Budget 2025: What Will KiwiSaver Changes Mean For Your Balance?
As part of the Budget, a number of changes were announced to KiwiSaver.
The government will halve the member tax credit available to people who contribute at least $1042 in a year to $260.72. When the scheme was first launched, the government provided a matching $1042. The cut is expected to save the government $400 million a year.
Employer and government contributions will be made available to 16- and 17-year-olds. Previously, they had only applied to those aged 18 to 65.
The default contribution rate for both employees and employers will increase in two stages to 4 percent from 1 April, 2028. Employees can opt to stay on the lower 3 percent rate, matched by their employer, but that will reset to the new default rate after 12 months.
Impact of higher contributions
KiwiSaver managers estimated that the increase to a default contribution rate of 4 percent, plus 4 percent for an employer, would make a material difference to KiwiSaver members' final outcomes.
Murray Harris, head of KiwiSaver at Milford, calculated that someone who was 35, earning the average wage with a KiwiSaver balance of $25,000 in a balanced fund, could have an extra $56,000 (inflation adjusted) at 65. That would give them $50 a week more to spend, he said.
At Sharesies, general manager of funds Matt Macpherson said without adjusting for inflation, the increase for a 30-year-old currently earning $75,000 a year with $30,000 saved in a growth fund would be $175,000 at 65.
Harris said the increase would help to close the gap between what it cost to live in retirement and what NZ Super would provide. But he said it would have been good to see contributions extended to people over 65, as well as teenagers.
Some KiwiSaver providers said the increase was not likely to be enough.
Kōura founder Rupert Carlyon said 4 percent plus 4 percent was better than 3 percent plus 3 percent.
"But it's well short of six plus six, which would have brought us in line with Australia, and it's nowhere near the 15 percent OECD average pension contribution. We have a long way to go, but it's better than nowhere."
Dean Anderson, founder of Kernel Wealth, said the government should have followed Australia's lead and set a path detailing how contributions would increase over time.
"I don't know why we couldn't have gone further, with a long-term plan."
Carlyon said he was worried by stats showing that half of employers used a "total remuneration" approach to KiwiSaver. This means that rather than providing a contribution on top of a person's salary, they are offered a total salary amount and the employee decides whether to contribute to KiwiSaver from that total.
Carlyon said he was worried this would become more common as a way for employers to avoid the additional contribution.
"This is probably net positive for balances over time, but not for everyone - only a select group of people who have employers who do the right thing."
Reduction in member tax credit
Macpherson said the impact of the smaller tax credit could compound out to $21,000 less for the 30-year-old earning $75,000 that he used as an example for the higher contribution calculation.
He said some people were being left behind, "in particular self-employed". He said he saw many self-employed people contributing to Sharesies' scheme at the level to get the member tax credit - they would now have their returns reduced.
Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson said low-income earners, Māori, women and self-employed people would be hit hardest by the reduction.
"It's a shame there are so few government incentives for a scheme that underpins private saving for retirement. I would at least have liked to see some of the savings from reducing government contributions be applied to serving those groups where we see the widest retirement savings gaps."
But other providers said the impact of the credit was not material for most KiwiSaver members. Anyone who was earning at least $50,000 a year and contributing 3 percent would have received the full payment.
"As much as I hate to see tweaking to KiwiSaver and removing incentives erodes confidence, when you're looking to find balance in the economy and make a saving, on a cost benefit basis, it's probably okay."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
a day ago
- Newsroom
Govt KiwiSaver cut ‘final nail in the coffin' for self-employed
Self-employed New Zealanders are re-thinking their retirement savings schemes after the Government slashed its KiwiSaver co-contribution in the Budget. Data compiled from accounting fintech Hnry's latest sole trader pulse check highlights negativity following the change, with 52 percent of the 502 self-employed workers polled, actively opposing the cut. Forty-three percent say it will alter their saving behaviour and 24 percent plan to reduce their contribution as a result of the change.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
KiwiSaver hardship reveals hidden cost of this economic downturn
We had news last week that KiwiSaver members withdrew more than $470 million for hardship reasons in the past 12 months amid continuing economic stress. Inland Revenue figures showed $470.7m was taken out of KiwiSaver in the June financial year, up 56.6% from $300.5m over the prior period. Looking back through the figures, there has certainly been a big spike in withdrawals in the past two years, but they have been on the rise for several years. Since Covid, both the number of people withdrawing funds and the amount withdrawn have risen steadily. As a barometer of the general economic situation, that isn't great. But the bigger problem with these hardship withdrawals is that the ultimate cost is (quite literally) compounded through the years. More than $1.3 billion of KiwiSaver funds has been withdrawn for hardship reasons in the past five years. If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations and assume this money could have earned around 7% returns for the next 20 years, then we get a figure of more than $5b that will be missing from the nation's pool of retirement funds by 2045. Given the current trend of withdrawals, I suspect this is a conservative estimate. I understand why we allow withdrawals for hardship. It doesn't make sense for people to lose their homes or to go hungry when they have thousands of dollars sitting in a KiwiSaver account, so I'm not advocating that we stop allowing the withdrawals. However, there is a hidden cost and the situation highlights just how crucial it is for the Government to put more focus on retirement savings. There is a lot more money coming out of the KiwiSaver scheme to fund people into their first homes. Since Covid hit, an average of about $1.2b a year has been withdrawn from KiwiSaver for first home purchases. A home is an asset at least, and home ownership is an important step on the path to financial independence. I suspect we just have to accept the first home buyer withdrawals as a feature of the KiwiSaver scheme. If young people are in the scheme from the start of their working life and have $10,000 or $20,000 to put towards a house deposit, they are probably ahead of where many in my generation were at the same age. But the reality is that as a nation, we're well behind on where we need to be with our retirement savings. According to Stats NZ projections, the percentage of the population aged 65+ will increase from roughly 16-17% in the early 2020s to about 19-20% by 2030. By 2050, around 24-26% of New Zealanders are expected to be 65+. The old-age dependency ratio (ratio of elderly to working-age population) is expected to nearly double between 2020 and 2050. Our annual superannuation bill already comes in at more than $20b, and Treasury has projected that to rise to about $45b by 2037. According to Budget 2025 data, New Zealand Superannuation costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person). From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points. It is also rising as a percentage of the Government's total tax revenue – from about 17% now, it is projected to rise above 21% by 2037. So we know we have a problem. It seems almost certain that the age of superannuation will have to be raised to 67 in the coming years – despite the current opposition of NZ First and Labour. Future governments will almost certainly come under more pressure to means-test. KiwiSaver, which currently has total funds of $122b, is one of our great hopes. But the total figure is flattering. There are more than three million KiwiSaver members so the average fund size is just $37,000. Hopefully, that will be skewed by a lot of young people who will see their savings grow dramatically in the next decades. That brings us back to the downside of withdrawing funds early for hardship, though. We need to be saving more, not less. Moves by the Government to lift the default contribution rate for both employees and employers to 4% from April 2028 were a step in the right direction. However, they pale in comparison to Australia's compulsory scheme, which requires 12% employer contributions. The scheme has the equivalent of $4.5 trillion invested, making Australia the fifth-largest holder of pension fund assets in the world, not per capita but in nominal terms. Australia, for the record, also allows people to withdraw funds for hardship, but one suspects fewer people there need to. If we want to make the most of the KiwiSaver scheme we have, we need to look more closely at who is withdrawing their money and why. Meanwhile, young Kiwis are voting with their feet and joining the Australian Superannuation scheme ... by virtue of moving to work there. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Otago Daily Times
6 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
KiwiSaver hardship withdrawals boom
By Susan Edmunds of RNZ and Nine to Noon More than 50,000 people made withdrawals from their KiwiSaver accounts on the basis of hardship in the year to June - compared to about 18,000 five years ago. KiwiSaver provider Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said the increase started in 2023 and the reasons were easy to understand - the recession and cost-of-living crisis were putting ongoing pressure on people's budgets. "But some context - the number of hardship withdrawals were 1.6 percent members, and 0.3 percent of savings. The hardship, as is true for the wider society, is concentrated pain among a few." Sorted's personal finance lead Tom Hartmann told RNZ's Nine to Noon programme today it was likely the ability to withdraw from KiwiSaver was giving people "peace of mind" that if their situation worsened they could draw on their savings. The average withdrawal was $8800, he said. For someone in their 30s earning $75,000 a year, a withdrawal of that size in a year could reduce their not-inflation-adjusted final balance by about $40,000. Hartmann said there had not been an increase in savings suspensions, which indicated that the withdrawal was a temporary stop gap for people who would get back to making contributions. People can opt to stop contributing to KiwiSaver for a year at a time, and can renew the suspension at the end of the 12 months. The number of people on a savings suspension had dropped from 89,000 a year ago to 85,000. Hartmann said the key thing for people considering a withdrawal was to make it a last resort. "Typically, there are other sources of support that need to be explored first." Financial helpline MoneyTalks was one option, he said. "The team there have reporting seeing an increase in even middle-income people exploring their options." Eaqub said for people making a withdrawal, it was often a choice between "certain hardship today versus more savings later in life". But he said the situation was worse for those without KiwiSaver. "Many low-income people do not contribute to KiwiSaver because the employee contribution lowers their take home pay. "But they also miss out on the employer contribution and government subsidies. It means when non-contributors face hardship, they do not have this fallback." But Rupert Carlyon, founder of Koura KiwiSaver, said people on lower incomes could build up good balances. "Someone earning $60,000 contributing 3 percent will end be putting in [about] $3500 per year, so over 10 years plus returns that really adds up. "You can easily see a $60,000 salary becoming a $45,000 balance over 10 years. That is the power of KiwiSaver, we are often encouraging people to save that would not otherwise do it."
