Commonwealth Games official in breach of ethics code
A "prominent" Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) official has been found to have breached its ethics code after a claim that they "spent an inordinate amount of time with a volunteer of the opposite sex" at a social event related to CGF business.In a decision published on the CGF's website, the chair of an ethics commission panel states that the unnamed individual admitted allegations that they "failed to act with the highest standards of integrity".The official - referred to only as 'AB' - is also said to have accepted acting "in such a way as to give the appearance of impropriety [and] to have the potential to bring the Commonwealth Games into disrepute".As a result, it has been decided that, the reprimanded individual must be accompanied or met by a safeguarding officer, law enforcement official or a senior CGF figure when travelling overseas on CGF business, and undergo training "to further educate [them] in ethical conduct".
What's the background?
The CGF revealed that in October 2024, a senior CGF figure received a report that 'AB' "may not have acted with the appropriate level of ethical conduct whilst performing a CGF related role".An investigation was then conducted by an unnamed London-based lawyer, referred to in the published decision as 'CD', who acted as an ethics officer in the case, and charged the official in February.Their report "included a summary and analysis of a first-person witness to the alleged unethical conduct"."The report documents that AB, while at a social event related to CGF business, spent an inordinate amount of time with a volunteer of the opposite sex," the CGF added."The first-person witnesses were uncomfortable with AB's behaviour…It is clear these witnesses had concerns about the potential to bring the CGF and/or CGF Officials into disrepute, to the extent that they took photographs of AB with the volunteer."The ethics commission chair noted that the official insisted "nothing inappropriate happened at the event", and "states that they have agreed to the allegations and acceded to the proposed sanction to allow the Ethics Commission to hear the matter with a chair as a single person panel".However, the chair also concluded that "the evidence before me indicates that AB's actions denigrated the perception of the integrity, of the potential for the appearance of impropriety, and the possibility of bringing the image of the Commonwealth Games into disrepute".The chair added: "The appearance of unethical conduct by a Commonwealth Games Federation official, which raised concerns by others who were present is like the proverb, 'Caesar's wife must be above suspicion'. Not only do Commonwealth Games Federation officials need to have integrity; they need to be examples of integrity and ethical conduct and avoid negative scrutiny or attention."
'Highly inappropriate'
In an intriguing twist, the panel chair also claimed that the lawyer acted inappropriately by proposing modified sanctions in March after the charges were initially delivered, giving the official "opinions or advice that goes well beyond the Ethics Officer role of providing information"."I have further determined that CD has, in effect, conducted what would be characterised as plea bargaining with AB, after AB had received the Notice of Charge" said the chair. "I find this to be highly inappropriate."CD should not have made any modifications to the charges or the sanctions, as that is in the sole purview of the Ethic Commission at a hearing, and only after a hearing is requested by the covered person."
'Reputational risk'
The chair also revealed that they rejected a suggestion by the reprimanded official to not publicly disclose the outcome of the case, stating that "not disclosing the decision could create a reputational risk for the CGF and possibly subject it to allegations of cover up."However, the chair said that they have chosen not to reveal the individual's identity because based on the investigation, "no harm was done to any person, there does not appear to be any risk of harm towards any person or persons".They also noted that "AB is not the subject of a provisional or sanctioned suspension or expulsion where their identity must be provided in order to ensure compliance; and that the sanctions proposed by CD and accepted by AB are on the less severe end of sanctions spectrum".It is also noted that the decision "shall be posted on the Commonwealth Games Website under the relevant section concerning the Ethics Commission, and shall not be posted on the 'News' feed. The decision will be posted for a period of 28 days only".The CGF has declined to comment further on the matter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Grenfell survivors and bereaved gather for memorial service
Grenfell Tower survivors, and the families of those who lost their lives, have attended a memorial service on the eighth anniversary of the 2017 tragedy. A total of 72 people, including 18 children, died in the fire, which is still being investigated by the Metropolitan Police. In a few months' time, work will begin to take down the 23-storey 200 people gathered at All Saints Church in Notting Hill, west London, for the Humanity For Grenfell annual service. Ahead of the service, flowers were laid at the foot of the tower by officials including minister for building safety, Alex Norris MP, Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan and London Fire Brigade (LFB) Commissioner Andy LFB firefighter Stephen Aslin, 58, also began a 30,000-mile cycling challenge and was cheered on by well-wishers and family. Before setting off, he led a 72-second silence to remember the victims of the fire. His solo bike ride around the world will help raise money for projects helping young people affected by the tragedy. During the service, a candle was lit in honour of each victim and prayers were led by Rev Paul Wood."We pray for all of those who seek to serve the community, for all those who seek justice," he said."We pray for all those across the world who are in pain, for those who are suffering in the Holy Land, in Ukraine and all places of war and those caught in the Air India disaster this week."Among the congregation, there remained a feeling of anger that justice had not yet been Met has previously said no charges would be announced until the end of 2026. Mr Roe said Grenfell should never be a statement, the commissioner said: "As we mark the eighth anniversary of the devastating Grenfell Tower fire, our thoughts remain with the families and loved ones of the 72 people who lost their lives, as well as the survivors, their families and the wider community."Over the years, the strength and dignity shown by the Grenfell community has been, and continues to be, humbling and inspiring." Sir Sadiq said: "Today we pause to remember the 72 people who lost their lives, and all those whose lives were changed forever by the horrific Grenfell Tower fire."Eight years on and the road to justice and change has been far too long."The publication of the final Grenfell Inquiry report last year was an important step towards correcting the catastrophic failures exposed by the tragedy, and all those responsible have more to do to ensure all lessons are learned."Every Londoner deserves to live in a safe home, something that Grenfell Tower residents were cruelly deprived of." Saturday's events will culminate in a silent walk at Notting Hill Methodist Church at 18:00 BST.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Urgent hunt after woman in her 30s ‘seriously sexually assaulted at cinema' as cops release CCTV
POLICE are urgently hunting for a suspect as cops release CCTV after a woman in her 30s was allegedly seriously sexually assaulted at a cinema. Cops have released an image of a man they want to speak to following an attempted rape in Finchley on June 11. A woman in her 30s reported being seriously sexually assaulted by a man at a cinema in South Hampstead at around 3.45pm. The man is said to be in his 50s, approximately 5ft 6ins, with a slim build. He has dark hair on the sides of his head and was spotted on CCTV wearing a North Face coat and glasses following the alleged offence. More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Telegraph readers who did the police's job themselves
When Mia Forbes Pirie and her husband Mark Simpson found their Jaguar E-Pace had been stolen from outside their house in west London, they used the AirTag it was fitted with to discover it was now parked less than three miles away. Keen to act as quickly as possible, they contacted the police – who gave no indication as to whether they could help or not. In the end, the couple was forced to retrieve the stolen car themselves. We covered this story earlier in the week, and outrage followed – as did, rather tellingly, an outpouring of weary recognition. Hundreds of Telegraph readers got in touch to say: us too. When our things are stolen – be it bikes, laptops, mobile phones or cars – we no longer expect the cavalry. Instead, we find ourselves playing detective with AirTags, GPS tracking and doorbell cameras. In other words, doing the police's job for them. It is vigilante justice via the apps on our phones. And, given how few thefts result in a charge and how many cases are closed almost as soon as they are opened, it seems increasingly like the best tool at our disposal. John Devaney, a 48-year-old property maintenance worker from the Thames Valley, is still haunted by the memory of waking up to discover his beloved Triumph Stag, a 1970s classic worth £10,000, had vanished from his garage. He turned to the tracker app on his phone. There it was: parked on a driveway 25 miles away. He called the police and gave them the address. 'They said they would send someone at some point in time,' he recalls. 'That it wouldn't be long.' Frustrated and anxious, Devaney drove there himself, hoping to meet the police. After half an hour of waiting, he decided to investigate alone. Under a tarpaulin in the driveway, he thought he could see a shape that looked suspiciously like his car – and when he lifted it to confirm, a man inside the house came out. 'He said he had bought it in a pub last night,' says Devaney. 'I said, 'No, you nicked it from my garage.'' The man then jumped in the car, mowed through the neighbour's hedge and sped off. Devaney followed. Eventually, he found the car abandoned at an industrial park. He rang the police again and waited an hour for them to arrive. There were fingerprints. There was photographic evidence. There was an address. There was even an identity: Devaney says police told him the man was 'known to them'. Still, it was a month before he was interviewed. When the car, which Devaney has now sold, was returned three months later, he was told no further action would be taken. 'I couldn't have handed it to them any better,' he says. 'There was not much more I could have done for them.' According to the police, officers received a report of the theft of a vehicle from a residential property. Detectives carried out a thorough investigation in which a man in his 40s was arrested. Following further enquiries, the case did not meet the threshold for criminal charges. Another Telegraph reader, pest controller Chris Johnson, 59, and his wife Paula, 57, were struck not once but twice at their house in Kent. The first time, a white Jeep Wrangler – worth £45,000 – vanished without a trace. The police issued a crime number, and not much else. Six months later, it happened again. A £39,000 Ford Ranger disappeared from the same spot. This time, however, they had learnt their lesson and fitted it with two trackers. The Johnsons were watching football at home when it happened. 'Someone must have walked straight up and driven off,' Chris says. The tracker showed it heading towards Eltham, and they immediately called the police. No answer. They jumped into Paula's Mini and followed the signal. 'We eventually tracked it to a housing estate in Eltham,' says Chris. 'We tried the police again, but still nothing. We sat there for 10 minutes watching the car, not knowing what we were walking into. I told Paula to get ready. If anything kicked off when I went to get the vehicle, she was to drive off and leave me.' Chris cautiously approached his car, tried his key, and to his relief, it unlocked. The thieves had ripped out most of the interior in an attempt to locate the trackers, successfully finding and disabling the manufacturer's system. But Chris's secondary tracker had gone undetected; he drove it home. The police got back to them hours later. The response? 'Well, you've got it back now.' Paula recalls explaining to the police that they had wanted them there while they rescued their car because they were scared of what they might find. 'He replied that they were overstretched, even having to work on Sundays, and that was that. We never heard anything more.' Since then, the Johnsons have doubled down on security: ghost immobilisers, steering locks, the works. 'If Sadiq Khan is putting up all these cameras and charging us more to drive, then why not use them to track down stolen vehicles?' says Chris. 'Imagine how many cars could be recovered. He might even look like a hero.' A Metropolitan Police spokesman says: 'Every incident of vehicle theft is carefully assessed to identify and pursue possible lines of enquiry, including forensic evidence and available footage. We advise victims to report crimes via appropriate channels.' Sadly, these are far from isolated cases. Ashley Sollit tells us about the night four electric vehicles were stolen from one street in Brent. His son-in-law – who was one of the victims – had an AirTag in his car and traced it to a council estate nearby, where he later found his and his neighbours' cars. He phoned the police, who advised that he should drive his own vehicle home and tell the neighbours to get theirs. This was, apparently, standard practice, as thieves often leave stolen cars out for a week to see which ones have trackers. When it was suggested to the police that the cars should be left in place to try to catch the criminals, the response from the police was short, but clear. 'We don't have the time.' Similarly, Ian Smith writes in with a story about his granddaughter, who had her car stolen from the hospital car park where she works. CCTV captured the crime, but when Smith's granddaughter suggested the police watch the footage, as it clearly showed the make and model of the car that the thieves arrived in, she was rebuffed. Luckily, the car was fitted with an insurance tracker; when it pinged with a location, the police told her to collect it herself. There is something rather depressing about these remarkably similar stories that speak to our new normal. We know, of course, that resources are stretched – but the message felt by many Britons is a stark one: if something is stolen, you're probably on your own. The result? Where we once relied on the police, now we depend on Bluetooth and Apple to keep us safe.
