Changes to Rent Pressure Zones needed to cope with growing population, Cabinet to be told
The report by the National Economic and Social Council (NESC) – the body that advises the Taoiseach on policy and strategy – outlines proposals to ensure future population growth is spread across Ireland's five largest cities.
Among its recommendations are that 'more flexible rent controls' are needed to increase housing supply.
This report is separate to an 'options paper' on RPZs which has been presented to Housing Minister James Browne.
That review outlines a number of options including allowing landlords to increase rents by more than the 2pc cap that is currently in place.
The NESC report on 'Deepening Compact Growth in Ireland' will further feed into the Government's thinking on what to do when RPZs expire at the end of this year.
RPZs were introduced in 2016 to try to calm soaring rents and have been extended ever since.
They will need to stay in place for at least another two years while an alternative system of rent controls is formulated, Housing Commission chairman John O'Connor has said.
The NESC report details how to ensure that at least half of the population growth between now and 2040 takes place within five cities and their suburbs. The Land Development Agency will have an important role in making this happen over the next 15 years.
At least 50pc of that growth should be in Dublin and the other half in four other cities: Galway, Cork, Limerick and Waterford, the report said.
Between 2016 to 2022, the share of population growth represented by the five cities was just 32pc.
The National Planning Framework target of having 40pc of new housing developments within existing, built-up areas is now being achieved, but the NESC said even more could be done.
The report, to be presented to the Cabinet by Taoiseach Micheál Martin, outlines the benefits of 'compact growth', including 'higher productivity and innovation, more sustainable travel, improved access to services and lower energy consumption'.
The report welcomes commitments in the Programme for Government relevant to compact growth, including the creation of a new strategic fund to invest in infrastructure, the enactment of a new Compulsory Purchase Order Bill and ensuring every local authority has an expanded vacant property team in place.
Other recommendations include: going further than the current target of having 40pc for new housing developments within existing built-up areas; increasing investment in cost-rental homes; developing a brownfield activation strategy; and encouraging 'densification of existing areas' including more use of corner sites, gardens and mews development.
It also recommends an increase in public investment to unlock land suited for desirable compact growth.
The NESC recommends the Government should, where possible, continue to seek reductions in the construction costs of apartments as well as houses and a 'more three-dimensional approach for planning in areas subject to the prospects of significant regeneration and change', to help people understand what is involved in new development and thereby facilitate deeper engagement.
Meanwhile, the Cabinet will also discuss its latest economic and fiscal projections. Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe will get approval for the first Annual Progress Report, which will be presented to the European Commission.
The report outlines how Ireland will comply with EU budget and debt rules, and replaces what used to be the Stability Programme Update.
The EU is allowing opt-outs from the fiscal rules to allow states to spend more on defence. But Ireland is not expected to be among the countries that will seek such an exemption.
Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan is also expected to seek approval to extend the laws allowing outdoor seating for licensed premises for another six months until the end of November 2025.
The Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2021 was introduced as a temporary, Covid-related provision to facilitate safer outdoor socialising.
The relevant provisions of the act can be extended for up to six months at a time by resolution of each House of the Oireachtas. The extension is requested to give clarity to licensed premises, local authorities and gardaí.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
New Government plan will increase meetings between criminals and their victims
THE GOVERNMENT WANTS to massively increase the number of meetings between criminals and the victims of their crimes in a bid to repair the harm caused by offenders. Fewer than 1% of court cases in 2019 were referred to restorative justice programmes, where offenders and victims meet face-to-face alongside trained professionals. The meetings typically let the victim talk about the impact the crime had on them and get answers to questions they may have. New targets have now been set out by the Probation Service seeking to increase the number of cases referred by the courts by 10% every year for three years, in the hope that restorative justice can be woven into the justice system. Welcoming the new targets, assistant professor in criminology at Maynooth University Dr Ian Marder said investment must be increased in order to make the service available to all who might benefit. 'These targets are achievable, but we're starting from a very low baseline,' Marder said. Pointing to his own research , Marder said the state is 'barely scratching the surface of the potential of restorative justice'. He said fewer than 400 cases were referred to the programmes in 2023, despite over 320,000 cases going through the courts. Based on those figures, as data from 2024 has yet to be published, the Probation Service could see just under 1,500 cases referred to them for restorative justice programmes between 2025 and 2027. The Programme for Government includes a commitment to continuing the rollout of the restorative justice programme in communities nationwide, Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan recently told the Dáil . Advertisement He cited an additional €4m in funding allocated to the Probation Service in Budget 2025 which, among other things, will support services such as restorative justice. Marder told The Journal : 'It is really important to increase referrals to restorative justice because most people affected by crime are still not being offered the chance to participate, even where services exist.' Sinn Féin's TD Matt Carthy told The Journal : 'In the broadest terms, I welcome the publication of the action plan and that it's seen that the Probation Service is taking seriously its commitments to restorative justice.' The party's justice spokesperson said he hopes the 10% increase is 'not seen as the upper limit' to what can be achieved by the Probation Service in the plan. Carthy added that the government should continue to provide additional funding to the service but stressed that it should be underpinned by increased investments for community-based organisation facilitating the practice. The two-year action plan seeks to increase interventions by 10% and start an upskilling and training drive. Potentially suitable cases are referred to the Probation Service's Restorative Justice and Victim Services Unit, probation officers and independent third parties. Many victims or people impacted by crime are often unaware that restorative justice programmes are available to them through the courts service. Referrals must be made by judges or gardaí. There are no immediate plans to recruit additional staff in the sector, with the action plan confident that capacity can withstand potential increases in referrals if partnered with sufficient training. Marder said some organisations have recruited one or two members of additional staff following a funding injection last year . He suggested that any additional funding in the action plan may seek to expand services into different counties. 'Again, the problem is that the starting point is very low,' he said. 'So we need to see the investment increase by many multiples before restorative justice will be accessible by everyone who might benefit.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, June 2nd: On PhD students, Israel and Pine Martens
Sir, – Advising potential US PhD students not to come to Ireland is perhaps an understandable reaction from students who have not been able to secure adequate funding for ever-increasing costs of living ( 'As PhD researchers this is our advice: avoid Ireland', Opinion, May 29th) . The article, however, contains a number of inaccuracies and omissions about the general conditions of Ireland's postgraduate research students. A PhD is the highest academic award a university can grant to a student. It comes with rigorous quality control and assessment. The sense of achievement on graduation is enormous, as are the benefits to the PhD graduate. Embarking on the (four-year plus) journey to obtain a PhD qualification is a very individual choice. Our supports for PhD students undoubtedly need to improve, but they are among the best in Europe and are far better than those on offer in most US universities, where many 'funded' students pay fees or work long hours as graduate teaching assistants. The four years is also an investment long term in their individual earning potential. As the recent HEA report on graduate outcomes has demonstrated, a PhD graduate is earning €815 per week compared with the €655 being earned by a graduate with a master's degree. The recent decision by Government and the main funding agencies to increase the PhD stipend to €25,000 per annum was welcome. All universities campaigned for this increase. We need to go further in increasing this base level – on that we all agree. READ MORE However, a direct comparison with the minimum and living-wage levels does not provide the full picture. PhD students do not pay tax or PRSI, unlike minimum wage workers. In addition, almost every student on the €25,000 stipend also has their tuition fees paid, at a further cost of between €5,000 and €13,000 each year – again a financial support not available to minimum wage workers. Dublin City University has moved all of our internally funded PhD students on to this new rate of €25,000, plus fees. This was done without additional Government support – at a significant cost to the university, but it is the right thing to do. The opinion piece suggests that universities seek to attract non-EU research students in order to raise income. Non-EU full-time research students are overwhelmingly on scholarships, where the higher rate of non-EU fee is paid by the research funder or the university, and they do not add significantly to university incomes. All of the universities have argued that the additional costs for those students, including visa fees, should be covered by funders. Furthermore, universities do not make a profit from PhD-based research. That research is significantly subsidised from other activity and through fundraising. Universities are also accused of acting like businesses in 'balancing the books'. The Universities Act sets out an obligation in law for each university to run a balanced budget. There are very significant consequences if this is not achieved. Despite the claim that 'many' of our universities are running financial surpluses, even the Government accepts that there is €307 million annual shortfall in public funding. In the absence of that funding being provided by government, universities have no choice but to seek to raise funds in all sorts of ways – including from business. Seeking external research funding is a key objective for all research-intensive universities. With regards to the profits made by DCU on-campus accommodation, our on-campus accommodation makes a significant portion of its revenue during the summer months when we charge full commercial rates to conference attendees and visitors to Dublin. Income from this period goes straight back into the university to help DCU to keep student accommodation rents as affordable as possible for students and their families. We need to properly fund our PhD students, including the additional costs of visas for international students, as well as increases to the basic stipend. To do that we need a properly funded public university system, and a wider research and innovation ecosystem. That is more urgent than ever in the current geopolitical uncertainty. Education, research and innovation have been at the heart of Ireland's social transformation, and will need to be again, as we adapt to the current turmoil. – Yours, etc, PROF JOHN DOYLE, Vice-president for Research, PROF SHARON O'BRIEN, Dean of Graduate Studies, Dublin City University Dublin 9. Squirrel spotting Sir, – Frank McNally's mentioned the common grey squirrel in a recent Irishman's Diary (Friday, May 30th). As luck would have it, only a day previously, I was fortunate enough to espy the lesser-spotted red variety scaling a tree in a wooded area in the Farnham Estate in Co Cavan. Moments later, a pine marten crossed my path at speed before disappearing into the undergrowth. A local woman to whom I recounted this wildlife encounter opined that the noticeable proliferation of red squirrels in the area was almost suggestive of a veritable truce having been declared between the two species. This state of affairs, she suggested, might be directly related to a corresponding reduction in the numbers of the once-thriving grey variety in the locality. Pine martens, she believes, are now content to ignore the agile red variety and instead concentrate their predatory instincts on their slightly larger and perhaps less athletic grey cousins. – Yours, etc, KIERAN FLYNN, Ballinasloe, Co Galway. Death and Gaza Sir, – As a proud Irish citizen of the European Union, I fear trust in the institutions of government have been irrevocably damaged if not completely eroded over the lack of sanction (or indeed any tangible action) from the EU on Israel's war in Gaza. The elephant in the room is that the EU has put US trade relations way above our human rights obligations as a block. Russia could be immediately sanctioned (rightly so) yet the dithering and feeble posturing over Palestinian slaughter has been embarrassing, infuriating and inhumane. This is not an EU of equals if Germany and Austria, with a few others, get to dictate our response to plausible genocide. Were we wrong to pass Nice and Lisbon treaties (albeit reluctantly) and dilute our voice in Europe? Have we left the warmongers in charge once more. Has business become our master in chief once and for all? I am a citizen, not a 'consumer'. I live in a country not a 'market'. I respect human life and dignity. Why have the citizens not been heeded? Why should we respect or participate in EU institutions any further when it was all fine words about culture, but in reality nothing more than an offshoot of multinational capitalist enterprise? – Yours, etc, SEAMUS HUGHES, Galway. Sir, – As a citizen of the EU, I would like to know what number of dead we in the Republic should expect to endure if we were being attacked by an outside state before we could anticipate that other countries would intervene to help us with actual action. It seems that we could look forward to at least 122 000 deaths (adjusting the current death-toll in Gaza for Irish population statistics). Just for context, in 2024 there were around 34,800 deaths registered here. Not that we need ever worry about being abandoned by the moral countries of the world; their recent track record inspires such confidence and pride. We would never be considered to have deserved such a fate though – we are, after all, far more human than the Palestinians. – Yours, etc, MARY MORAN, Shannon, Co Clare. Respecting the national anthem Sir, – I wish to fully endorse Kevin O'Regan's letter on the national anthem (Letters, May 29th) and fully support his suggestion of the introduction of a mandatory two-minute pause between the end of the anthem and the start of play in intercounty GAA games. I have noticed in recent years, especially at intercounty GAA games, a lack of respect for our national anthem. Some players do not stand to attention, and others break away from formation before the completion of the anthem. At a recent match I attended, the singer clearly didn't know the words, some players didn't even bother to stand to attention, and all players were breaking formation long before the anthem was finished. I understand players are anxious to get on with the game, but is one or two minutes going to make any difference to the starting? Gaelic games are our national games being watched worldwide, our national anthem deserves respect. – Yours, etc, VINCENT CARROLL, Dublin. Sir, – I wholeheartedly agree with your correspondent Kevin O'Regan on the apparent disregard for our national anthem within the GAA. It is a source of annoyance to see these players performing box-jumps and warming up during the anthem and not one of them actually reciting the words. I have long held the view that it should be compulsory for the players to sing the anthem and stand still to show respect. Compared to Six Nations rugby and the pride and passion the players show for their anthems, the GAA should hang their heads in shame. – Yours, etc, MARY LEE, Newbridge, Co Kildare. Sir, – The suggested mandatory two-minute pause between the end of Amhrán na bhFiann and the start of play at GAA matches would not be welcomed by corner forwards. – Yours, etc, LOMAN Ó LOINGSIGH, Kiltipper Road, Dublin 24. Climate change and fines Sir, – Ireland generates less than 0.1 per cent of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions. We are facing potential fines of up to €20-30 billion if climate targets are not reached by the end of the decade. Will the same penalties be proportionately applied to the world's biggest polluters, namely China, India, the United States and Brazil? If so, then their economies will justifiably collapse. A level playing field must surely apply. – Yours, etc, JOHN BURNETT, Co Cork. Cycling days gone by Sir, – I am sure readers of my vintage can recall the centre of Dublin, in places like College Green, being full of bicycles, riding several abreast. I'll wager not one of those riders considered him or herself a 'cyclist,' or had ever read a cycling magazine. The bicycle was transport, unless you were fairly well to do. Now, almost all bikes are ridden by enthusiasts. Having paid up to several thousand euro or pounds for their machines, and a tidy sum for helmets, clothing and accessories, they become members of a sort of parallel society, with its own rules and conventions – one of which seems to have a flagrant disregard for traffic lights and pedestrian crossings. I instinctively dislike extra laws and compulsion, but I feel it would be no bad thing if, as in some other countries, bicycles were registered and displayed a number plate. Where to mount it on some modern machines is another question. – Yours, etc, PAUL GRIFFIN, Liverpool.
Agriland
11 hours ago
- Agriland
‘Transparency' must be instilled in Agri-Food Regulator
Transparency and confidence must be instilled in the Agri-Food Regulator according to a senator who has called on the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Martin Heydon, to grant the regulator additional powers. Senator Victor Boyhan told the Seanad that Agri-Food Regulator 'should be in a position to produce the price and market reports' of the agri-food sector. 'The food regulator must carry out its functions. 'There must be reliable and verifiable sources of information it can stand over, so data is critical with regard to analysing the supply chain and the engagement and collaboration of all sides. The point about all sides is important,' the senator added. He also warned that if the regulator is to carry out its functions 'it must have the right to compel all information that is accurate and verifiable'. Agri-Food Regulator Responding in the Seanad, Minister Heydon said that the Bill that established the the regulator performs two key functions. The Minister added: 'It enforces the law on unfair trading practices, UTP, and it performs a price and market analysis and reporting function. 'Section 12 of the Agricultural and Food Supply Chain Act 2023 requires the regulator to publish analysis of information about price and market data relating to the agricultural and food supply chain. 'Currently, in respect of that function, the act provides that the regulator may seek from businesses … any data impacting upon price and margins considered necessary.' However Minister Heydon also highlighted that currently the act does not permit the Agri-Food Regulator to 'compel' businesses to provide financial information that is not in the public domain. But it does provide that the minister may make regulations on price and market information. The Programme for Government also commits to giving the Agri-Food Regulator 'enhanced powers to ensure transparency in the food supply chain with regard to providing market information'. Minister Heydon told the Seanad: 'I am fully committed to ensuring that the regulator is equipped with the necessary powers to fulfil its statutory function, subject to the legislative and consultative process. 'I need to ensure that the powers granted are proportionate. 'My department and I are in discussions with the Agri-Food Regulator and other key stakeholders to see how this can be achieved.'
