Potholes are bankrupting Indianapolis. New state funding won't help.
A lot of folks are celebrating the passage of House Bill 1461, which gives Indianapolis access to up to $50 million in additional state road funding. But before we pop the champagne, let's be honest: This bill doesn't solve our problem. It puts lipstick on a pig.
HB 1461 provides two funding paths. First, it allows the city to raise the local wheel tax, but Indianapolis isn't maxing out the current rate and Mayor Joe Hogsett's administration has previously said it won't raise the wheel tax.
Second, the bill offers $50 million in state money, but only if the city can match it with new revenue. There's a catch: That match can't come from existing infrastructure or public safety budgets, which already make up most of the city's spending. So, we'd have to either defund other services or raise taxes. And, even then, the money can't be used on greenways, sidewalks or bike lanes to reduce our oversized streets.
In other words, we're being asked to double down on the same overbuilt, underfunded road network that got us here in the first place.
A lot of road and little to no return
The real issue in Indianapolis isn't that we spend too little on roads; it's that we've built too many of them. We've stretched infrastructure across a landscape that doesn't generate enough tax revenue to support it.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
This started decades ago. In the 1970s and '80s, the city expanded rapidly under Unigov, pouring money into widening arterials like Shadeland and Emerson avenues. But the development that followed, mostly low-density, single-use housing, doesn't pay the bills.
Take a single-family home on a large lot. It needs roads, sewers, water, streetlights, trash pickup, fire protection and maybe even a school bus stop. But it only contributes a few thousand dollars a year in property taxes, nowhere near enough to cover the costs of service.
Multiply that pattern citywide and you get the math problem: long-term infrastructure liabilities that are not supported by surrounding properties. The way we've built is financially imprudent.
Now, imagine that same parcel with an attached duplex or a micro-retail store or small apartment. Same infrastructure, more tax revenue. More people helping to pay for the street they use. Less long-term maintenance liability.
Instead of encouraging this kind of efficient growth, our zoning code locks over 80% of Indianapolis into low-return land uses. In most of Marion County, it's still illegal to build anything but a single-family house. That's a policy choice and it's bankrupting our city one pothole at a time.
A broken tax system makes it worse
Just as our costs are ballooning, our ability to raise money is shrinking.
Earlier this year, the Indiana General Assembly passed Senate Bill 1, capping property tax revenue growth for local governments. It's a budget squeeze that will hit every city in the state, but especially one like Indianapolis, already struggling to pay for the system it has.
Indiana uses a three-tier property tax cap: roughly 1% for owner-occupied homes, 2% for rentals and farmland, and 3% for commercial and mixed-use properties. But, because we zone so much of the city for low-yield residential use, we're blocking the higher-return development that could help fund our streets, parks and public safety.
Urban3's land-use analysis conducted for IndyGo showed this clearly: most parcels in Indianapolis cost more to serve than they return in taxes. Our property tax ecosystem makes that imbalance worse.
So, here's the question: Is saving $300 on your tax bill really worth blowing a tire every spring?
The funding formula is pitted against us
Even if we could fix our land-use and tax system overnight, we'd still be fighting an uphill battle because Indiana funds roadwork in a fundamentally flawed way.
The state allocates money based on lane miles, not traffic volume. So, a four-lane arterial in Indy is treated the same as a two-lane local road in Kokomo. That encourages overbuilding and punishes efficient design.
Indianapolis is funded as if it has about 3,300 lane miles, but in reality we maintain more than 8,000. That's 5,000 miles of road we're responsible for, with no funding to back it up.
HB 1461 doesn't fix this. It just patches over the gap without asking why the hole exists.
We need a smarter way forward
If a household is struggling to pay its bills, it has two options: Make more money, or reduce expenses. Cities are no different.
We can't just keep paving our way out of this. Raising taxes is politically unpopular, and cutting roads sparks backlash. But there's a third option: Allow property owners to do more with their land.
When we let people build more housing, small businesses or mixed-use projects, we get more value out of the infrastructure we already have. That's revenue without raising tax rates and growth without adding costs. HB 1461 simply treats the symptoms and not the disease.
Hicks Braun cut taxes for businesses, but most Hoosiers will pay more
The administration has said it isn't concerned about what's in the bill; only that it's passed. That's not good enough. We need to ask why we're in this hole in the first place. HB 1461 solves the short-term funding issue by throwing more money at an inefficient system and then makes it illegal to change that system. Then, it takes away the flexibility we need to grow smarter.
If we're serious about fixing our roads, we need to fix our development code too. That means liberalizing zones, simplifying permitting, and encouraging land uses that pull their financial weight that justify and support our roadways.
We need to stop treating infrastructure as a cost to absorb and start treating it like an investment that has to earn a return.
HB 1461 feels like throwing money down a well expecting to get water — you lose your money, and you're still left with a giant hole.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump's move toward using the military on US soil is so fraught
The country hangs on a hugely significant precipice, as President Donald Trump moves toward making good on his long-running suggestions of an extraordinary step: deploying the military on US soil. About 700 Marines have now been mobilized to join the National Guard in Los Angeles to deal with demonstrations over federal immigration raids, CNN reports. The Marines were previously on 'ready to deploy' status. (It is still unclear what their specific task will be once in Los Angeles, sources told CNN. And like the National Guard troops, they are prohibited from conducting law enforcement activity such as making arrests unless Trump invokes the Insurrection Act.) But to hear the White House tell it, this show of force is not just the right thing to do but also a political winner. Responding to a poll showing 54% of Americans approved of Trump's deportation program, White House spokesman Steven Cheung wrote on X Sunday, 'And the approval number will be even higher after the national guard was sent to LA to beat back the violence this weekend.' But whether the American people actually want this military activation isn't nearly so clear. In fact, they've rejected such things in the past. The administration may be making a huge gamble on the American people's tolerance for a heavy-handed federal response. And while Americans might not have much sympathy for the demonstrators in Los Angeles who engage in violence or for undocumented immigrants, recent surveys have shown they often say Trump goes too far in his attempts to address such problems. There is something of an analog for the current situation. It came in 2020 when federal law enforcement suddenly moved to clear Lafayette Square, near the White House, of racial justice demonstrators, resulting in violent scenes. This wasn't the military, but it was controversial – in part because Trump then walked across the square with military leaders for a photo-op. (Then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper also resisted Trump's suggestions of using active-duty military at the time.) The American people did not like what they saw. A USA Today/Ipsos poll conducted a week later showed 63% of Americans opposed the use of rubber bullets and tear gas that day. It also showed Americans opposed deploying military forces in other states by 10 points, 51-41%. Similarly a CNN poll conducted by SSRS at the time asked a broader question – whether it would be appropriate for a president to 'deploy the U.S. military in response to protests in the United States.' Americans said this would be 'inappropriate' by a wide margin, 60-36%. All of which suggest Americans are predisposed to viewing such actions skeptically. These numbers come with caveats, though. The CNN poll question is a great window into how this could be received. But it's possible people's views have shifted or could shift with circumstances, including the role the Marines end up playing in Los Angeles. Back in 2020, the racial justice protests were relatively popular, and people didn't view them as particularly violent. Americans sympathized with the cause, believing George Floyd had been murdered by police. It's too early to tell how people view the demonstrators in Los Angeles. And the plight of the undocumented immigrants whom the administration is trying to deport is probably less sympathetic than the racial justice protesters' cause. (Clear majorities generally support deporting undocumented immigrants, who are in this country without authorization.) But when it comes to the administration's immigration crackdown, Americans have also expressed nuanced feelings. And the poll the White House cited this weekend is a case in point. In the CBS News/YouGov survey, which was conducted before Saturday's protests broke out in Los Angeles, Americans said they approved of Trump's deportation program, 54-46%. They also liked its 'goals,' 55-45%. But that's not quite the same as saying they approved of the administration's actions, full stop. The same poll asked whether people liked 'the way you think [Trump] is going about' the deportations. And there, Americans actually disliked his approach by double-digits, 56-44%. While independents were about evenly split on Trump's deportation program, they disliked how he's gone about it by 30 points, 65-35%. This is a dichotomy we see in lots of polling of Trump's deportation actions. Americans like the idea of mass deportation, but not so much the implementation. They like the president a lot on securing the border. But they like him significantly less on 'immigration,' and they like him even less when 'deportation,' specifically, is invoked in the question. One possible reason: Americans see the administration moving haphazardly. That could most notably be the case with things like deporting the wrong people and actions that have been halted by the courts, including ones in which judges have said people haven't been given enough due process. It's possible that people could come to sympathize with the cause of the Los Angeles protesters – if not the violent ones – at least to some degree. While Americans generally favor mass deportation, those numbers decline significantly when you mention the prospect of deporting otherwise-law-abiding people with jobs and those who have been in this country for a long time. (For example, a recent Pew Research Center poll showed Americans opposed deporting undocumented immigrants who have jobs, 56-41%, and they opposed deporting the parents of US citizen children 60-37%.) But the raids that set off the protests have been directed at workplaces generally – not necessarily at criminals or gang members. The Department of Homeland Security has claimed at least five of the people arrested during Sunday immigration sweeps in Los Angeles had criminal convictions or were accused of crimes. Through it all, the administration has made a rather Machiavellian political calculation: that however much people dislike the means, their support for the ends will carry the day. Maybe people say they don't like the lack of due process the administration has provided – or the wrong people getting sent to a brutal Salvadoran prison – but how much do they really care if the end result is lots of deportations? Similarly, the administration could be making the calculation that scenes of violence in Los Angeles could marshal support for a previously unthinkable step of deploying the military domestically against protesters – something Americans opposed by 24 points just five years ago. So much depends on what the Marines end up doing in Los Angeles and whether Trump invokes the Insurrection Act to allow them to engage in policing activities. But the Trump administration has clearly gone too far for people before as part of their deportation efforts. And the one big crackdown on protesters we have seen in the Trump era didn't go well. This would appear pretty fraught – not just practically, but politically.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bishop Budde hopes Pride Month can be ‘antidote' to ‘unnecessarily hurtful' rhetoric
Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde, who asked that President Trump 'have mercy' on LGBTQ children and immigrants during a prayer service he attended in January, says she hopes Pride Month celebrations this year help LGBTQ people heal from months of amped-up speech and policies targeting their identities. 'I pray that it is a really joyful, inspiring gathering where people feel safe, where they feel seen, where they feel supported, where they can laugh and learn,' Budde said about Pride in an interview with USA Today published Monday. 'Maybe it is a good antidote to some of the meaner rhetoric that has been unnecessarily hurtful. And just be a balm for people. We all need that.' Budde, the Episcopal leader for the Washington area, made national headlines when she used a prayer service following Trump's inauguration to make a direct plea to the president — who sat in the first pew of the National Cathedral with first lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance and second lady Usha Vance — on behalf of 'people in our country who are scared now.' 'There are gay, lesbian and transgender children in Democratic, Republican and independent families, some who fear for their lives,' Budde said during the service. She said most immigrants, even those without proper documentation, were good neighbors, and the vast majority are 'not criminals.' She told ABC's 'The View' in the days following her sermon that she would welcome a one-on-one conversation with Trump but would not apologize, as he demanded in a lengthy post on Truth Social. 'I am not going to apologize for asking for mercy for others,' Budde said. Since returning to office in January, Trump has signed several executive orders directly targeting transgender Americans, including one he issued on his first day declaring that the U.S. recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female, and prohibiting spending on 'gender ideology.' Other orders aim to bar transgender people from serving openly in the military, end federal support for gender-affirming care for minors and ban transgender girls from participating in girls' and women's sports. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last week that Trump has 'no plans' to issue a proclamation recognizing Pride Month this year. Budde told USA Today that Pride and its message of community and acceptance carries an 'urgency' with it this year. 'It feels as if there are some values, some accomplishments, some strides that are being called into question, and a fairly aggressive effort on the part of many to take away some of the things that have been so hard fought for,' she said. 'It's both a time of celebration and a reminder that this is who we are, and these are our beloved and this is who we stand with.' 'There seems to be a lot to be gained by keeping us divided and to project really false statements onto whole groups of people. That has not stopped, which is just worrisome and a bit heartbreaking,' Budde said. 'This is not, for me, a partisan thing. But I do want to constantly stand for and remind people of the values that are bedrock to me as a person of faith, but also to our country and to emphasize that we have far more in common with one another than we differ.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
El Pollo Loco opening new restaurants in multiple western states. Here's where.
Foodies wanting to grab a Pollo Bowl, tacos, or other menu items from El Pollo Loco will soon have new restaurants in six states, including Colorado and Texas. The Mexican-style restaurant is based in California but plans to open at least 10 restaurants in 2025 in other states, an El Pollo Loco spokesperson confirmed on May 30. That includes the company's 500th restaurant, which is set for Colorado Springs, Colorado. According to the company, it's the largest system-wide expansion since 2022. According to the spokesperson, the new additions will be constructed based on the company's new store design, which was unveiled in October 2024 as El Pollo Loco neared its 50th anniversary. New restaurants will feature updated branding elements, upgraded furniture and lighting, energy-efficient hoods and HVAC. So far in 2025, El Pollo Loco has opened two new locations, both of them in California: one in Los Banos and another in Lompoc. However, the company spokesperson said most future locations opening in 2025 are set for markets outside of California, including Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Texas, and Washington. The spokesperson said the company plans to open new locations in 2026 as well, including some in nontraditional locations like airports and university campuses. Customers can expect to see locations open in 2026 or later in states like California, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and more. El Pollo Loco serves chicken that's marinated using citrus and spices, then fire-grilled over a low flame for 60 minutes, as well as hand-smashed guacamole, salsa fresca and avocado salsa using real tomatoes, cilantro, and onion, according to its website. Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Email her at sdmartin@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: El Pollo Loco opening locations in six states this year. Here's where.