The transport sector should chart a clearer map on our voyage to a low-carbon future
Image: Supplied
In her recent budget speech, Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy provides a breadth of fresh air towards revitalising South Africa's not-so-healthy transport system in becoming resilient and efficient, alive to the needs and operating environment of the current and future economy.
The Minister's policy speech illuminated a signal of South Africa's intended transport trajectory and further announced the eminent revision of the Green Transport Strategy (GTS). That is a demonstration of a renewed political will towards the transformation of our transportation sector that is geared towards a just, sustainable, and low-carbon mobility - equitably serving people, the planet and the economy.
The budget speech's reaffirmation of the Department of Transport's (DOT) draft Just Transition Plan is a promising recognition of the socio-economic and justice complexities inherent in moving toward sustainable mobility.
It needs stating that the Presidential Climate Commission (PCC) supported the Department' Just Transition Plan with technical oversight and modelling analysis to align mitigation goals with the country's climate commitments. However, addressing critical gaps around implementation details, climate resilience, stakeholder inclusivity, and strategic zero-emission mobility adoption will decisively shape the sector's transformative potential. To realise the plan's ambitions, the finalisation and diligent implementation of the Transport Sector's Just Transition Plan is essential.
The intensifying climate risks calls for urgency towards sustainable mobility. We cannot blink to the urgent transitional and physical climate change risks and the local implications for the transport sector which contributes 12.7% of national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, mainly because the sector is deeply integrated in major economic activities. To this end the Budget speech lost an opportunity explicitly articulate the importance of climate resilience, particularly given South Africa's vulnerability to climate-induced events, which more often than not damages road, rail and telecommunications infrastructure – basically the backbone of our transport network and systems.
The budgetary allocation of R21.7 billion to enhance airport infrastructure, aimed at accommodating increased passenger numbers and air freight, highlights the interconnected nature of modern infrastructure investments. Such expansions inevitably trigger downstream effects on industries such as steel manufacturing, which carry significant carbon implications.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
While commitments towards passenger and rail reform, road safety, and significant financial investments underscore the government's resolve, critical questions remain how these initiatives will concretely deliver an inclusive, integrated transport system aligned with low-carbon mobility and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
With South Africa's Climate Change Act now mandating carbon budgets for major emitters (such as steel) from 2026, synchronising transport infrastructure developments within these carbon limits will be critical to sustainable economic growth.
Aligning the revised strategy's GHG emission targets closely with South Africa's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Just Transition Framework will demonstrate commitment, coherence, and credibility. Integration, Investment and Partnership is needed to drive transformation.
Primarily because transport remains a backbone of all economic activity and critical for our climate action ambitions, the Presidential Climate Commission (PCC) has previously highlighted, enhancing intergovernmental collaboration between key departments such as Transport; Forestry; Fishery and Environment (DFFE); National Treasury, and Trade, Industry, and Competition (DTIC) is pivotal to successfully transitioning towards low-carbon mobility.
Strategic spatial planning could significantly lower transport emissions and foster greater socio-economic inclusivity. Forward-thinking infrastructure planning that emphasises climate-proofing, inclusive spatial design, and proximity of transport hubs to residential communities will prove cost-effective in the long run and mitigate disruptions from future climate events.
By integrating green corridors and promoting pedestrian and cycling networks, South Africa can facilitate a modal shift towards public transport and location of public transport close to people to reduce their commuting costs and time, a much-required relief in this economy and this option has some significant Just Transition outcomes.
Clear delineation of public and private sector roles - especially regarding the ownership of strategic transport infrastructure like railways and ports - is essential. Minister Creecy's reaffirmation that these assets will remain publicly owned offers a foundational principle for sustainable and equitable transport governance.
All and sundry of research and policy reform recommendations have overemphasised that collaboration between these state departments will enable investments at multiple fronts, from rail expansion, EV charging stations, electric buses, solar power inter-modal facilities, biogas taxis, to mention but a few easy wins which require effective partnerships with the private sector, given the state's fiscal constraints.
While this transition represents an economic opportunity, it needs to be done in a manner that makes moves us closer to our own national development ambitions driven by increased manufacturing with incentives and support for our local auto-manufacturing industry and emerging renewable energy sector amongst others.
Taking lessons from transformation in sectors like mining, energy and construction sector, the Minster is urged to not lower the gear on inclusivity but ensure procedural justice by engaging stakeholders and communities in policy formulation and implementation to optimise inclusive outcomes arising from a sustainable transport sector in our country.
Simphiwe Ngwenya, Senior Manager: Climate Mitigation at the Presidential Climate Commission.
Image: Supplied
Simphiwe Ngwenya, Senior Manager: Climate Mitigation at the Presidential Climate Commission.
*** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
4 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Transnet will receive R94.8 billion from Transport Department over next 5 years to help manage mounting debt
JOHANNESBURG - Transnet will receive R94.8 billion in financial support from the Transport Department over the next five years to help manage its mounting debt. The Department said the additional guarantees will cushion the impact of recent credit rating downgrades, to mitigate risks and ensure Transnet can meet its debt obligations. This latest support follows a R51 billion guarantee approved earlier this year by Transport Minister Barbara Creecy and Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana. Department spokesperson Collen Msibi said the new allocation will help stabilise the entity's financial position. 'On the 12th of June 2025, the Minister of Transport, Ms. Barbara Creecy, announced government has initiated a process to allocate additional guarantees to Transnet. As a result, government has, on 25 July 2025, approved an additional R48.6 billion guarantee for Transnet to ensure that all debt redemptions will be covered over the next five years. '
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Fierce backlash against proposed Road Accident Benefit Scheme Bill following RAF board dissolution
The Department of Transport's move to revive the long-rejected Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) Bill has sparked concerns, following Minister Barbara Creecy's announcement that she has dissolved the Road Accident Fund (RAF) Board due to ongoing governance and operational failures. Creecy, who recently took over the transport portfolio, said the dissolution was necessary to stabilise the RAF and restore its ability to fulfil its mandate. She also confirmed the department's intention to finalise the Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS) Bill, a move that various organisations say is both undemocratic and dangerous. The department explained that the RABS Bill seeks to replace the current fault-based compensation model with a no-fault system, removing the need for costly legal processes. Civil society organisations, legal experts, and advocacy groups, many of whom have fought against the bill for years, have condemned its reintroduction. Among them is the Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV), which warned that pushing the bill forward again is a direct affront to democracy. 'Parliament has rejected RABS three times already,' said APRAV Deputy Chairperson and spokesperson Ngoako Mohlaloga. 'The continued attempt to revive it is either deliberate ignorance or a strategic attempt to bypass the will of the people.' APRAV Chairperson Pieter de Bruyn said the bill was rejected not only by lawmakers but also by road accident victims, legal professionals, disability rights groups, and medical experts. 'RABS would have stripped victims of their right to legal recourse, capped compensation, and imposed rigid limitations,' he said. 'It was unworkable and unjust, and its continued reappearance shows this is about pushing a political agenda, not real reform.' APRAV also pointed out that it led a two-year national consultation process that resulted in a credible and workable alternative to RABS, one that would fix the RAF without violating constitutional rights or collapsing the public purse. Legal expert Kirstie Haslam, a personal injury attorney and partner at DSC Attorneys, told Independent Media that the RABS Bill fails to tackle the real problems at the RAF, namely, poor management, inefficiency, and lack of accountability. 'RABS replaces a broken system with another flawed one,' Haslam said. 'It doesn't fix the root causes of RAF's dysfunction, and worse, it strips victims of access to justice by capping payouts and removing the right to claim for general damages.' She also added that the bill's attempt to limit legal oversight raises serious constitutional concerns and could face court challenges if passed in its current form. Haslam further highlighted troubling trends in the RAF's finances, which, although improved, have come at a cost. The RAF's 2023/2024 annual report shows the deficit has dropped from R8.43 billion to R1.59 billion, but partly due to reduced medical and loss-of-earnings payouts. Despite the tightening of spending, courts continue to issue significant awards. She revealed a series of recent payouts, such as in April, when a woman received over R4.6 million following the death of her husband in a motorcycle accident. That same month, another claimant, Seronica Nathram, was awarded nearly R3.9 million for injuries sustained in a crash. Another case involving the Road Accident Fund that commanded attention involved 16-year-old Ashwell Bernard Jones, where the Western Cape High Court awarded Jones just under R4,979,832 for future loss of earnings. He was only eight years old when he sustained a serious brain injury after being hit by a vehicle while riding his bicycle in Lavender Hill in 2017. The court ordered the RAF to cover all legal costs, including expert fees, travel expenses, and the possible appointment of a curator to manage the funds. The RAF was given 180 days to make payment, or interest will begin to accrue. While many groups remain opposed to the revival of RABS, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has backed the minister, calling the RAF a 'disaster site' with liabilities exceeding R400 billion. 'The RAF has become dysfunctional and has failed working-class South Africans for too long,' COSATU said in a statement. 'It's time for bold reform.' Responding to questions, the RAF Head of Corporate Communications, McIntosh Polela, said the RABS Bill is being revisited to address longstanding issues in the current RAF Act. 'The RABS Bill aims to reduce litigation, cut high administrative costs, and accelerate claim finalisation,' the fund said. 'It is part of a broader strategy led by the Department of Transport to ease the pressure on the courts and better serve road accident victims.' [email protected] Saturday Star
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Fierce backlash against proposed Road Accident Benefit Scheme Bill following RAF board dissolution
Various organisations have raised significant concerns regarding the proposed finalisation of the Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) Bill, especially following a crucial move by the Minister of Transport, Ms. Barbara Creecy, who has dissolved the Board of Directors of the Road Accident Fund (RAF). Various organisations have raised significant concerns regarding the proposed finalisation of the Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) Bill, especially following a crucial move by the Minister of Transport, Ms. Barbara Creecy, who has dissolved the Board of Directors of the Road Accident Fund (RAF). The Department of Transport's move to revive the long-rejected Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) Bill has sparked concerns, following Minister Barbara Creecy's announcement that she has dissolved the Road Accident Fund (RAF) Board due to ongoing governance and operational failures. Creecy, who recently took over the transport portfolio, said the dissolution was necessary to stabilise the RAF and restore its ability to fulfil its mandate. She also confirmed the department's intention to finalise the Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS) Bill, a move that various organisations say is both undemocratic and dangerous. The department explained that the RABS Bill seeks to replace the current fault-based compensation model with a no-fault system, removing the need for costly legal processes. Civil society organisations, legal experts, and advocacy groups, many of whom have fought against the bill for years, have condemned its reintroduction. Among them is the Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV), which warned that pushing the bill forward again is a direct affront to democracy. 'Parliament has rejected RABS three times already,' said APRAV Deputy Chairperson and spokesperson Ngoako Mohlaloga. 'The continued attempt to revive it is either deliberate ignorance or a strategic attempt to bypass the will of the people.' APRAV Chairperson Pieter de Bruyn said the bill was rejected not only by lawmakers but also by road accident victims, legal professionals, disability rights groups, and medical experts. 'RABS would have stripped victims of their right to legal recourse, capped compensation, and imposed rigid limitations,' he said. 'It was unworkable and unjust, and its continued reappearance shows this is about pushing a political agenda, not real reform.' APRAV also pointed out that it led a two-year national consultation process that resulted in a credible and workable alternative to RABS, one that would fix the RAF without violating constitutional rights or collapsing the public purse. Legal expert Kirstie Haslam, a personal injury attorney and partner at DSC Attorneys, told Independent Media that the RABS Bill fails to tackle the real problems at the RAF, namely, poor management, inefficiency, and lack of accountability. 'RABS replaces a broken system with another flawed one,' Haslam said. 'It doesn't fix the root causes of RAF's dysfunction, and worse, it strips victims of access to justice by capping payouts and removing the right to claim for general damages.' She also added that the bill's attempt to limit legal oversight raises serious constitutional concerns and could face court challenges if passed in its current form. Haslam further highlighted troubling trends in the RAF's finances, which, although improved, have come at a cost. The RAF's 2023/2024 annual report shows the deficit has dropped from R8.43 billion to R1.59 billion, but partly due to reduced medical and loss-of-earnings payouts. Despite the tightening of spending, courts continue to issue significant awards. She revealed a series of recent payouts, such as in April, when a woman received over R4.6 million following the death of her husband in a motorcycle accident. That same month, another claimant, Seronica Nathram, was awarded nearly R3.9 million for injuries sustained in a crash. Another case involving the Road Accident Fund that commanded attention involved 16-year-old Ashwell Bernard Jones, where the Western Cape High Court awarded Jones just under R4,979,832 for future loss of earnings. He was only eight years old when he sustained a serious brain injury after being hit by a vehicle while riding his bicycle in Lavender Hill in 2017. The court ordered the RAF to cover all legal costs, including expert fees, travel expenses, and the possible appointment of a curator to manage the funds. The RAF was given 180 days to make payment, or interest will begin to accrue. While many groups remain opposed to the revival of RABS, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has backed the minister, calling the RAF a 'disaster site' with liabilities exceeding R400 billion. 'The RAF has become dysfunctional and has failed working-class South Africans for too long,' COSATU said in a statement. 'It's time for bold reform.' Responding to questions, the RAF Head of Corporate Communications, McIntosh Polela, said the RABS Bill is being revisited to address longstanding issues in the current RAF Act. 'The RABS Bill aims to reduce litigation, cut high administrative costs, and accelerate claim finalisation,' the fund said. 'It is part of a broader strategy led by the Department of Transport to ease the pressure on the courts and better serve road accident victims.' Saturday Star
