Litigation funders get a boost in budget bill drama, court wins
The U.S. litigation funding industry is basking in a string of favorable developments this week, including a major legislative reprieve in Washington and courtroom victories for its most prominent player, Burford Capital.
On Capitol Hill, the U.S. Senate's parliamentarian struck a hefty proposed tax on litigation financiers from the massive pending budget bill before Senate Republicans approved the legislation on Tuesday.
The provision, championed by retiring Republican Senator Thom Tillis, would have initially imposed a 40.8% tax rate on all "qualified litigation proceeds" received by any third party through a litigation financing agreement.
Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough on Monday ruled the measure violated budget reconciliation rules, forcing Republicans to drop it from the final text. Democrats had objected to the proposed tax, Sen. Jeff Merkley, the ranking member on the Senate Budget committee, said in a statement last week.
The move was praised by litigation funders and their backers, who warned the tax would chill investment and undermine access to justice.
"The only thing this provision would have done is discourage investment in justice by burdening funders," said Paul Kong, executive director of the International Legal Finance Association, a trade group for the industry.
The Senate bill, which nonpartisan analysts say will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, is now back before the House, which advanced the bill toward a final yes-or-no vote early on Thursday morning.
Burford, meanwhile, is another step closer to collecting its massive share of a $16.1 billion court judgment against Argentina, after the South American country seized a majority stake in oil and gas company YPF in 2012.
U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska on Monday ordered Argentina to give up its 51% stake in YPF to partially satisfy a $14.39 billion award to Petersen Energia Inversora and a $1.71 billion award to Eton Park Capital Management, both of whom were minority investors in YPF.
Burford is poised to receive around 35% of Petersen's award and 82% of Eton Park's award, a spokesperson for the litigation-financing firm said. That comes out to a potential payday of more than $6 billion, not including interest, which Petersen and Eton Park said is accruing at more than $2.5 million a day.
Argentina is appealing Preska's September 2023 decision to award the $16.1 billion to the investors.
Burford also scored a litigation win in Chicago, where a judge ruled that a subsidiary of the company can retain control over one of its former clients' claims in a price-fixing lawsuit against leading turkey producers. Burford had acquired rights to the claims from food distributor Sysco.
The turkey producers had argued it was against public policy to allow a Burford subsidiary to serve as the named plaintiff when it never bought products from the defendants.
Burford CEO Christopher Bogart, whose company is the largest publicly traded litigation funder, with a $7.2 billion portfolio as of March 31, said the "basic recurring theme" of the week is that large institutions "have long enjoyed a structural advantage in the litigation system, and they're very unhappy about losing it."
There are now more than 42 active funders managing a total of $16.1 billion in assets, litigation finance firm Westfleet Advisors said in an annual report in March.
The funding industry still faces regulatory headwinds. Business groups have pushed for mandatory disclosures of litigation funding agreements, arguing litigants require greater transparency about the interests that may be guiding settlements and other courtroom tactics.
Indiana, Louisiana and West Virginia have enacted laws regulating litigation financing in recent years. In Washington, Republican U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa earlier this year introduced legislation that would require civil litigants to disclose any litigation funding agreements.
Issa's bill is backed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Institute for Legal Reform, whose president in February said the legislation "will help protect the integrity of our judicial system by ensuring that outside financiers are not secretly directing or profiting from litigation they are funding."
The International Legal Finance Association opposes the bill, arguing it would hurt small businesses and erect a "financial barrier to entry to civil litigation."
-- Litigator Roberta Kaplan is giving the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority a discount on her customary $2,000 hourly rate as she helps them defend New York's congestion pricing program, according to a contract obtained by Reuters.
Kaplan, co-founder of the small law firm Kaplan Martin, is billing at $1,450 an hour, a 27.5% discount from her normal hourly fee, the contract records showed.
It's common for lawyers to reduce rates for government clients. Kaplan's firm declined to comment.
Kaplan, who represented writer E. Jean Carroll in defamation lawsuits against Trump, formed Kaplan Martin last year with Tim Martin, Steven Cohen and Mitra Hormozi.
The congestion pricing program, which the Trump administration has moved to kill, generated $48.6 million in revenue for New York City in its first month, MTA said in February.
-- Legal technology company Clio on Monday said that it has agreed to acquire legal AI and research company vLex in a deal valued at $1 billion.
British private equity firm Oakley Capital agreed to sell Barcelona-founded vLex to Clio, a Vancouver, Canada-based company that said the deal marks a 'new era for AI-powered legal technology.'
Clio, founded in 2008, offers a platform for law firms to manage clients and cases and process payments, among other capabilities. The company last July raised $900 million at a $3 billion valuation.
In other recent legal tech news, AI company Harvey said last week that it raised $300 million at a $5 billion valuation.
Read more:
How much does Hunter Biden's lawyer charge?
Litigation funder fires back at Tyson Foods over settlement interference claims
Oregon contract shows law firms' stake in Coinbase securities fight
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gavin Newsom strikes back against Trump's Texas redistricting plan with his own move to claw back congressional seats
Gavin Newsom celebrated taking a giant step forward retaliation toward the Donald Trump-endorsed redistricting of Texas but going all out on his recent social media impression of the president. In the past week, Newsom's press office has consistently put out tweets aping the bombastic and singular style of Trump in an attempt to show some fight back from an increasingly unpopular Democrat Party. A day after the Texas State House approved a redistricting plan Trump thinks will eventually lead to Republicans gaining 100 seats in Congress, Newsom signed a law allowing California voters to decide whether the blue state will do the same. The governor celebrated by trotting out his new social media impression yet again. 'WOW!!! MY MAPS (THE BEST MAPS EVER MADE) WILL SOON PASS IN THE GREATEST LEGISLATURE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD (NOT JUST AMERICA),' he wrote. He joked that the maps are 'BETTER THAN COLUMBUS, BETTER THAN GOOGLE MAPS, BETTER THAN APPLE MAPS (SORRY TIM, NO GOLD BAR FOR ME, BUT I STILL LOVE YOU!).' 'PEOPLE ARE ALREADY SCREAMING 'MAMA! MAMA!' AND I SAY, 'NO, I AM YOUR DADDY!!!' THE GOLDEN ERA BEGINS IN THE GOLDEN STATE, ALL BECAUSE OF ME, THE PEOPLE'S GOVERNOR, THE CARTOGRAPHER-IN-CHIEF, WHO WILL NOW LET THE PEOPLE VOTE!!! THANK YOU, USA!!! — GCN' California lawmakers voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve legislation calling for the special election. Newsom, who has led the campaign in favor of the map, then quickly signed it — the latest step in a tit-for-tat gerrymandering battle. 'This is not something six weeks ago that I ever imagined that I'd be doing,' Newsom said at a press conference, pledging a campaign for the measure that would reach out to Democrats, Republicans and independent voters. 'This is a reaction to an assault on our democracy in Texas.' Republicans, who have filed a lawsuit and called for a federal investigation into the plan, promised to fight the measure at the ballot box as well. California Assemblyman James Gallagher, the Republican minority leader, said Trump was 'wrong' to push for new Republican seats elsewhere, contending the president was just responding to Democratic gerrymandering in other states. But he warned that Newsom's approach, which the governor has dubbed 'fight fire with fire,' was dangerous. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire and what happens?' Gallagher asked. 'You burn it all down.' Trump celebrated victory in Texas in the early morning hours on Thursday as the GOP passed a new redistricting law that Trump says could put the party on a path to gaining 100 seats in Congress. The Texas House on Wednesday approved redrawn maps that would give the GOP a bigger edge in 2026, muscling through what critics called a partisan gerrymander that launched weeks of protests by Democrats and a widening national battle over redistricting. Trump not only celebrated the bill's passing on Truth Social, but spelled out his game plan for further Republican victories nationwide. 'Big WIN for the Great State of Texas!!! Everything Passed, on our way to FIVE more Congressional seats and saving your Rights, your Freedoms, and your Country, itself. Texas never lets us down,' he wrote. He then listed which states may go this route next: ' Florida, Indiana, and others are looking to do the same thing. More seats equals less Crime, a great Economy, and a STRONG SECOND AMENDMENT. It means Happiness and Peace.' Trump said the next move is to, as he put it, 'STOP MAIL-IN VOTING, a total fraud that has no bounds' as well as instituting paper ballots. 'If we do these TWO things, we will pick up 100 more seats, and the CROOKED game of politics is over. God Bless America!!!' The maps, which would give Republicans five more winnable seats, are expected to to be approved by the GOP-controlled state Senate and signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Abbott celebrated the passing of the bill by giving it a familiar nickname to many Trump fans. 'Congrats to the Texas House on passing the One Big Beautiful Map,' he wrote. 'It will make Texas, and Congress, a brighter shade of Red.' But the Texas House vote had presented the best chance for Democrats to derail the redraw. Democrats tried to resist by fleeing the state. In early August, 57 lawmakers skipped town, flying to Illinois and New York in a dramatic attempt to block the GOP's map vote. They then said that they were being treated like fugitives as they are threatened with arrest if they don't show up to the house to vote during a bitter redistricting fight that could hand Republicans and Donald Trump five extra seats in Congress. State troopers were ordered to shadow Democrats around the clock, even when they dropped their kids at school, to ensure they stayed for votes. Their forced presence gave the Texas House a quorum, the minimum number of lawmakers required to move legislation forward.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
White male Port of Seattle worker was best candidate for promotion...then a gay Asian woman applied, lawsuit alleges
An electrician working at the Port of Seattle has claimed he was passed over for promotion because he is a white, straight male - and a gay Asian woman had applied for the position. Lawyers representing Chris Linhardt, 50, argue in a lawsuit filed last month in King County Superior Court that he had been working in the port's electrical division and even served temporarily as its electrical foreman for several months in 2022. So when the Port sought to permanently fill the position the following year, Linhardt jumped at the opportunity. 'Plaintiff ranked highest in the first-round interview; nevertheless, management scheduled an unprecedented second-round interview,' the lawsuit claims. Another employee, an Asian woman who identifies as gay, was then allegedly coached by the head of maintenance - who served as an interview committee member. That created an 'unfair advantage' in the interview, Linhardt's attorneys argue. The other employee ultimately wound up receiving the foreman position, though Linhardt's lawyers say she had 'substantially less supervisory and hands-on experience.' 'Upon information and belief, Defendant's decision makers were motivated by Plaintiff's race, sex and/or sexual orientation in deciding not to promote him,' the lawsuit argues. 'Plaintiff alleges that Defendant favored promoting an individual with different demographic characteristics over Plaintiff because of these protected characteristics, rather than basing the decision solely on merit.' In doing so, Linhardt's lawyers say the port violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination, which bars discrimination on the basis of race, creed, national origin, marriage status, family status, sexual orientation, age and more at workplaces in the state. He is seeking damages from the lost compensation as well as from the emotional distress he has endured in the years since, plus attorney's fees. According to government records, Linhardt was receiving an annual salary of $115,066 in 2021, after several raises since he began working as a wireman in 2019, when he received nearly $10,000 less. The woman who received the promotion, meanwhile, received an annual salary of $132,267 in 2023. 'Plaintiff has experienced humiliation, indignity, frustration and anguish due to Defendant's discriminatory actions,' the suit claims. His lawyer, Vanessa Vanderbrug, told the Seattle Times her client is 'fully supportive, of course, of diversity in the workplace, but has concerns that the manner in which the Port is attempting to achieve those diversity ends is really not serving the entire workforce.' 'Our anti-discrimination laws are designed for the purpose of allowing individuals to be judged based on merit, not based upon skin color, sexual orientation or other immutable characteristics,' she noted. 'From my perspective, these laws are designed to protect us all - not simply traditional minority groups.' A spokesperson for the Port of Seattle, which manages both the seaport and the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, said it does not comment on personnel matters. However, attorneys representing the government agency have argued in court documents that while Linhardt was a qualified candidate, he was not the most qualified for the role. They argued that the Port of Seattle 'acted reasonably and in good faith.' The lawyers also claimed that Linhardt only received the highest score in the first-round interview 'due to a skewed rating by [Linhardt's] direct supervisor and friend.' The Port was then forced to conduct a second round of interviews over the concerns of potential bias, and the other employee ranked higher. The lawyers are now seeking to get the lawsuit dismissed.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Federal judge orders closure of Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail
A federal judge in Miami late on Thursday ordered the closure of the Trump administration's notorious 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail within 60 days, and ruled that no more detainees were to be brought to the facility while it was being wound down. The shock ruling by district court judge Kathleen Williams builds on a temporary restraining order she issued two weeks ago halting further construction work at the remote tented camp, which has attracted waves of criticism for harsh conditions, abuse of detainees and denial of due process as they await deportation. In her 82-page order, published in the US district court's southern district of Florida on Friday, Williams determined the facility was causing severe and irreparable damage to the fragile Florida Everglades. She also noted that a plan to develop the site on which the jail was built into a massive tourist airport was rejected in the 1960s because of the harm it would have caused the the land and delicate ecosystem. 'Since that time, every Florida governor, every Florida senator, and countless local and national political figures, including presidents, have publicly pledged their unequivocal support for the restoration, conservation, and protection of the Everglades,' she wrote. 'This order does nothing more than uphold the basic requirements of legislation designed to fulfill those promises.' No further construction at the site can take place, she ruled, and there must be no further increase in the number of detainees currently held there, estimated to be about 700. After the 60-day period, all construction materials, fencing, generators and fixtures that made the site a detention camp must be removed. The ruling is a significant victory for a coalition of environmental groups and a native American tribe that sued the state of Florida and the federal government. Williams agreed that the hasty, eight-day construction of the jail at a disused airfield in late June damaged the sensitive wetlands of a national preserve and further imperiled federally protected species. 'This is a landmark victory for the Everglades and countless Americans who believe this imperiled wilderness should be protected, not exploited,' said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, one of the groups that filed the lawsuit. 'It sends a clear message that environmental laws must be respected by leaders at the highest levels of our government, and there are consequences for ignoring them.' The alliance plans to hold a press conference on Friday morning to discuss the ruling in detail. Conversely, the ruling is a blow to the detention and deportation agenda of the Trump administration. The president touted the camp, which recently held as many as 1,400 detainees, as a jail for 'some of the most vicious people on the planet', although hundreds of those held there have no criminal record or active criminal proceedings against them. There was no immediate reaction to Williams's ruling from the Florida department of emergency management, which operates the jail on behalf of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice), or from the Department of Homeland Security. But lawyers for the state told Williams in court last week that they would appeal any adversarial ruling, the Miami Herald reported. In addition, hundreds of detainees were moved from 'Alligator Alcatraz' to other immigration facilities at the weekend in anticipation that Williams would order its closure, the outlet said. Ron DeSantis, Florida's Republican governor, announced earlier this month that the state will soon open a second immigration jail at a disused prison near Gainesville to increase capacity.
