logo
I pored over John Swinney's strategy – here's what we must do now

I pored over John Swinney's strategy – here's what we must do now

The National20-07-2025
Swinney started with a declaration of intent: 'Scotland's interests are best served only when ­Scotland's future is in Scotland's hands. Our nation will only fully flourish when the people of Scotland are in charge of our own destiny with independence.'
He then went on to make his own personal case, arguing that he had 'steadied the ship', and that he had been able to 'restore the credibility of my party and my Government so that we could make – and ­importantly win – the argument for Scottish ­independence'.
Looking at the polls, this is largely true, and ­Swinney is right to make the claim that under his leadership the SNP, over the past 12 months, have won 13 local government by-elections – a big shift after a 20-month period without a single victory.
However, the irony is that they have achieved this by attempting to tackle the cost of living crisis, rather than focusing on independence.
Swinney is right to assert the claim that: 'We ­restored Winter Fuel Payments for Scotland's ­pensioners when Labour chose to scrap them. We are taking bold action on child poverty by lifting the cruel two-child cap that pushes thousands of children into poverty – a decision which been welcomed by every anti-poverty charity in the country and which Labour, to their shame, have failed to take at a UK level.'
But on other matters, the SNP's claims to be ­'tackling the cost of living crisis' seem a lot weaker.
For example, Swinney claims that: 'We are offering solutions to the ongoing cost of living crisis – with new policies such as the removal of peak fares on our railways. Our cost of living guarantee ­delivers ­savings for Scots that aren't available elsewhere. From council tax that is 30% lower than in England, or water bills 20% lower, or no charges for essentials like prescriptions.'
But the big-ticket items, like housing and energy bills, are absent, and only this month the SNP missed a huge opportunity to back zonal energy pricing. The SNP's housing policy has made no dent in the massive urban and rural housing crisis.
Swinney has steadied the ship but it is still ­taking water, and the sextant, compass and maps are all gone.
But the point of all of this is to manage a range of constituencies, tribes and demographics, to ­ensure electoral survival and persuade people that, ­somehow, the SNP are still the only show in town and the best vehicle to achieve independence, and/or ­govern a pre-independent Scotland more ­competently than anyone else. In some ways, this is an impossible task. In other ways, this is a low bar.
On the one hand, Swinney needs to manage this transition while operating within the fiscal restraints of ­devolution, with an overwhelmingly hostile media around him and with severe and v­ocal dissent from within the nationalist ­movement.
This makes the task one that is just ­immersed in hostility and negativity.
On the other hand, he is faced with opponents and opposition so abject and hopeless that it makes the SNP rise, ­Lazarus-like, over and over.
Swinney has a dual task: to speak to those who want (and need) good ­governance and those who want ­movement-building. He is far better at the first than the second.
His strategy, such as it is, is broadly to (re) build trust, then build an ­unstoppable coalition amid the rubble and decay of the debris of Late Britain for an independent Scotland. I would like to take this ­opportunity to examine this approach and evaluate its strengths and weaknesses.
Building a Coalition for Yes
TO his credit, Swinney shows some humility saying: 'Our renewed unity and sense of purpose is clear for all to see, and that too is giving people confidence once again in the [[SNP]], as the leading advocates of Scottish independence. Some good and necessary first steps have been taken, but they have only brought us to the starting line.'
Rather grandly, he writes: 'We are on the precipice of a new global age and that demands a bold new path for Scotland.' I don't really know what that actually means?
Speaking to the opposition, he writes: 'Others speak glibly of a new direction or for the need for reform, but the change Scotland needs is more fundamental', ­before declaring: 'To meet the challenges of this new age, we need a Scotland that is reborn.'
We do.
He continues to lay out his case, ­arguing: 'Last time, many people gave the UK the benefit of the doubt, many believing that an incoming Labour ­government might put things right. But an incoming Labour government has only made things worse.
'The evidence is staring us in the face: Westminster is not working for Scotland. Life is just too difficult for too many and the UK is incapable of providing the ­required, essential boost to living ­standards.'
This is self-evident, though worth re-stating, but this is where the cracks in the argument begin to emerge.
At no point in this new declaration do the SNP show the intent, the ­resolve or the track record to offer a ­genuinely radical economic alternative to the ­neoliberalism of Labour/Conservative rule. What they have shown is some ­ameliorative polices to try to counter the most regressive impact of being in the Union. But that's not enough.
Without many specifics, Swinney ­argues: 'It's therefore time for the people of ­Scotland to take our future into our own hands, so that we can ensure our vast ­energy wealth delivers tangible benefits for our people, including lower household energy bills and a more competitive business environment. So that we can create a dynamic, internationally ­connected economy, ensuring opportunities for all in an economy that works for all.'
This is, in the words of Jonathon Shafi, 'Word Soup'.
Having set out his stall, the First ­Minister then attempts to lay out his ­pathway to independence.
He says: 'We have to challenge the democratic outrage that Westminster – right now – refuses to acknowledge Scotland's right to determine her own future.
'We demonstrated in 2014 that an agreed democratic referendum is the correct means to bring about that ­independence. And have no doubt, such a democratic, constitutional ­approach is necessary if our independence is to achieve domestic and international ­legitimacy. Something that is ­essential if we are to receive international ­recognition and a smooth return to ­membership of the EU.'
These words, this plan, are the dividing line between those in the Yes movement, who want a new plan, a new direction, and Swinney's calculation that this is the route to take the majority of Scotland with him.
The Plan
SWINNEY lays out his ideas very clearly, saying: 'First, it will be a campaign designed to build the highest levels of support possible for independence as the best future for Scotland.
'I will be saying to those who voted Yes in 2014, and who have become ­independence supporters in the years since, that what they believed in then is just as valid today.
'They saw that Britain was fundamentally broken, that Westminster couldn't deliver on their dreams and aspirations, and what they saw has come to pass. And now it is time to do something about it.
'But I will also be urging people who were not persuaded of the merits of ­independence in 2014 to see the state of Britain today and take a different view.'
This is all good and shouldn't be ­disputed by anybody. Who doesn't want to build mass support for ­independence? The problem, as we'll go on to in a ­moment, is the lack of detail, ideas or strategy on how to make that happen and to navigate the many contradictions and challenges that it entails.
He continues: 'Second, that means building public pressure around Scotland's fundamental national rights. The UK parties speak of a partnership of equals, but those are empty words if Scotland does not have the ability to determine her own future.
'We are ready to turn the heat up on Westminster and its anti-democratic stance, mobilising the support, energy and the impetus of people in Scotland behind the simple idea: no ifs, no buts, Scotland has the right to choose.'
This is good, and he's quite right to lay out the basic anti-democratic nature of the British state's 'offering' to Scotland. But again, the problem is the lack of ­detail, ideas or strategy. There may be more to come but if there was, why not lay it out here?
Finally , the First Minister concludes: 'And third, I want to persuade independence supporters that the way to deliver independence is only with an emphatic SNP win in 2026 and the priority is to do that now. History tells us that only when the SNP are doing well is there any prospect of advancing on Scotland's constitutional cause.
'During the next parliament, we reach the point where there will be one million people eligible to vote who, last time around, were too young to do so or not even born. A generation has now clearly passed.
'It's time for the one change that will actually make a difference for Scotland, for the fresh start our nation needs so badly. It's time for Scotland to craft her destiny by ensuring Scotland's future is in the hands of the people of Scotland.'
To be fair, framing the SNP as a 'fresh start' after 18 years in power is pretty gallus, but there is something among all of this which shines out, and which could be the centrepoint of a more dynamic strategy.
Future Focused
MUCH of the dismay about being trapped within the Union is the ­overwhelming sense of decay and decline that pervades late Britain.
If this feeling reached its apogee at the death of the monarch, it can be seen daily in the appointment of ­ridiculous people to the House of Lords, the ­overarching power of the government within ­[[Westminster]] (as witnessed by the actions of Keir Starmer's whips' office against his own party last week) or the immersive deference inculcated by being subjects of a monarch in the 21st century.
The feeling of being trapped in an ­ancient regime that is unreformable and corrupt at its core is overwhelming and debilitating.
Beyond this fusion of ­cronyism and ­decay, though, is the reality of ­collapsing living standards, grotesque social ­inequality and elite grandeur. The ­response is a populist movement of the far-right that eulogises a mythical past.
In among the platitudes and the ­normcore of Swinney's 'plan', there is an opportunity to really contrast this backward-looking Ruritania, this Britain of fossils and past-glories and relics of Empire.
Countless commentators have ­remarked on how difficult it has become for anyone to 'imagine a better future' in timelines that seem dark and economic systems that seem all-pervasive.
There is a glaring opportunity for the case to be made for a new Scotland to ­really address the multiple problems ­facing not just young people but future generations – and for this case to be made by framing Scottish independence as a future-facing project in stark contrast to broken Britain.
What would that look like? It would mean really taking on the multiple ­problems faced by younger (and future) generations, which have been a dark inheritance passed on to them. A ­mammoth, impossible task? Yes, but one worth trying.
Where to start? I would start with the crisis of affordable housing which is life-altering for millions of people.
I would face the existential crisis of climate breakdown and create deep and radical action plans that would give hope and meaning for a liveable future.
I would create the outline of what an 'ethical foreign policy' (to use Robin Cook's words) would look like for a ­future Scotland.
I would begin to meaningfully address the crisis of social alienation and the epidemic of loneliness and mental health that has spooled out of lockdown, late capitalist anomie and digital culture, and particularly affects younger people.
If these seem ridiculous, impossible or utopian ideas, that's OK. In such dark times, we need to imagine a better ­future beyond the confines of today. As the ­political philosopher Murray Bookchin said: 'The assumption that what ­currently exists must necessarily ­exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking.'
Framing an independent Scotland as a project for future generations would be a reset for the entire independence movement, and would require a complete overhaul of thinking. But somehow, somewhat improbably, Swinney has stumbled on an idea: "During the next parliament, we reach the point where there will be one ­million people eligible to vote who, last time around, were too young to do so or not even born. A generation has now clearly passed.'
This has two consequences. First, we begin to sweep aside the fragile excuse that the Unionist community has hidden behind for repressing basic democracy in holding up the phrase 'for a generation' and assert that that time has passed.
Second, we go to, engage with and ­inspire the generation that are now ­eligible to vote, and who are ­overwhelmingly pro-independence.
To do this properly, and to begin to ­explore the generational issues I touched on, would require a break from 2014 and an effort to re-imagine the case for ­independence in a much more expansive timeframe.
This wouldn't be another 'campaign' with slogans and attack lines, it wouldn't be a politics of resentment, it would be a politics of imagination and possibility.
That Britain is in a morbid state is plain for anyone to see, but that must be ­contrasted with a movement that ­offers not just a constitutional off-ramp but an alternative to the politics of fear and ­resentment that activates the populist right. In this sense, we need to rethink the case for independence and recast it entirely.
In the words of Marshall ­McLuhan: 'Most of our assumptions have outlived their uselessness.'
Remaining in this Union means ­being engaged in the 'slow cancellation of the future'. For Scotland to be ­'reborn' ­demands that we step out of that ­paradigm and away from the ­hyper-nostalgia and denialism that characterises the most ­regressive elements of British and American nationalism.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump didn't push me to support new oil and gas drilling, Swinney says
Trump didn't push me to support new oil and gas drilling, Swinney says

Western Telegraph

time7 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Trump didn't push me to support new oil and gas drilling, Swinney says

The SNP leader said the US President made his views clear during their dinner on Monday but did not actively press him to back fresh drilling in the North Sea. Mr Swinney said he was aware of Mr Trump's posts on his social media platform urging the UK to lower taxes and drill. US President Donald Trump played some golf at Trump International Golf Links, on the Menie Estate in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire (Jane Barlow/PA) On the last day of his five-day visit to Scotland, the American leader posted: 'North Sea Oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. 'They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'we don't want you'. 'Incentivize the drillers, fast. A vast fortune to be made for the UK, and far lower energy costs for the people!' Mr Swinney had dinner with the President who was flanked at the table at Trump MacLeod House & Lodge – named after Mr Trump's Scottish mother, Mary Anne MacLeod Trump – in the Menie estate alongside Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Asked if the President pressed Mr Swinney to back new oil and gas licenses during the two-hour event, the First Minister said: 'He didn't. He didn't press me to do that. Trump had dinner with Keir Starmer and John Swinney on Monday evening (Jane Barlow/PA) 'He obviously expressed his view that there should be more oil and gas activity undertaken and I've seen material from the President this morning which raises issues about taxation, which of course, is not under my control. 'I don't have any influence over North Sea oil and gas taxation. 'Obviously the President made clear his view that he is not a supporter of wind turbines and I expressed the view that we have about our energy priorities on renewable energy.' Mr Trump landed in Prestwick on Friday on Air Force One before travelling to his golf course in Turnberry, South Ayrshire. On Monday, he and the Prime Minister were transported by Marine One to his golf course in Menie. He opened up The New Course there on Tuesday shortly before leaving for Washington. Mr Swinney had dinner with Mr Trump for around two hours where the First Minister made the case for exempting Scotch whisky from US tariffs, while a shorter discussion on Tuesday morning focused on what Mr Swinney said was the 'humanitarian catastrophe' in Gaza. During his trip – his first since 2023 and first since winning re-election – Mr Trump repeatedly referred to Aberdeen as 'the oil capital of Europe'. The US President campaigned on 'drill baby drill' during his election campaign last year. He has been outspoken in his dislike of 'windmills', having taken the Scottish Government to court over an offshore wind farm near his Aberdeenshire estate. Mr Trump said Scotland had the 'ugliest windmills I've ever seen', describing them as 'ugly monsters' that were 'destroying the beauty' of the country. Donald Trump has urged the UK to extract more oil from the North Sea (Andrew Milligan/PA) 'Wind is a disaster,' Mr Trump said. 'Wind is the most expensive form of energy. 'When we go to Aberdeen you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen. 'They're the height of a 50-storey building. 'You could take 1,000 times more energy from a hole in the ground. It's called oil and gas, and you have it in the North Sea. 'You are paying in Scotland, and the UK, and all over place, where they gave them massive subsidies to have these ugly monsters all over the place.'

Funding golf tournament was not attempt to ‘butter up' Trump
Funding golf tournament was not attempt to ‘butter up' Trump

Western Telegraph

time7 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Funding golf tournament was not attempt to ‘butter up' Trump

The Government announced on Saturday that £180,000 of public money would be spent to bring the Nexo Championship to Scotland next month – just days before the First Minister met Mr Trump. Mr Swinney said he had 'courteous' talks with Mr Trump on Tuesday morning, ahead of the official opening of a second course in Aberdeenshire. The leaders discussed the situation in Gaza and tariffs on Scotch whisky, which Mr Swinney said the president appeared to be willing to move on. Speaking to the PA news agency, the First Minister said the tournament funding was not to curry favour with the president. Asked if it was an effort to 'butter up' Mr Trump, he said: 'No, I think what I was trying to do is to make sure that a tournament that was coming to Scotland could be properly promoted. 'It's coming here, we've essentially intervened to secure a tournament quite late in the day.' Mr Swinney added that the Government provides cash to the Royal and Ancient Golf Club (R&A) in St Andrews. 'If the principle is good enough for the R&A, it's good enough for Trump International,' he said. Asked about his relationship with Mr Trump following his first face-to-face meetings with the leader, Mr Swinney said there had been 'very good and courteous' conversations between the pair. 'I think we talked well about the issues that matter to the people of Scotland,' he said. Donald Trump was joined by his sons Donald Jnr, left, and Eric for the official opening of the New Course at Menie, Aberdeenshire (Jane Barlow/PA) 'He has a deep affinity with Scotland, so he's got a warmth and an empathy towards Scotland and he was interested in all the issues that I was raising about Scotland. 'So I think we had a very welcome opportunity to engage in dialogue and to build a relationship.' Asked if he believes that positive relationship will continue into the future, the First Minister said he does, adding the president ended the meeting by urging him to contact the US administration should he wish to raise any issues. 'I intend to take him up on that issue, because my job as First Minister of Scotland is to promote and protect the interests of the country and I can engage constructively with the president of the United States to do that,' Mr Swinney added. As well as a meeting early on Tuesday, the First Minister was also invited to a dinner on Monday evening at the Aberdeenshire club alongside Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Over a meal of langoustines and beef, the First Minister had his first face-to-face meeting with the US president – having spoken over the phone after his election win last November.

What Labour's Jimmy Savile attack on Nigel Farage reveals
What Labour's Jimmy Savile attack on Nigel Farage reveals

Spectator

time7 minutes ago

  • Spectator

What Labour's Jimmy Savile attack on Nigel Farage reveals

Nigel Farage is on the side of sex offenders like Jimmy Savile. That's the verdict of Labour Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, after the Reform leader criticised the government's Online Safety Act. Kyle, is of course, speaking nonsense: opposing a law that fails to protect children and cracks down on free speech doesn't put you in the same group as Savile. But Kyle's comments do make one thing clear: Labour is seriously rattled about the rise of Reform. Farage has demanded an apology from Kyle, who has so far refused to back down. Instead, having told Sky News 'make no mistake if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today he would be perpetrating his crimes online – and Nigel Farage is on their side', Kyle has doubled down. The Labour minister took to X after that interview to say: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' Farage has made it clear that he is in favour of protecting children from dangerous content online but doesn't think the Online Safety Act – which his party would repeal – is the way to do so. Zia Yusuf, Reform's Doge chief, was even more outspoken than Farage. He told a press conference in Westminster yesterday that: 'So much of the Act is massive overreach and plunges this country into a borderline dystopian state.' But it was Farage who was Kyle's target on this morning's media round. The reason why is simple: Labour is scrambling to know how to respond to Reform, which has a seven-point lead, according to The Spectator's poll tracker. Labour is facing a sustained assault from Farage, and are finding it hard to get a grip. Previously, Keir Starmer's party simply dismissed Farage as a populist. As Reform's rise continued, they tried to question his patriotic credentials, with the Prime Minister levelling accusations earlier this year that the Reform leader was 'fawning over Putin'. Another Labour tactic has been to attempt to forge a sense of patriotism to challenge Reform's. Backbench MP for Dover and Deal Mike Tapp has been leading the charge. 'I'll never insult or belittle someone who votes Reform,' he told The Spectator in a recent interview. But still, Labour has failed to dent Farage. So Kyle has, instead, turned to insulting Farage. It's a tactic that will backfire. Voters can see the flaws in the Online Safety Act – and they are unlikely to take kindly to Farage coming under attack for pointing these out. Dressed up as a measure to protect children, in practice this Act will achieve little. There are already worrying reports of the impact this legislation, which came into effect last week, appears to be having. Footage of people being arrested in Leeds while protesting against asylum seekers' hotels was censored on X for users who had not verified their age. Meanwhile, videos of a speech made in Parliament by Katie Lam MP detailing the horrors of the rape gangs have also been blocked for some users. One X user reported that paintings by Titian and the 19th century painter William-Adolphe Bouguereau were censored. Were the effect on free speech not so chilling, it would be laughable. Farage is right to speak out against this ludicrous crackdown. Kyle should see sense and apologise.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store