Ex-Biden Official Rips Into Former President for Recent Interviews
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Former Biden administration official Anthony Coley called out ex-President Joe Biden amid his recent interviews, saying it's "not helpful" to the Democratic Party in the aftermath of the 2024 presidential election loss.
Newsweek reached out to Biden's office via online form for comment Friday night.
Why It Matters
Following former Vice President Kamala Harris' election loss in November and President Donald Trump's inauguration in January, both Harris and Biden have kept a somewhat low political profile.
Democrats have faced growing turmoil and scrutiny following the election loss, as the party struggles with delivering a cohesive message and picking a clear leader who resonates with voters. After the 2024 election, Republicans gained control of the White House, Senate and Congress.
In early polls surveying Americans on potential 2028 candidates, Harris has been a notable contender along with New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, California Governor Gavin Newsom and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
Former President Joe Biden speaks at a conference hosted by the Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled (ACRD) on April 15 in Chicago. (Photo by)
Former President Joe Biden speaks at a conference hosted by the Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled (ACRD) on April 15 in Chicago. (Photo by)
What To Know
Biden sat down for ABC's The View in his first live televised interview since leaving office. During the appearance, he said he ultimately took responsibility for Trump winning the election.
"I was in charge, and he won. So, you know, I take responsibility," Biden said in part.
He attended the interview alongside his wife, former first lady Jill Biden. The former president reiterated his belief that he would have been able to defeat Trump again on Election Day.
Biden also had an interview with BBC News earlier this week.
Reacting to the former president's remarks, Coley told The Hill that "Elections are about the future. Every time Joe Biden emerges, we fight an old war."
Coley led public affairs under Merrick Garland, former attorney general under Biden. He added that "Every interview he does provides a contrast to Trump that's just not helpful for the Democratic brand, which needs trusted messengers and fighters who can reach independents and moderates and inspire the base. Joe Biden ain't that."
He continued by wondering how Biden's interviews are actually helping his party. Coley adds that Democratic leaders "are just ready to turn the page. I just don't think he [Biden] understands how wide and deep this sentiment is."
Biden was also asked about his cognitive abilities on The View, saying in part that the people accusing him of having declined mental acuity "are wrong."
What People Are Saying
Former George W. Bush adviser Scott Jennings on X, formerly Twitter, this week: "Between what we saw of Biden today on The View & my understanding of what's about to drop in the Tapper/Thompson book, I don't think Dems have fully internalized the nuclear bomb that's about to hit their party."
Republican Representative Wesley Hunt of Texas posted to X on Friday: "ICYMI: Biden fumbles a softball on The View about his mental decline—rambles about COVID and the Civil War. Jill jumps in to save him... again. Memo to the Bidens: this PR tour is more 'Weekend at Bernie's' than West Wing. Give it a rest."
Jill Biden on The View, in part: "Joe worked really hard. I think he was a great president. ... If you look at things today, give me Joe Biden anytime."
What Happens Next
Biden has hired veteran communications expert and former Biden official Chris Meagher, a move that potentially indicates more media appearances may be on the horizon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The spectacular end of Elon Musk and Donald Trump's bromance
During a press conference in the Oval Office last week, President Trump praised Elon Musk, his adviser and the outgoing head of the president's Department of Government Efficiency, for waging war on the federal workforce. 'Elon has worked tirelessly to lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations,' Trump said alongside Musk, who wore a black DOGE hat and 'DOGEfather' T-shirt while standing next to the president. For nearly an hour, Trump heaped effusive praise on the billionaire Tesla chief executive, SpaceX founder and owner of X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, whose stint as a special government employee had come to an end. 'Elon's really not leaving,' the president added. 'He's gonna be back and forth I think.' What a difference a week makes. Trump and Musk's unlikely bromance unraveled in spectacular fashion on Thursday, with the president telling reporters in the Oval Office that he was 'very disappointed' with Musk's criticism of his 'one big beautiful' spending bill, and Musk railing at Trump in real time on X. "I'm very disappointed in Elon," Trump said before a bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I've helped Elon a lot." The president suggested that Musk, like many others before him, had become 'hostile' upon leaving his administration. "I'll be honest, I think he misses the place," Trump said. 'People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile." "They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone," the president added. "The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is." Trump also suggested that Musk was upset that the Republican-backed reconciliation bill did not include an electric vehicle mandate, which would have benefited EV manufacturers, including Tesla. 'He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem and he only developed the problem when he found out we were going to cut the EV mandate." "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Musk wrote on X. 'Whatever,' Musk continued. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that [is] both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!' Musk added. 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' Musk, who was one of Trump's most fervent and visible supporters during the 2024 campaign, wasn't done. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote. "Such ingratitude." Trump wasn't done either. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,'' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump added. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Musk tried to get the last word in, suggesting Trump's name is in unreleased FBI files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier and convicted sex offender. "Time to drop the really big bomb," Musk wrote. "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" "Mark this post for the future," Musk added moments later. "The truth will come out." On Thursday night, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that 'this is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted." She added "The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.' The split capped a longtime partnership for the pair, with Musk stumping for Trump on the campaign trail, and the president, after installing Musk as the head of DOGE, boosting Tesla amid criticism of Musk with an unusual event at the White House. ("Trump turns the White House lawn into a Tesla showroom," NBC News proclaimed.) But in the last few months, there had been reports that Trump was privately growing tired of Musk. On May 27, three days before Musk's farewell press conference in the Oval Office, CBS aired a clip that showed him expressing disappointment that Trump's signature spending bill would undermine his DOGE work. Then on Tuesday, Musk went full blast on the spending package. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," he wrote on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman," Musk wrote on Wednesday. "Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL." That brought us to Thursday, when Trump was asked about Musk's attacks during his Oval Office meeting with Merz. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump told reporters. "I don't know if we will anymore." In a phone interview with CNN on Friday morning, Trump said he was "not even thinking about" Musk and would not be speaking with him anytime soon. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem,' Trump said, adding: "I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well.'
The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Power bills in California have jumped nearly 50% in four years. Democrats think they have solutions
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers this week advanced several efforts aimed at reining in utility profits and slashing electricity bills as part of their agenda to tackle the sky-high costs of living. The proposals would make sweeping changes to how utilities fund expensive infrastructure projects like putting power lines underground to guard against wildfires. They also would add more oversight around wildfire mitigation spending and put new requirements on utility requests to increase rates. Supporters said the goal is to make the big investor-owned utilities start sharing some of the costs to fight wildfires and build new transmission infrastructure. 'This is not a set of modest tweaks that will make minor improvements at the edges of a problem without offending anyone,' said Democratic State Sen. Josh Becker, the bill's author. 'This is a big deal.' One of the bills is part of the state Senate's package to address affordability amid growing concern about the high costs of everything from gas to groceries. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order last year urging lawmakers to do something to address skyrocketing electricity rates, which rose 47% on average for residential customers between 2019 and 2023, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Analysts Office. But Republicans, who are in the minority in both chambers, say Democrats are not meaningfully addressing high prices. They did not support the energy reform bills, saying it wouldn't lower costs, and they unsuccessfully tried to force a vote on a proposal to limit utilities from raising power rates above the rate of inflation. Utility rate increases in recent years have been approved by state regulators in part to help investor-owned utilities bury power lines aimed at stopping wildfires. Some of the deadliest and most destructive fires in recent years have been sparked by power equipment. Pacific Gas & Electric, whose equipment sparked a 2018 wildfire that killed 85 people in 2024, raised its rates six times to help cover the costs of putting power lines underground and other improvement projects. While one in every five ratepayers can't pay their power bills, utilities like PG&E raked in record-breaking profits last year, according to The Utility Reform Network, a ratepayer advocacy group. The group supports Becker's measure and has sponsored a similar effort in the Assembly. 'There are no limits to how much the utilities can ask for in rate increases. There are no limits to how many times a year they can ask,' said Mark Toney, the group's executive director. 'You can't blame them for asking for the sky.' Under Becker's proposal, utilities would be required to use public financing to fund the first $15 billion spent on capital investment projects. The option would allow utilities to access funding with lower interest rates, and utilities also would be prohibited from collecting a return on that investment for shareholders. That would save customers $8.8 billion over the next 10 years, Becker said. The bill would also set up a state-backed fund to reimburse utilities for wildfire projects, among other things. But the state may not have money to pay for that this year. The bill would also increase oversight of utility budgets and their wildfire spending. Utilities would have to include at least one rate increase proposal that doesn't exceed the rate of inflation in their requests. The proposal also calls for $60 billion worth of credits to apply on bills over the years during the summer months when usage is often at its peak. Senate Democrats overwhelmingly advanced Becker's measure this week. But Republicans, utilities and the California Chamber of Commerce said it would only drive up more costs. The legislation 'moves today's utility costs around without eliminating them,' the chamber said in a letter in opposition. New regulations around rate increase and shareholder returns also could halt utilities' investment in preventing wildfires or enhancing the grid, the letter said. Republican State senators said rising power bills are caused by Democrats' policies and push for more electric vehicles and less reliance on fossil fuels. In the Assembly, meanwhile, Republicans have called for permitting reforms to make it faster and cheaper to build better utility infrastructure. 'The regulation regime that we have in this state is oppressive and definitely drives prices,' said Sen. Roger Niello, a Republican. 'Your package of affordability is rather modest in number, but it is even more modest in its potential impact.' Lawmakers also advanced a slew of other measures aiming to provide relief to ratepayers, including one that would prohibit utilities from using rates to pay for lobbying efforts and one that would allow California to join a regional energy market with other Western states to help increase grid reliability.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants
WASHINGTON — State and local government agencies, schools, small businesses, and others eligible for FMCSA's CDL grants will see fewer restrictions tied to the application process than was the case under the previous administration. FMCSA announced on Friday up to $89.4 million available in the latest round of competitive grant funding through its Commercial Driver's License Program Implementation (CDLPI) grant. The grants are aimed at developing, implementing and maintaining CDL programs. As is the case with all competitive grant programs now being run by the Trump administration, including infrastructure grants, the latest round of CDLPI grants eliminates the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and climate change requirements mandated under the Biden administration – what Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy refers to as 'woke' and 'Green New Scam' mandates. 'Previously, recipients of this critical safety grant were forced to prioritize climate change and DEI agendas alongside core safety objectives,' FMCSA by eliminating DEI, the agency asserts, 'taxpayer dollars are now fully dedicated to genuine safety improvements, appropriate accountability, and real, measurable outcomes. Potential applicants are instructed to thoroughly review the reformed application guidelines to align with these necessary and refocused priorities.' CDLPI grants help states strengthen compliance with federal safety regulations and enhance the integrity of the National Commercial Driver's License Program, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. The program 'focuses on the concept that each driver has only one driving record and only one licensing document, commonly referred to as 'One Driver — One License — One Record.'' The National CDL Program also requires states to conduct knowledge and skills testing before issuing a commercial learner's permit and/or a CDL, to maintain a complete and accurate driver history record for anyone who obtains either document, and to impose driver disqualifications as required by be considered for a CDLPI grant, applicants should specify performance goals related to the project. Performance goals for successful CDLPI grant award projects may include, among others: Sustained compliance with rulemakings: Activities that support a state's implementation of federal CDL regulatory requirements, such as medical certification, Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse, and entry-level driver training requirements. Timely driver history record (DHR) actions: Activities to issue disqualifications, suspensions and downgrades in a timely manner to CLP and CDL holders and post to their DHR, which will allow unsafe drivers to be removed from service. Data quality, accuracy and completeness: Activities that address a state's accuracy and completeness of DHRs, including all conviction and disqualification data, medical certifications, entry-level driver training verification, and knowledge and skills testing information. Innovative approaches to improving CDL issues: Activities that provide a novel technique or approach (program design, use of technology assets, etc.) to benefit national CDL safety and/or improve state driver license agencies' (SDLA) CDL safety data quality, which may include research projects and pilot testing new approaches to improving compliance. Human trafficking recognition, prevention and reporting: Activities that deter and reduce commercial truck-based human trafficking-related activities, and increase human trafficking awareness and training for SDLA, judiciary, and law enforcement staff and other industry stakeholders. Increased testing rates and integrity: Activities that increase a state's capacity for testing and issuing CDLs, including using new technology to ensure that CDL knowledge and skills testing integrity is maintained. Cost savings: Activities that reduce costs for SDLAs through the increased use of automated systems. Reduction in fraudulent CDL activities: Activities that increase the effectiveness of fraud prevention related to driving, medical credentials, skills testing operations and license issuance. Complete proposals must be submitted electronically by July 7. FreightWaves spotlight: CDL issues FMCSA makes up to $90M available in FY2025 grants Trump administration wants to cut FMCSA workforce by 7% Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher. The post FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants appeared first on FreightWaves.
