From Delhi's Majnu ka Tila, ‘herb trader' turned out to be international tiger trafficker on Interpol radar
The Interpol, however, believes Sherpa was a 'well-known international tiger trafficker and a key operative' in an organised criminal syndicate, 'trafficking tigers between India, Bhutan, Nepal and China'.
On January 24 last year, Sherpa, who had been absconding for the last eight years, was arrested by the Madhya Pradesh Police's Special Tiger Strike Force near Darjeeling, close to the India-Nepal border. Last month, Chief Judicial Magistrate Feroze Akhtar sentenced Sherpa to imprisonment for five years. He is currently lodged in the Hosangabad district jail.
David Caunter, Director of Interpol's Organised and Emerging Crime, has now reached out to the Madhya Pradesh government, seeking 'financial records, business details and interrogation records' of Sherpa. Caunter also offered Interpol's support to investigate the broader criminal network linked to Sherpa.
The investigation carried out by the Special Tiger Strike Force has revealed that Sherpa was a crucial international link in a wildlife trafficking network that systematically targeted tigers and pangolins and trafficked their parts into Chinese markets. Court documents reveal that Sherpa's trafficking ring was spread across parts of Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Sikkim, Nepal and China.
According to court documents, the network first came on the police radar on July 13, 2015, when 'Maniram and Gannu, mahouts patrolling on elephants, spotted 10 individuals' in the Karimat area of the Satpura Tiger Reserve. The mahouts chased the group on elephants, but they allegedly fled. The abandoned campsite yielded a crucial piece of evidence: three pangolin skulls in a bag.
Ten arrests followed on August 21, 2015, triggering confessions that mapped the spread of the network. Court documents show that two of the accused, Shrivas and Sakharam, allegedly admitted in February 2015 that they hunted a tiger, about 1-1.5 years old, near Gendi Nala in the Churna Range, close to the village of Sankai in Hoshangabad by poisoning a cow carcass with pesticide. They allegedly sold the tiger's skin and bones, besides some pangolin scales, to Farukh Miyan from Shahpur.
The call detail records of the accused led the investigators to J E Tamang and his partner Lachungpa Yangchen, who, according to the Tiger Strike Force, are 'international traders of wildlife parts and leaders of a large racket'. Bank records of the two revealed 'significant transactions' of over Rs 65 lakh in a space of 6-7 months.
It was Tamang's arrest on October 29, 2015 that allegedly exposed Sherpa's central role in the operation. Tamang told the investigators that his while his business involved selling herbs, 'he also illegally bought and sold tiger skins, bones, pangolin scales, and red sandalwood'.
Tamang said he was shown tiger bones when he visited a mutton shop owned by Sheikh Yunus in Itarsi district of Madhya Pradesh. A deal was struck, Tamang paid Yunus an advance of Rs 20,000 and instructed him to deliver 'the goods to New Delhi'.
Court records detail how, about 10-15 days later, Yunus arrived in New Delhi, allegedly carrying a bag with 12 kg of tiger bones and 9 kg of pangolin scales.
This is when Sherpa comes into the picture. In Delhi, Sherpa allegedly purchased the tiger bones from Yunus at Rs 12,000 a kg and the pangolin scales at Rs 7,000 a kg.
Court documents record that 'Sheikh Yunus returned to New Delhi in February 2015 with another large bag containing approximately 14 kg of tiger bones and 19 kg of pangolin scales.'
This second transaction was at a higher price. 'This time, he (Yunus) sold the tiger bones at Rs 14,000 per kilogram and the pangolin scales at Rs 8,000 per kilogram, earning a profit of Rs 1,500 per kilogram on tiger bones and Rs 500 per kilogram on pangolin scales…'
Tamang, out on bail in a separate case, has been absconding, with an Interpol Red Corner Notice against him. His partner Yangchen, who was arrested on September 15, 2017, allegedly told the investigators that between March and July 2022, Tamang travelled to Tamil Nadu and Kerala, and to Gadchiroli in Maharashtra in February 2023 to expand their network.
All along, they allegedly stayed in touch with Sherpa.
Ritesh Sirothia, who heads the MP State Tiger Strike Force, told The Indian Express, 'Sherpa set up one of the biggest wildlife parts smuggling operation in the country. He began his operations in 2010 and built his network in Madhya Pradesh, UP, Delhi, Sikkim, Nepal and China. He was operating this network from Majnu Ka Tila, selling tiger and pangolin parts. We have arrested 30 people in this case and his was the 29th arrest.'
The case ultimately involved 36 accused, with prosecution records showing that '29 have been arrested, and complaints have been filed against them'.
Statistics presented to the court in the aftermath of the case are stark. The prosecution has told the court that 308 cases of wildlife poaching were 'recorded in Narmadapuram alone and 171 cases of tiger poaching in Madhya Pradesh. Currently, only 785 tigers remain in Madhya Pradesh due to illegal poaching.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Rs 7.5 crore Ferrari ride comes to grinding halt in Bengaluru over tax evasion
Sometimes a fast ride leads straight to a parking spot you didn't ask for. A luxury Ferrari worth Rs 7.5 crore was seized by Bengaluru Road Transport Office (RTO) personnel after its owner was driving the supercar in the city, while having it registered in owner paid only Rs 20 lakh in road tax for the high-end sports car in the registered state, while in Karnataka the applicable tax would come to Rs 1.4 crore – a difference that caught the attention of officials intercepted the Ferrari near Lalbagh on Thursday morning. In an unusual move, after preliminary action, they transported the vehicle to the owner's residence and parked it in front of the property under official watch. Authorities gave the owner until Thursday evening to produce proper documents and clear the outstanding taxes. Failure to comply means the vehicle will be formally seized and legal action will follow under the Motor Vehicles owner is said to have paid Rs 1,41,59,041 and got the vehicle road tax system is among the highest in India. The state calculates road tax based on seating capacity, engine cubic capacity, fuel type, cost, weight, usage purpose, and vehicle age. A four-wheeler can face tax rates anywhere between 13 and 93 percent based on cost and age, though electric vehicles get a break at just 4 is reportedly one of the largest single-vehicle tax recoveries in recent memory in the state. The transport department has made it clear they're not slowing down their crackdown on luxury vehicles operating without valid tax Ferrari owner joins a growing club of luxury car enthusiasts who learnt their lesson against tax evasion the hard way. Back in February, the transport department seized 30 luxury cars, including Ferraris, Porsches, BMWs, Audis, Aston Martins and Range Rovers for tax evasion, with over 40 RTO officers involved in the operation.- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
ED raids 8 places in J'khand in money laundering case against Yogendra Sao
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted search and survey operations on Friday at eight locations in Jharkhand in connection with a money laundering investigation against former state minister Yogendra Sao, his family members, and associates. The raids have been underway since early morning in Jharkhand's Hazaribagh and Ranchi, based on an ongoing investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), official sources told ANI. The raid pertains to the "generation of substantial proceeds of crime through activities such as extortion, illegal sand mining, and land grabbing." Similar raids ED had conducted on March 12 last year at 20 locations in Ranchi and Hazaribagh related to Sao, Amba Prasad, MLA and their other family members and associates under the provisions of the PMLA in connection with a case related to criminal activities such as extortion, collection of levy, illegal sand mining and land grabbing. During the course of the search operation on March 12, 2024, an unexplained cash amount of approximately. Rs 35 lakhs, digital devices, fake stamps from circle offices and banks, and various incriminating documents, including handwritten receipts and diaries, were recovered and seized. Evidence related to illegal sand mining in the state of Jharkhand was also seized during the searches. "The proceeds of crime generated from such criminal activities have been identified to be acquired in cash and subsequently utilised for further business activities and for the purchase of several immovable properties," ED then said in a statement.
News18
41 minutes ago
- News18
Lawyer Suspended For Two Years Over Fake Rs 80,000 Court Fee Charged From Client
Last Updated: The three-member disciplinary committee also directed the advocate to pay Rs 25,000 as costs to the complainant within a month of receiving the order. In a disciplinary action against professional misconduct, the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) has suspended advocate Ranjeeta Vengurlekar from practising law for two years after finding her guilty of duping a client by charging a fictitious court fee of Rs 80,000. The three-member disciplinary committee — comprising Chairman Dr Uday Warunjikar and members Sangram Desai and Aniruddha Garge — also directed the advocate to pay Rs 25,000 as costs to the complainant within a month of receiving the order. The complaint was filed by Abhijeet Jagannath Zadokar, who alleged that Vengurlekar had taken Rs 80,000 from him under the pretext of paying court fees, but handed over a fraudulent receipt. He claimed that over time, he paid a total of Rs 1.5 lakh for legal services, and ultimately suffered financial losses to the tune of Rs 21 lakh due to the mishandling of his legal matter. The advocate denied all allegations, claiming that the money was partly her professional fee, and that the complainant had merely sought legal consultation from her office in Badlapur. She also denied any responsibility for the alleged financial losses suffered by the complainant. However, during the inquiry, the complainant stepped into the witness box and submitted detailed evidence, including WhatsApp exchanges and a Section 65B certificate authenticating the electronic records. The committee found that despite being served through post and even personally via messenger, neither Vengurlekar nor her lawyer appeared for the hearings after filing a brief written reply. The committee noted that the evidence submitted by the complainant had remained unchallenged throughout the proceedings, as the respondent failed to cross-examine or counter the claims. 'Bare perusal of the record goes to show that the complainant has proved his case about misconduct," the committee observed, holding that the receipt allegedly provided by the advocate for the Rs. 80,000 court fee was prima facie bogus. It added that although criminal action may also lie in such matters, the Bar Council's scope was limited to examining misconduct under Section 35 of the Advocates Act. The disciplinary body emphasized that while it was not passing any order on other prayers made by the complainant, it found sufficient grounds to impose a professional penalty. We are of the view that it would be appropriate to pass an order of suspension for period of two years, the order concluded. First Published:
