Bengal minister to BJP: Release funds, stop dreaming about winning 2026 polls
West Bengal Irrigation Minister Manas Ranjan Bhuiyan criticized the central government for allegedly withholding funds for the Tilpara Barrage restoration in Birbhum. Bhuiyan claimed the Centre's non-cooperation is destabilizing Bengal's economy, urging BJP leaders to advocate for the release of Rs 1.77 lakh-crore.
Agencies Kolkata, West Bengal Irrigation Minister Manas Ranjan Bhuiyan on Friday accused the central government of not helping the state government in the restoration of the Tilpara Barrage in Birbhum district, even as the state undertakes urgent repairs to protect lives and infrastructure amidst heavy rainfall.Calling on BJP leaders to stop "daydreaming" about winning power in 2026, Bhuiyan urged the opposition leadership in the state to demonstrate their commitment to the people of Bengal by helping expedite the release of withheld central funds "if they are truly sympathetic to the state's needs."
Talking to reporters, Bhuiyan claimed that the Centre was attempting to "choke Mamata Banerjee" and "destabilise" Bengal's economy by stalling the release of Rs 1.77 lakh-crore due to the state."Go in a procession and tell the prime minister and the Jal Shakti Minister - give Bengal's money, give Bengal's money!" he said, directly addressing BJP MPs and MLAs from West Bengal.Bhuiyan reiterated the state government's commitment to safeguarding the structurally compromised Tilpara barrage, constructed in 1950-51, which he claimed was now facing "cracks" and "sections that have sat down", creating an asymmetrical flow that struggles to withstand high water pressure.
"We are committed to the people of the state, irrespective of the Centre's non-cooperation. We have ordered urgent restoration work with Mackintosh Burn Ltd, a state-owned engineering company, from Saturday," he said."We will also consult the director of the Central Water Commission, who is arriving on Saturday, and continue liaising with IIT-Roorkee expert Prof J Ahmad," he added.Due to safety risks, the state has restricted traffic over the barrage to only motorcycles and ambulances, he added.The minister clarified that the ongoing repair work, tendered at Rs 21 crore, is being entirely funded by the state government after the Centre failed to approve a World Bank-supported model, which could have provided 70 per cent of the cost.However, the project suffered major setbacks after heavy rains began in mid-June."A large portion of the completed work has been damaged by the rains," he said, while appealing to the public for support.He added that despite the "misinterpretation" and "panic propaganda" being spread, the state administration, led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, remains vigilant. "We are squeezing every mechanical and engineering resource we have," he added.Bhuiyan also referred to Maithon and Panchet dams, alleging that indiscriminate release of water from the reservoirs is linked to long-standing silt accumulation in the DVC system, which has significantly reduced its water-holding capacity."If a pond's depth reduces, it simply cannot hold the same volume of rain anymore," he explained, stressing the need for urgent dredging.
Bhuiyan also highlighted the state's commitment to the Ghatal Master Plan, detailing the progress made and allocation of funds, despite the Centre abandoning the project over the years after initially promising support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
19 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Saffron outfits go on rampage, damage 200-year old tomb in UP claiming it to be a temple
Lucknow: Tension prevailed in Uttar Pradesh's Fatehpur district after hundreds of saffron activists barged into a 200-year old 'Maqbara' (tomb) and damaged two 'mazars' (shrine) on Monday claiming it to be a temple which was 'demolished' by the Muslim rulers and converted into a to the police sources here, a large number of BJP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) workers assembled near the tomb and, breaking the police barricades, barged into the tomb of Nawab Abdus Samad and performed 'aarti' and 'puja' in Uttar Pradesh town after Sufi saint's tomb found BJP president Mukhlal Pal and former MLA Vikram Singh led the saffron activists. They also recited 'Hanuman Chalisa' inside the saffron activists damaged two shrines inside the tomb with stones and sticks. A video which surfaced on social media purportedly showed some activists hitting the 'mazars with heavy stones and said that the members of the other community, who also reached there upon getting the information to 'confront' the saffron said that a large number of security personnel were deployed in and around the tomb and barricades were put up to prevent entry to the reports, the tomb was situated in Abu Nagar area in the district. The saffron outfits claim that it was a temple, which was converted into a tomb by the Muslims.''It is an ancient temple ... .there are symbols like trident and lotus flower inside it,'' Pal claimed. He had earlier appealed to the members of the Hindu community to perform puja there on said that they would not allow any one to change the status of the site until there was a court order or direction from the archaeological survey of India officials.
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile
US President Donald Trump's steep new tariffs on Indian imports, totalling 50%, threaten India's exports of several products, especially the thriving textile sector. At Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu's knitwear hub, exporters are worried about the impact. Tiruppur Exporters' Association (TEA) president K M Subramanian said the region's total annual exports stand at around Rs 45,000 crore, with the US accounting for Rs 12,000 crore or 30 per cent of the total. 'We expect 50 per cent of business to the US — worth about Rs 6,000 crore — to be impacted,' he told PTI. Industry members said some exporters have already stopped production, while others are exploring alternatives.'Right now, those catering to the US have halted production. It will severely impact us. We are adopting a wait-and-watch strategy for the next two weeks,' Subramanian said. Orders already received have been put on hold 'as per buyers' decision' and stock is being held, he added. Trump's steep tariffs jeopardise the future of India's textile industry as production might shift in future to low-tariffed countries and India may lose its export share to those Trump is not the first to impose high tariffs to weaken India's export economy. Much before him, the British colonial regime specifically targeted India's textile industry with steep tariffs to kill its export competitiveness. Also Read: In India, Trump's tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods India, prior to British colonisation, was one of the leading producers and exporters of fine textiles, particularly cotton and silk. Cities like Dhaka, Surat and Murshidabad were renowned for their skilled artisans and quality fabrics. However, with the advent of British colonialism, this flourishing industry experienced a steep decline. The causes of this downfall lie not just in internal inefficiencies but also in deliberate colonial policies that prioritised British economic interests over indigenous prosperity. Indian textile had a big market across the world before the British regime started weakening it. It was said that a whole sheet of Dhaka muslin could pass through a ring so fine it was. An Arab merchant who visited India in medieval times, wrote, 'There is a stuff made in his country which is not to be found elsewhere; so fine and delicate is this material that a dress made of it may be passed through a signet-ring. It is made of cotton, and we have seen a piece of it.'The chief reason behind the decline of India's textile exports is considered to be the Industrial Revolution which brought machine-made cloth in Europe which could not match the quality of Indian cloth but was cheaper and could be made in less time. However, another key reason was the British efforts to destroy indigenous industry and discourage exports with taxes and the Industrial Revolution, Britain was experiencing unprecedented growth in mechanised textile production. The demand for raw materials, especially cotton, was insatiable. By imposing restrictions on Indian textiles, the British aimed to secure a steady supply of raw cotton from India. This allowed British manufacturers to capitalize on the raw material, ultimately strengthening Britain's dominance in the global textile trade which was hitherto dominated by British administration systematically dismantled India's traditional textile industry. Indian artisans, who once catered to global demand, faced restrictive export duties that made it difficult for their products to remain competitive internationally. At the same time, British-manufactured textiles were imported into India without any comparable duties, giving them a price advantage in domestic markets. This dual pressure led to a significant drop in demand for Indian-made textiles, both at home and abroad, eventually crippling the traditional craft-based economy.A key strategy of the British regime was to flood the Indian market with British-manufactured textile almost duty-free, while imposing steep tariffs -- 70% to 80% -- on India-Made textiles that entered England. Will Durant, an American historian and philosopher, narrated this phenomenon in his book "The Case for India" which was published in 1930. "The Directors of the East India Company gave orders that the production of raw silk should be encouraged and the manufacture of silk fabrics discouraged; that silk-winders should be compelled to work in the Company's factories, and be prohibited, under severe penalties, from working outside," Durant wrote. "Parliament discussed ways and means of replacing Hindu by British industries. A tariff of 70-80% was placed upon Hindu textiles imported into free- trade England, while India was compelled, by foreign control of her government, to admit English textiles almost duty free. Lest Indian industries should nevertheless continue somehow to exist, an excise tax was placed on the manufacture of cotton goods in India." Durant cites a British historian who said India being dependent could not impose a counter tariff of its own on British-made textiles: "As a British historian puts it: It is a melancholy instance of the wrong done to India by the country on which she has become dependent. Had India been independent, she would have retaliated, would have imposed prohibitive duties upon British goods, and would thus have preserved her own productive industry from annihilation. This act of self-defense was not permitted her; she was at the mercy of the stranger. British goods were forced upon her without paying any duty, and the foreign manufacturer employed the arm of political injustice to keep down and ultimately strangle a competitor with whom he could not have contended on equal terms."He cites another British writer who said how Britain used tariffs in the guise of free trade to impoverish India. "And another Englishman wrote: We have done everything possible to impoverish still further the miserable beings subject to the cruel selfishness of English commerce. Under the pretense of free trade, England has compelled the Hindus to receive the products of the steam-looms of Lancashire, Yorkshire, Glasgow, etc., at merely nominal duties; while the hand wrought manufactures of Bengal and Behar, beautiful in fabric and durable in wear, have heavy and almost prohibitive duties imposed on their importation into England. The result was that Manchester and Paisley flourished, and Indian industries declined; a country well on the way to prosperity was forcibly arrested in its development, and compelled to be only a rural hinterland for industrial England," Durant wrote. The British had also banned some Indian textiles by passing a law. The Calico Act of 1721 was passed by the British Parliament to protect the British wool and silk industries from the popularity and affordability of Indian cotton textiles. The act banned the wearing and use of printed cotton fabrics in England.
NDTV
19 minutes ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Sets Aside Limit On Women's Appointment To Army's Legal Arm
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday set aside the Centre's policy that restricted the number of women who can be appointed to the Army's Judge Advocate General (JAG) branch. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan said that restricting the seats of women is violative of the right to equality. The bench said the selection should be based only on merit. The top court was hearing a writ petition of two women, who ranked fifth and sixth in merit, and challenged the Army's gender-based vacancy split (six for men, three for women) in the JAG Entry Scheme, arguing it unfairly denied them selection despite higher eligibility. "The executive cannot reserve vacancies for men. The seats of six for men and three for women are arbitrary and cannot be allowed under the guise of induction. The true meaning of gender neutrality and the 2023 rules is that the Union shall select the most meritorious candidates. Restricting the seats of women is violative of the right to equality," the bench said. Justice Manmohan directed the Centre to induct one of the two petitioners to be commissioned in the JAG department. The second petitioner is not entitled to any relief, the court found. "No nation can be secure if such policies are followed. Union is directed to conduct recruitment in the aforesaid manner and publish a combined merit list for all candidates, which includes men and women candidates," the bench said. Earlier, the bench, while reserving judgment, had stated that it was "prima facie" satisfied with the case made out by the petitioner and had directed her induction. The court had strongly questioned the rationale for a fixed male-female intake ratio, arguing that true gender parity means eligibility based on merit and not quotas. "If women can fly Rafales, why place limits on them in the Army's legal branch?" it had said. The Centre had defended the system, citing operational requirements and wartime attachments.
