logo
'I'll make £12.24 an hour - I live payday to payday'

'I'll make £12.24 an hour - I live payday to payday'

Yahoo25-03-2025

On Wednesday the chancellor will give an update on her plans for the economy.
The government has promised to boost growth, which should mean higher pay, more jobs, and more spending on services such as the NHS, education and transport.
Rachel Reeves will share the latest official outlook, which is expected to say the UK economy will grow 1% this year, rather than the previously forecast 2%.
And she will have to explain how she intends to tackle the big challenges facing her when she delivers her Spring Statement.
Those challenges are also being felt on the ground, in people's everyday lives.
People have contacted the BBC through our Your Voice, Your BBC News to tell us how they are feeling about the months ahead and what plans they have to tackle the hurdles they face.
"I'm working paycheque to paycheque," says Dylan Caulkin. "If I have a tyre that pops, I rely on credit."
The teaching assistant, who lives with his parents near Truro, Cornwall, is about to start a new job as a support worker for people with learning difficulties.
At £12.24 an hour, his pay will be only just above the level the minimum wage is rising to in April. But it is more than he is getting in his current role.
"I'm very excited," he says. The opportunity for doing overtime, too, means the change will have a "massive impact" on his finances.
He pays his parents £160 a month rent and contributes to food costs, which are higher for him as he is on a gluten-free diet. His car - a necessity, he says - costs about £500 a month to run. And he has a small amount of credit card debt he is currently trying to clear.
He sometimes has £100 left over at the end of the month for spending on himself.
"I'm very lucky to have family around me," he says. "I wouldn't be able to survive without them."
He would like to see the government provide more help for young people like him.
"In the near-future I'm looking to move in with my partner but it is just so expensive."
How much will the minimum wage rise by?
What happens next with interest rates is what matters most to Ellie Richardson and Billy Taylor.
They found their dream home for £350,000 last year, but the sale has been delayed and now won't be completed before stamp duty rises at the end of this month, costing them an extra £2,500.
"You have to roll with the punches," says Ellie, who works in sports PR. But they hope mortgage rates aren't also about to go up.
She and Billy, a builder, have been shuttling between his parents' and her parents' houses in Essex for the past three years.
"We've worked really hard to save as much as we can for this house," she says. "We're pretty set on it."
They have a joint income of around £80,000 and they have a mortgage offer that would see them pay around £1,200 a month.
But if the house purchase is delayed too long, they may end up having to apply for a new mortgage.
"The silver lining is, if we do complete later in the year, then hopefully mortgage rates could be lower," she says.
When will interest rates go down again?
What is stamp duty and how is it changing?
Elspeth Edwards is worried about the tightening of eligibility criteria for the welfare benefits she receives.
"If the support gets taken away I'll have to rely on my parents for everything," she says.
The student from Worcester has a combination of health conditions including PoTS, which causes her heart rate to increase very quickly when she stands up and can lead to loss of balance and consciousness.
"I faint multiple times a day, I'm in immense pain constantly. I dislocate my fingers, elbows, shoulders and knees a lot.
"Most students work part-time," she says. "I've been deemed unfit to work."
Elspeth receives a total of about £1,200 a month through a student maintenance loan and incapacity and disability benefits.
She is dropping out of her current course - nursing - because she can't manage the hospital shifts. She wants to start a new course, in astrophysics, in the autumn.
But she says her parents can't support her financially, so if her benefits are cut, she will have to abandon that ambition.
"I've got more outgoings than the average student," she says.
Currently, she has nothing left at the end of the month, after spending around £800 on rent and another good chunk on her cardiac support dog, Podge.
His food costs £90 a month, there are vet's bills, and recently he needed a new harness that helps him to communicate to her, including when she is about to faint. It cost £1,200.
"Currently all my money goes on him," she says.
What are the Pip and universal credit changes?
Under-22s to be excluded from incapacity benefits
Businessman Lincoln Smith reckons consumer confidence is the lowest it has been for 15 years.
He owns and runs Custom Heat, a plumbing firm based in Rugby. The rising cost of living has meant his customers have cut back on annual boiler services and other things. On top of that, taxes for businesses go up in April.
"That makes you shrink your ambitions, makes you think, 'Let's not replace people who are leaving.'"
The company is not taking on apprentices this year, and has even got rid of the office cleaner.
Lincoln himself is taking a 20% pay cut to help balance the books for the forthcoming financial year.
He'll be earning £125,000, while his wife, who also works for the business, earns £45,000.
"It sounds like a lot," he admits, but the cut will still mean lifestyle changes. "When you are earning any salary, you set your outgoings based on it."
With a mortgage of £3,000 a month they are already at "breakeven point", he says.
"We haven't booked a holiday this year. We are definitely not going away," he says.
But if that is not enough he will look at moving house to reduce the mortgage.
It's a bit upsetting, he says, because it's the only house his sons, aged seven and four, have known.
"I know it's 'first world problems'," he says. "You've just got to do what you've got to do."
How much do employers pay in National Insurance?
Radhika Gupta thinks whatever Rachel Reeves does on Wednesday she shouldn't cut spending on health or education.
The student from Derry in Northern Ireland is in the third year of a five-year medical degree at Queen's University in Belfast.
"One thing that worries me is how many doctors want to leave," she says.
"The consensus is it is not worth practising medicine in the UK because of how little you are paid. And you are left with a lot of student debt.
"I don't think the government really understands the challenges."
Despite what she sees as underfunded services and staff burnout she wants to work in England after she graduates.
But more needs to be done to fund and improve medical training, she says.
The other thing she would like to see more money spent on is transport, which is one of her biggest expenses at around £75 a month, partly because unreliable public transport sometimes means she takes a cab to the hospital.
Her parents and maintenance loan give her about £800 a month, which she supplements with tutoring and casual work in hospitality. Her rent is £600. There are extra costs like her scrubs - she needs several sets - at £35 a set.
"Things are quite tight," she says.
How do student loans work?
"There doesn't seem to be anything good on the horizon," says Malcolm Hindley, a retired window cleaner from Liverpool.
A widower, he lives with his daughter, who "does everything round the house" and cares for him and her disabled daughter.
He owns his own house, but finds it hard to get by on his £200-a-week state pension, plus attendance allowance of around £80 a week.
He needs a car to get to the shops and medical appointments, and has just been in a car accident that has left him with a neck brace, on top of existing mobility issues.
He will be listening out on Wednesday for further details around cuts to benefits for the long-term sick and disabled.
Losing the winter fuel payment was hard, he says, because he feels the cold more as he gets older. Now he is worried what else might go.
"The way this government's working, it just seems to be hitting the poorer more. What else are they going to take off us?"
He doesn't have much left at the end of the month, but what he does have goes on ice creams and sweets for the grandchildren.
"When you see their faces it's brilliant," he says.
How much is the winter fuel payment and who can still get it?
What will be in the chancellor's Spring Statement?
How fast is the UK's economy growing?
'I had to sell my house to become a doctor'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree over Gaza
Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree over Gaza

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree over Gaza

More than 300 Foreign Office staff who raised concerns about potential UK "complicity" in Israel's conduct in Gaza were told if they profoundly disagreed with government policy they could consider resigning. The staff letter, seen by the BBC, was sent to Foreign Secretary David Lammy last month. In it, officials questioned the UK's continued arms sales and what they called a "stark… disregard for international law" by Israel. The Foreign Office said it had systems for staff to raise concerns and added the government had "rigorously applied international law" in relation to the war in Gaza. The reply to the staff letter was sent from Sir Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer, the two most senior civil servants in the Foreign Office. They told the signatories: "[I]f your disagreement with any aspect of government policy or action is profound your ultimate recourse is to resign from the Civil Service. This is an honourable course." The response was met with "outrage" according to one official who signed the letter. "[There is] frustration and a deep sense of disappointment that the space for challenge is being further shut down," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. The officials' letter signed on 16 May was at least the fourth such document sent by concerned civil servants to ministers and Foreign Office managers since late 2023. The BBC understands the signatories represent a wide range of expertise across Foreign Office departments, embassies and missions including in London and overseas. The letters have reflected the scale of the civilian death toll in Gaza, Israel's restrictions on aid supply and Israeli settlement expansion and settler violence in the occupied West Bank, among other issues. Staff are also said to feel disquiet that many of their warnings have not been acted on, and those whose jobs it is to implement decisions could be liable in any future legal proceedings against the UK government. The 16 May letter said: "In July 2024, staff expressed concern about Israel's violations of international humanitarian law and potential UK government complicity. In the intervening period, the reality of Israel's disregard for international law has become more stark." It went on to list the killing by Israeli forces of 15 humanitarian workers in March and Israel's suspension of all aid to Gaza in the same month "leading many experts and humanitarian organisations to accuse Israel of using starvation as a weapon of war". It said the UK government's position had contributed to "the erosion of global norms", citing continued weapons exports and the visit to London in April by Israel's foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar "despite concerns about violations of international law". It added that, "supported by the Trump administration, the Israeli government has made explicit plans for the forcible transfer of Gaza's population". In their response on 29 May, Sir Oliver and Mr Dyer told the staff the department wanted to see "healthy challenge" as part of the policy-making process and had already set up a "bespoke Challenge Board" and regular listening sessions with employees to hear concerns in this policy area. They wrote that officials were entitled to their personal views, but added it "might be helpful" to "remind" them of mechanisms available to those uncomfortable with policy. It went on to list a series of ways staff could raise issues, before adding that resignation was an "ultimate recourse" and "honourable course" for those with profound disagreements over government policy. "[T]he bargain at the heart of the British Civil Service is that we sign up to deliver the policies of the Government of the day wholeheartedly, within the limits imposed by the law and the Civil Service Code," it said. A former official who saw the correspondence described the response as "obfuscation". "This… simply provides the government with supposed 'plausible deniability' for enabling breaches of international law," said the former official who also spoke on condition of anonymity. They said that the FCDO and broader civil service seemed unable to learn the lessons of the past, referring to the 2016 Chilcot Report recommendations following the inquiry into the Iraq war. Chilcot criticised the emergence of an "ingrained belief" within senior levels of the UK policy community over the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. His recommendations led to civil service reforms designed to challenge "groupthink" and empowering officials to speak out about policy concerns. The UK government's position is that Israel is "at risk" of breaching humanitarian law. Israel has previously said it operates according to international law. Palestinian rights groups have rejected this, taking evidence to several legal cases brought internationally. In September, Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced the suspension of around 30 arms export licenses to Israel, out of a total of about 350, citing a "clear risk" they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law. It came weeks before the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant as well as the military commander of Hamas. Israel's government has consistently rejected allegations it has committed war crimes in Gaza, calling the ICC's decision "antisemitic", while the US Department of State last week announced sanctions against four ICC judges for "transgressions against the United States and Israel". In a statement, the FCDO said the job of civil servants was to deliver on government policies and provide professional, impartial advice as set out in the Civil Service Code. "There are systems in place which allow them to raise concerns if they have them," said the spokesperson. They added: "Since day one, this government has rigorously applied international law in relation to the war in Gaza. One of our first acts in government was to suspend export licences that could be used by the Israeli Defence Forces in Gaza… "We have suspended direct exports of F-35 parts for use by Israel, and we categorically do not export any bombs or ammunition which could be used in Gaza," added the spokesperson. On 19 May the UK issued a joint statement with France and Canada threatening "concrete actions" against Israel if it did not stop its renewed military offensive and lift aid restrictions.

Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut

Labour backbenchers have called for a Government U-turn on planned disability benefit cuts, after Chancellor Rachel Reeves restored winter fuel payments to a majority of pensioners. Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review
People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review

This week the government will set out how much it is going to spend over the next four years on the public services that millions of people use every day. That includes the NHS, schools and public transport as well as welfare benefits, armed forces, energy projects and a whole range of other government spending. We asked a handful of readers, who had contacted the BBC via Your Voice, Your BBC News, what they would like to see in Wednesday's announcement. Lewis Eager, 26, works two shifts a week in the on-demand delivery service for a supermarket in Southend-on-Sea, earning £850 a month. He lives with his parents who he pays £120 a month. He would like the Spending Review to include a plan to help young people like him find well-paid, full-time jobs. Lewis completed a business administration apprenticeship and an Open University degree, but says he cannot find full-time work. He estimates he has applied for more than 4,000 jobs without success. "Getting knocked down all the time is horrible." Even entry-level jobs seem to require experience, he says. He sees a "looming crisis" among young people unable to get on the jobs ladder, and would like to see more money go into adult education. "I live with my parents which I have nothing against, but I thought I would have achieved more by now," he says. Resheka Senior, 39, is a nursery nurse and her husband Marcus, 49, a school caretaker. Between them they take home more than £50,000 a year. But the couple say they are still struggling, particularly while Resheka is on maternity leave. When she goes back to work, Resheka says she won't be much better off because she will have to pay for childcare before and after school for her five-year-old and all day for the younger children, aged two and nine-months. They have debts that they are shuffling between credit cards and no prospect of moving out of their two-bedroom council flat in Woolwich, London. "I don't want to stay at home. I've been working since I was 15 years old," says Resheka. But she would like to see more support for couples who are "making an honest living". She wants the government to pay for free breakfast and afterschool clubs or more free childcare on top of the 30 hours a week currently provided. "It's not as if I'm saying I want benefits," she says. "We're putting back into the economy. We just need some help." Ollie Vass works for a nutritional supplement company, where he earns £31,000. His girlfriend Grace Sangster also 19 is on an apprenticeship scheme earning £40,000. They each started saving from the age of 13, earning money mowing lawns and working in restaurants. In April, with the help of a small inheritance and their Lifetime ISAs, the couple completed on a £360,000 two-bedroomed terraced house near Slough. Ollie and Grace would like to see more support for young people starting out, especially first-time buyers, and more apprenticeships. They also think the tax-free allowance, which has been frozen since 2021 should rise so that people on low wages can keep more of their earnings. Ollie also wants to see cheaper rail fares: "At the moment it's too expensive to use." Leah Daniel, 23, and her partner are entitled to £800 a month in Universal Credit and the council pays £900 a month rent for the flat in Birmingham they share with their two-year old daughter. But currently around £100 a month is being deducted from their Universal Credit to pay for advances they took while homeless for a short time. Leah says they run out of money every month and have to borrow from friends and family, sometimes having to skip meals to make sure their daughter is fed. If the government decides to cut the welfare budget in the Spending Review, that would be "absolutely heartless", she says. "It's one thing to make sure the country's growing and we aren't wasting money and people aren't taking advantage of the system. "It's another thing if you aren't giving more support to help people out of poverty and help them look for work," she says. Above all she and her partner want stable jobs so they can "build up their lives". "So many times we haven't eaten and we're worried about tomorrow," she says. "I just want this situation to change." As a GP and practice partner earning £96,000 a year, Dr Kirsty Rogerson says she is aware she is well-off. She and her husband, a hospital consultant, own their own house, and are putting some money aside to support their sons through university. But she sees plenty of people in her surgery in Sheffield who aren't so fortunate and face what she thinks are impossible choices. If she could choose one thing for the government to take action on it would be to subsidise fresh fruit and vegetables and make processed food more expensive. "What [the government] shouldn't be doing is just tackling it at the other end with weight loss drugs," she says. "That's going to bankrupt the NHS." She would also like to see more money spent on public services. "As a mother, I'd rather pay more tax and know my children were being well educated and there's a good healthcare system," says Dr Kirsty Rogerson. The same goes for the police. "I'd rather go to bed each night knowing those things were there," she says. Sylvia Cook, 72, used to sell accounting software, then published books about Greece, before she retired. Living on a pension of £20,000 means being careful with her outgoings, so she welcomes the government's u-turn on winter fuel payments as "a good decision, if a little late". The extra £200 "obviously eases things", she says. But in general she thinks that rather than increasing spending, the government should look at where it can save money. "You can spend a lot of money and achieve nothing," she says. Instead she suggests changes to the tax system, efficiency savings across government and cutting perks for MPs and civil servants. "There are so many inefficient things they haven't got the common sense to sort out." The health service is a case in point she says. "Throwing more money at the NHS doesn't necessarily help if they don't sort that out," she says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store