India fails both militarily and diplomatically against Pakistan: Bilawal
PPP Chairman and former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari addresses PPP rally in Karachi after successfully leading a diplomatic mission to US and Europe. Photo: Courtesy PPP/ Facebook
Listen to article
Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari asserted that after suffering a humiliating defeat on the battlefield, India also failed in its diplomatic campaign against Pakistan abroad, while Islamabad's narrative prevailed on the international stage.
Bilawal led a delegation to United States and Europe, appointed by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, to present Islamabad's perspective on the recent conflict with India.
The visit aimed to secure international support, especially from the European Union, to help prevent further escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.
'میں اس دورے کے دوران پاکستان کا امن کا پیغام، کشمیر کا پیغام، سندھو کا پیغام اور دہشتگردی کے متعلق ہمارا موقف اقوام متحدہ، امریکہ، برطانیہ اور یورپی یونین کے سامنے لے کر گیا۔ بھارت کوشش کر رہا تھا کہ وہ جنگ کے میدان میں تو ہم سے جیت نہیں سکا تو بیانیہ کی جنگ اور سفارتی سطح پر… pic.twitter.com/CwWus38nB8 — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025
Speaking after returning from the successful tour in Karachi following a warm welcome on Friday, Bilawal emphasised the delegation's efforts in conveying Pakistan's message on peace, Kashmir, the Indus Waters Treaty, and counter-terrorism during visits to New York, Washington DC, London, and Brussels.
He noted that during the conflict with India, although the former was 'seven times larger', Pakistan's armed forces achieved a 'humiliating defeat' for their adversary — a feat he said filled the country with pride.
PPP chairman said Islamabad had overcome India's efforts to undermine it at the diplomatic level, adding that the country won the diplomatic battle through tireless efforts.
"India tried to succeed where it failed on the battlefield — by defeating Pakistan on the narrative and diplomatic fronts — but I want to tell you that even on that front, Pakistan emerged victorious and India failed."
Read More: 'No military solution to Pak-India disputes'
He asserted that Pakistan stood on the side of truth, while India relied on falsehood — a contrast that, he said, was evident in the international media, where Pakistan's narrative gained traction and India's failed to resonate.
Recalling the last month's skirmish with neighboring country, he said that Pakistan's armed forces had shot down six Indian jets — a denial initially issued by India, but later conceded a month later.
Highlighting that Kashmir has remained Pakistan's most important issue since partition, he stressed that Pakistan raised its voice for Kashmir everywhere.
'Before the war, India's stance was that Kashmir was a bilateral matter. Now they must recognise that it is no longer an internal issue but an international one.'
پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی کے چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری امریکہ، برطانیہ اور یورپی یونین کے کامیاب سفارتی دورہ کے بعد وطن واپسی کے موقع پر استقبال کیلئے آئے شرکاء کے پرجوش نعروں کا خیرمقدم کررہے ہیں۔@BBhuttoZardari
#ProudOfBilawal pic.twitter.com/aRDNbowES1 — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025
He also referred to US President Donald Trump's comments, saying the US was prepared to facilitate talks between Pakistan and India to resolve the Kashmir dispute — a 'historic success,' he said.
Turning to Pakistan's water security, he warned that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's threat to restrict the flow of the River Indus — described as an unprecedented move — would not go unchallenged.
'When it comes to the Indus, the PPP will lead the charge, whether domestically or internationally,' he said.
'بھارت کو سندھ طاس معاہدے کو ماننا پڑے گا، جس کے تحت چھ میں سے تین دریا پاکستان کے ہیں اور باقی بھارت کے حوالے ہیں، بھارت کے پاس دو آپشنز ہیں یا تو وہ عالمی قوانین کو تسلیم کرتے ہوئے سندھ طاس معاہدے پر عمل کرے اور اگر وہ ایسا نہیں کرتا تو پاکستان ایک اور جنگ کرئے گا اور پھر یہ چھ… pic.twitter.com/ngVxhoJZzN — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025
He issued a stern warning to India: 'You have two options: either abide by international law and the Indus Waters Treaty, which allocates three rivers to Pakistan and three to India, or face another war — and all six rivers will be ours.'
Bilawal also questioned why domestic political actors, whom he blamed for inciting hate and division, were silent in the face of India's water threat, insisting that these politicians had long been funded by India and accused them of raising sectarian slogans in Balochistan and Sindh.
'The people of Sindh will never forgive these political orphans for their silence today,' he added, referring to their apparent inaction over the river threats and water security concerns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan nominates Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
Listen to article The government has formally decided to recommend US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, praising his decisive diplomatic intervention and leadership during the recent Pakistan-India standoff, according to an official statement released Friday. Islamabad cited what it called 'unprovoked and unlawful' Indian aggression against Pakistan, resulting in civilian casualties, including women, children and the elderly. 'This constituted a grave violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity,' the statement added. In response, Pakistan launched Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, described as a measured and precise military action aimed at re-establishing deterrence while avoiding civilian harm. The operation, the statement said, was in 'exercise of the fundamental right of self-defence'. Read More: Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos: Pakistan counters India's Operation Sindoor The intervention of President Trump, coupled with robust engagement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, is credited with facilitating a ceasefire agreement on May 10, effectively preventing a wider conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations, the statement read. Trump's 'strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' helped de-escalate the crisis through vigorous diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi. 'His intervention secured a ceasefire and averted a broader conflict between the two nuclear states,' the statement added, calling the move a watershed moment for regional peace. Government of Pakistan Recommends President Donald J. Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize The Government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J. Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal… — Government of Pakistan (@GovtofPakistan) June 20, 2025 The statement further said the government acknowledges and greatly admires Trump's offers to mediate the long-standing Jammu and Kashmir dispute—a flashpoint that continues to destabilise South Asia. 'Durable peace in South Asia will remain elusive until UN Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir are implemented,' it stated. In formally backing Trump's Nobel nomination, the statement said: 'President Trump's leadership during the 2025 Pakistan–India crisis manifestly showcases the continuation of his legacy of pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building.' Also Read: Shehbaz hails Trump as 'man of peace' The United States is said to have leveraged diplomatic and economic pressure—particularly trade leverage—to expedite de-escalation. The statement concluded by expressing hope that Trump's diplomatic efforts would further promote regional and global stability, 'particularly amid ongoing crises in Gaza and the escalating situation in Iran.' Pakistan thus becomes one of the first countries to put forward Trump's name for the prestigious Nobel accolade, typically reserved for individuals with demonstrable contributions to peace and conflict prevention.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Water — not a bargaining chip
Listen to article In international diplomacy, some agreements are too foundational to tamper with. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), signed in 1960, is one such rare pillar of stability between Pakistan and India. It has stood wars, diplomatic tensions and political changes. Now, however, with an alarming twist, India has unilaterally "held it in abeyance", an expression of elasticity with potentially disastrous results. This is not just a bureaucratic manoeuvre. It is an affront to legal norms, a threat to regional peace, and most gravely, a dangerous suggestion that water, the source of life, is now a bargaining chip. Water is not optional for Pakistan. With more than 80% of its agricultural output relying on the Indus River system, and with already dwindling per capita water availability, any disruption to this flow is an existential threat. The provinces of Punjab and Sindh, which form the country's breadbasket, would face drought, economic paralysis and civil unrest. The consequences would not be limited to economic losses as it would increase inequalities, fuel provincial tensions and make an already unstable situation in the political arena much more complex. The legal basis of the Indian claim of the treaty being in abeyance is weak and the first in history. There is no provision in the IWT allowing a suspension and anyway what due process has been adopted by India in its regard under the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties. Under Article 57 of the Convention, a treaty may be suspended only by mutual consent or within the framework of the treaty itself and neither of these applies here. Article 60 does allow for suspension if a material breach occurs which India has no proof of. In essence, India has invented a legal grey area to justify a political decision. It is a breach not only of treaty obligations but of the basic principles of international law. To turn water into a pressure tactic is to reduce a humanitarian and ecological concern into a geopolitical lever. And once that precedent is set, it becomes dangerously difficult to undo. If water is fair game in power politics, what comes next? This is why the global community cannot afford to stay neutral. South Asia is already one of the most water-stressed regions. Climate change is causing shrinking glaciers and monsoons slackening, and has been speeding the dearth of platforms. The IWT despite all its shortcomings was a paradigm of collaboration on common resources. Such an undermining not only destabilises Pakistan, but also sends the signal to other riparian basins in Africa, Latin America and Central Asia that a unilateral weaponisation of water security is possible. Pakistan must act, but not recklessly. Although there is nothing wrong with citing India's shift as a possible casus belli, it has to first make all the diplomatic attempts. That involves appealing to the Security Council of the UN under Chapter VII of the UN Charter that specifically provides the possibility of interfering when there is a threat of peace. Water, especially when controlled by one nuclear power over another, constitutes exactly that kind of threat. The P5 states must be reminded of their 1998 commitment to intervene if South Asia's stability is at risk. That moment is now. This is not merely about sovereignty or national pride. It is about redefining what should be off-limits in conflict. Civilian water access cannot be a pawn in strategic calculus. Pakistan's response must reinforce this principle, legally and morally. Because if this treaty falls, the damage will go far beyond the Indus Basin — it will corrode the very idea of principled diplomacy. Water sustains life; it should never be used to choke it. The IWT is not a perfect document, but it is a symbol of what diplomacy can achieve even between enemies. To treat it as a bargaining chip is to abandon that legacy and to gamble with peace itself.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India fails both militarily and diplomatically against Pakistan: Bilawal
PPP Chairman and former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari addresses PPP rally in Karachi after successfully leading a diplomatic mission to US and Europe. Photo: Courtesy PPP/ Facebook Listen to article Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari asserted that after suffering a humiliating defeat on the battlefield, India also failed in its diplomatic campaign against Pakistan abroad, while Islamabad's narrative prevailed on the international stage. Bilawal led a delegation to United States and Europe, appointed by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, to present Islamabad's perspective on the recent conflict with India. The visit aimed to secure international support, especially from the European Union, to help prevent further escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. 'میں اس دورے کے دوران پاکستان کا امن کا پیغام، کشمیر کا پیغام، سندھو کا پیغام اور دہشتگردی کے متعلق ہمارا موقف اقوام متحدہ، امریکہ، برطانیہ اور یورپی یونین کے سامنے لے کر گیا۔ بھارت کوشش کر رہا تھا کہ وہ جنگ کے میدان میں تو ہم سے جیت نہیں سکا تو بیانیہ کی جنگ اور سفارتی سطح پر… — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025 Speaking after returning from the successful tour in Karachi following a warm welcome on Friday, Bilawal emphasised the delegation's efforts in conveying Pakistan's message on peace, Kashmir, the Indus Waters Treaty, and counter-terrorism during visits to New York, Washington DC, London, and Brussels. He noted that during the conflict with India, although the former was 'seven times larger', Pakistan's armed forces achieved a 'humiliating defeat' for their adversary — a feat he said filled the country with pride. PPP chairman said Islamabad had overcome India's efforts to undermine it at the diplomatic level, adding that the country won the diplomatic battle through tireless efforts. "India tried to succeed where it failed on the battlefield — by defeating Pakistan on the narrative and diplomatic fronts — but I want to tell you that even on that front, Pakistan emerged victorious and India failed." Read More: 'No military solution to Pak-India disputes' He asserted that Pakistan stood on the side of truth, while India relied on falsehood — a contrast that, he said, was evident in the international media, where Pakistan's narrative gained traction and India's failed to resonate. Recalling the last month's skirmish with neighboring country, he said that Pakistan's armed forces had shot down six Indian jets — a denial initially issued by India, but later conceded a month later. Highlighting that Kashmir has remained Pakistan's most important issue since partition, he stressed that Pakistan raised its voice for Kashmir everywhere. 'Before the war, India's stance was that Kashmir was a bilateral matter. Now they must recognise that it is no longer an internal issue but an international one.' پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی کے چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری امریکہ، برطانیہ اور یورپی یونین کے کامیاب سفارتی دورہ کے بعد وطن واپسی کے موقع پر استقبال کیلئے آئے شرکاء کے پرجوش نعروں کا خیرمقدم کررہے ہیں۔@BBhuttoZardari #ProudOfBilawal — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025 He also referred to US President Donald Trump's comments, saying the US was prepared to facilitate talks between Pakistan and India to resolve the Kashmir dispute — a 'historic success,' he said. Turning to Pakistan's water security, he warned that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's threat to restrict the flow of the River Indus — described as an unprecedented move — would not go unchallenged. 'When it comes to the Indus, the PPP will lead the charge, whether domestically or internationally,' he said. 'بھارت کو سندھ طاس معاہدے کو ماننا پڑے گا، جس کے تحت چھ میں سے تین دریا پاکستان کے ہیں اور باقی بھارت کے حوالے ہیں، بھارت کے پاس دو آپشنز ہیں یا تو وہ عالمی قوانین کو تسلیم کرتے ہوئے سندھ طاس معاہدے پر عمل کرے اور اگر وہ ایسا نہیں کرتا تو پاکستان ایک اور جنگ کرئے گا اور پھر یہ چھ… — PPP (@MediaCellPPP) June 20, 2025 He issued a stern warning to India: 'You have two options: either abide by international law and the Indus Waters Treaty, which allocates three rivers to Pakistan and three to India, or face another war — and all six rivers will be ours.' Bilawal also questioned why domestic political actors, whom he blamed for inciting hate and division, were silent in the face of India's water threat, insisting that these politicians had long been funded by India and accused them of raising sectarian slogans in Balochistan and Sindh. 'The people of Sindh will never forgive these political orphans for their silence today,' he added, referring to their apparent inaction over the river threats and water security concerns.
