
Maria Walsh: Polish election result shows we cannot take trust in Europe for granted
Earlier this month, Poland elected Karol Nawrocki as its new president as he edged out his opponent by the narrowest of margins in a record-breaking 73% voter turnout.
His defeat of liberal Warsaw mayor Rafał Trzaskowski stands in stark contrast to the centrist coalition currently governing in Poland's parliament — and could signal a pivot backwards in one of the EU's most strategically important member states.
With his Maga-style politics and growing nationalist platform, Nawrocki resembles a number of other right-wing populist leaders elected in recent years.
His victory arrives at a fragile moment for the EU, a moment when European unity is being tested by war on its borders, institutional reforms in Brussels, and a steady undercurrent of far-right momentum across the bloc.
This is a result that will have consequences far beyond the Polish borders — reverberations of the June 1 election will be felt across the EU and will undoubtedly arrive on Irish shores.
Conversations in Brussels this week have centred around the reasons underpinning Nawrocki's victory. It appears Poland's membership of the EU played a pivotal role in the end result. For some Poles, there is a growing feeling the European Union has "diluted" the Polish national identity. This feeling has been matched by a growing wave of nationalism, which is linked to a similar sentiment around migration and open borders.
Polish citizens, who have gained considerably from EU membership, much as we have done in Ireland, have elected a resident who is far from a fan of the European project.
While the impact of Nawrocki's victory might not be felt immediately in Brussels — he will not directly dictate Poland's decisions taken across the EU institutions — the presidential role is much more than a ceremonial footnote.
As president, he holds veto power over legislation and has already forced prime minister Donald Tusk — who leads a pro-European government — into calling a parliamentary vote of confidence. Given his power over the prime minister, a legislative stalemate surrounding Tusk's pro-European reforms is highly likely.
Fine Gael MEP Maria Walsh: 'We must ensure Irish citizens continue to see and understand the value of the European project — because trust in Europe cannot be assumed, it must be earned.'
Since Brexit, the EU's centre of gravity has shifted eastward. Poland has been at the heart of this transition, with its influence in the EU continuing to increase thanks to its economic growth, geographic position and strong defence capabilities.
Since joining the EU in 2004, Poland has become the fastest growing economy in Europe.
Alongside its fiscal success, Poland has emerged as a military frontrunner in the EU. The size of its army outweighs that of the UK, France, and Germany, with annual investment in defence reaching almost 5%.
Given its proximity to Kaliningrad and Russia, and past history of occupation, it is no surprise Poland has prioritised its security and defence, and in recent months it has played a central role in the Coalition of the Willing.
Nawrocki's victory puts into question how Poland will now be able to collaborate with the EU on issues of security, and crucially on the Russia-Ukraine war.
As the commander in chief, Nawrocki can shape foreign and security policy, and his current position on Ukraine is nuanced. On the one hand, he does not support cutting off weapons to Ukraine and has not been as pro-Russia as some other Maga-style politicians.
However, Nawrocki has demonised Ukrainian refugees in his country, claimed Zelenskyy 'treats Poland badly', and opposes Ukrainian integration into European-oriented bodies, such as the EU and Nato. Without a strong ally in Poland, the EU is significantly weaker in pushing ahead with its defence agenda.
Perhaps most notable about Nawrocki's victory is what it tells us about the European political climate. With recent gains by right-wing parties in the European parliamentary elections and across France, Germany, and Italy, the Polish result feels less like an anomaly and more like a bellwether.
The election of Romania's Nicușor Dan last month offers a glimmer of hope, but given Nawrocki's close ties to Donald Trump and Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán, we cannot ignore the steady erosion of the centre-ground.
In Ireland, we have been fortunate the centre has held in recent elections — underpinned by strong support for European cooperation, inclusion and democratic values. But Poland has shown us how quickly the tide can change.
In less than two years, a shift in public sentiment has deepened divisions on the EU's eastern flank and raised urgent questions about whether our institutions are still connecting with the citizens they represent.
The Polish election has practical implications for Ireland — we must push harder for EU cooperation and commit to a more serious role in European defence. Just as importantly, we must ensure Irish citizens continue to see and understand the value of the European project — because trust in Europe cannot be assumed, it must be earned.
Maria Walsh is a Fine Gael MEP for the Midlands-North West constituency
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
AI child sexual abuse material to be criminalised under new EU laws, says Irish MEP
NEW LEGISLATION FROM the European Union will criminalise AI-generated child sexual abuse material and remove a statute of limitation on child abuse crimes across Europe, MEP Maria Walsh has said. Walsh is a member of the European Parliament's committee responsible for the revision of the Combating Child Sexual Abuse Directive. The revised directive is due to be voted on in the European Parliament on Tuesday. The proposed legislation will criminalise child sexual abuse material that has been generated by artificial intelligence – including the development, possession, and distribution of AI systems used to produce the content. The issue of AI being used for nefarious means has become increasingly prevalent as AI systems grow rapidly more sophisticated. Last month, The Journal reported that the Children's Ombudsman said he is 'hugely concerned' about the potential of AI apps that can be used by anyone to create sexually explicit images of children. Dr Niall Muldoon warned that stronger laws were needed to tackle the scourge of so-called 'nudification' apps, which allow real photos of women and girls to be edited by artificial intelligence to produce deepfake images that make them appear naked. Advertisement In February, The Guardian reported that the UK was to be the first country to introduce tough new laws to tackle the technology behind the creation of such material. Today, Walsh said that once the vote has passed the legislation, it will result in the criminalisation of AI child sexual abuse material 'for the first time'. She said that the use of AI to sexually abuse children results in the victimisation of real children, including survivors of previous sexual abuse. 'The new laws will also remove the statute of limitation on child sexual abuse crimes in all EU countries,' she said. 'Shockingly, the average age of disclosure of an experience of child sexual abuse is 52 years old. In other words, child sexual abuse is a life sentence. On top of this, a third of abused children never disclose their experience at all.' She said that Ireland has a 'long and shameful history' of 'mistreating' young people and vulnerable members of society, but that the problem of AI child sexual abuse material extends further and across the European Union. 'Child abusers should never be allowed to hide and escape from accountability for their actions. A life sentence for victims must mean a lifelong possibility of justice,' she said. If you have been affected by any of the issues mentioned in this article, you can reach out for support through the following helplines: Dublin Rape Crisis Centre - 1800 77 8888 (fre, 24-hour helpline) Samaritans - 116 123 or email jo@ (suicide, crisis support) Pieta - 1800 247 247 or text HELP to 51444 – (suicide, self-harm) Teenline - 1800 833 634 (for ages 13 to 19) Childline - 1800 66 66 66 (for under 18s) Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Suzanne Harrington: 'Terrorist-adjacent', hilarious, galvanising, inspirational Kneecap
At a moment where that Chinese curse — may you live in interesting times — is taking itself far too literally, we could all do with a fat slap of levity. I'm pinning my hopes on Kneecap's Liam Óg Ó Hannaidh when he shows up at Westminster magistrates court this Wednesday on terror charges. I'm hoping he'll ask for a translator, like he did while playing a version of himself in the Kneecap film. That life will imitate art, and he will not speak a single word of English during this nonsensical waste of Liam's time and taxpayers' cash. Because really... terror charges? A surreal idea, like something dreamed up by Flann O'Brien and Franz Kafka after sharing a pot of peyote tea. These charges do not include any actual terrorism — no bombing of schools and hospitals, vaporising ambulances, starving and murdering tens of thousands of civilians — but centre on the alleged handling of a banned flag indoors last November. Touching a rectangle of fabric. Briefly. Kneecap, who have asked supporters to gather outside the London court building on the day, describe this moment of British power-flexing theatrics as 'political policing', a 'carnival of distraction'. Goliath, as ever, punching down; Daithí readying his sling. Because if the British government wants a carnival, it could not have cast better players. Kneecap know all about performance, situationism, absurdism. They themselves are fearless theatre. Imagine then this life-imitating-art scenario, where Liam Óg speaks only Irish in court. Imagine how funny that would be, how utterly, brilliantly comedic, how richly satisfying. The spluttering, the outrage, the apoplexy. The hilarity. The glee. And yes, it's a lot to ask a 27-year-old facing the wrath of the British establishment doing their best to intimidate, to derail his career, but tá bualain ar an bhuach. (And yes, of course I had to google that. I can't speak Irish; unlike Peig Sayers, Kneecap are the first people who have ever inspired me to look up any Irish words. Don't hate me if it reads like a badly translated menu). Celtic fans unveil a banner that reads "Free Palestine" and "Kneecap Abu" during the Scottish Gas Men's Scottish Cup final at Hampden Park, Glasgow. Picture date: Saturday May 24, 2025. PA Photo. That's why the establishment wants to squash Kneecap, cancel them, restrict their movement — because they inspire. They galvanise. Like those enormous peaceful marches for Palestine that regularly bring central London to a halt but are never reported by the BBC or other major British media (turnout for the last one on May 17 was 500,000-600,000) — Kneecap, along with a handful of other vocal critics, are doing what the British government is not: loudly calling out atrocities. They're being labelled as terrorist-adjacent for their trouble, as they provide a focus for people appalled at the genocide, appalled at the complicity of the US and Britain. Along with the marches, along with other musicians such as Fontaines and Macklemore, they are providing an unofficial form of anger management. It must be infuriating therefore for those keen to shut them up to see how the more Kneecap hold their nerve, hold their principles ('If it comes down to awards or breaking America by sacrificing what you believe in, then America can go fuck itself') the bigger they get. Cancelled from a Scottish festival that caved to 'safety concerns', they sold out an alternative venue in seconds. Glastonbury refused to cancel them. And in September, they play their biggest venue to date — Wembley Arena. The cancelling is not going well. I'm off to google the Irish for 'fight the power'. Read More Film Reviews: How to Train Your Dragon makes superb use of Northern Irish scenery


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish survivors to tell UN session why they want a ban on use of counselling notes in rape trials
Survivors of sexual offences will call on the Irish Government to ban outright the use of counselling notes in sexual offence trials, at a session of the United Nations on Monday. Ciara Mangan and Leyla Simsek of Beyond Surviving will be joined by human rights and equality researcher Lisa Murray in Geneva for a session of the Committee on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women. During the session — which runs from Monday to July 4 — the committee will review Mexico, Thailand, Ireland, Afghanistan, San Marino, Chad, and Botswana on how the countries are implementing the UN Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women. New bill stalled by Government The session comes just days after the Criminal Law (Prohibition of the Disclosure of Counselling Records) Bill 2025 brought forward by Ruth Coppinger was stalled by the Government for a year. The bill aims to ban outright the use of counselling notes in sexual offence trials. Ciara Mangan described as 'gut-wrenching' Thursday's decision not to progress the bill beyond second stage for 12 months, which a Government amendment said was 'to allow for consideration by the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration to consider and bring forward provisions relating to Counselling Records". Justice minister Jim O'Callaghan secured Government approval last month to draught legislation which would result in complainants' counselling notes only being disclosed in sexual assault trials if the court decides they are relevant. However, in a submission to the UN, Beyond Surviving described the minister's proposal as legislating to continue the practice of disclosure of counselling notes, 'rather than cease it'. Practice 'removes the victim's agency' The group says that the use of counselling notes in sex offence trials are 'disproportionately discrediting a truthful victim'. The submission added: 'Further, it removes the victim's right to non-disclosure, claiming it to be a solution to victims being 'fearful that if they do not agree to furnish the records, the prospect of a successful prosecution may be put in jeopardy'. It thereby removes the victim's agency entirely, denying any option to exercise the right to nondisclosure. The survivors' group argues that allowing counselling notes in court cases is a breach of human rights 'when such information is non-evidentiary and perpetuates harm through re-victimisation". The submission says: 'Beyond Surviving contends that the current legislation and proposed amendment is a violation of our rights.' Calling the use of counselling notes a violation, the submission also says: 'We assert that this practice is discriminatory and a breach of women's rights to access health and justice. It is a violation of our privacy and deeply harmful. This violation must be eradicated.' Arguing that their use does not lead to a fair trial, the submission continued: "We do not agree that emotional records from therapy bear relevance to the trial or help to determine the facts of the case.' The submission added: 'Significant harm and suffering caused by such interference [in using counselling notes] outweighs what is suggested as its purported benefit.'