logo
Who is Ahmad al-Sharaa? Syria's president who met Trump and once had $10m US bounty on his head

Who is Ahmad al-Sharaa? Syria's president who met Trump and once had $10m US bounty on his head

Independent14-05-2025

Six months after Ahmad al-Sharaa led the ousting of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, US president Donald Trump met the former al-Qaeda figure to talk about Syria's 'chance at greatness'.
The meeting, lasting around half an hour, according to a White House official, was a dramatic turnaround for a militant figure who spent years imprisoned by US forces after being captured in Iraq.
Trump agreed to 'say hello' to the interim Syrian president before the US leader wraps up his stay in Saudi Arabia and heads to Qatar, where Trump is to be honoured with a state visit. His Mideast tour will also take him to the United Arab Emirates.
In a meeting between a US delegation and the Syrian foreign minister Asaad al-Shibani in New York last month, US officials conveyed to al-Shibani that Washington wanted more than a dozen conditions met before sanctions could be removed.
Also in April, Al-Sharaa reportedly told a pro-Trump American activist, Jonathan Bass, that he was willing to discuss a Trump Tower in Damascus, a detente with Israel and an offer to give the US access to Syria's oil and gas in a Ukraine-style deal in a bid to curry favour with the US president.
Mr al-Sharaa, who used to operate under the nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Golani, was named president of Syria in January, a month after a stunning offensive by insurgent groups led by his Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, which stormed Damascus and ended the 54-year rule of the Assad family.
Trump said he decided to meet with al-Sharaa after being encouraged to do so by Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The president also pledged to lift years-long sanctions on Syria.
'There is a new government that will hopefully succeed in stabilising the country and keeping peace,' Trump said in a wide-ranging foreign policy address Tuesday in which he announced he was lifting the sanctions that have been in place in Syria since 2011. 'That's what we want to see in Syria.'
Speaking to an investment forum in Saudi Arabia's Riyadh, he added that it was Syria's 'time to shine'.
The sanctions go back to the rule of al-Assad, who was ousted in December and now lives in Moscow, and were intended to inflict major pain on his economy.
Both the Biden and Trump administrations had left the sanctions in place after Assad's fall as they sought to take the measure of al-Sharaa, who has renounced his past affiliation with al-Qaeda.
Thus far, the extent of his transformation from jihadi extremist to would-be state builder has been applauded. His state visit with Trump is the Syrian leader's next test.
As insurgents took control of the capital, Damascus, Assad fled into hiding, and for the first time in 50 years of his family's iron hand, it is an open question how Syria will be governed.
Syria is home to multiple ethnic and religious communities, often pitted against each other by Assad's state and years of war. Many of them fear the possibility Sunni Islamist extremists will take over.
The country is also fragmented among disparate armed factions, and foreign powers from Russia and Iran to the United States, Turkey and Israel all have their hands in the mix.
For years, al-Sharaa worked to consolidate power, while bottled up in the province of Idlib in Syria's northwest corner as Assad's Iranian and Russian-backed rule over much of the country appeared solid.
He manoeuvred among extremist organisations while eliminating competitors and former allies. He sought to polish the image of his de facto 'salvation government' that was running Idlib to win over international governments and reassure Syria's religious and ethnic minorities. He also built ties with various tribes and other groups.
Along the way, al-Sharaa shed his garb as a hard-line Islamist guerrilla and put on suits for press interviews, talking of building state institutions and decentralising power to reflect Syria's diversity.
'Syria deserves a governing system that is institutional, no one where a single ruler makes arbitrary decisions,' he said in an interview with CNN in the weeks after the ousting of Assad, offering the possibility HTS would eventually be dissolved after some semblance of order is restored to Syria.
'Don't judge by words, but by actions,' he said.
Al-Sharaa's beginnings in Iraq
Al-Sharaa's ties to al-Qaeda stretch back to 2003, when he joined extremists battling US troops in Iraq. The Syrian native was detained by the US military but remained in Iraq. During that time, al-Qaeda usurped like-minded groups and formed the extremist Islamic State of Iraq, led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
In 2011, a popular uprising against Syria's Assad triggered a brutal government crackdown and led to all-out war. Al-Sharaa's prominence grew when al-Baghdadi sent him to Syria to establish a branch of al-Qaeda called the Nusra Front. The United States labelled the new group as a terrorist organisation. That designation remains in place, and the US government has put a $10 million (£7.5 million) bounty on him.
The Nusra Front and the Syrian conflict
As Syria's civil war intensified in 2013, so did al-Sharaa's ambitions. He defied al-Baghdadi's calls to dissolve the Nusra Front and merge it with al-Qaeda's operation in Iraq, to form the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS.
Al-Sharaa nonetheless pledged his allegiance to al-Qaida, which later disassociated itself from ISIS. The Nusra Front battled ISIS and eliminated much of its competition among the Syrian armed opposition to Assad.
In his first interview in 2014, al-Sharaa kept his face covered, telling a reporter for Qatari network Al-Jazeera that he rejected political talks in Geneva to end the conflict. He said his goal was to see Syria ruled under Islamic law and made clear that there was no room for the country's Alawite, Shiite, Druze and Christian minorities.
Consolidating power and rebranding
In 2016, al-Sharaa revealed his face to the public for the first time in a video message that announced his group was renaming itself Jabhat Fateh al-Sham - the Syria Conquest Front - and cutting its ties to al-Qaeda.
'This new organisation has no affiliation to any external entity,' he said in the video, filmed wearing military garb and a turban.
The move paved the way for al-Sharaa to assert full control over fracturing militant groups. A year later, his alliance rebranded again as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham - meaning Organisation for Liberating Syria - as the groups merged, consolidating al-Golani's power in northwest Syria's Idlib province.
HTS later clashed with independent Islamist militants who opposed the merger, further emboldening al-Sharaa and his group as the leading power in northwestern Syria, able to rule with an iron fist.
With his power consolidated, al-Sharaa set in motion a transformation that few could have imagined. Replacing his military garb with a shirt and trousers, he began calling for religious tolerance and pluralism.
He appealed to the Druze community in Idlib, which the Nusra Front had previously targeted, and visited the families of Kurds who were killed by Turkish-backed militias.
In 2021, al-Sharaa had his first interview with an American journalist on PBS. Wearing a blazer, with his short hair gelled back, the now more soft-spoken HTS leader said that his group posed no threat to the West and that sanctions imposed against it were unjust.
'Yes, we have criticised Western policies,' he said. 'But to wage a war against the United States or Europe from Syria, that's not true. We didn't say we wanted to fight.'
Al-Sharaa, the Syrian president
In January this year, Syrian military commanders who took part in the ousting of al-Assad appointed al-Sharaa as the interim president, consolidating his power over the country.
He was empowered to form a temporary legislative council for a transitional period, and the Syrian constitution was suspended, according to an announcement made by the military command which led the offensive against Assad.
Addressing the conference, al-Sharaa said the first priority in Syria was to fill a vacuum in government 'in a legitimate and legal way'.
He also said civil peace must be preserved through transitional justice and preventing displays of revenge, that state institutions, foremost among them military and security forces, be rebuilt, and that economic infrastructure be developed.
He pledged to embark on a political transition including a national conference, an inclusive government, and eventual elections, which he has said could take up to four years to hold.
He has not said when the new legislative body might be picked or provided any new details for a timeline for the transition.
The nearly four months since his appointment have been mixed. French president Emmanuel Macron welcomed al-Sharaa in Paris last week to discuss eventually ending sanctions against Syria.
But mass killings of hundreds of civilians from al-Assad's minority Alawite sect in March, during clashes between the new security forces and loyalists to the former dictator, hardened fears among minorities that al-Sharaa's promises to protect them were empty.
Clashes between Islamist armed factions, security forces and fighters from the Druze religious minority further troubled the country.
The US has previously said it would not lift sanctions on Syria unless issues, including the protection of minority rights, are addressed, but whether Mr Trump's meeting with al-Sharaa materialises into a breaking of this policy remains to be seen.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll
Federal appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll

NBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Federal appeals court won't reconsider Trump's $5 million loss to E. Jean Carroll

President Donald Trump failed to persuade a federal appeals court to reconsider the $5 million verdict won by E. Jean Carroll after a jury found that he sexually abused and defamed the former magazine columnist in the 1990s. In an 8-2 vote, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Friday left intact its Dec. 30 decision by a three-judge panel upholding the jury award. Carroll, now 81, accused Trump of attacking her around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, and defaming her in an October 2022 Truth Social post by denying her claim as a hoax. In his denial, which repeated a similar denial in June 2019, Trump said the former Elle columnist was 'not my type' and made up the rape claim to promote her memoir. Jurors decided in May 2023 that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll and had defamed her by lying. They did not find that Trump raped Carroll, as she had claimed. The president, who turns 79 on Saturday, is separately asking the appeals court to throw out an $83 million jury verdict in January 2024 for defaming Carroll and damaging her reputation when the Republican first denied her rape claim. Oral arguments are scheduled for June 24. A further appeal of the $5 million verdict would go to the U.S. Supreme Court. A spokesman for Trump's lawyers said in a statement that Americans 'demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed.' The $5 million verdict included $2.98 million for defamation and $2.02 million for sexual assault. Carroll is 'very pleased' with Friday's order, her lawyer Roberta Kaplan said in a statement. 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed.' Circuit Judges Steven Menashi and Michael Park, both appointed by Trump, dissented from the order. Menashi wrote that evidence in the case 'makes it more likely that President Trump believed that the lawsuit had been concocted by his political opposition — and therefore that he was not speaking with actual malice.' The judge also said the panel also improperly allowed 'stale' trial testimony about Trump's alleged groping of businesswoman Jessica Leeds on a plane in the late 1970s. In seeking reconsideration, Trump maintained that the trial judge erred in letting jurors review a 2005 'Access Hollywood' video of him bragging about his sexual prowess. He also challenged a 'pile-on' of inflammatory evidence that he mistreated Leeds and former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff, who accused Trump of forcibly kissing her at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005. Trump has denied Leeds' and Stoynoff's claims. In seeking to overturn the $83.3 million verdict, Trump argued that the Supreme Court's decision last July providing him substantial criminal immunity shields him from liability in Carroll's civil case. The verdict included $18.3 million of damages for emotional and reputational harm, and $65 million of punitive damages.

Israel's Netanyahu says Washington knew about Iran attack plans
Israel's Netanyahu says Washington knew about Iran attack plans

Reuters

time41 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Israel's Netanyahu says Washington knew about Iran attack plans

JERUSALEM, June 13 (Reuters) - Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday that Israel had informed the United States about its plans to attack Iran before carrying them out. "I leave the American position to the Americans. We updated them ahead of time. They knew about the attack. What will they do now? I leave that to President (Donald) Trump. He makes his decisions independently," Netanyahu said in a recorded video message. "I am not going to speak for him (Trump). He does that very convincingly and assertively. He said that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, they cannot have enrichment capabilities."

Iran, an evil and desperate regime, is now more dangerous than ever
Iran, an evil and desperate regime, is now more dangerous than ever

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Iran, an evil and desperate regime, is now more dangerous than ever

When I was woken up this morning at 3am by sirens that sounded across Israel I knew exactly what was happening. The signs had been piling up for the last few days: International Atomic Energy Agency declaring Iran in breach of its obligations, US pulling non-essential staff out of embassies, hospitals in Israel made ready, a warning issued to Hezbollah in Lebanon against attacking; the list goes on. But the signs of the inevitable had also been there for many years before. Iran has been a rogue state since the ayatollahs seized power in 1979. The Islamic Revolution that year was built on 'death to Israel' and 'death to America'. The US was the 'Great Satan', Israel and Britain the 'Little Satans'. These were not mere words. Iran was behind the suicide bombings that killed 241 US and 58 French military personnel plus six civilians in Beirut in 1983, as well as 63 deaths at the US Embassy there six months before. Iran's dirty work was also responsible for the killing of 85 people at a Jewish community centre in Buenos Aires in 1994, as well as 29 in an attack on the Israeli embassy in the same city in 1992. Iran and its proxies killed at least 1,100 British, American and allied troops in Iraq between 2003 and 2007 as well as an unknown number of coalition troops during the Afghanistan campaign. They have targeted US bases, international shipping and oil fields in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. And they have been attacking and killing Israeli soldiers and civilians for decades. That eventually culminated in the October 7 pogrom in Israel, in which 1,200 people were killed and many were taken hostage. There is much more to add to Iran's catalogue of terror: a bomb factory in London, for instance, that was disrupted by British security services in 2015 and alleged attempted terrorist attacks in the UK leading to arrests last month. Iran has also been the major supplier of drones and missiles to Russia which have been used against civilian and military targets in Ukraine. For decades the Tehran regime has been working to develop nuclear weapons. Although Iran sometimes paused its programme when it feared punitive action from either the US or Israel, it has refused to stop; its upward trajectory has now reached a point where the IAEA believes it now has enough highly enriched uranium to make at least ten bombs. Iran's ballistic missile capability has also been proceeding apace, giving it a nuclear capability to span the region, and of course there are also other more covert means of delivering nuclear weapons. Until recently the missing part of the intelligence jigsaw was weaponisation, the ability to turn fissile material into a viable bomb. Today Israeli prime minister Netanyahu revealed that Iran has indeed been working on that important final step. With all diplomatic pathways to prevent Iran becoming a nuclear armed state closed off, Israel had no choice but to attack. The alternative would have been unthinkable: a regime that has repeatedly proven its capacity for unlimited violence acquiring nuclear weapons capability. But Iran's dictators are now in a desperate situation. How they will react is difficult to foresee. Israel has decapitated their armed forces and destroyed significant parts of their offensive capability. The IDF will continue to attack Iran's nuclear facilities and to degrade its capacity to strike, although we don't yet know whether it will be completely neutralised. If not, like Hitler in his bunker, the unhinged ayatollahs might try to lash out at oil states in the region – either with their own remaining armoury and or using what terrorist proxies remain to them. They might even attack US bases in the Middle East, which they have threatened to do, even though they know that could bring about their Armageddon. All of that might lead to insurrection in the country. Much of the population in recent years has reached new heights of hatred for rulers that have oppressed, imprisoned, tortured, murdered and impoverished them. But it is far from clear that there is a viable opposition able to step up; one scenario is perhaps some kind of military coup. It is possible that ayatollah Khamenei might heed president Trump's advice today and come to the negotiating table. That would probably be the worst option, because whatever Khamenei agrees to would not be honoured, leaving the Islamic State in a position to lick its wounds and then return to its nuclear programme. It is therefore vital now that Israel be given the freedom and support to finish the job it started last night.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store