Keir Starmer says he will not be ‘deflected' from plans by repeat rebel MPs
The Prime Minister suspended the whip from Rachael Maskell, Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff.
The four MPs all voted against the Government over the welfare reform legislation, but party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion.
Sir Keir Starmer said he had to 'deal with people who repeatedly break the whip' and that everyone elected as a Labour MP needs to 'deliver as a Labour Government'.
Asked at a press conference if his decision to punish MPs made him look weak, the Prime Minister said the party was elected to enact change and 'we've got to carry through that change, and we've got to carry through reforms'.
He said: 'I'm determined that we will change this country for the better, for millions of working people, and I'm not going to be deflected from that.
'And therefore we had to deal with people who repeatedly break the whip because everyone was elected as a Labour MP on the manifesto of change and everybody needs to deliver as a Labour Government.
'This is about what we're doing for the country, and that's why I'm so determined to press forward with the reforms and the change that we need to bring about.'
York Central MP Ms Maskell said earlier she thought Sir Keir's response was wrong, saying: 'On this occasion, I don't think he's got it right.'
She told the BBC: 'I really hope from this process there will be reflection over the summer, but also learning.
'There needs to be a better reach-out to backbenchers to ensure that we are the safeguards of our Government.'
Other MPs have been more supportive of the Prime Minister's decision, with one telling the PA news agency: 'Someone has to die in the square.'
Arguing that politics was a 'team effort', they suggested the suspensions would make rebels 'think more about the politics'.
Government minister Jess Phillips said the four should not be surprised by the action against them.
The Home Office minister told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'There has to be an element of discipline otherwise you end up not being able to govern.'
She added: 'I think that constantly taking to the airwaves and slagging off your own Government, I have to say, what did you think was going to happen?'
On Sky News she said: 'We were elected as a team under a banner and under a manifesto, and we have to seek to work together, and if you are acting in a manner that is to undermine the ability of the Government to deliver those things, I don't know what you expect.'
Referring to a description of the rebels by an unnamed source in The Times, she told Sky News: 'I didn't call it persistent knob-headery, but that's the way that it's been termed by some.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HS2 has suffered ‘significant cost' from legal challenges by public bodies
HS2 has incurred 'significant cost' because public bodies have launched nine legal challenges against it, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said. The Cabinet minister noted that in 'almost all cases', the courts have found in favour of the high-speed rail scheme between London and Birmingham. HS2 Ltd was given the power to construct the railway when the High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Act received royal assent in February 2017. The most recent of the nine legal challenges the project has faced from other public bodies since then was launched by North Warwickshire Borough Council in relation to the extension of the under-construction Bromford Tunnel. In May, the High Court rejected the council's bid for a judicial review. Since royal assent was obtained, there have also been 25 appeals relating to the HS2 planning regime. In a six-monthly written update to Parliament on HS2, Ms Alexander acknowledged it is 'right there are checks and balances embedded in our legal and planning systems', but expressed concern these are being used to 'frustrate the delivery of consented projects'. She wrote: 'The delivery of HS2 has continued during this period to be the subject of both legal and planning challenges, which have added significant cost, uncertainty and potential for delay.' She added: 'The Government continues to monitor this issue closely and will consider further interventions where appropriate, alongside its wider work on planning reform.' Ms Alexander also announced that she has lifted safeguarding on the majority of land protected for HS2's former Phase 2b eastern leg between Birmingham and Leeds, which was cancelled in November 2021. Safeguarding is used to stop land from being developed in a way that would conflict with future schemes. More than 550 properties were acquired by HS2 Ltd ahead of the planned construction of Phase 2b's eastern section. Removing safeguarding means the process of selling them can begin. Former owners of property within the safeguarding zone, which was acquired by HS2 Ltd will be given the opportunity to buy it back at the current market value. HS2 has suffered repeated delays and soaring costs. Ms Alexander announced last month there was 'no route' to meet the target date of having HS2 services running by 2033. In her update to Parliament, the Secretary of State said her department is working with HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild to 'reset' the project, with the aim of providing an 'updated delivery baseline and funding envelope in 2026'. She went on: 'Until this work is completed, this Government is not in a position to say with confidence how much HS2 will cost or when it will be delivered. 'That is a deeply unsatisfactory position, but it is necessary to complete the hard work we have embarked upon.' HS2 was originally planned to run between London and Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs. The first phase was initially scheduled to open by the end of 2026, but this was later pushed back to between 2029 and 2033. In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham. In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Minister reacts to Diane Abbott's suspension
The exchequer secretary to the Treasury has said Diane Abbott's Labour suspension should be resolved as swiftly as possible. James Murray said there is a process underway to investigate the comments made by Ms Abbott about racism.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
System of regulating water firms needs complete overhaul, MPs warn
The system of regulating water companies needs 'a complete overhaul' as the sector hikes customer bills to expand failing infrastructure and tackle pollution, MPs have said. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the Government must act with urgency to strengthen oversight of the sector to rebuild trust and ensure its poor performance improves. In a report released on Tuesday, the committee highlighted how bills are expected to rise at their fastest rate in 20 years while customer trust in the sector is at an all-time low. Years of underinvestment, a growing population and extreme weather caused by climate change have led to intense pressure on England's ageing water system, causing widespread flooding, supply issues, sewage pollution and leakages. Last year 10 companies were unable to generate enough income to cover their interest payments at a time when the sector must invest in environmental measures, cut leaks and build new reservoirs in the coming years to avoid a shortfall of five billion litres by 2050. 'The environmental performance of companies is woeful,' the report said. 'Ofwat and the EA (Environment Agency) have failed to secure industry compliance.' The PAC said reforms to the system of regulation carried out by the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) are needed 'to address the fragmentation of accountability and failure to enforce current environmental standards'. 'There are gaps in critical areas such as oversight of the wastewater network and understanding of the condition of assets,' the report read. 'No-one is taking ultimate responsibility for balancing affordability with long-term needs.' The PAC's inquiry found that 20% of people are struggling to afford their water bills while companies are implementing huge bill increases without explaining why, or how the money will be spent. In response, the group of MPs recommended Ofwat sets clear expectations for companies to explain where customer money is being spent, why bills are rising and what improvements customers can expect for their money, in the next six months. The report also warned that company plans to spend around £12 billion in the next five years to update the antiquated sewage system will only fix around 44% of sewage overflows. And while the Environment Department (Defra) created a £11 million fund for rolling out environmental improvements from water company fines in 2024, the money has not yet been distributed, with the PAC urging the Government to do so by the end of the year. Elsewhere, the committee warned that there appears to be 'no single guiding mind' balancing the need for improvements with the impact on bills. It is therefore calling for the Government to plug the gaps in regulator responsibilities and be explicit on the trade-offs between the need for improvements, water supply needs, and the impact on bills. In terms of financial failings, the PAC is urging Ofwat to review its powers and capabilities to ensure it can act to improve the financial resilience of the sector. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, PAC chairman, said: 'The monumental scale of work required to reverse the fortunes of failing water companies is rivalled only in difficulty by the efforts needed to repair customers' faith in the sector. 'In the face of looming water shortages, steps must be taken immediately if the Government is to set the sector back on the right path. 'Customers are being expected to shoulder the burden of water companies' failings, without being told why or on what their money will be spent. 'It is past time that we had a low risk, low return water sector, from its current farcical state of overly complex, sometimes unregulated companies, and a culture of excessive dividends and borrowing. 'There is also a lot to be done in the regulatory sphere, with a pressing need to improve and streamline the existing regulatory regime. 'More must be done to stem the flow of pollution entering our waterways, as it poses a serious risk to human health and continues to degrade the quality of our lakes and rivers. 'However, regulators are overwhelmed by the number of prosecutions and appear unable to deter companies from acting unlawfully. 'Government must act now to strengthen regulators and support their efforts to hold companies to account.' An Environment Agency spokesperson said: 'We take our role in protecting environment and regulating the water sector very seriously. 'Our enforcement action has led to over £151 million in fines since 2015 and we are conducting the largest ever criminal investigation into potential widespread non-compliance by water companies at thousands of sewage treatment works. 'We're also modernising our approach to regulating the water sector, with more regulation and enforcement officers, better data and are on track to carry out 10,000 inspections this year.' A Defra spokesperson said: 'The Government inherited a broken water system. But in just one year, we have put down the building blocks to clean up England's rivers, lakes and seas. 'This is just the beginning. Next week the Independent Water Commission will come forward with its final report to rebuild a water system that is fit for Britain in the 21st century and restore our rivers, lakes and seas to good health.' A Water UK spokesperson said: 'We agree that fundamental change to regulation is needed. 'By suppressing investment, Ofwat achieved short-term cuts to people's water bills but at long-term risk to the resilience of our vital water supplies. 'This is finally being put right, with a record £104 billion investment over the next five years to secure our water supplies, end sewage entering our rivers and seas and support economic growth. 'We hope that the recommendations of the Independent Water Commission next week ensure we never again find ourselves in this position again.'
