
Help Me Hera: I'm jealous of my rich friend
Dear Hera,
I have this friend from high school who recently returned home after finishing uni. She has never worked, and she recently got accepted into an incredibly prestigious postgraduate program overseas, not on a scholarship, so I can only assume that her parents are paying for it, as they are for her European holiday she is going on beforehand, which includes seeing one of our favourite artists.
Since moving back home, she will ask me if I'm free during the week and I'll have to tell her I'm working. Or she'll want to go out for dinner, and I'll have to tell her I can't afford it.
I grew up middle-class. I have friends who grew up with less than me, and I have friends who grew up with more than me, but none to the same extent as this friend who is going overseas for postgrad.
During high school, it didn't bother me too much that we had different financial backgrounds. Now, when most of my other friends in their early 20s are scraping by, I'm finding it so hard to listen to her talk about this music festival.
How can I keep our friendship going when it feels like we're living in different worlds?
Sincerely, Little Miss Bitter
The traditional solution to having despicably wealthy friends is simply to crash their expensive Italian vacation, learn to forge their signature, take them out on a rental boat and quietly murder them. Either that, or get them to invest in one of your pyramid schemes. But it's a lot harder to fake your death and steal someone's identity these days. Short of overthrowing global capitalism, I'm afraid you're just going to have to find a way to deal with the unfairness of the situation.
The situation is unfair. No arguments there. Global inequality is worsening, the cost of living is getting higher, and our governments are doing their best to facilitate wealth hoarding at the expense of literally everyone else on the planet. I don't blame anyone for having a few idle guillotine-based fantasies.
The situation is so unfair, it's beyond the scope of an advice column. I'm not going to tell you that if you work hard and apply yourself, you might someday be on the Forbes 30 Under 30. It's probably equally unhelpful to remind you that you're a lot better off than a vast number of people, many of whom would consider your lifestyle scandalously decadent and hedonistic. Even saying the average modern middle-class person has a life of comfort and stability that would rival the living conditions of some of the great kings of antiquity isn't much consolation when you're trying to decide between an emergency trip to the dentist or paying your rent.
Life is unfair, and I don't blame you for saying so.
However, let's say you love your friend and want to see her happy. Let's say you're simply looking for advice on how best to swallow your envy, like a dog being force-fed charcoal tablets at the vet. How do you feel happy for someone who seemingly has everything you want, and doesn't even seem to appreciate it?
The first thing you can do is be honest. I'm not suggesting you have a tearful conversation about the cosmic injustice of her European holiday. But if she's in town and wants to catch up, and you can't afford to go out for dinner, don't grit your teeth or make excuses. Just tell her you can't afford it! Say you're living on the memory of yesterday's beans, and there's no way you can afford to split the check at a two-wine dinner. I think you would be surprised at how receptive most people are to hearing 'sorry babe I'm flat broke.' If money is a sensitive issue for you, it can feel shameful to admit this, but the better you get at laying out the realities of your financial situation without apology or embarrassment, the easier it will get. You have nothing to feel ashamed about! You may not be able to afford the roasted cauliflower head for two, but the truth is free. I think the more honest you're able to get with her, the less resentment you'll feel about having to make weird excuses for no reason.
Your friend, on the other hand, might feel embarrassed about her relative wealth. But that's her own problem! If she's a good friend, she'll either offer to shout you dinner, or be willing to find a cheaper way to enjoy your company.
It may be cold comfort, but I also have to remind you that even rich people don't all have enviable lives. I'm not saying money can't buy happiness, or at least solve nine out of your 10 most pressing problems. But even Elon Musk's extensive personal fortune would never be enough money to convince me to swap lives with Elon Musk. Butter might be $10 a block, but not being Elon Musk is free! That's a luxury even the richest man in the world (Elon Musk) can't afford.
Many rich people live miserable lives of private desperation, just with better quality linens and healthcare. That might not be a comforting thought when you're behind on your electricity bills and scrolling through your rich friend's vacation photos. But I'm willing to bet there are things about your life your friend is envious of. There are so many different ways in which life can be unfair. Health. Geography. Personal tragedy. Looks. Family. Talent. Fertility. The ability to whistle. Having people who love and care for you. We tend to take the good for granted, but many of these qualities are arguably much luckier than being born into generational wealth. I'm sure your friend has her own private insecurities and griefs, which you don't know the full extent of. Money truly isn't everything. Just something to think about while threading camels through needles.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
'I'm so very sorry this cost has been put upon you'
By Monique Steele of RNZ The agriculture minister has apologised to New Zealand's top beef exporters for extra costs they will likely face due to new anti-deforestation rules for European Union imports. Those sending agricultural products - like beef, leather or logs in New Zealand's case - will have to prove that their products have not come from land that was recently deforested. Despite fierce opposition from New Zealand industry groups and government officials, the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) appeared to be going ahead. From the end of the year, all exporters to the EU will be required to prove land used for forests has not been cut down for animals to graze on since 2020. The regulation was amended to exclude sheep products in 2022 and its implementation was delayed last year. But the beef, meat and wood processing sectors were preparing for the new incoming requirements. It was announced this week that the Meat Industry Association, Beef and Lamb New Zealand and an analytics firm were developing aerial and satellite-generated farm maps, in addition to compiling the movement of livestock. The New Zealand Deforestation Map initiative was to help the sector prepare the documents and data needed with each shipment of their products going to the EU from 31 December. The regulation was expected to affect $213 million in beef and leather exports to the EU and $100m of New Zealand wood products. Minister 'banging on the table' for exemption Minister for Agriculture, Forestry and Trade and Investment Todd McClay told the red meat sector conference in Ōtautahi/Christchurch on Tuesday that companies should get prepared for the incoming new rules. "Well done for preparing. I'm so very sorry this cost has been put upon you, because in my view it is unnecessary," he said. "Since we came to government, I have consistently said to the European Union we have standards, the equivalent to yours if not higher, so you should not be putting costs upon every single producer in New Zealand, and we have been looking for ways to find exemptions or to changes, or to get the cost down." McClay wrote to the European Commission last year, and said he met the European Commissioner in Brussels last month who suggested other countries were also trying for exemptions, like France. "You'd figure when the EU member states don't like something, perhaps there's a change coming," he said. But he said New Zealand already had native forest protection rules that resulted in penalties or prosecutions for offending. "They have nothing to worry about in New Zealand. You're not allowed to deforest native forests in New Zealand. "Ultimately I as the government can give an absolute assurance that it doesn't happen because we prosecute, we go and find these things." He said it will likely impose "unreasonable" costs on producers, making it a barrier to trade, even while there was a free trade agreement with the EU now in force. "So you need to keep preparing in case they don't get there, but we're gonna keep banging the table." Mapping farms and tracking livestock Industry analytics firm Prism Earth was a partnership between Silver Fern Farms and Lynker Analytics launched to meet the increased demand for carbon traceability, its website said. Prism Earth was now using satellite imagery, aerial photography, LiDAR and artificial intelligence to map farms and identify grazing areas, forests and track animals via the National Animal Identification and Tracing (NAIT) programme. Also speaking at the red meat industry event, managing director Matt Lythe said the challenge was to accurately understand the conversion of land and animal movements. "Every consignment will need to have a due diligence statement that essentially monitors every NAIT tag, every animal and its passage through the New Zealand landscape and the grazing process through all its dimensions, and whether it's past deforested land or not," he said. "There are some record-keeping requirements that need to be held in place for five years, so it's a reasonably onerous obligation on us all to achieve." Lythe said its modelling showed there were just under 14,000 hectares of beef production farmland to October 2024 where forests had been removed, and 1600 "affected NAIT" farms. "So headline number, just under 14,000 hectares have had forest removal," he told the conference. The main types of removal were pine rotation, followed by woodlots then shelterbelts. The modelling showed 32 hectares of indigenous forest were removed, affecting 24 farms. "I've highlighted the indigenous loss as really the key critical area that we're focusing on," he said. "Thirty-two hectares of indigenous forest in New Zealand has been removed that breaches that European rule." Owners of farms deemed to have been deforested would need to demonstrate to Prism that the removal of trees was not to convert land for agricultural use. Lythe said farmers could mitigate the risk of cattle crossing into deforested land through fencing or other controls, and demonstrate that the removal of trees was due to either animal welfare, erosion control, health and safety or conservation and biodiversity protection. The New Zealand Deforestation Map would be updated before December, and updated every year. The Meat Industry Association was then expected to engage with the wider sector.


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Italy's Supreme Court Verdict Serves A Blow To Oil Company ENI, A Victory For People And Planet
In a landmark decision, Italy's highest court ruled that Italian judges can hear climate change lawsuits to protect people's human rights. This decision supports the appeal case filed in June 2024 by 12 Italian citizens, Greenpeace Italy, and ReCommon against energy giant ENI and its main shareholders, the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A. (CDP), Italy's development bank.[1] 'The Supreme Court establishes unequivocally that no one is above the law and that the interests of Big Oil cannot outweigh the rights of people to have their health and safety protected by courts. The protection of the fundamental human rights of citizens threatened by the climate emergency is above any other prerogative. Climate justice is now a key concern for Italy's courts,' Greenpeace Italy and ReCommon said. The landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation will significantly influence all current and future climate lawsuits in Italy, as well as the protection of climate-related human rights already recognised by the European Court of Human Rights. The lawsuit against ENI, CDP and MEF, seeking redress for current and future damages resulting from climate change, will now continue before the Court of Rome. Notes: [1] In May 2023, the 12 Italian citizens and the two organisations filed a civil lawsuit against ENI, the MEF and CDP, - the latter two entities as shareholders exercising a dominant influence over ENI. The plaintiffs sought redress for current and future damages resulting from climate change, to which the Italian oil and gas giant has knowingly and significantly contributed over the decades. ENI, CDP and MEF contested the very authority of Italian courts to hear the case, arguing that climate lawsuits are not justiciable in Italy. Consequently, the 12 citizens, Greenpeace Italy and ReCommon appealed to the country's highest court, the Supreme Court of Cassation, for a final decision on whether judges in Italy can decide on climate cases.


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
The charges date back to when Rachida Dati was a European MP and allege she accepted lawyer's fees
French Culture Minister Rachida Dati is to go on trial accused of corruption and abuse of power while she was a European Parliament member. Photo / Mohammed Badra, pool, AFP Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. The charges date back to when Rachida Dati was a European MP and allege she accepted lawyer's fees French Culture Minister Rachida Dati is to go on trial accused of corruption and abuse of power while she was a European Parliament member. Photo / Mohammed Badra, pool, AFP France's Culture Minister Rachida Dati is to go on trial accused of corruption and abuse of power while she was a European Parliament member, a judicial source told AFP. Dati, a high-profile minister who holds ambitions to become Paris mayor next year, was placed under investigation in 2019 on suspicion she lobbied for the Renault-Nissan car group while at the European Union institution. French investigating magistrates also ordered that Carlos Ghosn, the former Renault-Nissan chairman and chief executive, be tried, a judicial source said. Ghosn, 71, who has been living in Lebanon for years after escaping arrest in Japan, has rejected the charges against him. Dati, 59, also denies the allegations, and lashed out at some of the investigating magistrates on her case, accusing them of 'trampling' on her rights.