logo
The miracle babies born following life-changing womb transplants around the world

The miracle babies born following life-changing womb transplants around the world

Independent08-04-2025
Amy Isabel became the first child in the UK to be born following a womb transplant, joining dozens of other miracle babies around the world thanks to the pioneering surgery.
Grace Davidson gave birth after receiving a womb transplant from her older sister, Amy, in a groundbreaking procedure. She was born by planned NHS Caesarean section on February 27 at Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital in London.
Mrs Davidson said she felt 'shock' when she first held her daughter, adding: 'We have been given the greatest gift we could ever have asked for.'
The 36-year-old was born with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH), a rare condition that affects around one in every 5,000 women, meaning they have an underdeveloped or missing womb. The ovaries are intact and still function to produce eggs and female hormones, making conceiving via fertility treatment a possibility.
However, this is not the first baby to be born following a womb transplant.
The first was in Sweden in 2014, when a 36-year-old mother who was born without a uterus received a donated womb from a friend in her 60s.
The woman, who remained anonymous, gave birth to a child prematurely weighing 1.8kg (3.9lb), according to the British medical journal The Lancet.
Since then, around 135 such transplants have been carried out in more than a dozen countries, including the US, China, France, Germany, India and Turkey.
As a result of these pioneering surgeries around 65 babies have been born around the world.
In March 2023 Prue Craven, who lives in Melbourne, Australia, received a womb transplant.
A year later, the 37-year-old said she felt 'whole' when she welcomed her daughter Rose into the world.
Ms Craven discovered she had never developed a uterus aged 17 and was diagnosed with MRKH syndrome.
After attempting surrogacy in Thailand and looking into adoption in the UK, Ms Craven and her husband Tom moved back to Australia where they explored transplants.
Ms Craven's mother was first in line to be a donor, but she was not a match. However, Lifelong friend Madonna Corstorphan, 57, stepped in.
The women endured a marathon 14-hour operation to complete the uterus transplant.
Following the birth of her baby she told the BBC: 'I could never have imagined when I was 17 that I would have a uterus transplanted into me and I would carry a baby to live birth and now have a child from it.
'Mentally and emotionally, it is like a part of me is being filled that has always been missing.'
Peyton Meave, 24, was the third mother in the US to deliver her baby, a girl named Emersyn Rae, in June 2019, after a womb transplant.
The mother who lives in Oklahoma, said having a child through participation in a US trail had been a 'life-changing' experience, The Guardian reported.
However, her pregnancy was not straightforward, at 22 weeks she had unexplained bleeding, which doctors said was due to her having an incompetent cervix, which can cause it to open early – risking miscarriage and premature delivery.
Following bed rest she gave birth at 30 weeks. 'She's four now – as busy as can be and super healthy. She's just the light of our lives,' she told the newspaper.
But due to the complex pregnancy, she decided to have the transplant removed.
Maria Montes was the second mother in Spain to welcome a child into the world following a womb transplant.
The baby, Manuel, was born at 37 weeks via a caesarean section and weighed 2.9kg, according to the Clinic Barcelona website.
It was all made possible thanks to Ms Montes' mother who donated her uterus which was transplanted in April 2022.
Just two months after the surgery, Maria Montes had her first period and, after a few months the fertility treatment began.
Four days after the c-section, Ms Montes, Tono – the baby's father - and Manuel were able to go home and start their new life.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BBC Gardeners' World star had 'to-do list' as she opens up on battle with devastating illness
BBC Gardeners' World star had 'to-do list' as she opens up on battle with devastating illness

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

BBC Gardeners' World star had 'to-do list' as she opens up on battle with devastating illness

Gardeners' World star Rachel de Thame was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2018, and said that it had a knock-on effect to her life and left her feeling "shaken" Gardeners' World presenter Rachel de Thame has opened up about her "desperate" to-do list following her breast cancer diagnosis in 2018, revealing how the news sent "shockwaves" through her life. ‌ Penning her thoughts for The Times at the time, Rachel shared: "While one is grateful to have options, treatment is no walk in the park. Strangely, though, I've also found that there are compensations. Top of the list is a renewed, almost desperate desire to get on with some of the things that for too long have lingered on a mental to-do list." ‌ The beloved BBC personality reflected on the impact of her health scare, stating: "When you've felt rocked to your foundations, the only sensible thing is to get on with living." ‌ With a newfound outlook, Rachel admitted she's now viewing life through a different lens, with ambitions to transform her garden into a sanctuary for herself and others. She elaborated on her aspirations: "On a more immediate and personal level, I'm focusing on next spring and how I want my garden to look and, above all, make me feel." Fortunately, Rachel's condition was detected early, prompting her to take time off from Gardeners' World as she embarked on her treatment journey. Speaking to the BBC during this period, she conveyed optimism: "I'm doing well and coming towards the end of it. It's caught early so that's all very positive, so on the whole it's better not to be working too much just now," reports the Express. Thankfully, she made a complete recovery and has since extolled the virtues of gardening for its role in her physical and mental well-being during that tough time. ‌ At the Chelsea Flower Show, Rachel expressed: "I know there's a big message this year at Chelsea about the importance of gardening for your general health and mental health, if you're going through some chronic illness, whatever it is, it's vital to go out and be in a garden." In one of the most recent episodes of Gardeners' World, fans were left in tears after expert Steve opened up about his terminal diagnosis. He shared: "Very recently, I had been diagnosed with a terminal cancer, and I don't know how long I might live. It could be two months or two years, possibly. "I didn't feel down as a result of it, I just saw it as another challenge, I'm going to have to sort something out for this. "And actually, I have had a big, creative burst, I think, as a result of that positive attitude, and I am getting there. I am finding ways in which Pippa and our son, between them, will be able to manage this whole process once I've gone."

Kill the single state pension age
Kill the single state pension age

Spectator

time4 hours ago

  • Spectator

Kill the single state pension age

When William Beveridge designed the welfare state in the 1940s, the state pension age was 65 for men and 60 for women. Life expectancy for a man was around 66, and around 71 for a woman. The pension was not designed to fund decades of leisure: it was a modest provision for the last couple of years of life, one that not everyone would receive. Today, life expectancy for a man aged 66 (the current state pension age) is around 85, and a woman aged 66 can expect to live until she is 88. The average person now spends close to a fifth of their life in retirement. What was once a short post-script has become a major chapter – and an increasingly expensive one. This is the backdrop for the latest statutory review of the state pension age (SPA), led this year by Dr Suzy Morrissey. Her terms of reference are technical: consider sustainability, intergenerational fairness, life expectancy, international practice. Behind the dry language sits a political question no one rushes to answer: when should people stop working, and who pays for the years they do not? You know the script here. Britain is ageing. The ratio of workers to pensioners is shrinking. Every review concludes that the SPA must rise. Every opposition grumbles about the cruelty of doing so. Every government, when in office, quietly nudges the age upwards. Nothing fundamental changes. What almost never gets challenged is the model itself: a single age at which everyone, regardless of class, health or occupation, is deemed equally ready for retirement. This is tidy for Whitehall. It is also daft. The Office for National Statistics reports that male life expectancy for a retirement age man in Surrey is 86 years; in Blackpool, it is 81. Healthy life expectancy – the years lived without major illness – shows still sharper divides. Yet we persist in pretending that the 66-year-old accountant in Guildford and the 66-year-old ex-dockworker in Hull should both cross the same finish line. That is unjust, and unsustainable. It loads the cost of longer-lived, healthier retirees onto taxpayers who may not live long enough to see much retirement at all. Here I can almost hear some readers reaching for outrage about contributions. Shouldn't a person's pension entitlement reflect their national insurance contributions? So a Surrey stockbroker who pays more NI than a Sunderland scaffolder has earned the right to draw the state pension for longer? This takes me to the biggest and most persistent misunderstanding in British politics: the state pension isn't really a pension. It's a benefit. And it's funded not from some pot of money patiently built up from each recipient's contributions, but from the taxes of today's workers. National Insurance is just a tax, and one that long ago lost any hypothecated link to the pension system. That means pension policy cannot be treated as a personal contract between citizen and state. It is a collective transfer between generations. Pretending otherwise, with talk of 'I've paid in, I deserve it back', hides the real choices – about fairness between regions, between classes, and between young and old. Other countries are at least edging away from the one-size-fits-all fiction. Denmark and the Netherlands now link their pension ages directly to life expectancy. Countries including Norway and Portugal offer some scope to offer earlier pensions to those who have done physically demanding work. None has yet built a fully 'variable' pension age, but the recognition is spreading: a uniform pension age does not match demographic reality. Britain should be bolder. One approach is to tie entitlement not to age but to years of contributions, recognising that someone who started work at 18 has done their share by 65, while the graduate entering at 25 has not. Another is to give more flexibility to those in arduous jobs: that Sunderland scaffolder is likely to be physically knackered in a way that his stockbroking compatriot is not. More radical still is to abandon the cliff-edge retirement model altogether. Instead of full-time one day and nothing the next, policy should support tapering – part-time, flexible work in the sixties and seventies, subsidised and encouraged so people can scale down, not drop out. This would help individuals, who gain income and purpose. It helps employers, who retain skills and experience. It helps the state, which saves on pensions and collects more tax. Above all, it acknowledges reality: ageing is a spectrum, not a binary switch from 'young' to 'old'. This is politically difficult, to put it mildly. I am recommending electoral hemlock, because it entails higher pension ages for some (who will be angry) and different treatment for some (ditto). No sane politician attempts major change to the state pension. The fury of the Waspi women still haunts ministers. Even tinkering with winter fuel allowances causes uproar. You'd be mad to do it, minister. But it must still be done. The fiscal maths is brutal. By 2075, pensioners will make up more than a quarter of the adult population. The cost of the state pension is projected to rise from around 5 per cent of GDP today to nearly 8 per cent. Absent reform, the money has to come from somewhere: higher taxes on a shrinking workforce, or cuts to other services. Intergenerational politics are already sour. Younger voters see themselves funding entitlements for older cohorts who enjoyed cheaper houses and more generous occupational pensions. A rigid single SPA deepens that resentment. That is the real political danger: not the fury of today's pensioners, but the alienation of tomorrow's workers who simply refuse to pay for the pensions of others. Dr Morrissey's review is framed as technical, but it is inescapably political. She has licence to say what ministers will not: that one pension age for all is outdated, unfair and unaffordable. A braver politics would seize that truth, and act on it. None of this is easy. None of it is popular. But it is necessary. The single state pension age should end.

Risk of cancer death drops by 11.1 per cent to record low
Risk of cancer death drops by 11.1 per cent to record low

The National

time5 hours ago

  • The National

Risk of cancer death drops by 11.1 per cent to record low

Statistics published by Public Health Scotland (PHS) have shown an 11.1% reduction in mortality rates since 2013, from 333.7 per 100,000 diagnoses to 296.8 per 100,000 in 2022. The data, published on Tuesday, showed the death rates from the illness are the lowest on record since 1998. READ MORE: Chemical company fined £100k after worker suffers 'serious burns' Health Secretary Neil Gray said: 'It is encouraging to see the risk of dying from cancer in Scotland is at a record low. This is down to the hard work of NHS staff, improved treatment options, and people reporting their symptoms at an earlier stage. 'We are determined to further improve cancer survival, reduce waiting times and provide excellent, equitably accessible care right across Scotland.' Due to Scotland's ageing population, 69% of all cancer-related deaths recorded in 2022 were individuals aged 70 or older. 'We are taking action to improve the awareness and earlier diagnosis of cancers, including expanding our Rapid Cancer Diagnostic Services and our investment of more than £14 million towards cancer waiting times this year', Gray continued. 'Reducing health inequalities is a clear ambition for this government. Cutting smoking rates is key to tackling lung cancer incidence in areas of deprivation – our world-leading tobacco control measures are helping us in our goal of a Tobacco-Free Scotland by 2034.' MSP for Rutherglen Clare Haughey welcomed the figures, praising the work of NHS staff and action taken by the Scottish Government to improve both treatment options and early detection initiatives. 'One death from cancer is one too many but these figures are welcome and show the real progress we are making to improve cancer survival under the SNP Government', Haughey said. READ MORE: Ayrshire trust in race to raise £200k for community ownership of B-listed church 'The fact that the likelihood of dying from cancer is at its lowest level on record is testament to the incredible work that staff in our NHS do throughout Scotland every day. 'The SNP is determined to go even further to improve cancer survival across Scotland by taking action to improve awareness and earlier diagnosis of cancers. This includes expanding our Rapid Cancer Diagnostic Services and investing more than £14 million to reduce cancer waiting times this year. 'Whilst other parties continually talk down our NHS, the SNP is getting on with the job of improving and extending lives by investing to tackle health inequalities and improve health outcomes for people right across Scotland.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store