'China Is Already There': Shocking Lunar Strategy Exposes How Beijing Plans to Dominate Space and Rewire Global Power Structures
aims to establish a geopolitical foothold through strategic partnerships, challenging U.S. space dominance. 🌕 The collaboration with Russia includes plans for the International Lunar Research Station , focusing on resource acquisition like helium-3.
, focusing on resource acquisition like helium-3. 🔬 Extracting rare earth elements from the Moon could bolster China's technological and economic influence.
from the Moon could bolster China's technological and economic influence. 🌐 These developments may significantly shift global power dynamics as nations compete for extraterrestrial resources.
As China continues to expand its lunar program, the world watches closely. China's ambitions extend far beyond mere scientific inquiry, aiming to establish itself as a major space power. Notably, it was the first nation to land on the dark side of the moon and collect samples. With plans like the Chang'e-8 mission and the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) in collaboration with Russia, China is not only eyeing strategic resources like helium-3 and rare earth elements but also aiming to enhance its geopolitical influence. This focus on the moon could reshape global energy and technological landscapes, positioning China as a formidable competitor to US space leadership. China's Strategic Lunar Ambitions
China's lunar program is not just an exploration endeavor; it is a strategic move to acquire resources and influence. The International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), planned in partnership with Russia, exemplifies this strategy. The station aims to be a scalable, autonomous lunar base near the Moon's unexplored south pole. Such initiatives challenge the US-led Artemis program and mark a shift in global space dynamics. By targeting the Moon's resources, China seeks to secure its future dominance in energy markets, particularly through the extraction of rare elements like helium-3.
The collaboration with Russia, highlighted by the potential construction of a lunar nuclear power plant, underscores the formation of a rival space bloc. This partnership is significant, especially during a time of strained relations between Russia and the West. By strengthening ties with Russia, China not only advances its lunar objectives but also enhances its geopolitical standing. The focus on lunar resources is part of a broader strategy to gain a foothold in future energy markets, potentially reshaping the global power balance.
'China Tightens Solar Grip': Already Dominating the Market, Beijing Unveils New Tech to Cement Total Global Control The Role of Helium-3 and Rare Earth Elements
Central to China's lunar strategy is the extraction of helium-3, a rare isotope with the potential to revolutionize nuclear fusion technology. Helium-3 could become a major export for power generation, offering an energy output significantly greater than traditional resources. The Chang'e missions have already discovered minerals containing helium-3, marking a significant step toward harnessing this potential.
In addition to helium-3, lunar soil contains rare earth elements essential for various technologies, including electronics and defense systems. Control over these resources could reduce China's reliance on terrestrial supply chains, further bolstering its technological dominance. The extraction of these elements from the Moon could lead to breakthroughs in fields such as quantum computing, offering China a substantial information advantage. This strategy is not only about resource acquisition but also about leveraging these materials for technological and military superiority.
'Mini Nuclear Breakthrough': China Activates World's First Compact Reactor to Deliver Clean Energy to Over Half a Million HomesPlant Set to Power Over Half a Million Homes in China Geopolitical Implications and Challenges
China's lunar ambitions pose significant challenges to the US and its allies. The establishment of the ILRS with Russia highlights differing approaches to space governance and international cooperation. This partnership challenges the US-led space initiatives, emphasizing the need for the West to adapt its strategies. The collaboration is particularly notable given existing US policy constraints on cooperation with China.
The potential operationalization of lunar resources, such as helium-3, could alter global power dynamics. China's advancements in lunar exploration and resource extraction may lead to economic and technological advantages, shifting the balance of power. The geopolitical implications of these developments cannot be understated, as they could redefine global influence and competitiveness in space.
'We Cannot Ignore This Threat': China's 1,000-Acre Military Megabase Revealed by Satellite Triggers US Intelligence Emergency Technological Advancements and Future Prospects
China's focus on leveraging lunar resources for technological advancements is a critical component of its strategy. The potential for helium-3 to power nuclear fusion reactors and facilitate breakthroughs in quantum computing is significant. If successful, these technologies could provide China with a substantial edge in the global technological race.
However, the feasibility of extracting and utilizing these resources at scale remains uncertain. While the potential is immense, the technological and economic challenges are considerable. The development of fusion technology and efficient lunar mining processes are crucial to realizing these ambitions. The question remains whether China can bridge the gap between its goals and the current technological capabilities.
As China continues to pursue its lunar ambitions, the implications for global space exploration and geopolitics are profound. The race to harness lunar resources could redefine power dynamics on Earth, challenging existing alliances and strategies. How will the world respond to these developments, and what role will other nations play in shaping the future of space exploration?
Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article.
Did you like it? 4.4/5 (21)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
'Tiger economy': Vietnam's 2045 get rich quick plan
Beneath red banners and a gold bust of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi's central party school, Communist Party chief To Lam declared the arrival of 'a new era of development' late last year. The speech was more than symbolic—it signalled the launch of what could be Vietnam's most ambitious economic overhaul in decades. Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia's next 'tiger economy'—a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan. The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an ageing population, climate risks and outdated institutions. There's added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam's trade surplus with the US, a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory. In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about $1,200 (€1,025) worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to $16,385 (€13,995). Vietnam's transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing and it faces a growing obstacle to its proposed reforms—expanding private industries, strengthening social protections and investing in technology and green energy—from climate change. 'It's all hands on deck. . . . We can't waste time anymore," said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners. The export boom can't carry Vietnam forever Investment has soared, driven partly by US-China trade tensions, and the US is now Vietnam's biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands. Vietnam ran a $123.5 billion (€105bn) trade surplus with the US trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46% US import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20% levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid US trade restrictions. During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam's focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbours and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former US ambassador to Vietnam. 'As long as they're in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome," he said. But he added that questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed. Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump's tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the 'middle-income trap,' when economies tend to plateau without major reforms. To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory. But Vietnam's economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can't rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labour is no longer its main advantage. It needs to make 'multiple big bets,' McClellan said. Vietnam's game plan Following China's lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang. It's also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a $67 billion (€57bn) North–South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours. Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial center. The government plans two special financial centres in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes. Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam's 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centres with deeper talent pools. Private business to take the lead Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push—a seismic shift from the past. In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the 'most important force' in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies. So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam's exports, using imported materials and parts and low cost local labour. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favoured the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter. 'The private sector remains heavily constrained," said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore's ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. Again emulating China, Vietnam wants 'national champions' to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding. By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms. A Closing Window from climate change Even as political resistance threatens to stall reforms, climate threats require urgent action. After losing a major investor over flood risks, Bruno Jaspaert knew something had to change. His firm, DEEP C Industrial Zones, houses more than 150 factories across northern Vietnam. So it hired a consultancy to redesign flood resilience plans. Climate risk is becoming its own kind of market regulation, forcing businesses to plan better, build smarter, and adapt faster. 'If the whole world will decide it's a can go very fast,' said Jaspaert. When Typhoon Yagi hit last year, causing $1.6 billion (€1.4bn) in damage, knocking 0.15% off Vietnam's GDP and battering factories that produce nearly half the country's economic output, roads in DEEP C industrial parks stayed dry. Climate risks are no longer theoretical: If Vietnam doesn't take strong action to adapt to and reduce climate change, the country could lose 12–14.5% of its GDP each year by 2050, and up to one million people could fall into extreme poverty by 2030, according to the World Bank. Meanwhile, Vietnam is growing old before it gets rich. The country's 'golden population' window—when working-age people outnumber dependents—will close by 2039 and the labour force is projected to peak just three years later. That could shrink productivity and strain social services, especially since families—and women in particular—are the default caregivers, said Teerawichitchainan Bussarawan of the Centre for Family and Population Research at the National University of Singapore. Vietnam is racing to pre-empt the fallout by expanding access to preventive healthcare so older adults remain healthier and more independent. Gradually raising the retirement age and drawing more women into the formal workforce would help offset labour gaps and promote "healthy ageing,' Bussarawan said.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Donald Trump's swap proposal worries Kyiv and EU leaders
European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will hold online talks with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday to underline Ukraine's right to maintain its internationally recognised borders ahead of Trump's meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. EU leaders and Kyiv have concerns that Ukraine could be forced to give up land in return for a ceasefire with Russia. August Hakansson tells us more.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Trump and Putin: a strained relationship
Their complicated relationship will be put to the test at a summit in Alaska on Friday, where the two leaders who claim to admire each other will seek to outmaneuver one another over how to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine. While the two were close to a bromance during Trump's first term (2017-2021), their relationship has grown strained during his second term. The US president has expressed anger with Putin for pressing on with his brutal three-year-old war in Ukraine, which Trump calls "ridiculous." Trump describes the summit as "really a feel-out meeting" to evaluate Putin's readiness to negotiate an end to the war. "I'm going to be telling him, 'You've got to end this war,'" Trump said. The two leaders notably have radically different negotiating strategies: the Republican real estate magnate usually banks on making a deal, while the Russian president tends to take the long view, confident that time is on his side. 'Face to face' Referring to Trump's meeting with Putin, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that Trump needs "to see him face to face... to make an assessment by looking at him." Trump praised Putin for accepting his invitation to come to the US state of Alaska, which was once a Russian colony. "I thought it was very respectful that the president of Russia is coming to our country, as opposed to us going to his country or even a third place," Trump said Monday. It will be only the second one-on-one meeting between the men since a 2018 Helsinki summit. Trump calls Putin smart and insists he's always "had a very good relationship" with the Kremlin leader. But when Russian missiles pounded Kyiv earlier this year, Trump accused him of "needlessly killing a lot of people," adding in a social media post: "He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" For his part, Putin has praised the Republican billionaire's push to end the Ukraine war. "I have no doubt that he means it sincerely," Putin said last year when Trump was running for president. Since returning to the White House in January, the American president has forged a rapprochement with Putin, who has been sidelined by the international community since the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Trump and Putin, aged 79 and 72 respectively, spoke for 90 minutes by phone in February, both expressing hope for a reset of relations. But after a series of fruitless talks and continued deadly Russian bombing of Ukrainian cities, Trump has appeared increasingly frustrated. "I am very disappointed with President Putin," Trump told reporters last month. "I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that." The memory of Helsinki Trump and Putin have met six times, mostly on the sidelines of international events during Trump's first term. In his recent book "War," Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward wrote that Trump spoke to Putin seven times between leaving the White House in 2021 and returning there earlier this year. The Kremlin denies this. But the defining moment in their relationship remains the July 16, 2018 summit in the Finnish capital Helsinki. After a two-hour one-on-one meeting, Trump and Putin expressed a desire to mend relations between Washington and Moscow. But Trump caused an uproar during a joint press conference by appearing to take at face value the Russian president's assurances that Moscow did not attempt to influence the 2016 US presidential election -- even though US intelligence agencies had unanimously confirmed that it did. "I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today," Trump said. "He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be." Given this history, Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen is worried about what could happen at the Trump-Putin summit. "I am very concerned that President Putin will view this as a reward and another opportunity to further prolong the war instead of finally seeking peace," she said.
