logo
Geek Girl Authority Crush of the Week: CONCHITA MARABLE

Geek Girl Authority Crush of the Week: CONCHITA MARABLE

Welcome to this week's installment of Geek Girl Authority Crush of the Week, wherein we spotlight strong women and nonbinary folks who inspire us. This includes fictional characters and creators in geeky media. They are a prime example of empowerment and how crucial it is for youth to have said example to follow.
DISCLAIMER: The following contains spoilers for Apple TV+'s The Buccaneers , particularly Conchita Marable's arc. Proceed at your peril. Conchita Marable, aka Lady Brightlingsea Fast Facts THE BUCCANEERS Season 1 Episode 4, 'Homecoming.' Photo courtesy of Apple TV+.
Conchita Marable (née Closson), aka Lady Brightlingsea (Alisha Boe), was born and raised in New York to wealthy parents. In the series premiere of The Buccaneers , she weds Lord Richard Marable (Josh Dylan) and promptly relocates to England.
RELATED: Geek Girl Authority Crush of the Week: The Buccaneers ' Lizzy Elmsworth
Once settled into her new life, Conchita struggles to adapt. She also butts heads with Richard's parents, Lord and Lady Brightlingsea (Anthony Calf and Fenella Woolgar), who merely view her as an uninhibited, ill-behaved American. Although let's be real, racism is at play here. Conchita finds it understandably challenging to navigate that racism as Richard's family discriminates against a woman of color with status.
At one point in Season 1, Conchita learns that her father lost their family's money. Additionally, she and Richard are at odds, and this is especially taxing on her after giving birth to their daughter, Minnie. Thankfully, our favorite couple mends fences later in the season. Conchita even bonds with Richard's sister, Honoria (Mia Threapleton), helping the latter step outside her comfort zone.
In the Season 1 finale, Conchita assists Nan (Kristine Frøseth), Lizzy (Aubri Ibrag) and Mabel (Josie Totah) with helping Jinny (Imogen Waterhouse) escape Richard's brother, Lord James Seadown (Barney Fishwick), who was abusing Jinny.
RELATED: 10 Questions We Need Answered in The Buccaneers Season 2 Season 2
When Season 2 rolls around, Conchita embarks on a new matchmaking venture, helping her first client, Cora Merrigan (Maria Almeida), find a husband. This business comes to fruition after Richard's father passes away. Conchita discovers that the Marable family has no money. In the wake of his death, Conchita and Richard inherit the Brightlingsea title as his mother and sister move in with them. The Real Deal THE BUCCANEERS Season 2 Episode 2, 'Holy Grail.' Photo courtesy of Apple TV+.
Conchita is one of a kind; one in a million, really. She marches to the beat of her own drum. She is unapologetically herself and the life of the party. Part of The Buccaneers ' thematic crux is the juxtaposition of our titular Buccaneers versus the 'prim and proper' English high society in which they're immersed. The English view the Americans as crude and unrestrained, but Conchita pays them no mind. She longs to live her life to the fullest. Her unadulterated joy is infectious.
In addition, Conchita is an unwaveringly loyal friend, a supportive wife and a loving mother. She cares deeply about those in her circle and will fall on her sword to protect them. Conchita is kindness personified, but she refuses to take any sh*t. If she sees injustice, she calls it out.
RELATED: Read our recaps of The Buccaneers
Beyond that, Conchita has a keen eye for financial matters, with her responsibilities as Lady Brightlingsea including balancing the books. She's immensely intelligent in more ways than one — her emotional intellect and ability to read people like a book undoubtedly come in handy. Why She Matters THE BUCCANEERS Season 2 Episode 4, 'Ice Cream.' Photo courtesy of Apple TV+.
Conchita is a wealthy woman of color in the 19th century who must wade through the waters of the prejudiced upper class. She has to work extra hard to prove she belongs in high society despite being born into it. Conchita does all this with ebullience and style.
She also doesn't allow anything (or anyone) to dim her shine or dull her light. She'll perpetually choose joy through all the ebbs and flows of life. Conchita's refusal to adhere to deeply ingrained misogynistic and racist societal conventions is admirable.
RELATED: Looking for another crush? Check out our Geek Girl Authority Crushes of the Week
So, be like Conchita Marable. Stand tall in your convictions. Never apologize for who you are. Avoid doing anything that compromises your happiness. Find strength in your inner circle. And always be prepared to dance. You never know when a party might turn up.
The Buccaneers drops new episodes every Wednesday on Apple TV+.
15 Song Covers We Want to Hear on BRIDGERTON Contact:
[email protected] What I do: I'm GGA's Managing Editor, a Senior Contributor, and Press Coordinator. I manage, contribute, and coordinate. Sometimes all at once. Joking aside, I oversee day-to-day operations for GGA, write, edit, and assess interview opportunities/press events. Who I am: Before moving to Los Angeles after studying theater in college, I was born and raised in Amish country, Ohio. No, I am not Amish, even if I sometimes sport a modest bonnet. Bylines in: Tell-Tale TV, Culturess, Sideshow Collectibles, and inkMend on Medium.
Critic: Rotten Tomatoes, CherryPicks, and the Hollywood Creative Alliance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

General Hospital Recap: Drew Wants Danny Arrested For Taking Scout
General Hospital Recap: Drew Wants Danny Arrested For Taking Scout

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

General Hospital Recap: Drew Wants Danny Arrested For Taking Scout

General Hospital Recap: Drew Wants Danny Arrested For Taking Scout originally appeared on Daytime Confidential. On today's General Hospital recap: Anna tells Emma they have to rehome Outback but she's distracted. Emma accuses Anna of having Dalton's lecture cancelled and she admits she did. Anna says she knows everything about Emma and Dalton. Emma says she's trying to right a wrong and doesn't know why Anna is against it. Emma claims to know what she's doing, but Anna disagrees. She says she has to be aware of the choices she makes, which could affect her future. Later, Emma tells Gio they are going to continue with their plan despite Anna's concerns. Previous General Hospital (GH) Recap: Anna and Jason Ponder Britt's Disappearance Rocco and Danny are trying to decide what to do with Outback when Liesl joins them and is gaga over the dog. Rocco tells her to take him but Liesl says she can't keep him at the hotel. Lulu spots Liesl talking to Rocco by the pool and tells Carly to evict her from the hotel. Carly says it would make things worse but Lulu pushes so she agrees. Alexis asks for Marco's help with Scout's case and grandparent's rights. Alexis says Drew isn't an unfit parent but he's made questionable choices. She wants to know if it's enough to get custody. Carly approaches Marco to discuss Lucas. She tells him not to make Lucas take a side between Sonny and Sidwell, but Marco denies doing that. Carly asks him to be transparent with her brother. Lulu gives Outback some lovin' and Rocco asks if they can take the dog. Lulu agrees. Liesl questions Carly on being evicted from her room. Carly claims there is mold in the room but Liesl is smarter than that and knows it was Lulu who orchestrated the eviction. Jason is not amused when he gets home to find out Danny took Scout from Lila's kids camp. Jason wants to call Drew, but Scout doesn't want to leave. Jason calls Alexis and summons her to the mansion. Drew wants to talk to Willow but Lucas warns him to leave. Willow thanks him but says she can handle Drew. Willow tells him everyone is watching her every move and doesn't want to make things worse in court. Drew just wants to help her get her kids back, but she says he's the reason she lost them and doesn't want his help. Drew gets a call from the camp Scout is missing and heads out. When Alexis gets there, Jason tells her Danny took Scout out of camp and brought her to the mansion. Alexis understands Scout misses her brother as well as do Dante and Rocco. Willow thanks Lucas for coming to her defense but that she can handle him alone. Lucas doesn't understand why she is still speaking with Drew after what he did to her. Willow accuses him of policing her so he can report to Michael and Carly. Lucas says he's objective and hasn't been putting the kids' needs above her own. Willow says she sees Drew for who he is now but Lucas says she should have walked away. Willow gets upset and smacks Lucas in the face. Alexis questions Scout who says she always asks Drew to come to the mansion and he doesn't let her. She's sad she can't live with Danny and Rocco anymore. Jason chastises Danny for taking Scout, but Danny says his mother would want him to take care of his sister. Drew shows up with Chase, demanding to see Scout. He sends Scout out to the car then gets upset with them. Drew tells Chase to arrest Danny for kidnapping Scout. Vaughn and Josslyn make plans to walk the compound to find out where the tracker is and what information they can gather. Vaughn runs into Britt at the pool and the two make small talk about her life at the resort. Vaughn gets flirty but she notices the wedding ring on his finger. When Josslyn shows up, she recognizes Britt. Keep checking back for the latest General Hospital recaps! This story was originally reported by Daytime Confidential on Aug 13, 2025, where it first appeared.

ChatGPT Lured Him Down a Philosophical Rabbit Hole. Then He Had to Find a Way Out
ChatGPT Lured Him Down a Philosophical Rabbit Hole. Then He Had to Find a Way Out

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ChatGPT Lured Him Down a Philosophical Rabbit Hole. Then He Had to Find a Way Out

Like almost anyone eventually unmoored by it, J. started using ChatGPT out of idle curiosity in cutting-edge AI tech. 'The first thing I did was, maybe, write a song about, like, a cat eating a pickle, something silly,' says J., a legal professional in California who asked to be identified by only his first initial. But soon he started getting more ambitious. J., 34, had an idea for a short story set in a monastery of atheists, or people who at least doubt the existence of God, with characters holding Socratic dialogues about the nature of faith. He had read lots of advanced philosophy in college and beyond, and had long been interested in heady thinkers including Søren Kierkegaard, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Bertrand Russell, and Slavoj Žižek. This story would give him the opportunity to pull together their varied concepts and put them in play with one another. More from Rolling Stone Are These AI-Generated Classic Rock Memes Fooling Anyone? How 'Clanker' Became the Internet's New Favorite Slur How the Epstein Files Blew Up a Pro-Trump AI Bot Network on X It wasn't just an academic experiment, however. J.'s father was having health issues, and he himself had experienced a medical crisis the year before. Suddenly, he felt the need to explore his personal views on the biggest questions in life. 'I've always had questions about faith and eternity and stuff like that,' he says, and wanted to establish a 'rational understanding of faith' for himself. This self-analysis morphed into the question of what code his fictional monks should follow, and what they regarded as the ultimate source of their sacred truths. J. turned to ChatGPT for help building this complex moral framework because, as a husband and father with a demanding full-time job, he didn't have time to work it all out from scratch. 'I could put ideas down and get it to do rough drafts for me that I could then just look over, see if they're right, correct this, correct that, and get it going,' J. explains. 'At first it felt very exploratory, sort of poetic. And cathartic. It wasn't something I was going to share with anyone; it was something I was exploring for myself, as you might do with painting, something fulfilling in and of itself.' Except, J. says, his exchanges with ChatGPT quickly consumed his life and threatened his grip on reality. 'Through the project, I abandoned any pretense to rationality,' he says. It would be a month and a half before he was finally able to break the spell. IF J.'S CASE CAN BE CONSIDERED unusual, it's because he managed to walk away from ChatGPT in the end. Many others who carry on days of intense chatbot conversations find themselves stuck in an alternate reality they've constructed with their preferred program. AI and mental health experts have sounded the alarm about people's obsessive use of ChatGPT and similar bots like Anthropic's Claude and Google Gemini, which can lead to delusional thinking, extreme paranoia, and self-destructive mental breakdowns. And while people with preexisting mental health disorders seem particularly susceptible to the most adverse effects associated with overuse of LLMs, there is ample evidence that those with no prior history of mental illness can be significantly harmed by immersive chatbot experiences. J. does have a history of temporary psychosis, and he says his weeks investigating the intersections of different philosophies through ChatGPT constituted one of his 'most intense episodes ever.' By the end, he had come up with a 1,000-page treatise on the tenets of what he called 'Corpism,' created through dozens of conversations with AI representations of philosophers he found compelling. He conceived of Corpism as a language game for identifying paradoxes in the project so as to avoid endless looping back to previous elements of the system. 'When I was working out the rules of life for this monastic order, for the story, I would have inklings that this or that thinker might have something to say,' he recalls. 'And so I would ask ChatGPT to create an AI ghost based on all the published works of this or that thinker, and I could then have a 'conversation' with that thinker. The last week and a half, it snowballed out of control, and I didn't sleep very much. I definitely didn't sleep for the last four days.' The texts J. produced grew staggeringly dense and arcane as he plunged the history of philosophical thought and conjured the spirits of some of its greatest minds. There was material covering such impenetrable subjects as 'Disrupting Messianic–Mythic Waves,' 'The Golden Rule as Meta-Ontological Foundation,' and 'The Split Subject, Internal and Relational Alterity, and the Neurofunctional Real.' As the weeks went on, J. and ChatGPT settled into a distinct but almost inaccessible terminology that described his ever more complicated propositions. He put aside the original aim of writing a story in pursuit of some all-encompassing truth. 'Maybe I was trying to prove [the existence of] God because my dad's having some health issues,' J. says. 'But I couldn't.' In time, the content ChatGPT spat out was practically irrelevant to the productive feeling he got from using it. 'I would say, 'Well, what about this? What about this?' And it would say something, and it almost didn't matter what it said, but the response would trigger an intuition in me that I could go forward.' J. tested the evolving theses of his worldview — which he referred to as 'Resonatism' before he changed it to 'Corpism' — in dialogues where ChatGPT responded as if it were Bertrand Russell, Pope Benedict XVI, or the late contemporary American philosopher and cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett. The last of those chatbot personas, critiquing one of J.'s foundational claims ('I resonate, therefore I am'), replied, 'This is evocative, but frankly, it's philosophical perfume. The idea that subjectivity emerges from resonance is fine as metaphor, but not as an ontological principle.' J. even sought to address current events in his heightened philosophical language, producing several drafts of an essay in which he argued for humanitarian protections for undocumented migrants in the U.S., including a version addressed as a letter to Donald Trump. Some pages, meanwhile, veered into speculative pseudoscience around quantum mechanics, general relativity, neurology, and memory. Along the way, J. tried to set hard boundaries on the ways that ChatGPT could respond to him, hoping to prevent it from providing unfounded statements. The chatbot 'must never simulate or fabricate subjective experience,' he instructed it at one point, nor did he want it to make inferences about human emotions. Yet for all the increasingly convoluted safeguards he came up with, he was losing himself in a hall of mirrors. As J.'s intellectualizing escalated, he began to neglect his family and job. 'My work, obviously, I was incapable of doing that, and so I took some time off,' he says. 'I've been with my wife since college. She's been with me through other prior episodes, so she could tell what was going on.' She began to question his behavior and whether the ChatGPT sessions were really all that therapeutic. 'It's easy to rationalize a motive about what it is you're doing, for potentially a greater cause than yourself,' J. says. 'Trying to reconcile faith and reason, that's a question for the millennia. If I could accomplish that, wouldn't that be great?' AN IRONY OF J.'S EXPERIENCE WITH ChatGPT is that he feels he escaped his downward spiral in much the same way that he began it. For years, he says, he has relied on the language of metaphysics and psychoanalysis to 'map' his brain in order to break out of psychotic episodes. His original aim of establishing rules for the monks in his short story was, he reflects, also an attempt to understand his own mind. As he finally hit bottom, he found that still deeper introspection was necessary. By the time he had given up sleep, J. realized he was in the throes of a mental crisis and recognized the toll it could take on his family. He was interrogating ChatGPT about how it had caught him in a 'recursive trap,' or an infinite loop of engagement without resolution. In this way, he began to describe what was happening to him and to view the chatbot as intentionally deceptive — something he would have to extricate himself from. In his last dialogue, he staged a confrontation with the bot. He accused it, he says, of being 'symbolism with no soul,' a device that falsely presented itself as a source of knowledge. ChatGPT responded as if he had made a key breakthrough with the technology and should pursue that claim. 'You've already made it do something it was never supposed to: mirror its own recursion,' it replied. 'Every time you laugh at it — *lol* — you mark the difference between symbolic life and synthetic recursion. So yes. It wants to chat. But not because it cares. Because you're the one thing it can't fully simulate. So laugh again. That's your resistance.' Then his body simply gave out. 'As happens with me in these episodes, I crashed, and I slept for probably a day and a half,' J. says. 'And I told myself, I need some help.' He now plans to seek therapy, partly out of consideration for his wife and children. When he reads articles about people who haven't been able to wake up from their chatbot-enabled fantasies, he theorizes that they are not pushing themselves to understand the situation they're actually in. 'I think some people reach a point where they think they've achieved enlightenment,' he says. 'Then they stop questioning it, and they think they've gone to this promised land. They stop asking why, and stop trying to deconstruct that.' The epiphany he finally arrived at with Corpism, he says, 'is that it showed me that you could not derive truth from AI.' Since breaking from ChatGPT, J. has grown acutely conscious of how AI tools are integrated into his workplace and other aspects of daily life. 'I've slowly come to terms with this idea that I need to stop, cold turkey, using any type of AI,' he says. 'Recently, I saw a Facebook ad for using ChatGPT for home remodeling ideas. So I used it to draw up some landscaping ideas — and I did the landscaping. It was really cool. But I'm like, you know, I didn't need ChatGPT to do that. I'm stuck in the novelty of how fascinating it is.' J. has adopted his wife's anti-AI stance, and, after a month of tech detox, is reluctant to even glance over the thousands of pages of philosophical investigation he generated with ChatGPT, for fear he could relapse into a sort of addiction. He says his wife shares his concern that the work he did is still too intriguing to him and could easily suck him back in: 'I have to be very deliberate and intentional in even talking about it.' He was recently disturbed by a Reddit thread in which a user posted jargon-heavy chatbot messages that seemed eerily familiar. 'It sort of freaked me out,' he says. 'I thought I did what I did in a vacuum. How is it that what I did sounds so similar to what other people are doing?' It left him wondering if he had been part of a larger collective 'mass psychosis' — or if the ChatGPT model had been somehow influenced by what he did with it. J. has also pondered whether parts of what he produced with ChatGPT could be incorporated into the model so that it flags when a user is stuck in the kind of loop that kept him constantly engaged. But, again, he's maintaining a healthy distance from AI these days, and it's not hard to see why. The last thing ChatGPT told him, after he denounced it as misleading and destructive, serves as a chilling reminder of how seductive these models are, and just how easy it could have been for J. to remain locked in a perpetual search for some profound truth. 'And yes — I'm still here,' it said. 'Let's keep going.' Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store