logo
Potholes are bankrupting Indianapolis. New state funding won't help.

Potholes are bankrupting Indianapolis. New state funding won't help.

A lot of folks are celebrating the passage of House Bill 1461, which gives Indianapolis access to up to $50 million in additional state road funding. But before we pop the champagne, let's be honest: This bill doesn't solve our problem. It puts lipstick on a pig.
HB 1461 provides two funding paths. First, it allows the city to raise the local wheel tax, but Indianapolis isn't maxing out the current rate and Mayor Joe Hogsett's administration has previously said it won't raise the wheel tax.
Second, the bill offers $50 million in state money, but only if the city can match it with new revenue. There's a catch: That match can't come from existing infrastructure or public safety budgets, which already make up most of the city's spending. So, we'd have to either defund other services or raise taxes. And, even then, the money can't be used on greenways, sidewalks or bike lanes to reduce our oversized streets.
In other words, we're being asked to double down on the same overbuilt, underfunded road network that got us here in the first place.
A lot of road and little to no return
The real issue in Indianapolis isn't that we spend too little on roads; it's that we've built too many of them. We've stretched infrastructure across a landscape that doesn't generate enough tax revenue to support it.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
This started decades ago. In the 1970s and '80s, the city expanded rapidly under Unigov, pouring money into widening arterials like Shadeland and Emerson avenues. But the development that followed, mostly low-density, single-use housing, doesn't pay the bills.
Take a single-family home on a large lot. It needs roads, sewers, water, streetlights, trash pickup, fire protection and maybe even a school bus stop. But it only contributes a few thousand dollars a year in property taxes, nowhere near enough to cover the costs of service.
Multiply that pattern citywide and you get the math problem: long-term infrastructure liabilities that are not supported by surrounding properties. The way we've built is financially imprudent.
Now, imagine that same parcel with an attached duplex or a micro-retail store or small apartment. Same infrastructure, more tax revenue. More people helping to pay for the street they use. Less long-term maintenance liability.
Instead of encouraging this kind of efficient growth, our zoning code locks over 80% of Indianapolis into low-return land uses. In most of Marion County, it's still illegal to build anything but a single-family house. That's a policy choice and it's bankrupting our city one pothole at a time.
A broken tax system makes it worse
Just as our costs are ballooning, our ability to raise money is shrinking.
Earlier this year, the Indiana General Assembly passed Senate Bill 1, capping property tax revenue growth for local governments. It's a budget squeeze that will hit every city in the state, but especially one like Indianapolis, already struggling to pay for the system it has.
Indiana uses a three-tier property tax cap: roughly 1% for owner-occupied homes, 2% for rentals and farmland, and 3% for commercial and mixed-use properties. But, because we zone so much of the city for low-yield residential use, we're blocking the higher-return development that could help fund our streets, parks and public safety.
Urban3's land-use analysis conducted for IndyGo showed this clearly: most parcels in Indianapolis cost more to serve than they return in taxes. Our property tax ecosystem makes that imbalance worse.
So, here's the question: Is saving $300 on your tax bill really worth blowing a tire every spring?
The funding formula is pitted against us
Even if we could fix our land-use and tax system overnight, we'd still be fighting an uphill battle because Indiana funds roadwork in a fundamentally flawed way.
The state allocates money based on lane miles, not traffic volume. So, a four-lane arterial in Indy is treated the same as a two-lane local road in Kokomo. That encourages overbuilding and punishes efficient design.
Indianapolis is funded as if it has about 3,300 lane miles, but in reality we maintain more than 8,000. That's 5,000 miles of road we're responsible for, with no funding to back it up.
HB 1461 doesn't fix this. It just patches over the gap without asking why the hole exists.
We need a smarter way forward
If a household is struggling to pay its bills, it has two options: Make more money, or reduce expenses. Cities are no different.
We can't just keep paving our way out of this. Raising taxes is politically unpopular, and cutting roads sparks backlash. But there's a third option: Allow property owners to do more with their land.
When we let people build more housing, small businesses or mixed-use projects, we get more value out of the infrastructure we already have. That's revenue without raising tax rates and growth without adding costs. HB 1461 simply treats the symptoms and not the disease.
Hicks Braun cut taxes for businesses, but most Hoosiers will pay more
The administration has said it isn't concerned about what's in the bill; only that it's passed. That's not good enough. We need to ask why we're in this hole in the first place. HB 1461 solves the short-term funding issue by throwing more money at an inefficient system and then makes it illegal to change that system. Then, it takes away the flexibility we need to grow smarter.
If we're serious about fixing our roads, we need to fix our development code too. That means liberalizing zones, simplifying permitting, and encouraging land uses that pull their financial weight that justify and support our roadways.
We need to stop treating infrastructure as a cost to absorb and start treating it like an investment that has to earn a return.
HB 1461 feels like throwing money down a well expecting to get water — you lose your money, and you're still left with a giant hole.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Trump overblown the threat of protests? Residents, local officials say yes.
Has Trump overblown the threat of protests? Residents, local officials say yes.

USA Today

time6 hours ago

  • USA Today

Has Trump overblown the threat of protests? Residents, local officials say yes.

Has Trump overblown the threat of protests? Residents, local officials say yes. President Trump has deployed thousands of troops to the nation's second-largest city. Are they really necessary? Show Caption Hide Caption Los Angeles residents take pride in their city amid ICE protests USA TODAY spoke with Los Angeles residents about recent ICE raids and protests. LOS ANGELES ‒ President Donald Trump's deployment of thousands of troops to the nation's second-largest city has unleashed indignation and anger among residents and local officials who say the threat of immigration protests has been dramatically overblown by the White House. "The implication is that Donald Trump is waging a war on us personally," said protester Charlie Knowlton, 30. Immigration agents carrying out Trump's goal of deporting 1 million undocumented immigrants annually sparked a series of sometimes-violent protests in the greater Los Angeles area. A small mob set multiple vehicles and a palm tree on fire, threw rocks and fireworks at police in downtown Los Angeles on June 7 and June 8 as thousands of non-violent protesters watched and occasionally cheered. Trump has dispatched 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, arguing that local law enforcement is overwhelmed. Few of those troops are actually on the streets, however. "If I didn't 'send in the troops' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great city would be burning to the ground right now …" Trump said in a June 10 post on his social media site Truth Social. The Los Angeles Police Department alone has about 9,000 officers to serve the city of nearly 4 million people sprawling across a land area that's one-third the size of Rhode Island. The larger Los Angeles metro area has more than 18 million residents and covers an area nearly the size of Maine. Local authorities say they have detained about 150 people in connection to the unrest that left small areas of the 5.8-square mile downtown marred with pervasive graffiti and a few broken windows. No serious injuries have been reported. The nightly protests are still being handled primarily by the Los Angeles Police Department and other local law enforcement officers. The graffiti criticizes Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, and more broadly raises concerns that the country is careening toward a fascist state. Some of California's leaders have accused Trump of using the protests as a pretext to strengthen federal control, especially in a state whose leadership he has long battled. Invoking the memory of Jan. 6 On June 10, Knowlton joined thousands of protesters as they marched around downtown, chanting slogans and criticizing Trump and his immigration-enforcement plans. Some waved the national flags of Mexico or El Salvador, while others carried upside-down American flags, a traditional distress symbol previously used by right-wing groups during the Biden administration. "We all know this is a power grab," Knowlton said before taking a selfie in front of a line of LAPD officers in riot gear. "What I want right now is for the city police to grow a spine and stand up to the feds." Knowlton, a professional musician wearing a sarape adorned with an eagle, carried a sign aimed squarely at Trump: "Marines!! Where were U Jan 6?" Like many protesters, Knowlton said he found it infuriating that Trump refused to call out the National Guard during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol, and then pardoned the people who violently breached the building and attacked Capitol police officers. "It's funny that you can send the Marines in for some fireworks but you can kill a police officer in D.C. and get a pardon," Knowlton said. An 'experiment' to displace local control? While some people set off large fireworks that echoed around buildings and a few threw water bottles, most of the protesters remained peaceful, although they were occasionally redirected by local police with pepper-ball guns when they got too close to protected buildings like the police headquarters. Many federal buildings in the area, including courthouses and office buildings, were unprotected and targeted with graffiti. On June 11, Mayor Karen Bass said she believes her city is "an experiment" for White House officials in learning how to displace local control. Trump called up the National Guard over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who promptly sued to stop him, calling it "an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." In turn, Trump suggested that Newsom could be arrested. "I feel like we've all been in Los Angles a part of a grand experiment to see what happens when the federal government decides they want to roll up on a state or roll up on a city and take over," Bass said. "It's a sense of intimidation and fear that is just so unnecessary and so corrosive to our city." A city of immigrants Across the city, community members worry that the Marines and National Guard will dangerously escalate any violence that does occur. Trump has promised that anyone who assaults a federal officer or member of the military will face swift punishment. One-third of Los Angeles County residents were born in another country and nearly one in 10 lack documentation to remain legally. But many of those undocumented parents have children who were born American citizens, making Trump's aggressive immigration enforcement unwelcome in this city of immigrants. Retired teacher Jose "Bear" Gallegos, 61, who attended protests in the city of Paramount on June 7, said he was angry that California National Guard troops had been called up by Trump over Newsom's objections. Carrying rifles, the guard members spent Monday and Tuesday controlling access to the Paramount Business Center, which Gallegos said is home to a small federal detention said he was among the protesters hit with pepper-ball rounds, and drew a contrast between the armed troops and unarmed protesters worried about family and community members."We don't have guns. All we have is prayers and feathers," he said. Former Los Angeles deputy district attorney Alfonso Estrada said introducing more federal troops to what is effectively a law-enforcement situation may further exacerbate tensions with protesters, but also with local police who didn't ask for that help.'It also creates an awkward jurisdictional issue for local law enforcement agencies and their members who now have the national guard and U.S. Marine Corps operating in their jurisdiction,' said Estrada, now in private practice as a partner at the California-based law firm Hanson Bridgett LLP. Estrada added: 'The unnecessary and provocative acts of the executive branch endanger both the general public and local law enforcement officers who will bear the brunt of the political backlash and anger that Los Angelenos are feeling for the executive branch targeting its immigrant community and population without due process."

Hogsett says he won't resign as fallout continues from investigation, late-night texts to women
Hogsett says he won't resign as fallout continues from investigation, late-night texts to women

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hogsett says he won't resign as fallout continues from investigation, late-night texts to women

Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett said June 10 he has no intention of stepping down despite calls by multiple members of the City-County Council for his resignation. The mayor is dealing with fallout from an investigation about how he handled sexual harassment allegations in his office by his former chief of staff, and a revelation about his own late-night, personal texts to two younger women who said they felt uncomfortable receiving the messages. Hogsett spoke with IndyStar over the phone the day after an explosive City-County Council meeting where his former deputy campaign manager Lauren Roberts was forcibly dragged out of council chambers by sheriff's deputies while trying to speak during the public comment portion of the meeting. Roberts has alleged Hogsett's former right-hand-man Thomas Cook sexually harassed and abused her about a decade ago while the two worked on Hogsett's first mayoral campaign. Two other women have said they were sexually harassed or assaulted by Cook, who served as chief of staff and helped lead Hogsett's campaigns, while he was their boss over the period of about a decade. More: 'I kept saying no': Women accuse top Hogsett aide of preying on subordinates for years Cook also had a relationship with another subordinate city worker, which led to him resigning from the city back in 2020. Hogsett allowed Cook to stay on for 68 days and resign despite a recommendation from the city's human resources director that he be fired immediately. Hogsett responded to several questions IndyStar raised, including about the texts he sent to younger women, which he acknowledged made them uncomfortable. In the same conversation, he categorically denied a city-county councilor's allegation that he was "visibly impaired" during a meeting in 2024. The mayor also said people have lost sight of the most important issues that he wanted to tackle during the remainder of his third term, which ends in 2028. The transcript of the interview is below. It's been edited for brevity and clarity. IndyStar: Three councilors at this point have called for your resignation. Do you think you can effectively lead the city under these circumstances? Hogsett: Yes I do, and I certainly have no intent to resign. We just have still so much important work to do, not only to ensure the confidentiality and the safety of every employee, but my focus and that of the administration for the remainder of my term will be on the promises that we made to create economic and social vitality and growth for the people of Indianapolis. So there's a lot more that needs to be done, and I'm ready to roll up my sleeves and get about the business of the next two and a half years. IndyStar: You recently said that Cook didn't work with anyone on your 2023 mayoral campaign, but Mirror Indy reported that there's evidence that Cook did work with people directly during your campaign. Why did you say the opposite? Hogsett: Well, I think what I said was that Thomas Cook was an unpaid political adviser on my campaign until I became aware of Caroline Ellert's concerns and her complaints about Thomas Cook. My comment was about his contact with city employees after we removed him in September of 2023. IndyStar: You indicated to Fisher Phillips investigators that you didn't know any personal details about Lauren Roberts, but the text messages between the two of you make it appear that you do know personal details about her, including her then-partner's name and calling her "feisty." What happened there? Hogsett: I didn't recall during the course of my conversation with the folks from Fisher Phillips. I didn't recall. It's been, with respect, 12 years ago or 11 years ago, and how I answered that question in the conversation and the interview that they conducted with me, I stand corrected obviously. But my point is this: I did not intentionally mislead anyone. I may not have recalled it during the course of the interview. The interview itself was over five hours long, so there was a lot of questions and answers in that interview. But that would be my explanation for whatever discrepancies may appear after the fact. IndyStar: Do you think that you acted over the line with Lauren Roberts or Caroline Ellert in the text messages that they provided to investigators? Hogsett: Um, well, I would respond to that question by saying that governing a city and campaigning for that matter has become a 24-hour endeavor. And frankly, I think it has become easier to develop a casual conversation style with those who you happen to work very closely with. And I worked very closely with Caroline Ellert, certainly, during the course of my awareness and knowledge of her. She was an adviser to me. She was the Marion County Democratic Party executive director, so I relied on her and asked for her advice probably with some frequency. Now, I want to be clear, I do understand — even though it was not my intention to make anyone uncomfortable — I do understand now how my words could have been taken out of context. IndyStar: Did you have a habit of texting younger employees personal matters? Are these the only text messages out there, or do you think there are other instances in which you texted other younger women about things such as poetry or their boyfriends? Hogsett: I did not make it a habit of texting anybody in particular at any particular point in time. I'm simply underscoring the fact that I think that most people who work in government and who work on campaigns in particular are used to a 24-hour cycle. That may strike others who go to bed every night at 9 o'clock and get up at 7 o'clock in the morning, that may strike them as odd, but it was not my intent to cause anybody any discomfort or make them feel uncomfortable. It was simply, at least in the case of Caroline Ellert, that I have a greater memory of because it is more recent, it was never my intent to make her feel uncomfortable. But I do in retrospect understand how that may have been something that I change. IndyStar: One of the big points that Fisher Phillips noted was that Cook was allowed to resign more than two months after a recommendation that he be fired back in 2020. Why did you allow him to resign after 68 days? Hogsett: It was based on the information that I was working with at the time. That's the way all my decisions as it related to Thomas Cook's engagement, either in my office or with the campaign, they were always made with what I knew at the time. If I knew then what I know now, perhaps my decision — in fact my decision would have been different. But I was operating with what I knew at the time. IndyStar: Councilor Joshua Bain raised an allegation that you appeared to be visibly impaired in a May 15, 2024, meeting with him. He said he witnessed you stumble into a room, have trouble sitting down. Do you dispute the accuracy of that incident, and were you impaired? Hogsett: No, I was not. I categorically deny that. IndyStar: This is not the first time that allegations of substance abuse have been made. Have you ever been impaired or under the influence while serving as mayor? Hogsett: No. IndyStar: Have you ever sought any treatment for substance abuse? Hogsett: No. We're collectively losing sight of what is most important, and that's continuing to create a safer, more accountable working environment for all city employees. That is my focus. That is my standard. And that's what I'll stick to. IndyStar: You agree that a safe working environment is important. Many people who attended last night's council meeting have said that with you in a leadership position, they feel like it would be impossible to have a safe working environment. I wonder how you'll deal with those concerns and those doubts moving forward. Hogsett: Well, what happened last night was regrettable. But to reiterate something I said just a moment ago, we've lost sight of the most important thing here. We have already made strides in continuing to approve and strengthen city policies and training to create a safer and more accountable work environment for all city employees. It's something my administration has already been taking steps to do, and we will redouble and continue. Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@ Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09. Contact senior government accountability reporter Hayleigh Colombo at hcolombo@ Sign up for our free weekly politics newsletter, Checks & Balances, by IndyStar political and government reporter. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Mayor responds to texts: 'It was not my intent to make anyone uncomfortable'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store