logo
Life outside work was chaotic and grubby. Behind the beauty counter I became someone else

Life outside work was chaotic and grubby. Behind the beauty counter I became someone else

The Guardian09-06-2025
For six years I worked for an Australian cosmetics brand with a reputation of being a bit of a cult. I wasn't the usual recruit – you might describe me as a former theatre kid, with a dash of recovering horse girl. The company I worked for was known for its demure and self-serious marketing campaigns; for unflinching eye contact; for a religious devotion to personal care. Perhaps you know the brand I'm referring to. Perhaps you even know someone with the same story as me: someone who went from casual employee to dedicated, dewy-skinned disciple.
Throughout my time at the company, tying my linen pinafore before a shift felt like slipping into the costume of a well-known cartoon character. In fact, working on the brand's frontline – the immaculately dusted retail stores – resembled a job at Disneyland in more ways than one: its strict code of conduct, its obsession with ritual and its insistence that perfection was possible between the hours of 10 and six. Outside work my life was chaotic and grubby but behind the store's grand brass tester sink I became someone else.
I began my tenure working at one of the smallest retail stores alongside a group of jewellery designers, film-makers, poets and painters. The store in our care rarely made more than $1,000 a day, which meant we spent most of our time polishing bottles and trading stories. Often the daily take was contingent on one wealthy woman deciding that she needed to restock her mind-boggling number of bathrooms: the city apartment, the beach house, the Airbnb and her son's new rental.
The customers who frequented this store had more money than sense, although they were kind and rarely in a hurry. I attributed this to the fact that many of them did not have jobs. Working at this store rarely felt like a job to me, so I wondered if I could count myself as one of them.
Then I transferred to a city store – the flagship – which was not something to be taken lightly. It was a place to build a career. I'd learned the art of sink demonstrations but at the flagship I perfected it. Dispense all product on to your skin first, maintain contact with the customer's hand at all times, use a firm, assured pressure.
Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning
The flagship store's customers were so familiar with the brand that I wondered if they were assessing our abilities and reporting back to the training team – a group of charismatic, God-like women who had achieved sink demonstration mastery. I was working at the city store when I met the brand's chief customer officer. I shook her hand for what I felt was an appropriate amount of time and, as I pulled away, she clamped down on my palm. She decided when the handshake was over. It was exhilarating.
After my time at the flagship store I left the company for an overseas trip. I bounced around a few odd jobs upon my return, including a stint at a smaller, copycat brand that took Fair Work regulations as mere suggestion.
Sign up to Saved for Later
Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips
after newsletter promotion
Eventually, I begged my former employer to take me back and, after some convincing, the company found a position for me. It was at a shopping centre on the city fringe, which was not a huge distance from the company's head office, but it attracted the stigma of being far from anything worth visiting. As such, the brand's leadership team never made the journey. Although our conscientious store manager tried her best, we were largely left to our own devices. The self-fulfilling prophecy of banishment took hold. We let our on-brand affectations slip.
Our bad attitudes, by upper management's standards, were surprisingly effective in communicating with customers. Addressing the shopping centre crowd with pomp and circumstance would attract raucous laughter. 'I just want my soap, love,' customers would cry as we listed the benefits of the brand's latest skincare release. We tallied the number of people who wandered into the store just to ask us why our products were so expensive. They were rarely rude – it was a genuine question, one we struggled to answer.
Before my time in the linen pinafore, I believed that a job – any job – at a company like this would quell my existential distress. As if merely being associated with an aspirational, culture-focused B Corp could rid my life of friction.
What I discovered was that the friction only intensified over time. I didn't want to become a product copywriter, contrary to every conversation I had with my store manager and HR representative. I wanted to write jokes about copywriting.
I left the company in 2023 and, although I'm still mourning the loss of my staff discount, my life feels more cohesive now.
I spend a lot of my time writing jokes. And very little thinking about the skin's barrier function.
Chloe Elisabeth Wilson is the author of Rytual (Penguin, RRP A$34.99)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Empty corridors and a quiet hum: if there were fireworks at Albanese's economic roundtable, they were well hidden
Empty corridors and a quiet hum: if there were fireworks at Albanese's economic roundtable, they were well hidden

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Empty corridors and a quiet hum: if there were fireworks at Albanese's economic roundtable, they were well hidden

'What's on your agenda this week?' 'Hanging out for three days while we wait.' So went a conversation overheard in Parliament House, between two people from organisations represented at the government's economic reform roundtable, just before the three-day meeting kicked off. Rome wasn't built in a day, and Australia's economy won't be fixed in three days (although with productivity gains, who knows how we could have supercharged the Roman construction sector). Government sources were quick to stress the 'constructive' atmosphere in the room; in a rosy five-line statement after the first day's activities, an upbeat Jim Chalmers described the vibe as 'outstanding', 'promising', 'productive', 'constructive' and 'consensus building' – proving, if nothing else, productivity is high among his media team. But those of us stuck outside the cabinet room – that is, everyone but the 30-odd participants – were left waiting and wondering what the economic inner circle were discussing. Parliament House wasn't exactly abuzz – more a quiet hum as staffers of interest groups drifted the halls like tumbleweed, trying to fill in time between sessions. Aussies cafe, usually the spot to see and be seen in Parliament, lay near-empty. Journalists skulked around the ministerial wing, trying to learn any scraps from inside; while shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien, the Coalition's sole invitee, bustled out during the lunch break, appearing to take a phone call but perhaps just hoping to avoid questions. Nationals senator Matt Canavan, taking advantage of an unexpected lull in the middle of the day, set up a real-life version of the 'change my mind' meme on the front lawn of the building, spruiking his own pirate version of a roundtable on Tuesday. A special media space set up for press conferences lay mostly empty, barely used beyond quick stand-ups from one business group and one union secretary, where each criticised the other over an ACTU push for employers to pay a levy to train workers. Industry leader Innes Willox reportedly called that idea a 'crock of shit'. ACTU assistant Secretary Liam O'Brien said these weren't 'new tensions', but said the summit was helping thorny issues get 'surfaced in a productive way.' In public comments, at least, participants played nice, saying compromises were being found. But on the outside, like waiting for chimney smoke from the papal conclave, we were left to interpret the smallest signals emanating from the cabinet room. Phones and smart watches had to be surrendered at the cabinet room door, the tech devices of the nation's key policy minds left stranded in little plastic boxes. Sadly the large 'no mobile phones' sign didn't include a warning to switch them to silent, leaving one smart watch to ring deafeningly during Chalmers' opening address and spotlight moment, prompting a mad scramble from the staffers in the lobby. We managed to nip inside the cabinet room as Anthony Albanese and Chalmers made their opening addresses to the roundtable (it was an oval table), to check out the seating plan. Flanking the PM were treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson, and Chalmers (on Albanese's left this time, not his right-hand man). Sitting directly opposite, Productivity Commission chief Danielle Wood, former treasury secretary Ken Henry, and Commonwealth Bank boss Matt Comyn. Sitting on the far rounded edge of the cabinet table, as far from Albanese as would be possible, was Ted O'Brien. Albanese said he didn't expect participants to agree on every issue. With unions, business groups, environment leaders and politicians in one room, it's probably hard to agree on the coffee order, let alone the future economic direction of the country. But in the spirit of consensus (a word you're hearing a lot this week, alongside 'constructive') the PM invited all the roundtable members to drinks at the Lodge on Wednesday night. It will follow a key economic summit of another kind on Monday night at the PM's house. Chalmers, in business-casual mode, in a quarter-zip jacket meeting Albanese… and his dog, Toto. 'I'm delighted at how specific people's ideas have been and how constructively participants have worked together,' Chalmers said after day one, praising participants for having 'risen to the occasion' with 'a lot of consensus building'. But with business groups and unions expecting a key confrontation on AI and regulation on day two, let's check back tomorrow to see if the smoke signals are quite as positive.

Woodside cuts exploration, shifts focus to $39 billion project pipeline after profit drop
Woodside cuts exploration, shifts focus to $39 billion project pipeline after profit drop

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Woodside cuts exploration, shifts focus to $39 billion project pipeline after profit drop

SYDNEY, Aug 19 (Reuters) - Woodside Energy ( opens new tab said on Tuesday it will scale back exploration efforts and prioritise its $39 billion project pipeline to strengthen its balance sheet, after depreciation and decommissioning costs led to a slump in first-half profit. Woodside, Australia's top gas producer, posted an underlying net profit of $1.25 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, down 24% from $1.63 billion last year. CEO Meg O'Neill said the company will take "a disciplined approach to future growth and reduced spend on new energy and exploration as we prioritise delivering sanctioned projects." In an interview with Reuters, she said Woodside's focus had shifted from pursuing growth projects to "absolutely" concentrating on delivery. Woodside's four major projects, worth a combined $39 billion, include the Scarborough gas field in Western Australia, the Trion deepwater oil field in Mexico, and the Louisiana liquefied natural gas and Beaumont New Ammonia projects in North America. "For Woodside now, it's all about project execution," said James Hood, senior energy analyst at Regal Funds. "The risk for them is they're going through a heavy capex period when the market's expected to be in material oversupply of crude by the end of the calendar year," he said, adding this will ensure Woodside delivers an attractive dividend. The Perth-based company declared an interim dividend of 53 cents apiece, at the higher end of its payout ratio target range of 50% to 80%. The company is seeking a further 20%-30% selldown of its stake in the Louisiana LNG project, and said that it is seeing "strong interest from high-quality potential partners". MST Marquee's Saul Kavonic said Woodside is likely advancing talks with major Northeast Asian buyers, including Japan and Korea, to secure offtake and equity deals in Louisiana. This is aimed at rebalancing trade deficits and appeasing U.S. President Donald Trump. O'Neill said demand from Asia will boost global LNG demand, noting that while Europe has been an important market, significant growth is expected in the 2030s from Asian importers, driven by energy needs for data centres, AI, and chip manufacturing. Shares of Woodside closed 2.79% lower at A$26.14. Woodside's operating revenue rose 10% to $6.59 billion. Still, depreciation and amortisation costs tied to its Sangomar offshore oil and gas field in Senegal totalled $773 million, while a $445 million decommissioning expense weighed on the balance sheet, pushing net debt above expectations to $8.65 billion. ($1 = 1.5413 Australian dollars)

Australia's Santos flags delay in finalising $18.7 billion ADNOC-led buyout
Australia's Santos flags delay in finalising $18.7 billion ADNOC-led buyout

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Australia's Santos flags delay in finalising $18.7 billion ADNOC-led buyout

Aug 19 (Reuters) - Santos ( opens new tab said on Tuesday the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC)-led consortium will not be able to finalise its $18.7 billion bid for the Australian gas producer for at least a month, well past the exclusive due diligence deadline. Shares in Santos, Australia's second-largest independent gas producer, fell as much as 3.5% to a more than five-week low of A$7.68 as investors questioned whether the delay could kill the deal. "The market is telling you there's increased risk and uncertainty," said James Hood, Regal Funds Management's senior energy analyst. Santos shares have traded consistently well below the proposed offer of A$8.89 from the consortium led by ADNOC's international investment arm XRG on June 16, which analysts have attributed to scepticism the transaction will proceed. Exclusive talks between Santos and the consortium, which includes Abu Dhabi Development Holding Company (ADQ) and private equity firm Carlyle, were due to finish on Friday. The consortium told Santos it would need at least four more weeks to secure all required approvals for its bid to be formalised. XRG said in a separate statement it would continue its due diligence and progress negotiations to reach a formalised offer. Taking into account net debt, the deal would give Santos an enterprise value of A$36.4 billion, which would make it the largest all-cash corporate buyout in Australian history, according to FactSet data. "This was never going to be an easy transaction to pull off with the confluence of domestic energy security and national interest considerations as well as the multitude of hard to please stakeholders involved," said Kaushal Ramesh, vice president, gas and LNG research at Rystad Energy. The deal requires approval from regulators in Australia, Papua New Guinea, and the U.S. given Santos holds assets in each of those jurisdictions. Approval from Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board could be a major hurdle for the transaction with the government likely to be wary to hand control of key energy assets to Middle Eastern investors, analysts said. "I don't think (the delay) is going to change the overall risk to the takeover, and that's still the Foreign Investment Review Board. I think that's probably the biggest risk to the whole takeover," said Jamie Hannah, deputy investment director at Van Eck, which is a Santos shareholder. Australia's gas market is politically sensitive as the country's competition regulator has warned that the populous eastern states face a shortfall of gas from 2028 without new investment. Santos has long said its long-delayed Narrabri gas project in New South Wales state could help fill the supply gap. Woodside ( opens new tab and Santos last year scrapped $52 billion merger talks after failing to reach an agreement. Woodside Chief Executive Meg O'Neill said on Tuesday the company was not interested in making a rival bid. If successful, the consortium would gain control of two Australian liquefied natural gas operations - Gladstone LNG and Darwin LNG - as well as stakes in PNG LNG and the undeveloped Papua LNG. Santos' interests in Papua New Guinea are considered its most prized assets. The company is also developing an oil project in Alaska, Pikka, due to start producing in mid-2026. Meanwhile, Santos said it would defer its interim earnings report to August 25 from August 20.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store