
The IRS has had six leaders in 2025. What that means for taxpayers.
The IRS is on its seventh commissioner of the year, has lost one-quarter of its staff and is faced with implementing a raft of new regulations. Whether and how this turmoil could affect Americans remains to be seen.
But the first impacts are likely to be lower tax collections and a harder time getting answers to tax-related questions, according to a former commissioner and a policy analyst.
'You can be fairly confident of the direction of the impact, that having this level of instability is not good for IRS' core functions and for taxpayer service," said Alex Muresianu, Senior Policy Analyst at the Tax Foundation, a tax policy think tank. 'This level of instability coinciding with the implementation of a new set of tax laws ‒ that is a dangerous mix."
The IRS got its seventh leader of the year Aug. 8 when President Donald Trump tapped Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as its temporary head, after removing Commissioner Billy Long.
Trump ousted Long after 53 days on the job, giving him the shortest tenure of any Senate-approved IRS Commissioner.
The IRS media office referred USA TODAY to the Treasury Department, which did not return a request for comment Aug. 12.
Long, who said he will be nominated as ambassador to Iceland, was the fifth person picked by Trump to lead the agency since regaining the Oval office in 2025, but the only one approved by the Senate. Biden's IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel resigned his five-year position three years early in January, rather than be fired by Trump.
New priorities with each new leader
Each IRS commissioner sets priorities, moves resources and staff around and problem solves differently, Werfel told USA TODAY.
Constant flux over the last 8 months has likely made it difficult for staff to function, he said.
The IRS Commissioner's job is to make sure the agency runs well. Werfel compared it to keeping trains on time.
"Every time you have a new leader these rules and processes can change," he said. "It just sows confusion."
CNN and The Washington Post reported that Long was fired after the IRS clashed with the White House over using tax data to help locate suspected undocumented immigrants. Long, a former Republican Congressman and auctioneer, previously had to walk back plans to start tax season later and eliminate the IRS' free tax filing program.
Fewer agents to process returns and answer taxpayer questions
The Biden administration added nearly $80 billion in new IRS funding, largely to collect unpaid taxes from the wealthy. That money brought the agency to one of its highest staffing levels just before Trump took office. The new administration almost immediately began mass layoffs and offered early retirements for federal employees, in an effort to downsize the government.
A quarter of the IRS staff had left the agency as of mid- July, according to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
Among the hardest hit positions are people responsible for reviewing and processing federal tax returns, and agents, who conduct individual and business audits. Other fired workers were involved in modernizing IRS technology or helping taxpayers by telephone.
Werfel said the staffing cuts will impact customer service unless those people's jobs have been replaced by technology, and he said there is no indication they have been.
Contact with the IRS is stressful for most taxpayers, Werfel said. Fewer employees means fewer people answering phones and responding to requests for help, fewer available inperson appointments and longer waits for audit results, he said.
"The higher functioning IRS you have, the less stressful this is," he said. "If you're going to engage that bureacracy, you want it to at least work."
Fewer audits means less revenue
Conducting fewer audits means the country is collecting less revenue, which Werfel said should bother Americans worried about the national debt.
"We should want our country to be fiscally responsible," he said. "The more money that we leave on the table that is actually owed to the country, the more that we have to put on the credit card at a high interest rate."
For every dollar spent auditing America's highest earners, for example, the IRS reaps more than $4 in recovered tax dollars, research shows.
Werfel said there is an estimated $700 billion in taxes that are owed each year but not paid, an amount he said could climb if the risk of an audit drops and there is less pressure to pay.
"It creates an incentive for more people to break the rules and that means less revenue," he said.
Implementing the GOP tax law
The IRS and Treasury Department are rushing to stand up Republicans' new tax law.
Lawmakers left it up to the agencies to fill in the details of the policy changes, many of which take effect this tax year, including sorting out specifics of how new breaks for overtime pay, tips and other provisions will work.
Muresianu, the tax analyst, said taxpayers often need more clarification from the IRS when new tax laws take effect, and the call volume will likely be higher next year.
'If you have instability at the IRS, management problems at the IRS, and their ability to provide service declines, that is particularly bad if it's coming at a time where there a lot of people looking for clarity,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP senator on DC carjacking fears: ‘I don't buckle up'
Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) on Wednesday expressed his fear of being carjacked in the nation's capital, as the Trump administration ramps up its federal takeover of local law enforcement. 'And by the way, I'm not joking when I say this, I drive around in Washington, D.C., in my Jeep, and yes, I do drive myself, and I don't buckle up. And the reason why I don't buckle up, and people can say whatever they want to, they can raise their eyebrows at me again, is because of carjacking,' Mullin said during an appearance on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle.' 'I don't want to be stuck in my vehicle when I need to exit in a hurry, because I got a seatbelt around me and that — and I wear my seatbelt all the time,' he told host Brian Kilmeade, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. 'But in Washington, D.C., I do not, because it is so prevalent of carjacking,' the Oklahoma Republican continued. 'And I don't want the same thing [to] happen to me what's happened to a lot of people that work on the hill.' President Trump announced earlier this week that his administration was taking control of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and deployed hundreds of National Guard soldiers to the area to combat crime and violence in the city. The move, sparked after a former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer was attacked by teenagers during a carjacking — has received heavy blowback from Democrats and local officials. A provision in Washington's ' Home Rule Act ' allows the president to federalize the police force for up to 30 days — but any additional time requires Congressional approval. During a speech Wednesday from the Kennedy Center, Trump said he will seek a 'long-term' extension. 'Well, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress,' Trump said, when asked about whether he's talked to lawmakers about extending the takeover. He added that he expects meet with Congress 'very quickly' and snag GOP support. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) signaled in a post online Wednesday that he and fellow Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) were working with the Trump administration on a safety package for the district. 'Together, we will try to shepherd the DC Security Fund through Congress to give President Trump the resources he will need to improve the safety and quality of life in our nation's capital,' he wrote on social platform X. 'Every American should be behind this effort to make Washington, DC clean and safe so that it can truly become the shining city on the hill.' For such a move to advance, however, it would likely need support from some Senate Democrats. Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) made clear that his caucus would not back the measure. 'No f‑‑‑ing way,' he told podcast host Aaron Parnas. 'We'll fight him tooth and nail. … He needs to get Congress to approve it, and not only are we not going to approve it, but there are some Republicans who don't like either.' D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has also pushed back on Trump's moves, calling them an 'authoritarian push' as data shows the crime rate declining in the nation's capital. The mayor has also used the national attention as a platform to reup the district's quest to gain statehood.

Los Angeles Times
7 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Secretary's willingness to tamper with past climate reports is dangerous
To the editor: U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright is intending to review and potentially alter the nation's next climate science report ('Energy secretary says Trump administration may alter past National Climate Assessments,' Aug. 7). He's already removed the climate assessments from the government websites. He has accused the previous reviews (even the ones made during the first Trump administration) as being 'politically biased.' Just wondering if Wright has actually looked outdoors recently or at least kept abreast of the weather reports. Has he not seen the spate of unprecedented tornadoes razing towns and communities? Or witnessed the deadly floods throughout the country? Or the wildfires from hell in the West? Or the unbearable heat waves hitting the Northeast? Or the approaching hurricanes that signal widespread death and destruction on the way? It is clear that Wright is on a leash, eager to do the bidding of his master — old 'Drill, Baby, Drill!' His stated intentions, as well as his removal of the climate assessments from years past from governmental websites, make him complicit in the disaster that is to come. Lanore Pearlman, Claremont ... To the editor: I see that Wright, previously the CEO of a company that did fracking, says that the government climate reports have been politically driven and are not accepted by 'a credible economist or scientist.' I am sure he is right that some economists do not wish to contemplate the possibility of climate change, but I would challenge him as to what the majority scientific opinion might be. Hundreds of scientists have studied the issue. Most published articles note that change is occurring. The evidence is everywhere: shrinking glaciers in every part of the globe, shrinking polar and Greenland ice sheets, the melting of the Russian tundra, bleaching coral reefs, longer, hotter summers, disruption of rain patterns, even the opening of the Northwest Passage. The actual debate appears to be whether human activity is causing it. In other words, conservatives do not believe we can stop the process. Erica Hahn, Monrovia ... To the editor: Wright's changes might misinform some, but if our extreme weather-related events continue at their enhanced pace, eventually the public will demand action. Those events are devastating and deadly to the affected population and the economic damage is astounding. I find it disingenuous and devious that the Energy secretary is considering changes to previous scientific-based reports. Going back to scrub past reports won't change the facts that our climate has changed and fossil fuel emissions are exacerbating this change. Jonathan Light, Laguna Niguel


Business Wire
7 minutes ago
- Business Wire
U.S. Financial Confidence Continues to Drop: New Data from the Mutual of Omaha Protection Index Report Underscores Taking Timely Action to Proof the Futures of Americans
OMAHA, Neb.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--With the goal to empower Americans to protect what matters the most and achieve their financial goals, Mutual of Omaha reveals the findings from its Protection Index Report, to mark National Financial Awareness Day today. The proprietary research study*, which highlights a critical need to address both short-term concerns and long-term financial confidence, reinforces Mutual of Omaha's commitment to clear, approachable advice that helps Americans better understand and protect their financial well-being. 'We know financial planning can get overwhelming, especially when we try to juggle today's priorities with tomorrow's goals,' said Jennifer Wulf, Vice President, Consumer Insights and Marketing Strategy for Mutual of Omaha. 'That belief is at the core of the Protection Index Report. We want to understand the minds of today's American consumer, to meet them where they are and deliver advice and solutions that address their needs.' Most Americans Say They are Not Ready for the Future Despite some generational optimism about the future, overall confidence in financial protection is declining, particularly among the most vulnerable: Only 23% of Americans currently feel financially protected, down from 24% in 2023. 17% feel their protection is threatened, up from 13% just two years ago. Many respondents cite difficulty saving, lack of clear strategies, and rising costs as obstacles. Gen Z Feels Good About the Future, Boomers are More Hesitant Among the generations, 87% of consumers overall, and 92% of Boomers, say they feel a responsibility to protect their family's financial future. Particularly, consumers cited life insurance, burial policies and savings for their children as the top protection priorities. Gen Z, the second youngest generation born between 1996-2010, is at the very beginning of their careers and early stages of adulthood. Despite low current confidence likely due to this, the study found that Gen Zers expressed the highest optimism about being financially prepared in 10 years. Gen Z is also significantly more likely to say they haven't even started thinking about their financial future, despite feeling more confident compared to other generations when asked about their retirement savings and future. Millennials and Gen X fall between, with younger Millennials often struggling with debt and older Gen Xers beginning to prioritize retirement. 'We found that Gen Z's optimism stands in stark contrast to other generations. While we can speculate whether it's the promise of long careers ahead of them or the anticipation of the Great Wealth Transfer, one thing is certain, their confidence is real. And, that's encouraging,' said Nate Hobson, Mutual of Omaha National Advisor Sales Director. 'For generations, Mutual of Omaha has been a trusted partner for every stage of life. While we remain committed to helping all generations protect their finances, we have an exciting opportunity to help Gen Z turn their optimism into action.' The Gap Between Hope and Belief Is Wide 60% of respondents want to believe they'd avoid financial crisis if seriously ill or injured, but only 49% believe that's true. The gap is especially wide among women and lower-income respondents, both of whom report lower belief in crisis readiness. Respondents named inflation, medical costs, and the high cost of insurance as key obstacles. As a Millennial woman herself, Sarah Whitmore, Mutual of Omaha Financial Advisor added, 'Financial protection is more than the product offerings, it's about confidence. Whether Gen Z or a Boomer, our goal is to support all Americans, including women who are more likely to express concerns about debt, savings, and future security, by arming them with the right advice and resources to feel protected.' Turn Concern into Confidence with Manageable Steps Mutual of Omaha's team of experts is helping Americans move from awareness to action by offering clear, practical steps to build long term financial confidence. Clarify your personal financial goals, challenges, and priorities. Think about both your immediate needs and long-term aspirations. Connect with a trusted financial advisor or planning professional to explore options that fit your situation. Build a simple monthly budget to track your income, spending and savings, and adjust it as your life evolves. Start an emergency fund to cover unexpected expenses and create a cushion of financial security. Review your current protection tools including life insurance, disability coverage and long-term care planning to make sure they align with your family's needs and life stage. To read the full report and access resources and expert guidance, visit *About this survey: For this publication, Mutual of Omaha partnered with research vendor, quantilope to conduct The Protection Index survey. This research had a sample size of 400 respondents aged 18-77. Research was conducted in a 10-minute online survey from May 15-19, 2025. All data included in this report are based on Mutual of Omaha proprietary research unless otherwise noted. About Mutual of Omaha Founded in 1909, Mutual of Omaha is a highly rated, Fortune 500 organization offering a variety of insurance and financial products for individuals, businesses and groups throughout the United States. Our mission is to help our customers protect what they care about and achieve their financial goals. As a mutual company, we are owned by our policyholders and operate in their best interests. For more information, visit