
I thought I'd nailed screen time until my kids admitted the truth
'Having a computer in our basement was crack cocaine.'
It was sobering to hear this from one of my sons, now in his twenties, last week.
We'd been talking about online harm, prompted by the Netflix series Adolescence. I had been quietly relieved that none of my five children had laptops in their rooms, unlike Jamie, the show's protagonist, who goes to some dark places online in the privacy of his private space.
That's when my son informed me: 'Just because our computer was on view didn't make any difference as far as we were concerned.'
It was a shock, and not a very pleasant one.
It's hard to admit to making mistakes as a mum, especially if, like me, you give advice to other parents, teachers and caregivers about how to raise resilient teens.
However hard we parents try to control our children's online use, raising adolescents in the age of screens is littered with challenges, and I've clearly not got everything right.
Smartphones weren't such an issue with my older children, born in 1995 and 1997.
iPads were becoming popular when the twins were six (Picture: Getty Images)
However, my younger children, born 1999, and twins five years later, are digital natives.
iPads were becoming popular when the twins were six. They were drawn to the fun games and unlike the TV shows that ended when I turned them off, the challenge was the 24-hour availability.
By 2012, my 12-year-old wanted a smartphone. I said no. I had realised relatively early on that social media could harm adolescents.
One of our boys, then 15, had posted a picture on Facebook. The comments suggested he looked 'weird' and he took it to heart. I felt desperate at seeing him so miserable.
On another occasion, our daughter was distraught to learn via social media she hadn't been invited to an event. Another son was devastated he had been left out of a WhatsApp group. My other daughter felt she didn't match up to skinny girl ideals on Instagram.
I realised that, as a family, we needed some rules.
My first rule was for all of us: No screens in bedrooms (Picture: Rachel Kelly)
It would be impossible to ban phones altogether: They were crucial for the children to stay in touch with friends. I also knew banning phones would make them more desirable.
So my first rule was for all of us: No screens in bedrooms. Phones were to be left downstairs. Then – at least in theory – I could see what they were watching.
Second, we delayed buying the younger two smartphones until they turned 14. Instead, they had Nokia bricks that let them stay in touch without connecting to the internet.
But of course, that was a temporary fix. Soon enough the twins turned 14 and I stayed true to my word.
By this stage, however, we had been having the conversation about online risks for several years.
So rather than limit their credit, ban social media or figure out parental controls (all of which they could get around if they wanted to), I decided to appeal to their good sense, critical faculties and their desire for autonomy – a crucial factor happening to the teenage brain.
The family PC was my blind spot Quote Quote
Therefore, my final rule was phone and iPad free zones – at mealtimes, family time, evenings and bedtimes.
When it came to the family computer, however, I was more relaxed.
I associated it with hard work and homework. My focus was on the dangers of social media on smartphones and I had done well on that. The family PC was my blind spot.
My son also told me that while he and his brothers were using the computers for gaming, one was gaming for several hours a day.
In the end, supported by his siblings, he stopped completely – something I only learnt about years later when we talked openly about his experience.
All my children have since told me they appreciated phone-free time – and wished I had been firmer in enforcing it. I think I was frightened to do so; sometimes I thought I would be more likeable if I let my teenagers do what they wanted.
Looking for more info on raising adolescents?
Rachel Kelly's book, The Gift of Teenagers: Connect More, Worry Less is available now.
The more we talked, the more my children began to regulate their own social media use (Picture: Rachel Kelly)
There is no escaping the fact that your teenager needs technology to run their life, and there's nothing wrong with that.
In my experience, the issue is not 'who' as much as 'what' teenagers are exposed to. And the way to stop them seeing harmful and violent content is to talk about it.
How did social media make them feel? Answer: Bad.
How many hours a day were they online? How many other things did they miss out on as a result? Sport, meeting up in real life, getting some sleep? My kids agreed they were missing out.
In fact, they were relieved to discuss this stuff. I could make it clear that I was their parent, I loved them, and I didn't want them to see things online which would upset them.
The more we talked, the more they began to regulate their own social media use.
Does that mean I think limiting screen time is pointless? Absolutely not. The key is to find a balance that works for both parties, together.
Do not take your children's phone use as a rejection of you personally – just give them all the tools and guidance to make sure they do it safely and securely and let them know that you are doing so because you love them.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
Arrow MORE: I slept for 24 hours straight and realised something was seriously wrong
Arrow MORE: My farts make me £20,000 a year – I'm blown away by the demand
Arrow MORE: The Race Across The World victors aren't too posh to win

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Are Spanish bluebells invasive and should you dig them up?
Spanish bluebells (Hyacinthoides hispanica) are a slightly larger version of Hyacinthoides non-scripta, which is the native version of bluebells to the UK. They are stronger growing than native bluebells as they seed more freely, meaning they can quickly invade your garden. According to Gardeners' World, they can also hybridise with the native bluebell, with this form having the possibility to escape gardens and out-compete it in rural areas. Spanish bluebells can hybridise with the native UK bluebell (Image: Getty Images) Some people from the UK aren't a fan because of the potential threat to the native bluebell, with an individual on the r/GardeningUK Reddit page calling it "the ruiner of gardens". What is the difference between native and Spanish bluebells? The native and Spanish bluebell look very similar, but there are a few subtle differences which can help tell them apart. Spanish bluebells have broad leaves (around 3cm wide), while the native species has smaller ones at around 1-1.5cm wide. Additionally, the Spanish bluebells have no scent, have upright stems and flowers all around the stem. In comparison, the native species has a sweet scent, distinctly drooping stems and flowers on one side of the stem, according to the Wildlife Trust. Does it matter if I plant Spanish bluebells in my garden? The charity Plantlife recommends that you don't grow them if you live near a native bluebell colony. This prevents any accidental hybridisation and therefore protects the native British bluebell. Spanish bluebells are not on the Government's list of invasive plants in England and Wales. However, they are considered an invasive non-native plant in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, while in Scotland, it is an offence to plant any non-native plant in the wild. Should you dig up Spanish bluebells? If care is taken when planting Spanish bluebells in the garden, you shouldn't need to dig them up. However, it is important to dispose of cuttings or bulbs carefully and not plant them in the wild. The Wildlife Trust adds: "If you fancy planting bluebells in a shady part of your garden, try to pick the native variety. "Not only will you help to prevent the spread of invasive, non-native species into the wider countryside, but you will also provide food and shelter for a range of our native insects, from bees to butterflies." If you want to dig them up, they are a deep-rooting plant that is difficult to get rid of once established. Gardeners' World adds: "To get them all out, you may need to dig up the bulbs for several years in a row. Recommended reading: "If you are in the process of removing them and others continue to grow, cut off the flowerheads before the blooms open to prevent cross-pollination with English bluebells." It is important to dispose of the bulbs in council garden waste collections. They shouldn't be put on your compost heap or dumped outside in your garden, as they will simply regrow.

The National
6 hours ago
- The National
'Mindless' vandalism of Scottish UNESCO heritage site condemned
Photos shared on social media on Sunday show the Vinnie sculpture, information board and bench at the Antonine Wall World Heritage Site in the Lusset Glen, graffiti-ed in an act that has been damned by West Dunbartonshire Council. The area is part of UNESCO's Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site. It is also understood that the same kind of blue spray paint was on the steps outside the Mildam Park in Faifley at the weekend, reading "Stop the Boats". Vinnie statue in the Lusset Glen. (Image: Supplied) An information board at the site was also vandalised. (Image: Supplied) Councillors in the area have since hit out at the vandalism, which was reported to the local authority. Cllr William Rooney for Kilpatrick, said: "I'm disgusted to see this kind of vandalism in our community. I've escalated the matter to the chief officers at the council so this can be removed immediately. "The installation in Old Kilpatrick was added only in the last couple of years as part of the Rediscovering the Antonine Wall project, and it has already been targeted by vandals. "It's a crying shame to witness such mindless vandalism in Old Kilpatrick and Faifley." It is understood that a local woman who saw the images on Facebook went up to the monument shortly after seeing the damage and cleaned up the site. A council team have also visited the site and carried out any repairs and clean-up work. (Image: Supplied) Cllr Lauren Oxley for the Waterfront ward, said: "I was saddened to hear that our beloved Vinnie, along with the bench and Antonine Wall information board in the Lusset Glen, had been vandalised. "I got in touch with the council's vandalism team straight away, and I've been advised that they'll be out today to assess for any damage and finish any clean-up that's still needed. I also know some kind residents have already been down to help tidy things up - thank you so much for taking the time to do that. "Grateful to everyone who brought this issue to my attention, and hopefully this isn't a situation we need to deal with again." A spokesperson for West Dunbartonshire Council says they are "disappointed" by the graffiti and the site has been promptly assessed and cleaned. They said: 'The council is disappointed in this mindless act of vandalism at Lusset Glen in Old Kilpatrick. "The sculpture is located in close proximity to the Antonine Wall World Heritage and reflects the rich Roman heritage of the area. "The bench and area have been fully cleaned up and restored.'


Scotsman
7 hours ago
- Scotsman
Schooling Tropical Fish 2025: There are the 15 most popular fish to form colourful shoals
From garden ponds filled with Koi Carp to the humble goldfish bowl (although goldfish need more space to thrive) – the UK is a nation of fish lovers. Around 10 per cent of British households own fish – making them the third most popular pet after dogs and cats. There's plenty of choice when it comes to adding fish to (well prepared and correctly set up) home aquariums , with pet shops offering a bewildering range of colourful and interesting finned friends. Schooling fish are particularly popular – fish that are only happy in a group of the same species, travelling around your tank in colourful packs. As a general rule you should make sure to have at least six of these fish in your tank at any one time – and be aware that some species thrive when there's a particular proportion of males to females (if there's any doubt ask an expert at your local pet shop). So, here are 15 of the best species of schooling fish for aquarists (the official name for people who maintain aquariums). 1 . Neon Tetra The Neon Tetra is the UK's (and probably the world's) most popular tropical fish - and is the epitome of a schooling fish. The tiny fish's bright red and blue colouring and ease of care are a winning combination for beginners. They originally come from backwater streams in the Amazon basin in South America. You'll need a seperate tank if you want to breed then though. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales 2 . Black Skirt Tetra Larger than their Neon Tetra close cousins, the Black Skirt Tetra is a peaceful and hardy schooling fish that can hold its own against larger rivals. It's native to the Paraguay River basin of south-central Brazil, Paraguay and northeast Argentina. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales 3 . Lemon Tetra Yellow bodies with red-tipped fins give Lemon Tetras a cheerful appearance. They prefer groups, show brighter colors in well-planted tanks, and are peaceful companions for other small tropical fish. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales 4 . Dwarf Neon Rainbowfish A shoal of Dwarf Neon Rainbowfish add a silvery shimmer to your aquarium. You'll want a minimum of six, with equal numbers of males and females to minimise the risk of aggression. These beautiful fish originally come from the Mamberamo River basin in Indonesia. | Canva/Getty Images Photo Sales Related topics: Pets