Car Deal of the Day: Hit the road in style with the electric BMW i4 for only £344 a month
Fun to drive; practical interior
Desirable M Sport model
Only £343.96 a month
BMW's i4 was an early challenger to the mighty Tesla Model 3, but despite its advancing years it's still a formidable rival. Badge appeal, a quality interior and fine driving dynamics all add up to a desirable electric saloon. Advertisement - Article continues below
Through the Auto Express Find A Car service, VIPGateway is offering the i4 for £343.96 a month right now. Naturally, there's an initial payment to sort first – here it's £4,477.46 – and this is a three-year deal, with a 5,000-mile-a-year cap.
If this is too limiting, then 8,000 miles a year can be had for the princely sum of £15.34 extra a month.
You'll be getting the smaller battery model, but at 70.3kWh, you should be able to achieve 300 miles
on a full charge, according to BMW.
Meanwhile, you can enjoy M Sport specification; easily the most desirable trim of the range, this brings a host of appealing extras such as racier styling, anthracite headlining, an M Sport leather steering wheel, 18-inch alloys and sports seats with 'M piping'.
The i4 is easily one of the finest electric saloons on the market, thanks to its agile handling and cosseting ride, and its sharp steering makes light work of twisty roads. And while it's often referred to as an electric saloon, it has a practical hatchback – something that the Tesla Model 3 can't boast of.
The Car Deal of the Day selections we make are taken from our own Auto Express Find A Car deals service, which includes the best current offers from car dealers and leasing companies around the UK. Terms and conditions apply, while prices and offers are subject to change and limited availability. If this deal expires, you can find more top BMW i4 leasing offers from leading providers on our BMW i4 hub page.
Check out the BMW i4 deal or take a look at our previous Car Deal of the Day selection here…
Find a car with the experts Electric car drivers won't ever go back to petrol or diesel
Electric car drivers won't ever go back to petrol or diesel
Editor Paul Barker thinks the EV transition is coming whether we like it or not Car Deal of the Day: Bag the iconic Volkswagen Golf GTI for under £300 a month
Car Deal of the Day: Bag the iconic Volkswagen Golf GTI for under £300 a month
It's arguably been the daddy for 50 years, and can be snatched for a low price right now. The VW Golf GTI is our Deal of the Day for 27 May The MG HS just got hot! New 221bhp Hybrid+ model joins line-up
The MG HS just got hot! New 221bhp Hybrid+ model joins line-up
The Hybrid+ gives the MG HS another tool to take on the Dacia Bigster
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Starmer: Wave of investments will make military an ‘integrated fighting machine'
The Prime Minister said he would invest in a military that is 'more integrated, more ready, more lethal than ever'. As part of the review, due to be published on Monday, the Government has pledged £1.5 billion to set up at least six factories, and will support the procurement of up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons. The move is in response to the review's call for an 'always on' munitions production capacity that could be scaled up quickly. Director of mechanical engineering Matt Beamont shows Defence Secretary John Healey a storm shadow missile (Dan Kitwood/PA) The new funding will see UK munitions spend hit £6 billion during this Parliament and support around 1,800 jobs throughout the country. Sir Keir called the review a 'radical blueprint' that would drive forward investments in shipbuilding, drone technology and cyber defences. Preparing for the threats of tomorrow means 'bringing together every capability we have, from drones, to artillery, to human instinct and intelligence, into one formidable, integrated fighting machine,' he wrote in The Sun. 'To achieve this, we are announcing a wave of new investments in our Armed Forces across land, air and sea.' He said Labour would end the 'disgraceful hollowing out' of the armed forces. 'We will invest in a fighting force that is more integrated, more ready, more lethal than ever — putting Britain back where it belongs as a leader in defence and a leader in Nato. 'We will provide better kit for our warriors when they are fighting abroad — so that they can use the full range of conventional and technological capabilities.' Defence Secretary John Healey said the Government would embrace the recommendations in the review and make defence an 'engine for economic growth'. It will urge the the Ministry of Defence to lay the industrial foundations to boost weapons stockpiles to meet the demand of 'high-tempo' warfare. More than £1.5 billion in extra funding will go to military homes in response to the review. The cash will be spent on urgent repairs such as fixing boilers and roofs, and other issues including tackling damp. 'Our forces make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe and to serve this country and yet for years, we've forced their families to live in substandard homes,' Mr Healey said on a visit to military accommodation in Cambridgeshire. The Conservatives criticised the investment in munitions factories as too slow. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Chancellor has used the strategic defence review to put an 'effective freeze' on new orders for military kit. 'It's a bit rich of Labour to talk about 'always on' munitions production when procurement has been largely switched off for the past year,' he said. He added: 'Of course, we welcome investment in new munitions factories, but we don't know when they will be ready, only that these orders should have been placed months ago. 'Ultimately, we need to see greater ambition for the pace and scale of rearmament our armed forces require, given the threats we face and the need to replace inventory gifted to Ukraine. 'That means 3% of GDP by the end of this parliament, and Labour properly prioritising defence spending – instead of seeking to outspend Reform on welfare.'
Times
37 minutes ago
- Times
Why a mid-retirement MoT can keep you on track
You get your car checked every year, and even the boiler gets a regular service — but when was the last time you gave yourself a money MoT? People are living longer than ever, and while this is a welcome development, it also presents a significant financial challenge: ensuring your pension pot can comfortably last the distance. For many people in their seventies, a mid-retirement MoT has become an essential part of managing their finances. By this stage, people tend to have settled into retirement and have a clear picture of their lifestyle and outgoings. This makes it easier to work out a sustainable rate at which to take money from their pension pot. Only 48 per cent of people aged between 65 and 75 are confident their savings will last their lifetime, according to a report by the insurance company Aviva and the charity Age UK. That's despite the fact that many people underestimate how long they will live. Many people assume that their spending patterns will be consistent through retirement, the survey of 1,000 people found. That's wrong — it is usually 'U-shaped', say experts, with higher initial outgoings, a potential decline in the middle years, and then a resurgence in later life, particularly if there are care costs. Romi Savova from the pension firm PensionBee said: 'Just as regular pension check-ins are essential before retirement, it is important to assess your income and spending once you're in retirement, and especially around the halfway point. 'A mid-retirement MoT is a good way to make sure your savings remain on track, particularly as your lifestyle, spending and health needs may have changed over time.' John Ford has planned meticulously. Ford, 73, has an inflation-linked defined benefit pension — which pays a guaranteed income — and a state pension, which together give him an annual income of about £36,000. He also has £340,000 in a defined contribution (DC) pension — which gives him a retirement income based on how well his investments perform — which he has barely touched. 'I am keeping it for emergencies and future medical bills,' Ford said. 'Last year I paid about £7,000 to remove cataracts at a private clinic as I didn't want to wait for a slot on the NHS. I also need some money to make some repairs to my property near Bristol.' Ford retired from his job as a surveyor in the construction industry in 2017, when he was 65. His wife, Carole, 70, retired four years ago and gets a state pension plus a small defined benefit pension, giving her an annual income of about £15,800. • Flip-flopping is chipping away at our faith in pensions Ford said: 'Luckily we have enough to live a decent lifestyle and our spending has not really changed much since we retired. However, we know we may need money later in life for care bills, which is what the DC pot is for.' Reviewing your finances once a year can help you to identify whether you need to rebalance your investments or make any adjustments to the amount that you are withdrawing, and to check that you are on track with your financial goals. Lucie Spencer from the wealth manager Evelyn Partners said: 'The early years of retirement are usually where most of the non-essential spending happens. For many people this is the first time they have had a substantial pot of money and total freedom to spend it as they wish. 'However, many do not plan for their later years. What will happen if they go into a care home or need support at home? Who will pay the bills if all their funds are spent? Will the state pension be enough to live on if they've exhausted all their savings? Such questions tend to become more pressing from the mid-seventies.' Withdrawing money from your pension is a fine balance — it needs to be enough to provide the lifestyle you want, without depleting your pot so fast that it runs out. A common guideline suggested by experts is to withdraw money at a rate of 4 per cent of the value of your pot per year. The idea is that since the rest is still invested, it should be able to replenish itself in time for the next withdrawal. Fidelity International, the wealth manager, analysed what happened to a £100,000 pension pot after ten years of withdrawals starting at 4 per cent a year and rising by 2 per cent each year to factor in inflation. Its analysis looked at withdrawals starting each year from 1994 to 2014 to see how much the pot would be worth after a decade. Based on a typical portfolio of 60 per cent global shares and 40 per cent in bonds, there were only three years (1999, 2000, and 2001) in which someone could have started taking annual income and been left with a pot worth less after a decade — in all other years the pot's value would have increased, even after ten years of withdrawals. For example, if someone had started making withdrawals of 4 per cent a year in January 2014, the value of their £100,000 pot would have grown to about £154,000 by January 2024. However, if they had started withdrawing in January 2000, the value of their pot would have fallen to £81,319 by January 2010, according to Fidelity's analysis. • Are you on track for your dream retirement? It is important to bear in mind that managing withdrawals can become problematic at times of stock market turmoil. When the market falls, so too does the value of your pot, as many savers experienced during the recent Trump tariff upheaval. Spencer said it was best to avoid withdrawing money at such times as it could mean locking in losses, and make it harder for the value of your pot to recover: 'During retirement if you are drawing down on your pension after a market shock, you could be selling investments at impaired values and that can deliver a serious blow to the longevity of your pot.' It is recommended that you have about a year's worth of spending, including bills, saved in cash which you can use instead during such times, allowing your investments to recover. An alternative to leaving your pot invested is to use some or all of it to buy an annuity, which provides a guaranteed income for life in exchange for a lump sum. Tom Selby from the investment platform AJ Bell said: 'Once you reach your seventies, you may start to consider whether drawdown is still the right option, or if using some of your fund for an annuity could be a good choice.' Life expectancy directly affects annuity rates — the longer you are expected to live, the lower the rate, because the income will have to paid out for a longer period. This means that if you buy an annuity later in life, you could get a higher income. A healthy 75-year-old with a £100,000 lump sum could secure an income of about £10,129 a year, according to the pension firm Just Group. That is about 30 per cent more than the £7,813 a 65-year-old is likely to get. Disclosing health or lifestyle factors that might reduce life expectancy, such as smoking or diabetes, could also mean you get a better rate. Shopping around for the best deal is always advised. Annuities do have drawbacks. The level of income is fixed so you may find it is not enough if your circumstances change, such as needing more money for care costs. You also forgo potential long-term investment growth, and unless you choose a policy that pays out to a surviving spouse, the income dies with you. A concern for older people in retirement is cognitive decline and the associated anxiety with technology, digital accounts, and a general loss of confidence in managing money, especially investments. It is important to arrange for someone to manage your money if you aren't able to do it yourself. 'I recommend all clients have a power of attorney in place in case they do start to lose mental capacity,' Spencer said. • Do I need to update my power of attorney? A lasting power of attorney is an official document that gives someone the authority to manage your financial and medical interests if you are no longer capable. There are two types of power of attorney — ordinary and lasting. The first is used as a temporary measure, for example if you are overseas and cannot do it yourself. The lasting power of attorney comes in two forms — health and welfare, and property and finance. One allows someone to make medical decisions on your behalf, while the other covers your money. It is usually advisable to have both. You can apply for both at the same time and must have them in place while you still have the mental capacity to give someone the authority to act for you. The forms can be downloaded from and each costs £82. You get a 50 per cent discount if your pre-tax income is less than £12,000 a year.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Conclave author reveals Ralph Fiennes was third choice for lead role in Oscar nominated film - behind two other A-list Hollywood actors
His acclaimed performance as a liberal cardinal in Conclave secured him an Oscar nomination – but Ralph Fiennes was not the first choice for the part. Both Hollywood legend Robert de Niro and Spanish star Javier Bardem were in line to take the lead role, author Robert Harris has revealed. But negotiations with both actors' representative broke down, opening the way for 62-year-old Fiennes. His casting also meant a change to his character. In Harris's original 2016 novel, the dean of the council of cardinals was an Italian called Jacopo Baldassare Lomeli. But once Fiennes was cast, he became the English Cardinal Thomas Lawrence. The author told the Hay-on-Wye literary festival: 'For a long time, Robert De Niro was supposed to play the Fiennes role, but that fell through, and then Javier Bardem was supposed to do it.' But again a deal could not be struck, so producers turned to Fiennes, best known for playing evil Lord Voldemort in the Harry Potter blockbusters and M in the Bond films. It was Fiennes and director Edward Berger who decided to change the character's nationality, Harris revealed. 'They came to lunch and told me they wanted to change the nationality of Cardinal Lomeli, because Ralph wanted to play an Englishman. I looked across the table and thought, ''Do I really want to lose Ralph Fiennes?'' And of course, it doesn't make any difference at all.' Harris – whose other bestselling novels include Fatherland and Enigma – also told the Hay audience that film producers had been circling around his novel before he had finished writing it. But after the initial clamour, the executives decided to hold back the film's release – which turned out to be fortuitous as it ended up in cinemas just before the real Vatican conclave to select Pope Francis's successor. Harris, 68, said: 'They sat on it for a year to prevent it being swamped by other films, which was a stroke of genius as it got a lot of attention. There was this rolling interest in conclaves, and I found myself peculiarly having written a primer on conclaves.' Among those who watched the film this year was American Cardinal Robert Prevost, who saw it just before the conclave voted him to become Pope, subsequently taking the name Leo XIV. Conclave, which also starred Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow and Isabella Rossellini, was nominated for eight Academy Awards, but secured only the Oscar for best adapted screenplay for Peter Straughan's script. Two Oscar voters later told trade magazine Variety that they hadn't backed Fiennes as they wrongly believed he had won the award before.
