
How are species named?
A brief history
Naming organisms is necessary to classify and document them, thereby helping us manage them better (such as planning conservation strategies). So how do we name the species? It all traces back to Swedish naturalist Carolus Linnaeus. The formal classification that is internationally accepted had its origin in the 1750s, with the Linnaean system of binomial nomenclature, created by the naturalist. He is considered the founder of modern taxonomy and was the first to use binomial nomenclature. Over the years, Linnaeus's rules and procedures have undergone a lot of modifications. A species (animal or plant) is thus designated by two parts, with the first identifying the genus to which it belongs and the second the species.
Take for instance the case of us, modern humans. The scientific name is homo sapiens. Homo is the genus, Sapiens is the species, and we are the only member of the genus Homo that is not extinct.
This internationally understood nomenclature is paramount to documenting all the species on our planet. While International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) regulates the zoological nomenclature or the naming of animals, the International Association of Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) controls the scientific naming of plant diversity such as algae, fungi, and plants.
Quite often species are named after their characteristics. At times, they are named after celebrities, fictional characters, projects or sometimes simply using some quirky play of words.
Species named after iconic personalities
Did you know that there is a wasp species named after Colombian singer-songwriter Shakira? Or that an entire genus of ferns named after American musician Lady Gaga? Back in 2022, a millipede (Nannaria swiftae) in North America was named after singer-songwriter Taylor Swift. British nature historian Sir David Attenborough has more than 40 species of animals and plants named after him (and counting, we must say!). Many species have been named after U.S. Presidents. For instance, the first U.S. president George Washington has a parasitic wasp living in Costa Rica named after him, called Heterospilus washingtoni. An ant that lives in the Venezuelan Amazon was named after the English rock band Radiohead. It is called Sericomyrmex radioheadi. But what is the logic behind giving the names of celebrities? Mostly, it is to bring attention to the species whose discovery might sometimes go unnoticed by the public or it can be done as an homage. For instance, while describing the species Sericomyrmex radiohead, the scientists said that it was an ode to the band's efforts at environmental activism.
'Attributing the name of a personality to a species began as a way to poke fun at people. When it comes to naming a creature several aspects are taken into account. Sometimes it is the unique characteristic that might be highlighted in the name or the habitat in which it is found. Sometimes, the species can be cryptic or similar to an already described species. This is when these fancy names come in. They are named after scientists, projects, celebrities, and universities as a means to honour them,' says Dr. Sandeep Das, national post-doctoral fellow at the University of Calicut who, along with his team, has described more than 20 species. A lizard he described has been named Agasthyagama edge, as an ode to the Zoological Society of London's international program, EDGE which works towards the conservation of the Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered species. 'The lizard is also unique and the second species from that genus and hence we chose to name it so,' says Sandeep.
There are still debates ongoing in the scientific community on naming the creatures after celebrities. For instance, some names are considered problematic by certain sections, such as the name given to a cave beetle. Christened Anophthalmus hitleri, the species is named after Adolf Hitler. There have been several calls from various sections to change the name as some find it offensive to name it after someone who perpetrated genocide. The species had even become a target of some memorabilia collectors.
Species named after a mission
When researcher Vishnudattan N.K. described the third marine tardigrade in India, it was around the time India launched its enviable Chandrayaan-3 moon mission. Its landing near the south pole of the moon was a first for any nation to achieve. So what better way to commemorate the occasion and pay homage to this glorious event than to name a species after the mission? And thus the marine tardigrade was named Batillipes chandrayaani. The new species of marine tardigrade was discovered from the southeast coast of Tamil Nadu.
'I thought of the name as a homage to the mission. It was a prestigious occasion. So I thought of naming the species after the mission. Moreover, it could also draw attention to the species and popularise it among the public,' says Vishnu, the lead author of the study and former senior research fellow, Department of Marine Biology, CUSAT. The first marine tardigrade species he described was named Stygarctus keralensis, as a homage to the state of Kerala and the second marine tardigrade species as Batillipes kalami, honouring Abdul Kalam.
Species named after places
Like Stygarctus keralensis, another species that is named after a state is the Gekko mizoramensis, a parachute gecko, described by the researchers of the Max Planck Institute for Biology based in Tübingen, Germany. This nocturnal, arboreal lizard has been named after the northeastern state of Mizoram after it was discovered from there. Another example would be Pinanga subterranea, a species of palm tree. The name refers to the palm's subterranean habitat. It is the first palm described as one flowering and fruiting underground.
Species named after fictional characters
The world of fiction, mythology, and fantasy has inspired the names of many species. Not to mention imaginary places such as Hogwarts being the inspiration behind the naming of the dinosaur Dracorex hogwartsia. The fossilised remains of the dino reminded the scientists of the dragons in the 'Harry Potter' series, following which they named the dinosaur after the magical school of Hogwarts. Dracorex hogwartsia means 'dragon king of Hogwarts.'
The magical creatures in English writer J.R.R. Tolkien's work are often used to name new species. Gollumjapyx smeagol (named after the fictional character Gollum), Oxyprimus galadrielae (based on the character Galadriel), Macrostyphlus gandalf (based on the character Gandalf), and so on are some examples.
Science fiction writer H.P. Lovecraft's mythical creature Chtulhu has also been an inspiration for many scientists. Cthulhu macrofasciculumque and Cthylla microfasciculumque are some of the species named after the creature.
Mythology and religion are also sources of names. Catchphrases from fiction and TV characters are also used. For instance, Kermit the Frog, the star of the children's television series 'The Muppet Show' has inspired the naming of Kermitops gratus, a species of an ancient amphibian ancestor. Kodama jujutsu, a species of pygmy squid, is another species name formed by joining 'Kodama', a tree spirit in Japanese folklore and 'jujutsu', a martial art of the same name. The list is indeed endless.
Quirky, idiosyncratic names
Then there are names that leave you bemused. There is an amusing play of words here. Take the case of Gelae baen, Gelae fish, Gelae rol, Gelae belae and Gelae donut. These are all types of fungus beetles. Orizabus subaziro is a scarab beetle discovered from Oaxaca, Mexico. Note the play of words here. It is a palindromic name. Sometimes scientists choose to rhyme, for instance, Cedusa medusa or go for quirky, humourous names such as Ytu brutus or Inglorious mediocris. And sometimes the species gets a name like Erythroneura ix. The leafhopper was named so when the scientists reached the ninth species of the leafhopper.
How are species discovered ?
So how do the scientists find these species? Sometimes the species can just surprise you, like how the tardigrade Stygarctus keralensis did. Vishnu was in fact on a different research, as he was identifying the meiofauna (small benthic invertebrates) along the coastal regions. 'It was while the samples were being investigated that the species caught my attention. It was something new,' he recalls.
After further investigation, he identified the genus and eventually arrived at a conclusion that the mysterious creature is in fact a new species, a marine tardigrade, thereby becoming India's first marine tardigrade species to be described. The story of the third species is even more interesting. 'When I got the samples and identified the second tardigrade, I observed something that looked like the tardigrade's juvenile. But on further investigations I realised that it was indeed an adult and that it was a new species of tardigrade,' he says. Vishnu and his team have to their credits all three discoveries of the marine tardigrade species in India. The studies were carried out under the supervision of Dr. S. Bijoy Nandan, Dean of the School of Marine Sciences, CUSAT.
Knowledge of indigenous communities
Discovering a new species can thus be something totally unexpected or it might be a planned investigation. But the role indigenous communities play in species identification is something the larger public may not be widely aware of. Their knowledge is an untapped wealth.
'Local ecological knowledge is an emerging branch in science. Indigenous people may know many aspects of the wild that we do not. They might even have different names for these species. They have a strong knowledge about our forests and its biodiversity,' adds Sandeep.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
a day ago
- News18
Two Ancient Human Species Coexisted In Ethiopia 2.6 Million Years Ago, One Possibly Unknown
Last Updated: Fossilized teeth found in Ethiopia show that two human ancestor species, including a possibly unknown one, lived there 2.6 million years ago. A decades-long archaeological project in Ethiopia's Afar region uncovered fossilized teeth revealing that two different types of early human ancestors- including a possible previously unknown species- lived in the same area between 2.6 and 2.8 million years ago. The findings, published in Nature, challenge long-held views that species of the genus Homo emerged only after the extinction of Australopithecus. Instead, the discovery shows they coexisted. Researchers from the Ledi-Geraru Research Project identified ten teeth belonging to Australopithecus and three to early Homo. The Australopithecus fossils, discovered between 2018 and 2020, did not match known species such as afarensis- the species of the famous 'Lucy" fossil- or garhi, suggesting a new species may have walked the Earth alongside early Homo. While Australopithecus species walked upright but had smaller brains, Homo had larger brains and different teeth structures. The team is continuing excavations to find more skeletal remains to determine how these species lived and whether they competed for resources. Lead author Brian Villmoare of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said, 'This discovery adds a critical piece to the puzzle of where we came from. But to fully understand it, we need more fossils." Location : Washington D.C., United States of America (USA) First Published:


News18
a day ago
- News18
For people with ADHD, medication can reduce risk of accidents, crime, suicide
Sydney, Aug 16 (The Conversation) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects around 7 per cent of children and 2.5 per cent of adults. ADHD causes difficulties with holding and sustaining attention over periods of time. People with ADHD also experience hyperactivity and high levels of impulsiveness and arousal. This can make it difficult to plan, coordinate and remain engaged in tasks. ADHD is linked to problems at work, school and home, and to higher rates of mental illnesses such as anxiety. It's also associated with higher rates of long-term harms. Stimulant medication, such as methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine, is the most common treatment for managing ADHD symptoms. Most people with ADHD will respond to at least one ADHD medication. But rising rates of prescriptions in recent years have prompted concern for their effectiveness and safety. New research published today in the journal BMJ points to additional longer-term benefits. It found that people with ADHD who took medication were less likely to have suicidal behaviours, transport accidents, issues with substance misuse, or be convicted of a crime. What did the study do? The study tracked 148,581 people who received a new diagnosis of ADHD between 2007 and 2018. The authors used population-based data from Swedish national registers, including everyone aged six to 64 who was newly diagnosed with ADHD. The average age was 17.4 years, and 41per cent were female. Participants either started or did not start medication within three months of their ADHD diagnosis. The authors examined the effects of drug treatment for ADHD on five critical outcomes: suicidal behaviours, substance misuse, accidental injuries, transport accidents and committing crimes. They looked at both first-time and recurrent events. This study used a method that uses data from health records or registries to mimic the design of a randomised controlled trial, in an attempt to reduce bias. The researchers accounted for age, education, other mental and physical illnesses, prior history and use of other drugs to account for factors that may influence results. What did they find? Within three months of receiving an ADHD diagnosis, 84,282 (56.7 per cent) of people had started drug treatment for ADHD. Methylphenidate was the most commonly prescribed drug, accounting for 88.4 per cent of prescriptions. Drug treatment for ADHD was associated with reduced rates of a first occurrence for four out of the five outcomes: a 17 per cent reduction for suicidal behaviours, 15 per cent for substance misuse, 12 per cent for transport accidents and 13 per cent for committing a crime. When the researchers looked at people with recurrent events, the rate reductions associated with ADHD medication were seen for all five outcomes (including accidental injury). The effect of medication was particularly strong when someone had a history of these events happening frequently. This means those with the most severe symptoms may benefit most. Stimulant drugs were associated with lower rates of all five outcomes compared with non-stimulant drugs. It's likely these benefits are associated with improvements in attention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. People may be less likely to be distracted while driving, to self-medicate and show impacts from other mental health challenges. What didn't the study do? The large sample size, use of national linked registers and sophisticated design give greater confidence that these findings are due to medication use and not due to other factors. But the study was not able to examine medication dosages or track whether people reliably took their medication as prescribed. It also had no way to track the severity of ADHD symptoms. This means it can't tell us if this helped most people or just some people with severe symptoms. We know that ADHD medication helps most people, but it is not effective for everyone. So, we still need to understand why some people don't benefit from ADHD medication, and what other treatments might also be helpful. Finally, even though the study was rigorous in its design and adjusted for many factors, we can't rule out that other unaccounted factors could be associated with these effects. As prescribing increases, the size of the benefit decreases. A second study, published in June, used the same Swedish national registers and self-controlled case series design. This study also concluded that ADHD medication was associated with reduced risks for self-harm, accidental injuries, transport accidents and committing a crime. However, this study also showed that as prescribing rates increased nearly fivefold between 2006 and 2020, the size of the observed benefits of ADHD medications reduced. While remaining significant, the size of the associations between ADHD medication use and lower risks of unintentional injury, traffic crashes, and crime weakened over this time. This could mean people who are less likely to need ADHD medications are now receiving them. What are the impacts for patients and policymakers? People need to know that if ADHD medications are helpful for them or their children, they might also improve many other areas of life. These findings can also give governments confidence that their recent initiatives and efforts to increase access to ADHD support and treatment may have positive downstream impacts on broader social outcomes. But medications aren't the only ADHD treatment. Medication should only represent one part of a solution, with other psychological supports for managing emotional regulation, executive and organisational skills and problem-solving also beneficial. Psychological therapies are effective and can be used in combination with, or separately from, medication. top videos View all Yet research shows drug treatments are relied on more frequently in more disadvantaged communities, where it's harder to access psychological supports. Policymakers need to ensure medication does not become the only treatment people have access to. People with suspected ADHD need a high-quality diagnostic assessment to ensure they get the right diagnosis and the treatment most suitable for them. (The Conversation) SKS GRS GRS (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 16, 2025, 12:45 IST News agency-feeds For people with ADHD, medication can reduce risk of accidents, crime, suicide Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
People who live past 100 have one thing in common, finds study
What makes some people live to see a full century while others don't? According to a Swedish published in GeroScience by researchers from the Karolinska Institute, a surprisingly simple clue may lie within the body, distinguishing future centenarians from the rest of the population. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Researchers tracked tens of thousands of older adults over several decades, observing patterns that hinted at exceptional longevity long before participants reached 100. While genetics, diet, exercise, and lifestyle factors continue to influence lifespan, the study found a consistent pattern in certain blood markers that strongly correlated with living past a century. These findings offer an intriguing glimpse into the biological secrets behind extraordinary longevity and could help guide future research on healthy aging. Key biomarkers linked to living past 100 The study analysed twelve blood markers connected to metabolism, inflammation, kidney and liver function, malnutrition, and anaemia. Researchers found that people who eventually reached 100 tended to have healthier, more balanced readings even in their 60s, suggesting that these biomarkers can provide early signals of exceptional longevity. Lower levels observed in future centenarians included: Glucose (blood sugar) Creatinine (kidney function) Uric acid (inflammation) AST/ALT (liver enzymes) Alkaline phosphatase (liver and bone health) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, tissue damage) Total iron-binding capacity (TIBC, nutrition status) Higher levels observed included: Iron Total cholesterol Researchers noted that the readings of future centenarians were rarely extreme. Instead, most had moderate, stable values, highlighting that a balance in these biomarkers, rather than unusually high or low figures, may be key to longevity. Interestingly, these patterns were remarkably consistent across individuals, suggesting a common physiological profile among those who achieve exceptional age. The findings also suggest that maintaining these markers within healthy ranges may reflect both genetic advantages and lifestyle factors, such as a balanced diet, regular physical activity, and effective management of chronic health conditions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This early physiological advantage, evident even decades before reaching 100, underscores the importance of midlife health as a foundation for long-term survival. How these markers can predict longevity All but two of the twelve biomarkers were found to have predictive power for reaching 100. Low iron or very low cholesterol appeared to reduce the likelihood, while stable kidney and liver markers, low uric acid, and low-normal blood glucose were strong indicators of longevity. Subtle differences in these measurements were often evident decades before the 100th birthday, highlighting the value of routine blood tests as a tool for assessing long-term survival prospects. Health and lifestyle in the journey to 100 Many future centenarians already displayed fewer chronic conditions and healthier overall profiles by their 60s. This suggests that both genetics and lifestyle factors—such as diet, exercise, and preventive healthcare—play important roles. Women represented roughly 85% of those who reached 100, reflecting broader global longevity trends. The combination of healthy blood markers and fewer health issues in midlife appears to set the stage for exceptional longevity. What it means for the rest of us The study's findings hint at a practical takeaway: monitoring and managing key physiological markers can offer insight into long-term survival prospects. Paying attention to glucose, cholesterol, iron, inflammation, and kidney and liver health—even later in life—may improve the odds of reaching a century. While genetics still matters, lifestyle and regular health monitoring appear to provide a real opportunity to influence how long and how well we live.