What late-June sizzle could mean for US corn yields: Braun
NAPERVILLE, Illinois, June 18 (Reuters) - Although the U.S. Corn Belt is in for a scorching weekend, June weather has been mostly supportive of crop development, with corn health ratings improving for three consecutive weeks.
But how much bearing might that have on final corn yields or weather outcomes for the pivotal month of July?
As early as last year, meteorologists warned that the U.S. Corn Belt could be due for drought in 2025, though that has yet to unfold. A mid- or late-summer drought could still be in the cards, of course, and the yield impacts would vary depending on timing.
Recently, new-crop CBOT corn futures appeared to be carrying minimal weather premium as prices sank to six-month lows this week. December corn has since bounced with this weekend's hot forecast in focus, though prices remain well off the year's peak.
Recent weather models suggest that both temperatures and precipitation for June will be above average across the Midwestern United States. While warm Junes are more likely to feature dry conditions, this warm-wet combination is similar to last year.
Corn yield outcomes have varied widely in relation to observed June weather. But July temperatures are where things start to separate.
In the past quarter-century, the worst corn yield outcomes all coincided with warmer-than-normal Midwestern Julys. The truly good years featured cool Julys, but slightly warm temperatures were also passable a couple of times (2016, 2017).
Big corn yields have resulted from abnormally dry Julys (2014), though this works only if July is cool and June and/or August rainfall is ample.
The strongest corn yields all resulted in years where July-August Midwestern rainfall was near or above normal. Near-average yields have coincided with dry July-Augusts, but only when July temperatures were cool.
Obviously, a hot July plus a dry July-August is the very worst combination for yields, which was seen in 2011 and 2012. Interestingly, 2011 is the last time that corn conditions improved over the same three weeks in June as the 2025 ones.
But the fact that June 2025 will likely feature above-average rainfall doesn't tell us much about what's coming next. July and August have been both wet and dry following wet Junes, though warm Julys are more likely to follow warm Junes.
Current extended forecasts suggest the next four weeks could be warmer than average across the central Corn Belt, featuring pockets of both wet and dry weather. Uncertainty is always high when it comes to long-range forecasts, but the current outlook should warrant some caution.
August matters for U.S. soybean yields like July matters for corn. Last year, the market was harshly reminded of the need for August rains to support large soybean yields.
August 2024 rainfall across the Midwest amounted to just 87% of normal, the driest August since 2013. But 2024 U.S. soybean yield forecasts were still easily at record levels as late as October.
The government's yield estimate plunged 4.5% between October and January, the largest decline for that period since 1993, emphasizing the significance of the August rainfall deficit.
That occurred despite above-average June and July rains, meaning the range of possibilities for U.S. soybean yields is even wider than those for corn given that August is still several weeks away.
Karen Braun is a market analyst for Reuters. Views expressed above are her own.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Tesla asked to delay robotaxi launch by Democratic Texas lawmakers
June 18 (Reuters) - A group of Democratic Texas lawmakers has asked Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab to delay its much-anticipated robotaxi launch in Austin until September, when a new autonomous-driving law is scheduled to take effect. The group of Austin-area lawmakers said in the letter sent on Wednesday that delaying the launch, which CEO Elon Musk said could "tentatively" happen this Sunday, "is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations." If Tesla decides to move forward with a launch this month, the lawmakers asked that Tesla respond with "detailed information" demonstrating how Tesla will comply with the new state law when it launches. Musk last year staked Tesla's future on autonomous-driving technology as it pivoted away from chasing rapid growth in electric-vehicle sales. Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter. It is unclear how much weight a letter from Democratic lawmakers will carry in a state where Republicans hold the governorship and majorities in both legislative chambers. Musk announced in January that Tesla would be offering "autonomous ride-hailing for money in Austin, in June," and since then the Austin rollout has been closely watched by investors and analysts - many of whom attribute the majority of Tesla's stock market value to hopes for robotaxis and humanoid robots the company has yet to deliver. Current Texas law allows autonomous-vehicle firms to operate their vehicles anywhere in Texas, as long as the vehicles meet basic registration and insurance requirements. The new legislation, which passed the Texas legislature last month and has not been signed by the governor, would for the first time require autonomous-vehicle companies to apply for authorization to operate in the state. It would give state authorities the power to revoke permits if they deem a driverless vehicle "endangers the public." Firms are also required to provide the state information on how police and first responders can deal with the vehicles in emergency situations. Musk and Tesla have given few details about their plans for the Austin robotaxi launch. The CEO has said the Austin rollout would begin with 10 or 20 Model Y vehicles, and that the company will begin operating in 'only the parts of Austin that we consider to be the safest.' Musk and Tesla have not said who the passengers will be, how Tesla will charge for rides, where in Austin they will operate or how extensive remote monitoring and operation of the vehicles will be.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Baby boomers enrage younger Americans with selfish housing act
It's looking like baby boomers are never, ever going to sell their homes, frustrating younger generations on the hunt for bigger homes where they can raise a family. It was revealed that one-third of baby boomers who own their home say they're not budging, according to a new Redfin survey. Even more frustrating for younger buyers looking for homes for their growing families, another 30 percent of boomers say they will sell their home at some point — but not within the next decade. They're also living longer than ever so we'll see about that. It is the latest generational bust-up after cash-rich boomers came under fire for snatching homes from under the noses of younger buyers — with big money up front offers up their sleeves. Older people are even less likely to sell, with nearly half of Silent Generation, people born between 1928 and 1945, saying they never planning to sell. It's younger homeowners are more likely to eventually part ways with their house. Only 25 percent of Gen Xers and 21 percent of millennial/Gen Zers say they'll never sell. The rest would happily sell at a profit. There are several financial and lifestyle reasons why older Americans are much more likely than younger Americans to stay put. Many baby boomers who own their home simply don't have a financial incentive to sell. Additionally, many older homeowners have lived in their home for a long time and simply prefer to stay put. Roughly two-thirds (67 percent) of baby boomer homeowners have lived in their home for 16-plus years. When asked why they're staying in their current home, most baby boomers surveyed (55 percent) said they just like their home and have no reason to move, making that the most commonly cited reason. The next-most common reasons are financial. For 30 percent of owners their home is almost or completely paid off. Another 16 percent said today's home prices are too high, and 8 percent don't want to give up their low mortgage rate. Housing costs have risen significantly over the last several years. Home prices are up roughly 40 percent since pre-pandemic, and mortgage rates are near 7 percent, up from about 4 percent before the pandemic. Nearly one-third of baby boomers who own their home say they couldn't afford a home like theirs in their neighborhood today. On the downside, older Americans hanging onto their homes is one reason it's difficult for younger Americans to find and afford houses, especially houses large enough to fit a family. Nearly nine in 10 of the homes owned by baby boomers are single-family homes. Just about five percent are condos and 4 percent are townhomes. A 2024 Redfin analysis found that baby boomers are twice as likely to own large homes as millennials, which infuriated millennials. Meanwhile, more than 70 percent of millennial and Gen Z homeowners have minor children living in their home, compared to 4 percent of baby boomers. 'While inventory is improving, supply is tight for young house hunters looking for family homes, especially in suburban areas where homes priced like starter homes—yet large enough for families—are scarce,' said Redfin chief economist Daryl Fairweather. 'With baby boomers opting to age in place rather than sell, it's challenging for younger buyers to find affordable options that fit their lifestyle. Fairweather adds that it's worth noting that even though many older Americans say they're not planning to sell their homes, many are likely to eventually part ways as it becomes harder to live independently and/or keep up with home maintenance. Meanwhile, one-quarter (25 percent) of millennial and Gen Z renters say they're not purchasing a home in the near future because they can't afford a home in an area where they want to live, making it the most commonly cited reason for not buying a home. The next-most common reasons are they are financially unprepared for surprise costs of owning a home (23 percent), mortgage rates are too high (20 percent), and inability to save for a down payment (18 percent). Redfin's report report comes as experts warn where house prices are starting to drop the fastest. That's good news for young homebuyers. Supply is up; there are roughly 500,000 more home sellers than buyers in today's market. It's a buyer's market now in many parts of the country, and Redfin economists predict home prices will decline 1 percent year over year by the end of 2025. This year boomers made up the largest group of home buyers, locking out younger people with all-cash offers and bigger down payments. With decades of savings from low mortgage rates, boomers have overtaken Millennials, Gen X, and Gen Z in home purchases. Millennials (ages 29 to 44) now make up just 29 percent of buyers — down from 38 percent a year ago. Gen X buyers remain steady at 24 percent, while Gen Z account for three in every 100 home purchases. Overall, the combined share of younger boomers (ages 60–69) and older boomers (ages 70–78) rose to 42 percent of all home buyers from April 2024 to April 2025, according to a report by the National Association of Realtors. 'In a plot twist, baby boomers have overtaken millennials – the largest U.S. population – to become the top generation of home buyers,' said Jessica Lautz, NAR deputy chief economist and vice president of research. 'What's striking is that boomers are purchasing homes entirely with cash, bypassing financing altogether.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Gold prices tick up as Middle East tensions buoy demand
June 19 (Reuters) - Gold prices gained on Thursday, as rising tensions in the Middle East buoyed demand for the safe-haven asset, although the U.S. Federal Reserve's cautious stance on future rate cuts kept gains in check. Spot gold was up 0.2% at $3,376.48 an ounce, as of 0215 GMT. U.S. gold futures eased 0.4% to $3,393.70. "Gold has made a modest bounce as we await the next steps in the Israel-Iran conflict. If the U.S. does decide to get directly involved in the conflict this could raise the geopolitical stakes," KCM Trade Chief Market Analyst Tim Waterer said. Geopolitical tensions remained heightened as U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday refrained from confirming whether the U.S. would join Israel's bombardment of Iranian nuclear and missile sites, prompting residents of Tehran to leave the city amid ongoing air strikes. The U.S. military has moved some aircraft and ships from bases in the Middle East that may be vulnerable to any potential Iranian attack, two U.S. officials told Reuters on Wednesday. Gold is often used as a safe store of value during times of geopolitical and financial uncertainty. The Fed held interest rates steady on Wednesday. Fed policymakers still forecast slashing rates by half-a-percentage point this year, but they slowed the pace of future cuts. However, Fed Chair Jerome Powell cautioned against putting too much weight on this outlook, warning of "meaningful" inflation ahead as higher import tariffs loom. "The Fed was not as dovish as some had hoped, and I'd argue Powell was a tad more hawkish than many would like. The U.S. dollar is likely at oversold levels, and that is likely to cap gains on gold over the next few weeks," said Matt Simpson, a senior analyst at City Index. Elsewhere, spot silver eased 0.2% to $36.66 per ounce, platinum rose 1.5% to $1,342.36, while palladium gained 0.6% to $1,055.18.
