
DoorDash CEO Tony Xu is taking on the role of industry consolidator in food delivery
During the depths of the Covid pandemic, with restaurants around the country facing an existential crisis, DoorDash CEO Tony Xu had an unconventional proposal. He wanted to cut commissions.
Chief Business Officer Keith Yandell worried that such a move would result in a massive hit to profits ahead of the company's planned IPO. But Xu made a persuasive case.
"If restaurants don't thrive, we cannot," Yandell told CNBC in a recent interview, recalling Xu's perspective at the time. "We need to take a leadership position."
The company ended up sacrificing over $100 million in fees, Xu later said.
Since starting DoorDash on the campus of Stanford University in 2013, the now 40-year-old CEO has navigated the notoriously cutthroat and low-margin business of food delivery, building a company that Wall Street today values at close to $90 billion. The stock has emerged as a tech darling this year, jumping 23%, while the Nasdaq is still down for the year largely on tariff concerns.
More than four years after its IPO, net profits remain slim. But that's not getting in the way of Xu's mission to become an industry consolidator, using a combination of cash and new debt to fuel an acquisition spree at a time when big tech deals remain scarce. Earlier this month, DoorDash scooped up British food delivery startup Deliveroo for about $3.9 billion and restaurant technology company SevenRooms for $1.2 billion.
"What we've delivered for a customer yesterday probably isn't good enough for what we will deliver for them today," Xu told CNBC's "Squawk Box" after the deals were announced.
This week DoorDash announced the pricing of $2.5 billion in convertible debt, and said the proceeds could be used in part for acquisitions.
The San Francisco-based company has a history with scooping up competitors to grow market share. In 2019, it bought food delivery competitor Caviar for $410 million from Square, now known as Block. About two years later, DoorDash said it was paying $8.1 billion for international delivery platform Wolt. The deal was its last big transaction until this month.
When DoorDash entered the food delivery market, it had to face off against the likes of GrubHub and Seamless, which later joined forces. That combined entity was bought late last year by restaurant owner Wonder Group. In 2014, Uber launched Uber Eats, which is now DoorDash's biggest competitor in the U.S.
"It's a very competitive market, and I think merchants do have choice," Xu said in the CNBC interview. "What we're focused on is always trying to innovate and bring new products to match increasing standards and expectations from customers."
DoorDash didn't make Xu available for an interview for this story, but provided a statement about the company's acquisition strategy.
"We're very picky, very patient, and conscious that, for most companies, deals don't work out in hindsight," the company said. "When we see an opportunity that brings value to customers, expands our potential to empower local economies around the world, and has a path to strong long-term returns on capital, we tend to push our chips in."
DoorDash differentiated itself early on by cornering suburban markets that had fewer delivery options, while other players attacked city centers. When Covid shut down restaurant dining in early 2020, DoorDash capitalized on the booming demand for deliveries. Revenue more than tripled that year, and grew 69% in 2021.
Colleagues and early investors credit a customer-first focus for much of Xu's success. Gokul Rajaram, who joined DoorDash through its Caviar acquisition, described Xu as "the best operational leader in the U.S." after Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Restaurants haven't universally viewed DoorDash as an ally. Commissions can reach as high as 30%, which is a hefty cut to fork over. Many restaurants have reluctantly paid the high fees because of DoorDash's dominant market share, which reached an estimated 67%. In 2021, the company introduced three tiers of pricing, with a basic option at 15% for more price-sensitive businesses.
DoorDash needs the high fees in order to stay in the black. The company's contribution profit as a percentage of total marketplace volume hovers below 5%.
Colleagues who have known Xu for decades say the food delivery entrepreneur hasn't changed much since the early days of the company.
Yandell said Xu once took advice from his young daughter, who complained about a routing issue while accompanying him on food delivery orders. All employees, including Xu, are required to complete orders and handle support calls every year as part of the company's WeDash program.
In a part of the country known for the pomp of its wealthy founders, Xu has a very different reputation.
Early workers recall memories of Xu pulling up in a dilapidated green 2001 Honda Accord to team events, or participating in company knockout basketball games referred to as "knockys," next to the animal hospital in Palo Alto, which DoorDash briefly called its headquarters. Xu also personally approved every offer for the company's first 4,000 employees.
Xu spends many mornings answering customer service complaints. He often drops his kids off at school and, after tucking them in at night, hops on calls with international regions, colleagues say. Xu is an avid Gold State Warriors basketball fan but has a soft spot for the Chicago Bulls, having spent many years in Illinois. Once or twice a week, Xu squeezes in a morning run, and will often do so while traveling to explore different neighborhoods and stores.
Xu was born in China and moved with his family to Champaign, Illinois, in 1989. Growing up, he played basketball and mowed lawns to save up for a Nintendo. He told Stanford's View From the Top podcast in 2021 that the experience, and watching his parents hustle, taught him how to "earn your way into better things."
His "characteristics became the company's values," said Alfred Lin, an early DoorDash investor and partner at venture firm Sequoia.
Xu often attributes his entrepreneurial spirit to his parents. His mother worked as a doctor in China, and juggled three jobs in the U.S. for over a decade, saving up enough to eventually open a medical clinic. His father worked as a waiter while pursuing a Ph.D. Xu said on the podcast that watching his mom gave him a deep understanding of what it takes to run a small business, which came in handy in DoorDash's early years as he was trying to convert restaurants into customers.
Employees say Xu has a reputation for detecting hidden talents among his colleagues. Jessica Lachs, the company's chief analytics officer, was working as a general manager assisting with DoorDash's Los Angeles launch when Xu guided her toward her passion for data.
"He believes in leaning into the things you're really good at, rather than trying to be mediocre at a lot of things," she said.
After Toby Espinosa, DoorDash's ads vice president, lost a deal with a major fast food company during his early years at the startup, Xu told him to work "10 times harder" and become an expert in his field. A few years later, the company secured the partnership, Espinosa said.
Grit and struggle defined the early years of DoorDash. The founding team of four managed deliveries around Stanford and Palo Alto though a Google Voice number directed to their cellphones.
DoorDash emerged out of a Stanford business school course known as Startup Garage, taught by Professor Stefanos Zenios. The class requires students to present a business idea, test it, and then pitch it to investors.
Zenios said Xu stood out with his data-driven approach and natural leadership qualities. The team tested two different ideas, including a platform that helped small businesses better track the effectiveness of their marketing, he recalls. Zenios called the idea to target suburban areas a "brilliant insight."
Xu and his team entered Y Combinator in the summer of 2013. The three-month startup accelerator program is known for spawning companies like Airbnb, Stripe and Reddit. Every session culminates with a demo day in front of some of Silicon Valley's biggest investors.
The DoorDash idea excited Paul Buchheit, creator of Gmail and a partner at Y Combinator. But like many other potential investors, Buchheit was skeptical about the economic model.
"You had a talented team of founders working on what I thought was an idea that had potential," he said. "That's basically the formula for a good startup."
On pitch day, the company failed to lure any venture firms, but Buchheit later participated as a seed investor.
Shortly after demo day, DoorDash encountered Saar Gur of Charles River Ventures. Gur had been looking for a food delivery platform to back and was conducting due diligence on another company when a friend led him to DoorDash.
By the end of their first meeting, they were "finishing each other's sentences," Gur said.
Sequoia's Lin initially passed on DoorDash after the Y Combinator pitch, but kept in touch with the team. Lin said he wanted to see data that showed the platform could penetrate beyond Stanford and Palo Alto, and retain customers. He ended up leading two institutional rounds, attaining a 20% stake for Sequoia at the time of the IPO.
"Tony always believed that his company would succeed, or they'll find a way to succeed," Lin said.
Shortly after its Y Combinator stint, DoorDash hit an early roadblock. Following a Stanford football game, a rush of orders bombarded its delivery system causing massive delays, Xu told Y Combinator's CEO Garry Tan in an interview this year.
The founders refunded the orders and spent the night baking cookies, then driving them to customers early the next morning.
Oren's Hummus co-owner Mistie Boulton said DoorDash still takes that approach. The team comes to meet with her every quarter and she serves as a beta tester for new products.
The restaurant, which started in Palo Alto and has since expanded to a half-dozen locations across the Bay Area, was one of DoorDash's first clients, latching onto the opportunity to reach more customers beyond its small establishment that frequently had lines snaking out the door.
"We just fell in love with the idea," Boulton said. "The number one thing that encouraged and enticed me to want to work with them was Xu's passion. He really is one of those people that you can count on."
Wall Street is now counting on Xu's ability to execute big deals, even with the company having this month surpassed $10 billion in delivery orders worldwide.
The acquisition of Deliveroo, based in London, marks a renewed effort by DoorDash to expand its presence overseas, following the purchase of Finland's Wolt three years ago.
The cash deal for SevenRooms, a New York City-based data platform for restaurants and hotels to manage booking information, takes DoorDash into an entirely new category. Xu told CNBC that DoorDash is a "multi-product company now that's operating on a global scale."
Following the acquisition announcements, which coincided with a disappointing earnings report in March, analysts at Piper Sandler reiterated their hold recommendation on the stock.
One reason for concern, they said, was that "integrating multiple acquisitions at once may create some noise near-term."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Duolingo Stock a Buy in the Second Half of 2025?
Duolingo delivered a record performance in 2024. It has the potential to sustain its growth momentum for the foreseeable future. The stock's high valuation should give investors pause. 10 stocks we like better than Duolingo › Duolingo (NASDAQ: DUOL) stock has been on fire recently. In the last 12 months, it has risen 164% due to strong financial results and growth prospects. If you missed out on that impressive rally, you may now be considering initiating a position in the stock. Here's what you need to know about this high-growth tech company. Duolingo offers the world's No. 1 language learning app, and it enjoyed a stellar 2024. All key metrics, including revenue, bookings, and net income, reached record levels. Revenue surged 41% to $748 million, while net income rose more than sixfold from $14 million to $89 million. And the company kicked off 2025 with a bang as well. For the first quarter, revenue jumped 38% year over year to $231 million, and bookings increased 38% to $272 million. Its adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margin also improved about 900 basis points to 27.2% for the quarter. The foundation of that strong performance is steady user growth. Monthly active users (MAU) reached 130.2 million, up 33% year over year. Daily active users saw an even bigger boost, up 49% to 46.6 million. But overall user growth is just one part of the story. Duolingo is also improving its paid subscriber penetration rate, which increased year over year from 8.6% to 8.9%. Ongoing improvements to its content and user experience have led to better user engagement. The app's virtual assistant Lily, for example, allows Duolingo Max subscribers to practice their language skills in a fun, low-stakes environment to help them gain confidence over time. Despite the company's already impressive reach and scale, its has a long growth runway. Management says the online language learning industry will be worth $47 billion in 2025, just a small slice of the $6 trillion of annual global education spending. The company also estimates 2 billion people worldwide are learning a new language. And of its 130.2 million MAUs, less than one in 10 are paying subscribers, giving the tech company a huge opportunity to grow its user base and convert them over time. To this end, Duolingo's continuous improvement efforts should significantly contribute to attracting, retaining, and converting normal learners to paid subscribers. It has added new subjects, such as music and math, in an effort to expand beyond its language courses. Introducing artificial intelligence to the platform is another example of how Duolingo is working to improve learning outcomes. The company plans to enhance the user experience by making Lily and her environment 3D with interactive backgrounds to make conversations more immersive for learners. While there are many things to like about Duolingo's solid execution and growth prospects, the stock doesn't come cheap. As of this writing, it boasts a price-to-earnings ratio of more than 250. Even if you believe this is a growth-first story and focus on its price-to-sales valuation instead, at 30 times trailing revenue, Duolingo is one of the most expensive large-cap stocks in the Nasdaq Composite index. A premium is expected for most growth stocks, but paying such a hefty price comes with significant risk. Even a small hiccup that calls Duolingo's bullish outlook into question could see its valuation contract dramatically. That potential for short-term volatility, however, shouldn't immediately scare investors away from a company that's clearly firing on all cylinders as it tackles a massive market opportunity. With that in mind, a position in Duolingo makes the most sense for investors with a long investment horizon of at least five years -- or an immense risk appetite. Before you buy stock in Duolingo, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Duolingo wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 Lawrence Nga has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Duolingo. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Duolingo Stock a Buy in the Second Half of 2025? was originally published by The Motley Fool


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Oil giant BP seeks buyers for one of its crown jewels as it looks to stave off a takeover
Britain's BP appears to be attracting a number of possible buyers for its Castrol lubricants business as the struggling oil giant seeks to fend off a prospective takeover . Energy companies including India's Reliance Industries and Saudi Arabia's oil behemoth Aramco , as well as private equity firms Apollo Global Management and Lone Star Funds, have all been touted as suitors for BP's Castrol unit, according to Bloomberg , citing people familiar with the matter. It's thought the sale of Castrol could fetch between $8 billion to $10 billion. BP, which launched a strategic review of its Castrol unit in late February, declined to comment on the speculation. The reports come as BP remains firmly in the spotlight as a prime takeover target. The London-listed oil company recently sought to restore investor confidence by launching a fundamental strategic reset. BP's new direction included a green strategy U-turn and the divestment of $20 billion of assets by the end of 2027. Analysts described BP's Castrol unit as one of the "crown jewels" of its portfolio, noting that reports of interested buyers should be viewed positively as the firm's management look to deliver on the new strategy. Read more Oil giant BP is seen as a prime takeover target. Is a blockbuster mega-merger in the cards? BP to slash renewable spending and double down on fossil fuels BP profit falls sharply but CEO says oil major 'off to a great start' in strategy reset Maurizio Carulli, energy and materials analyst at wealth manager Quilter Cheviot, told CNBC that it remains unclear whether the divestment of Castrol would stave off a potential takeover, however. He cited three considerations an industrial buyer might look at. Firstly, Carulli said the level of BP's debt would decrease with the sale of its high-performance lubricants business, potentially making the firm more attractive to a prospective buyer. Ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty could also make it difficult for BP to sell Castrol at an attractive valuation, he added. This could subsequently have a negative effect on BP's valuation, making it a cheaper proposition for any possible suitor. Thirdly, Carulli cited the level of cost and revenues that another energy firm could extract from the purchase, adding that the sale of Castrol is unlikely to substantially affect BP given that it is a small part of its overall business. 'Point of maximum weakness' BP, which reported weaker-than-expected first-quarter profit, has faced renewed pressure from activist investors in recent months. In late April, for instance, U.S. hedge fund Elliott Management went public with a stake of more than 5% in the company. Elliott was first reported to have assumed a position in BP back in February, driving a share price rally amid expectations that its involvement could pressure the firm to shift gears back toward its oil and gas businesses. BP CEO Murray Auchincloss told CNBC's " Squawk Box Europe " on April 29 that the company was "off to a great start" in delivering on its strategic reset. He cited the firm's "highest upstream operating efficiency in history" and six recent oil and gas exploration discoveries. Lydia Rainforth, head of European energy, equity research at Barclays, said BP's future appears to be "really bright" — if the company can get through the next six months. "The sum of the parts is, I think, much greater than where the current share price is, but if I think about when that point of maximum weakness is for BP, it is over the next six months," Rainforth told CNBC's Steve Sedgwick on May 22. "As I get towards the end of the year, hopefully we will see some divestments taking down debt. Things like, they've talked about selling their lubricants business — that could raise $12 to $15 billion," she added. On the right track? Shares of BP, which have underperformed industry peers, are more than 20% lower over the last 12 months. The ongoing weakness has stoked speculation of a prospective tie-up with domestic rival Shell . U.S. oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron have also been touted as possible suitors. Shell has declined to comment on the speculation, while spokespersons for Exxon Mobil and Chevron have not previously responded to a request for comment. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said shareholders are looking for BP to provide evidence that it can generate more cash to ensure net debt doesn't keep rising and buybacks and dividends can continue at current levels at the very least. Plans for $3 billion to $4 billion in asset sales and lower capital investment in 2025 are clearly part of BP's push to bring down net debt to between $14 billion and $18 billion by the end of 2027, Mould said. "Delivery here, perhaps via a successful disposal of Castrol, would help convince shareholders that BP is on the right track," Mould told CNBC via email. "But too many more quarters of weak cash flow and lower share buybacks may not help management's cause and lead to further engagement by the usually indefatigable Elliott."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
1 Magnificent S&P 500 Dividend Stock Down 23% to Buy and Hold Forever
PepsiCo has popular beverage and food brands. Higher prices have hurt short-term results. The board of directors remains committed to raising dividends. 10 stocks we like better than PepsiCo › Equity markets have been volatile this year. Uncertain tariff policies and the impact on the global economy have certainly played a role. During these unsettled times, turning to a dividend-paying stock that has experienced a large price drop can prove a wise investment, providing the company's long-term fundamentals remain sound. Fortunately, PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP), although its share price has fallen nearly 23% over the last year through May 30, fits the bill nicely. It's time to look closely at what makes this consumer staples company a buying opportunity for long-term dividend-seeking investors. Most people know about the company's Pepsi soda brand. However, PepsiCo has a host of brands across beverage and food categories that consumers recognize and buy. PepsiCo's beverages include Gatorade, Mountain Dew, and Ocean Spray. It also sells food like cereal, granola bars, oatmeal, and a host of snacks under brands like Life, Quaker, and Doritos. Unfortunately, even PepsiCo's products aren't immune from consumers fatigued by higher prices. Its first-quarter adjusted revenue, which removes foreign-currency translation effects and the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, grew a tepid 1%. This was entirely due to higher prices, which added 3 percentage points. Meanwhile, volume subtracted 2 percentage points. Since the company sells its products globally, the impact of tariffs remains unclear. However, it could raise costs and force management to raise prices. This could further dampen demand and hurt profitability. Management currently expects this year's adjusted earnings per share to come in roughly flat versus 2024. Previously, it called for a mid-single-digit percentage increase. However, given the company's breadth of offerings, I'm not concerned about long-term demand when tariff policies become more stable. In the meantime, PepsiCo's shareholders can collect reliable dividends. In fact, the board of directors raised the June quarter's payout by 5%. That marked 53 straight years with an increase, making the company a Dividend King. At the new $5.69 per-share annual rate, shareholders can sit back and collect the 4.3% dividend yield. That's more than triple the S&P 500 index's 1.3% yield. It's typically a positive sign when companies raise dividends, particularly given that they're loath to cut payouts. However, it's still useful to check for yourself. And PepsiCo meets the test with a 78% payout ratio. Of course, PepsiCo's dividends could get cut if its products see a long-term decline in demand. However, with its stable of well-known products, I don't see that happening. Consumers have been hit with higher prices before, and more may come down the pike. These are short-term effects, but demand should rebound once the larger economic headwinds calm down. After all, people will still buy soda, Gatorade, and chips, and PepsiCo has a plethora of popular offerings. Meanwhile, the stock's valuation has become more attractive. The shares trade at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 19, down from 26 a year ago. It's also cheaper than the S&P 500's average P/E multiple of 28. You can sit back and collect dividends while waiting for higher demand for PepsiCo's products to return. Once it does, earnings growth will accelerate, and the stock likely will receive a higher valuation. That should result in an attractive total return for PepsiCo's shareholders who can see the big picture while the company suffers through some short-term earnings pain. Before you buy stock in PepsiCo, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and PepsiCo wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 Lawrence Rothman, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Magnificent S&P 500 Dividend Stock Down 23% to Buy and Hold Forever was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data