Trade Tensions Shape CATL's Hong Kong Market Debut, Shutting Out U.S. Investors
The exclusion highlights the accelerating financial 'decoupling' between the two global powers, with CATL, the world's leading electric vehicle battery maker, caught in the middle. Already a dominant force in the industry, CATL supplies batteries to global automakers including Tesla and General Motors, and is now pushing further into Europe with a new plant in Hungary.
Yet, geopolitics loomed large over the listing. The U.S. government has ramped up efforts to limit Chinese companies' access to American capital, citing national security concerns. CATL, previously labeled a "Chinese military company" by the Pentagon, faced pressure from U.S. lawmakers who urged Wall Street banks to pull out of the deal. The company also faces tariffs and increasing scrutiny from U.S. regulators.
In response to these tensions, CATL restructured its offering to a Regulation S (Reg S) listing—effectively blocking onshore U.S. investors by avoiding certain U.S. regulatory disclosures. While major global funds like Kuwait's sovereign wealth fund, Oaktree Capital Management, and Hillhouse Capital joined the deal, many American investors were left on the sidelines.
'We are headed toward full financial decoupling with China,' said Stephen Roach, former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman. He warned that U.S.-listed Chinese firms could be next in line for further restrictions.
The contrast with past market enthusiasm is stark. A decade ago, Alibaba's $21.8 billion IPO on the New York Stock Exchange drew massive fanfare. Now, the exclusion of U.S. investors from CATL's $4.6 billion Hong Kong listing signals a dramatic shift.
The U.S. has tightened investment restrictions over concerns that American capital could help advance China's military and tech ambitions. A proposed Ford battery plant in Michigan using CATL technology has faced bipartisan criticism, and lawmakers are pushing to revoke subsidies from U.S. companies that rely on Chinese tech.
Despite the headwinds, CATL's strong debut underscores its global appeal. Its batteries are lighter, cheaper, and faster-charging—crucial advantages in the EV race. The company's regulatory filings acknowledge the risks of growing trade tensions but remain focused on international expansion.
In a statement responding to the Pentagon's classification, CATL insisted it has never participated in military-related activities and has engaged with the U.S. Department of Defense to contest the label.
Although some U.S. institutions can still invest in CATL shares via offshore accounts, the regulatory wall is significant. Victor Shih, a China finance expert at the University of California, San Diego, estimates around 10% of U.S. investors might have bought into the offering if allowed.
'This is a major milestone,' Shih said. 'We're likely seeing the beginning of a broader trend—one that will cut U.S. investors out of future Chinese tech opportunities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
Ageing population, high debt seen as drags on China's growth ahead
China is expected to face an adverse economic impact in the coming decades due to its ageing population and high government debt, according to reports. High government debt raises interest costs and leaves less fiscal room to respond to shocks, just as ageing populations push up pension and health outlays, according to a report in Newsweek. The Chinese and US governments are among the most indebted in the world. The US government's gross debt at 123 per cent is equal to the country's GDP, according to International Monetary Fund data. China's stands at 84 per cent, buoyed by debt-driven growth in the 2010s and a housing market crunch that has heavily indebted local governments. London-based global advisory firm Oxford Economics estimates the Chinese economy's potential growth could be cut roughly in half by the 2050s. According to the Newsweek report: "Soaring pension and healthcare expenses are the biggest policy challenge of the 2020s in all advanced economies and most emerging ones." As per a United Nations report, China currently has a median age of around 40, which is well above the global average, and is projected to reach 52 by 2050. This would be much higher than even the US median age, which is expected to stay around 41 years. China's old-age dependency ratio, or the share of people aged 65 and older, is projected to rise by more than 50 percentage points by 2026 compared to 2010, versus roughly 8-10 points in the United States. This will strain China's modest safety net. And unless the country is able to reverse its flagging birth rate, this will shift the burden onto a smaller pool of workers, according to the report in Newsweek. Jed Cartledge, an economist and one of the authors of the Oxford Economics report, said this better positions the US demographically. China's fertility rate of 1.2 births expected per woman is among the world's lowest. While higher, the US rate of 1.6 births remains well below the rate of 2.1 necessary to sustain a population naturally. Cartledge pointed out, however, that historically, immigration has largely offset declining births and averted demographic problems in the U.S. "Admittedly, US immigration is taking a hit under the second Trump presidency, but we're expecting the reduction in net immigration to only last through the remainder of his second term before reverting to a 1.1 million per annum, which was the typical pace prior to the pandemic," Cartledge told Newsweek.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
How saying yes to overwork can hinder success: 5 lessons professionals need to learn
Modern workplaces run on an unspoken currency: Employees' willingness to say 'yes.' Yes to staying late, yes to filling in for colleagues, yes to tasks far removed from one's actual role. For decades, this readiness has been celebrated as ambition, commitment, even loyalty. But a new report exposes the darker side of this culture: workers are paying a heavy price for carrying burdens that extend well beyond their job descriptions. LiveCareer's Hidden Costs and Rewards of Extra Work Report (December 2024), based on a survey of 1,160 US employees, lays bare a paradox that defines today's labour force. On the surface, saying 'yes' can open doors, sharpen skills, promotions beckon, and paychecks fatten. But beneath that thin layer of reward lies a corrosive truth: Overwork is pushing nearly all employees toward burnout, leaving them stretched, fatigued, and disillusioned. The findings challenge one of the most enduring myths of modern careers, that extra work is always the highway to success. Instead, the survey paints a portrait of a workforce trapped in a cycle of pressure, compliance, and exhaustion, where the costs often outweigh the gains. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo A culture of overextension The numbers from the report paint a sobering picture. 77% of employees take on responsibilities outside their role at least weekly, with more than a third facing such requests daily. Only 3% say they are never asked to do more. The concept of 'extra' work, once seen as occasional, has become structurally embedded in workplace operations. This isn't about 'going the extra mile,' it's about a workplace survival strategy that relies on stretching human capacity until boundaries blur. Burnout: The hidden epidemic The toll is undeniable. A staggering 93% of employees report burnout as a direct consequence of accepting extra work. Nearly 60% say they frequently feel drained because they cannot say no. Burnout has become less of a red flag and more of a badge employees are forced to wear, a silent marker of endurance in an unforgiving environment. The normalization of this fatigue raises a critical question: When exhaustion becomes the default, is the system itself broken? Why saying 'no' rarely happen Despite the consequences, most employees still comply. 56% admit they feel pressured into saying yes, while 27% cite direct managerial influence. Recognition (24%), the desire to be seen as a team player (23%), and career ambitions (18%) also drive compliance. Only 11% set boundaries and refuse additional work. This imbalance underscores a workplace psychology where declining requests is equated with jeopardizing one's future. In a precarious labour market, self-preservation often means self-sacrifice. Where the work comes from What makes this overextension even more insidious is its source. It isn't limited to one layer of authority: 23% of requests come from direct managers, 22% from senior leaders, 22% from coworkers, 21% from other team managers, and even 13% from HR. The expectation to do more is everywhere, woven into every layer of hierarchy. The tasks themselves are telling, administrative duties, event planning, overtime, mentoring, or covering for absent colleagues. These aren't career-advancing stretch projects; they're organizational gaps papered over by human labor. The rewards that keep people hooked Yet, the story isn't entirely bleak. One in three employees credits extra work with skill development, financial rewards, or closer colleague relationships. About 31% even report career advancement opportunities. In fact, 90% of respondents feel fairly compensated for their additional contributions, and more than half believe their efforts are critical to business survival. But the benefits are uneven. Older workers (41+) are far more likely to see fairness and advancement opportunities than their younger counterparts, who often perceive the trade-off as thankless. A question of sustainability The dual reality is stark: Extra work brings rewards, but also crippling burnout. When nearly every employee admits to being overburdened, the problem ceases to be individual; it is systemic. The culture of relentless 'yes' may keep businesses afloat in the short term, but it breeds long-term instability, eroding mental health, engagement, and retention. Redrawing the boundaries What LiveCareer's report uncovers is more than statistics; it is a mirror held up to modern workplaces. Saying 'yes' has become a default response, not out of enthusiasm, but compulsion. Companies may celebrate it as commitment, but in truth, it reflects a structure built on overreliance and exhaustion. The task ahead is twofold: Employees must find the courage to draw boundaries, and employers must confront their dependence on burnout economics. Until then, the corporate culture of 'yes' will remain less about opportunity and more about erosion of energy, balance, and dignity at work. Lessons professionals need to learn In today's hyper-competitive workplace, many professionals believe that saying yes to every task is the surest way to climb the ladder. Yet, the reality is often the opposite. Overcommitment drains energy, blurs focus, and creates a cycle where effort outweighs achievement. True success lies not in endless hustle, but in mastering balance and discernment. Boundaries safeguard growth Agreeing to every request leaves little room for strategic work. Setting boundaries allows professionals to channel time and energy into projects that drive meaningful results. Productivity isn't about hours logged Staying late may look impressive, but output matters more than optics. Professionals who focus on efficiency often deliver stronger results than those stuck in the cycle of overwork. Burnout destroys long-term potential Short-term wins earned through exhaustion come at the cost of health, creativity, and sustainability. Protecting well-being ensures careers last and flourish. Selective commitments build credibility Saying yes to everything dilutes quality. By prioritizing key responsibilities, professionals establish a reputation for reliability and excellence. Rest is a competitive advantage Recovery sharpens judgment, strengthens resilience, and boosts leadership potential. In a world that glorifies busyness, choosing rest can set professionals apart. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US tariffs impact on jobs: Nearly 3 lakh workers at risk in textiles and gems; Here's what experts say
The steep tariffs imposed on Indian exports to the US have triggered sharp debate among staffing specialists, with some flagging the risk of immediate job losses and others suggesting that India's domestic demand and trade diversification could soften the blow. 'The recent imposition of additional US tariffs is expected to have a direct and substantial impact on India's employment landscape. This will especially impact those industries relying heavily on the US market for business continuity and growth,' Genius HRTech founder, chairman and managing director R P Yadav told PTI. Yadav identified textiles, auto components, agriculture, and gems and jewellery as the most vulnerable sectors, warning that micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) will absorb the heaviest shock. He estimated that 2,00,000 to 3,00,000 jobs are at immediate risk, with textiles alone—being labour-intensive—potentially losing as many as 1,00,000 positions if the tariff regime remains in force for over six months. He further cautioned that gems and jewellery hubs in Surat and SEEPZ, Mumbai, could also face widespread job losses due to shrinking demand and rising costs in the US market. However, not all experts foresee an employment crisis. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo TeamLease Services Senior Vice President Balasubramanian Anantha Narayanan argued that India's reliance on domestic consumption makes its job market less vulnerable than China's. 'At this point in time, we aren't seeing any signs of a slowdown or loss of jobs. This also by extension means that our jobs are largely in service of domestic demand too, with the exception of some sectors like ITeS among others. Our exports to the USA are USD 87 billion, which is roughly about 2.2 per cent of our overall GDP. Largely pharma, electronics etc. won't be affected for now, which will further limit the export exposure to industries such as textiles, gems and jewellery among others,' he said, quoted PTI. He also noted that the tariffs are yet to take effect, leaving space for possible negotiations. 'On the other side, we've also had several positives by way of the recently closed FTA with the UK and other countries. Even if these US tariffs do come about, we'll definitely figure out a way of redirecting or diversifying our trade to other markets. Therefore, at this point in time, we aren't seeing any signs of a slowdown or loss of jobs. It's an evolving situation and we'll get to know more in due course of time,' Narayanan said. According to him, the broader drag on employment stems from global consumption slowdown, tariff uncertainties, and ongoing geopolitical conflicts. CIEL HR MD and CEO Aditya Mishra said the tariff scenario is unsettling exporters in sectors deeply tied to the American market—including electronics, textiles, gems and jewellery, auto components, leather, footwear, shrimp and engineering goods. 'Even industries outside the direct tariff ambit, like pharmaceuticals, are feeling the ripple effect through costlier upstream chemicals and materials,' Mishra said. He added that uncertainty could persist through the third quarter of this financial year as negotiations unfold. While Mishra does not expect widespread layoffs, he noted that companies are already adopting cost-control measures—cutting discretionary spends, streamlining production, freezing hiring, and putting pressure on temporary and contractual roles. 'The immediate pressure will be on temporary and contract roles, particularly shop-floor workers, artisans, sales and logistics staff, and some mid-level managers in export-led units. This will have a cascading effect on thousands of MSMEs in the supply chain, which collectively account for a large share of employment,' he warned. Mishra also pointed to potential spillover risks for IT and global capability centres (GCCs). 'The IT sector is already experiencing slow spending and hiring, and this additional uncertainty could delay its recovery further. GCCs are likely to take a cautious approach to hiring and investments until there is greater clarity on trade negotiations and market stability. If the tariff situation persists, India's market share in the US could shrink, leading to longer-term repercussions for exporters and the industries that depend on them,' he said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
