What's wrong with learning any Indian language?': Amid Hindi row, Devendra Fadnavis defends NEP's 3-language formula
A day after the Maharashtra government issued an amended order saying that Hindi will 'generally' be the third language, instead of being mandatory, for Class 1 to 5 students in Marathi- and English-medium schools in the state, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Wednesday defended the three-language formula, saying it was as per the National Education Policy (NEP).
'Earlier, we had made it mandatory to learn Hindi. Now we have removed the word mandatory. Now we have said that students can learn any other third Indian language. The three-language formula is as per the NEP,' Fadnavis told reporters in Dehu. Fadnavis was in the temple town to witness the Sant Tukaram Maharaj palkhi (palanquin) begin its journey to Pandharpur as part of the annual Pandharpur Wari festival.
Fadnavis said that as per the NEP, learning the mother tongue was mandatory, besides two other languages, including one Indian language. 'English is acceptable to all. The third will be any other Indian language. Earlier, we had said that the third language should be Hindi. Now we have removed the 'mandatory' clause. Students can learn any other third language, but there should be 20 students in a class. We will provide teachers. We will also provide online teaching,' he said.
'We are backing English but hating Indian languages. This is not appropriate. Indian languages are better than English…,' Fadnavis said.
The NEP has opened the door for making Marathi a global language, he added. 'Now, we are teaching engineering and medicine in Marathi. Even MBA is being taught in Marathi…The NEP has opened the door for making Marathi a global language, a knowledge language and a language of economics…The Maharashtra government has accepted it. And therefore, the opposition to it is not good. If you see, Marathi is mandatory in all schools while an alternative has been provided to Hindi,' he added.
Fadnavis's remarks came on a day when Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray had hit out at the government, saying that any move to impose Hindi on students would threaten the cultural and linguistic identity of the state.
On the opposition by MNS, Fadnavis said, 'I have spoken to MNS chief Raj Thackeray. He is insisting that there should be two languages, and the third language should not be imposed. I have tried to convince him that the central government in NEP has brought in a three-language formula. If there is a three-language formula across the country, then Maharashtra cannot have a two-language formula. The NEP is for the country. The government of Tamil Nadu has gone to court against the three-language formula, but the court has not accepted it.'
Fadnavis asked, 'What is wrong with learning any other Indian language? If it is done by sidelining Marathi, we can understand (the opposition). If our children learn any other language while learning Marathi, they will gain knowledge of the other language as well. The NEP has been prepared by experts…they have taken everything into consideration. It has been prepared scientifically after holding widespread discussions for three years.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
31 minutes ago
- Hans India
NCP Leader Slams Singapore Airlines For Delayed Condolences On Air India Crash
Former Civil Aviation Minister and NCP leader Praful Patel has strongly criticized Singapore Airlines for what he described as a belated and insincere response to the Air India flight AI171 tragedy in Ahmedabad, which resulted in the deaths of more than 270 people, including 241 passengers and crew members. Singapore Airlines, which holds a 25.1% stake in Air India, waited almost six days after the June 12 crash before releasing a public statement expressing condolences to the victims' families. The airline stated, "The Singapore Airlines (SIA) Group extends its deepest condolences to the families and loved ones of everyone affected by the devastating Air India flight AI171 accident," and assured ongoing support to Tata Sons and Air India during this difficult period. Patel, however, was not satisfied with the timing or tone of the statement. He took to social media to question why Singapore Airlines, as a significant shareholder with board representation and a CEO nominee in Air India, delayed its public response. He accused the airline of "paying lip service" and highlighted its "deafening silence" in the immediate aftermath of the disaster. The crash, involving a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner en route from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, also resulted in 29 fatalities on the ground, making it one of the deadliest incidents involving an Indian airline and the first fatal crash of the Boeing 787 model since its introduction. Patel further pointed out that Singapore Airlines is responsible for maintaining a large portion of Air India's wide-body fleet and questioned the lack of visible engagement from the airline following the tragedy. He also noted that Air India's CEO, Campbell Wilson, is a nominee of Singapore Airlines, intensifying expectations for a prompt and empathetic response. Meanwhile, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and Air India's internal safety board have launched investigations into the crash. The DGCA recently reported that no major safety concerns were found in Air India's Boeing 787 fleet, and maintenance systems were compliant with safety standards after a thorough review.
Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
One visit, many openings: At G7, a step forward in India-Canada ties
After much anxiety on both sides, India and Canada have finally begun to turn a new page in their bilateral relations. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to Canada for the G7 summit concluded with significant positives. His meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney, described by the latter as a 'foundational' step in rebuilding India-Canada relations, was crucial. Importantly, threats by some Sikh organisations to ambush PM Modi did not materialise at all, underscoring the resilience of diplomacy against disruptive elements. After the summit, Carney publicly acknowledged India's 'natural' and 'consistent' place at the G7 table, reflecting Canada's recognition of India's growing global stature and the Carney government's pragmatic resolve to address worsening bilateral ties. Carney emphasised India's importance, highlighting the 'size and dynamism of the Indian economy, Indian technology, and its role in a host of venues, G20 and beyond.' This recognition is central to India's perspective. As a proponent of making Canada an 'energy superpower', Carney lauded India's role in energy transition. At the Outreach Session, PM Modi reciprocated, underscoring the need for global energy security through sustainable and green pathways. He highlighted India's initiatives like the International Solar Alliance (ISA), the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI), and the Global Biofuels Alliance. Modi's consistent push for the Global South's concerns at such a high-profile forum further solidified India's role as their leading voice. PM Modi also reaffirmed India's stance against terrorism, urging G7 leaders to galvanise global action and pushing for strict measures against those who promote and support it. He briefed leaders on Operation Sindoor, carried out against terror infrastructure in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, demonstrating India's proactive stance. Discussions also focused on technology and innovation, particularly the AI-energy nexus and quantum-related issues, with PM Modi highlighting India's experience in democratising technology. Beyond the summit, PM Modi engaged in numerous bilateral meetings with other world leaders, expanding India's diplomatic outreach. Carney's realistic and encouraging description of their meeting as a 'foundation and necessary first step' conveyed a shared will to rebuild. PM Modi unequivocally communicated that, for India, national security and the fight against terrorism remain non-negotiable priorities. India's firm stance against any double standards in combating terrorism, underscores this commitment. This comes after a year of unprecedented tensions, marked by diplomatic expulsions and strained engagements stemming from the unresolved killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a designated Khalistani separatist. India has consistently denied involvement, attributing the crisis to Canada's perceived leniency towards extremist elements on its soil. The most tangible outcome is the agreement to restore the role of the high commissioners. Their absence had created a glaring void, impeding diplomatic functions and harming people-to-people and business ties. Reinstating these crucial diplomatic posts, alongside resuming senior and working-level engagements, is more than procedural; it signals a clear intent to restore normalcy and vital services. Both leaders affirmed the importance of open and forward-looking dialogue, stressing mutual respect, democratic values, sovereignty, and the rule of law, along with their commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. Stalled trade negotiations were also discussed. Negotiations are also underway to establish a joint working group on transnational crime. While Carney portrayed that as a starting point of the conversation, India sees this as a two-way street and demands accountability on Canada's side as well. Cooperation against transnational crime and terrorism demands genuine collaboration and a clear understanding of each other's security concerns. India has consistently provided evidence and sought action against elements promoting secessionism against India from Canadian soil. A relationship built on 'mutual respect' must inherently involve Canada addressing these core Indian concerns with seriousness and demonstrable action. Carney's concluding remark that 'there is a lot of work that needs to be done' resonates deeply in New Delhi. This visit is undeniably a positive development, a crucial first step on a path that promises to be long and arduous. It is not a magical cure for the deep-seated issues plaguing the relationship. Trust, once eroded, demands time and consistent effort to rebuild. The appointment of high commissioners is a vital beginning, but the real work of repairing trust and fostering deeper cooperation still lies ahead. The writer is assistant professor, Centre for the Study of the Americas, School of International Studies, JNU
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump repeats stopping India-Pak conflict: 'I love Pakistan, Modi a fantastic man'
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday once again reiterated his claim of stopping military actions between India and Pakistan in May. "I stopped the war between Pakistan and India," Donald Trump said, according to Reuters. Trump's remarks come a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi told the US president that the decision by India and Pakistan to halt military actions in May was made directly during talks between the armies of the two sides. In a 35-minute conversation, Modi also told Trump that India has never accepted mediation and will never do so. 'India has never accepted mediation, does not and will never do so', foreign secretary Vikram Misri said, speaking in Hindi. Misri said that the prime minister also made it clear to Trump that during the entire episode of the four days of military clashes between the two countries during May 7-10, issues such as the 'India-US trade deal or mediation by the US between India and Pakistan' were not discussed 'at no time [or] at any level'. The prime minister also told Trump that after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, India had conveyed its determination to take action against terrorism to the whole world. "India had also made it clear that any act of aggression from Pakistan would be met with a stronger response," the foreign secretary said. Misri said President Trump sought to know if Modi could visit the US on his way back from Canada. "Due to prior commitments, Prime Minister Modi expressed his inability to do so. Both leaders agreed to make efforts to meet in the near future," Misri said. Donald Trump was the first to announce the halting of hostilities between India and Pakistan on May 10. Since then, Trump has repteadly claimed that he got India and Pakistan to stop fighting and that he used the threat of stopping trade with both countries in these efforts.
