Mass. beach closures: Nearly 40 beaches closed on Sunday, July 13
Nearly 40 beaches were closed mostly due to high bacteria levels, according to the state Department of Public Health.
One of those is the main beach at Walden Pond State Reservation, which will remain closed for the entirety of summer 2025 as a new, state-of-the-art $6.1 million bathhouse is constructed. Red Cross Beach at Walden Pond will remain open with no lifeguards.
Here is the list of closed beaches:
Ashby: Damond Pond Beach for an unlisted reason
Ashland: Ashland Reservoir-Main Beach due to bacterial exceedance
Beverly: Brakenbury due to bacterial exceedance
Boston: Constitution at Middle, North and Rec Center; Malibu; Tenean; all due to bacterial exceedance
Bourne: Cataumet Harbor; Patuisset due to bacterial exceedance
Brewster: Upper Mill Pond due to harmful cyanobacteria bloom
Brookfield: South Pond due to bacterial exceedance
Chatham: Jacknife Harbor due to bacterial exceedance
Concord: Walden Pond - Main - due to an unlisted reason
Danvers: Sandy Beach due to bacterial exceedance
Dartmouth: Jones Town Beach North and South due to a CSO/SSO event; Moses Smith Creek due to bacterial exceedance
Eastham: S. Sunken Meadow due to bacterial exceedance
Lynn: Kings beach at Eastern Ave., Kimball Road and Pierce Road due to bacterial exceedance
Quincy: Wollaston at Channing Street, Milton Street, Rice Road, and Sachem Street due to bacterial exceedance
Salem: Children's Island - Back - and Ocean Avenue due to bacterial exceedance
Springfield: Camp Wilder at Right due to bacterial exceedance
Swampscott: Fisherman's, Kings and Phillips, due to bacterial exceedance
Swansea: Leeside due to bacterial exceedance
Templeton: Beamans Pond, at Campground and Day Use, due to bacterial exceedance
Westminster: Crow Hill Pond Beach due to bacterial exceedance
Winchester: Shannon Beach at Upper Mystic due to bacterial exceedance
Winthrop: Donovans and Halford due to bacterial exceedance
Bacteria in beach water can come from a variety of sources, including:
Stormwater (rain) run-off
Failing or malfunctioning septic systems
Combined and sanitary sewer overflows
Leaking sewer pipes
Illegal sewer hookups
Wildlife and pet waste
Agricultural runoff
In order to ensure beaches are safe for swimming, the DPH tests the waters anywhere from daily to monthly, depending on how likely the beach is to have water quality issues and its popularity.
If a beach is used often or is prone to water quality issues, then it's tested more often and vice versa, the DPH wrote.
Beaches remain closed until laboratory analysis shows bacteria levels are within the acceptable range for safe swimming.
'Laboratory analysis for all beach samples takes approximately 24 hours,' according to the department's website. 'So it is common for a beach closure to last a day or two following an exceedance.'
Swimming in beach water that has high levels of bacteria can be risky and can result in illnesses, including:
Gastrointestinal symptoms- nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain
Respiratory symptoms- sore throat, cough, runny nose and sneezing
Dermatological symptoms- skin rash and itching
Eye and ear symptoms- irritation, earache, itching
Flu-like symptoms- fever and chills
Therefore, it's important to check for any warnings or beach closures indicating that the water could be unsafe. To do this, done check the weather, avoid swimming after heavy rain, watch for signs of water pollution like discolored, fast flowing and strong smelling water, do not swim near trash or litter floating in the water, avoid swallowing the water and swim in areas designated as 'swim beaches.'
Although a beach could be posted, the public can still visit the location and take part in other activities that don't involve contact with the water. This can include anything from playing sports like volleyball or frisbee to sunbathing or collecting seashells or sea glass, the DPH said.
The public can also do its part in helping to reduce contamination and pollution at the beach by:
Cleaning up after pets
Not feeding the birds as it encourages them to hang around the beaches, which increases fecal matter
Using public restrooms
Picking up and throwing away trash using public restrooms or properly disposing of it at home
Not entering the water when sick or feeling unwell
Changing diapers and putting plastic or rubber pants, known as swim diapers, on diapered children before they enter the water
Not dumping anything down storm drains, as water moving through these drains does not get treated at a wastewater facility and flows directly into lakes and streams
Avoiding the use of fertilizers and pesticides in yards since these chemicals can easily carry into the surface of waters during rain events and snowmelt
Use walkways and avoid walking on dunes to prevent erosion and preserve vegetation that filters out pollutants from runoff before they reach the beach
More details from the DPH can be found here.
After long break, Our Lady of Mount Carmel Italian Feast is back (Photos)
Generations of Desmarais family gather in Chicopee for 100th reunion
'He didn't deserve this': Mass. man who died after police struggle identified
Driver injured after crashing into 2 Springfield homes
Gardener's Supply Co. bankruptcy is set to hit WMass farms hard
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
24 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Runners, you need to read this — study suggests a simple training tip could be the key to avoiding injury
A new study from Aarhus University has thrown into doubt everything we know about running injuries, suggesting that the most common cause of them is going too far on a single run. Most injuries are caused suddenly by a single workout where you run too far compared to your normal distance. Until now the most common advice for runners looking to avoid injuries was to gradually increase your overall training load each week. This advice is built into the best running watches, which monitor your acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) training load to ensure they are balanced and you're not pushing too hard compared to what your body is able to handle. However, research done on 5,200 runners found that most injuries don't develop over time because you're exceeding a suggested weekly training load, but are caused suddenly by a single workout where you run too far compared to your normal distance. The study found that the risk of injury grew when you ran more than 10% further than your longest run from the past 30 days. If you ran 10-30% further than your longest run in the last 30 days, the injury risk increased by 64%. If you ran 10-30% further than your longest run in the last 30 days, the injury risk increased by 64%. The risk of injury increases by 52% if you run 30-100% further than your longest run from the past 30 days, which is interestingly smaller compared to the risk from a 10-30% increase in distance. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Unsurprisingly, if you increase the distance of your run by over 100% compared with your longest run from the last 30 days, it poses the biggest risk of injury, with a 128% increase. The takeaways from this study are refreshingly simple — don't go too far on a single run. If your longest run in the last 30 days was five miles, then don't suddenly run 10 miles; build up to that distance carefully. This does tie-in with the advice on training load you get from running watches in some ways, as avoiding big increases in training load each week will usually help to keep the length of your longest runs down. The lead author on the study, Associate Professor Rasmus Ø. Nielsen from the Department of Public Health at Aarhus University, suggests that watches could use the advice from the research to create new features to help users. "I imagine, for example, that sports watches with our algorithm will be able to guide runners in real-time during a run and give an alarm if they run a distance where injury risk is high,' says Nielsen. 'Like a traffic light that gives green light if injury risk is low; yellow light if injury risk increases and red light when injury risk becomes high.' This advice is particularly important for those marathon training, who might well suddenly start doing very long runs to prepare for the 26.2-mile event. Give yourself time to build-up to those 20-milers if you can. Hoka has announced a limited-edition collaboration with Australian cycling brand, MAAP, merging the world of running and cycling in a version of the Tecton X2. Built for the trails, the Tecton X2 has a carbon fibre plate for a faster heel-toe transition on all terrains. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Skift
24 minutes ago
- Skift
OpenAI lanza el modo de agente ChatGPT: Lo que podría significar para el sector de los viajes
Very Online is your best source for news about online travel, from startups to the biggest online travel agencies. Get it in your inbox every Wednesday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
No one knows whether Trump's $50B for rural health will be enough
A ranch owner brings in a load of hay from her ranch in Texas in 2024. Experts and lawmakers worry a new $50 billion program designed to help struggling rural health care providers may not be enough to offset federal funding losses. (Photo by) Congress set aside $50 billion for rural hospitals and medical providers to allay fears over the billions more in historic cuts to federal health care spending that President Donald Trump signed into law on Independence Day. But is that bandage big enough to save struggling rural hospitals? 'I have more questions than I have answers,' said Alan Morgan, CEO of the National Rural Health Association, a nonprofit policy group. 'No one has those answers yet.' Morgan noted that the new money for rural health, to be spent over five years, is far less than the $155 billion in rural Medicaid spending cuts over 10 years, as estimated by KFF, a nonprofit health policy and research group. Experts, hospital leaders and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle fear that Trump's signature legislation will particularly gut rural hospitals and clinics, which see an outsize share of patients who are insured through Medicaid, the federal-state public health insurance for people with low incomes. The new law slashes more than $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next 10 years to help pay for tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy. States scramble to shield hospitals from GOP Medicaid cuts The $50 billion addition was an effort by Republican leaders in Congress to win the votes of colleagues within their party who initially balked at supporting such steep cuts to Medicaid and other health services. In the U.S. Senate, the rural program helped secure the vote of Alaska moderate Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who expressed concern about the law's impact on health care in her state. About 1 in 3 Alaskans are insured through Medicaid. Jared Kosin, the president and CEO of the Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association, said he's deeply frustrated with the new law's gutting of Medicaid funding, which he thinks will wreak lasting damage on Alaskans. And Republicans sidestepped potential solutions by just throwing money into a program, he said. 'It's frustrating in the public realm when decisions like this are made fast and, frankly, carelessly,' he said. 'The consequences are going to fall on us, not them.' More than half of the law's cuts to funding in rural areas are concentrated in 12 states with large rural populations that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to cover more people, according to KFF: Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Some GOP lawmakers in Congress have heralded the $50 billion rural program as a health care victory. But it's still unclear which hospitals, clinics and other providers would receive money and how much. The Rural Health Transformation Program will dole out $10 billion annually from fiscal years 2026 through 2030. States must apply for their funding by the end of this year, submitting a detailed plan on how it would be used. The law outlines some ways that states can use the money, according to an analysis of the legislation from the Bipartisan Policy Center: Making payments to rural hospitals to help them maintain essential services such as emergency room care or labor and delivery. Recruiting and training rural doctors, nurses and other health workers. Bolstering emergency medical services such as ambulances and EMTs. Using new technologies, including telehealth. Providing opioid use disorder treatment and mental health services. Improving preventive care and chronic disease management. Half of the $10 billion each year will be distributed evenly across states that have applied for it. The other half can be distributed by the administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — currently Dr. Mehmet Oz — at his discretion, based on a state's rural population and rural health facilities. Although the program doesn't replace the amount states are likely to lose, Morgan said it's still an opportunity to rethink how rural health care is funded. He'd like to see states given flexibility in how they're able to use the funds, and he hopes they focus on keeping rural communities healthy through preventive care while still helping hospitals keep their doors open. 'If done correctly, it could really change the future course for rural America,' Morgan said. 'That is such a tough ask, though.' Kentucky could take the biggest hit from the new law's reduction in rural Medicaid funding, losing an estimated $12 billion over 10 years, according to a KFF analysis. Tracking Medicaid patients' work status may prove difficult for states The state's Medicaid department is still waiting for additional federal guidance to understand how the state's program will be affected, Kendra Steele, spokesperson with the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, told Stateline in a statement. 'Over 1.4 million Kentuckians rely on Medicaid — including half of all children in our state, seniors and more vulnerable populations — and the passage of legislation on the federal level will have serious impacts for those individuals, rural health care and hospitals and local economies,' she wrote. Even with the new program, states across the country will have to reevaluate their budgets in light of the cuts, said Hemi Tewarson, executive director at the National Academy for State Health Policy, a nonpartisan group that supports states in developing health care policies. 'Every region is slightly different and there's not a one-size-fits-all approach,' she said. 'Hospital ownership varies [as well as] the types of services that are critical for the community where they're located. They have to think about new ways to provide those services in a context with fewer resources.' About 44% of rural hospitals are operating in the red, according to a KFF analysis of Rand Hospital Data, a higher share than the 35% of hospitals in urban areas. Prior to the bill's passage, Oz attempted to reassure U.S. House Republicans that their districts could get money from the program even if they weren't specifically rural, Politico reported earlier this month. We're all rural at heart when it comes to money. – Alan Morgan, CEO of the National Rural Health Association Pennsylvania Republican U.S. Rep. Rob Bresnahan said money would begin flowing to his district as early as the beginning of next year, telling the Wilkes-Barre Times Leader earlier this month that he met with Trump, Oz and others to secure pledges that hospitals in his district could access the fund. He represents the northeastern corner of Pennsylvania, which includes suburban and rural areas, as well as the cities of Scranton and Wilkes-Barre. Though the legislation includes guidelines on which facilities or areas qualify as 'rural,' Morgan, of the National Rural Health Association, expects a mad dash from lawmakers and providers to claim rural status in order to get a piece of the funding. 'That's going to be a huge issue — defining who's rural,' Morgan said. 'We're all rural at heart when it comes to money.' Stateline reporter Anna Claire Vollers can be reached at avollers@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
