retail Price Inflation (RPI). This rose to 4.8 per cent in July up from 4.4 per cent. This is significant as it was last years' July RPI (3.6 per cent) that set the 4.6 per cent rail fare rise in March 2025, at exactly one percentage point higher. If the same formula is used this year, then fares could rise by a massive 5.8 per cent next March. Campaigners have reacted negatively to the possibility, calling on the government for clarity. Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Today's inflation figure could mean a big fare rise for rail passengers next year, especially if the Government decides to go with an above-inflation increase like we saw this year. 'With the railways now moving under public control, the fundamental question for the Government is how to use its role in setting fares policy to deliver a more affordable rail network and encourage more people to travel on it. 'Next year's annual rise represents the first real opportunity for the Government to show passengers – both current and future – just how it plans to do this.' Why did inflation rise again in July? Grant Fitzner, the ONS's chief economist, explains: 'The main driver was a hefty increase in air fares, the largest July rise since collection of air fares changed from quarterly to monthly in 2001. 'This increase was likely due to the timing of this year's school holidays. 'The price of petrol and diesel also increased this month, compared with a drop this time last year. 'Food price inflation continues to climb – with items such as coffee, fresh orange juice, meat and chocolate seeing the biggest rises.' Will inflation rise again? The Bank of England is expecting CPI inflation to continue rising to a peak of 4 per cent in September, before price rises start to ease. The central bank is tasked with keeping inflation at 2 per cent. Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist for Pantheon Macroeconomics, suggested the Bank's policymakers could be concerned by rising inflation in the UK services sector, but that it was 'partly driven by a sharp move in the erratic airfares component, which could unwind in August's data'. The annual rate of services CPI inflation rose to 5 per cent in July from 4.7 per cent in June. 'The big picture remains that inflation is set to stay miles above target for the foreseeable future,' he said. The economist is forecasting that CPI will remain above 3 per cent until April 2026, meaning the Bank could keep interest rates on hold for the rest of the year.
Edinburgh Live
30 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Live
East Lothian housing estate in Wallyford to get more than 90 new homes
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A housing developer has been given the go ahead to build more than 90 new homes as part of a growing estate at Wallyford, in East Lothian. Taylor Wimpey said the latest phase of its house building will be its first East Lothian location using its new 'national house types' which include a mix of terraced, semi-detached, detached and two bedroom apartments to give a broader appeal to buyers. Confusion surrounded the location of the housing at the council's planning committee after a report by officers into the site's background referred to a neighbouring site where plans to build 150 homes on a site earmarked as park land had been approved earlier this year. That development was refused permission by councillors but was overturned on appeal by Scottish Ministers. However council officers said the reference to the neighbouring site in the report was intended to give councillors background on the 'wider site history' rather than referring to the application by Taylor Wimpey for neighbouring land. Councillor Cher Cassini raised concerns about which site was involved and was told by officers: 'Just to avoid any confusion this application isn't on the site which was previously marked out as open space, it is to the north of that.' Councillor Cassini said that now the new Taylor Wimpey housing development was going to be next to another 150 homes instead of open space, it sparked concern about a lack of green places for new residents. Concerns were also raised about the impact of the additional housing on road junctions serving the site. A spokesperson for Taylor Wimpey reiterated the land approved for the new housing they planned was not the area initially set aside for a public park and had, in fact, always been in the masterplan for the area as housing. They said: 'Our application aligns fully with the approved masterplan and Planning Permission in Principle (PPP). The area granted consent under appeal is entirely separate from the scope of the current application.' Speaking after councillors unanimously approved the new housing on the site, which is being named Dolphingstone Grange, Pauline Mills, technical director at Taylor Wimpey East Scotland, commented: "We are pleased to have secured detailed planning consent for 93 homes from East Lothian Council, signalling progress for our Dolphingstone Grange development and another part of the Dolphingstone masterplan. 'This development also gives us the opportunity to introduce our new national house types to customers in East Lothian when they are launched for sale early next year, adding to the overall choice we can offer customers.' The approval came as the company announced pre-construction work for its Ravensheugh Heights development in Wallyford has started with the project bringing approximately 700 new homes to the wider site. The first homes at Ravensheugh Heights are expected to go on the market in the next few months from the existing sales information centre just off St Clements Wells in Wallyford. The Dolphingstone master plan includes plans for new foot and cycle connections, fostering an active travel corridor to Wallyford and the local train station. Financial contributions of over £6.4 million will be made to fund education capacity and transport improvements, as well as a contribution of £186,000 to Network Rail for enhancements towards the rail link to Wallyford.
Daily Mirror
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them
A 'failure of public policy' under the Tories saw former immigration minister Robert Jenrick brag about how fast he was securing hotel rooms as the asylum backlog grew and grew The Government faces an asylum hotel crisis as councils line up to launch legal challenges which could see thousands of people kicked out. On Tuesday the High Court granted a temporary injuction preventing the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing migrants after weeks of tension. Home Office lawyers had warned that such a ruling 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart' as ministers grapple to shut down venues. Dozens of local authorities are now exploring similar challenges, with the Government now drawing up contingency plans. Labour has vowed to end the use of hotels by the end of this Parliament after the Tories resorted to using them when the asylum system descended into chaos. Experts said a "failure of public policy", with years of not processing asylum claims by the Conservatives, led to people being put in expensive accommodation. In 2023, when the asylum backlog was a mammoth 175,000, more than 400 hotels were in use, housing over 56,000 people. At the time Robert Jenrick, who was immigration minister, bragged at the speed he was securing rooms. He said, in a quote dug up by Labour this week: "More hotels have been coming online almost every month throughout the whole of this year. So Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel were securing more hotels. What I have done in my short tenure is wrap that up and secure even more." The brazen Shadow Justice Secretary has been vocal on the issue of asylum hotels in recent weeks, joining demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel to protest about problems his party caused. The backlog swelled after the UK lost its legal right to return migrants to Europe after Brexit, while a string of botched laws under the Tories failed to drive down small boat crossings. The Conservatives pinned their hopes on being able to send people to Rwanda as the number of people in the asylum system grew and grew. Labour has pledged to get a grip of the chaos, but says it will take time to see the results. At the end of March this year there were 32,345 people living in asylum hotels, Home Office figures show. This was up from 29,585 when Labour came to power. It means 31% of asylum seekers were receiving asylum support earlier this year. Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the Government accepts that hotels are not the most appropriate place for asylum seekers to be housed. And in the immediate aftermath of the Epping judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said Labour had "inherited a broken asylum system". Dame Angela said the Government would "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns" around asylum hotels. Imran Hussain, from the Refugee Council, told Sky News: "Nobody thinks asylum seekers should be kept in hotels while their case is being assessed. "It's very expensive. It's not good for the asylum seekers. It's isolating. It's an isolating experince I think even before the protests, with the protests it's incredibly terrifying for people. "And of course as we've seen for local communities, there's a lot of tension, some of which is being exploited by people on the far- right. So no one thinks it's a good idea." And explaining how hotels came to be used, Mr Hussain continued: " This isn't a planning issue, really. This is a failure of public policy. For 20 odd years that we've supported asylum seekers through, the system worked perfectly well. "We had accommodation for people without using hotels. But the last few years there's been a huge backlog of cases that's grown up because the previous government (the Tories) stopped making decisions on cases because it wanted to send people to Rwanda. "The backlog has meant the accommodation that was existing was full and people have had to use hotels."
