Campari warns of tariffs impact, sees 2025 as "transition year"
MILAN (Reuters) - Italian spirits group Campari warned on Tuesday of the potential hit from U.S. tariffs in what it said would be a "transitional year" under its new chief executive.
The spirits industry is facing a prolonged downturn in demand and concerns about tariffs, which led Diageo to withdraw its sales growth target and Pernod Ricard to cut its sales forecasts in February.
The Italian group expects moderate organic growth in revenues, and operating margins to be mainly flat this year.
The maker of Aperol and Campari bitters said its adjusted operating profit dropped 2.5% last year on an organic basis, in the first set of results approved under new Chief Executive Simon Hunt who took up the role only in January.
The group expects the potential annual impact of 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada and Europe into the U.S. to be around 90-100 million euros before any "potential mitigation actions" which the group is assessing.
U.S. President Donald Trump's new 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada took effect on Tuesday and he has also promised additional tariffs on the European Union.
Campari reported a 2.4% increase at constant exchange rate in like-for-like sales, to 3.07 billion euros ($3.23 billion), a touch above analysts consensus, which expected an increase to 3.02 billion euros according to LSEG data.
"Looking forward, following a transition period in 2025, we are very confident in our ability to deliver long-term sustainable outperformance," new CEO Hunt said in a statement.
He added that he sees significant potential for geographic expansion, but at the same time he wants to focus on "efficiency and commercial execution while ensuring balance sheet and operating deleverage".
Campari confirmed its medium-term guidance.
Campari appointed Hunt as chief executive to replace Matteo Fantacchiotti, who resigned in September after only a few months in the role.
($1 = 0.9496 euros)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
42 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Tesla takes drastic measures to keep robotaxi plans secret
Tesla (TSLA) has big plans for Austin, Texas, this summer. The company is expected to roll out its long-anticipated robotaxi program in mere days. However, the company has also been fighting tooth and nail to keep those plans under wraps, according to a new report. Tesla has teased its robotaxi program since CEO Elon Musk first mentioned it in 2016. While the program has advanced at a snail's pace since then, it is days away from getting its first real-life test run. Related: Elon Musk says he is 'paranoid' about this issue; he's right to be The program will use Tesla's full self-driving technology to allow Teslas to operate autonomously as ride-hailing vehicles. According to Musk, Tesla plans to test only about 10 vehicles during this initial pilot run. Still, the ultimate plan is to have every Tesla on the road capable of serving as a robotaxi. Earlier this year, Tesla said that its FSD system has driven a cumulative total of 3.6 billion miles, nearly triple the 1.3 billion cumulative miles it reported a year ago. While Tesla has been open about some of the progress FSD and its robotaxi program have made, it has given scant details on many other issues and is currently fighting to keep one media organization from learning more about it. On Friday, June 6, Reuters published a story detailing its efforts to get public information about robotaxis from the city, specifically communications between Austin city officials and the company over its plan to launch autonomous vehicles this summer. Reuters requested access to communications from the last two years between the company and city officials in February, after Musk announced in January that robotaxis were coming to Austin. The city's public information officer told the news agency that "third parties" asked the city to withhold those records to protect their "privacy or property interests." The dispute went to the Texas Attorney General's office, as he adjudicates Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request disputes. Related: Elon Musk, Tesla finally get some good news out of China Tesla's attorney wrote to the AG on April 16, objecting to releasing the "confidential, proprietary, competitively sensitive commercial, and/or trade secret information" contained in the emails. The attorney says the emails contain information that would reveal "Tesla's deployment procedure, process, status, and strategy" and "irreparably harm Tesla." Reuters sent a letter to the AG stating that Tesla's plan to deploy unproven technology on Texas streets "is an issue of enormous importance to Texas and the public at large," while underscoring the public's right to know about the program. While Tesla recently killed its Cybercab concept, at least for now, the company plans to test Model Ys already on the road as part of its robotaxi program. "It's prudent for us to start with a small number, confirm that things are going well, and then scale it up," Musk told CNBC's David Faber. Once it proves its concept in Austin, Tesla plans to expand the robotaxi program to Los Angeles and San Francisco soon after. California was Tesla's old stomping grounds before Musk moved the company's HQ to Austin in 2021 due to what he said were arduous regulatory practices, which may have to do with the company's operation during the Covid pandemic. With Tesla's plan to expand in the state, Musk will be heading back into that regulatory environment, except now the rules governing autonomous driving are much stricter. In April, the California Department of Motor Vehicles announced that it is seeking public comment on proposed regulations for self-driving vehicles. The agency told CNBC that it wants California to "offer the nation's most comprehensive rules for the operation of autonomous vehicles and underscore the DMV's commitment to enhancing public safety, fostering innovation, and establishing a robust framework for AV technology testing and deployment." Related: Elon Musk confirms Tesla's summer plans The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say
By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80 percent of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing towards their positions.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Google Going to Trial After Doing Something Super Sketchy to Android Users
In the information age, data is gold — and Google has enough to make King Midas blush. But in this new economic paradigm, all that data comes at a price: privacy lawsuits. To amass its wealth, Google's been caught collecting personal information from users even in incognito mode, tracking location data even when location tracking is off, collecting children's personal information in violation of child safety laws, and selling millions of Americans' health data to a healthcare conglomerate — and that's just a taste. Now, Reuters reports that Google's going to trial in California after a class action lawsuit representing some 14 million state residents alleged the company gathered personal data from their phones even when they were off. The suit alleges that Google enables Android phones to send and receive info "for Google's own purposes," draining users' cellular data as they do. While the California suit is unique for going to trial, it's just one of 50 separate state class action lawsuits being brought against the tech company. Altogether, there are billions of dollars on the line. It's a big case with some major implications: can the companies that sell our phones — and in Google's case with Android, create the underlying operating system — decide whether or not we can ever turn them off? Google's response is telling. Rather than deny that it had collected data on powered-off Androids, it's saying that Android users gave their consent to Google's "passive" data harvesting when they agreed to the company's terms of service agreement, which is required to use the phone. Google is also challenging the core of the plaintiffs' argument — basically, that cell phone data doesn't count as personal property under California law. And if it isn't, then there's nothing wrong with Google taking it without permission. Ultimately, there's a lot of money riding in how the state classifies that nebulous data. George Zelcs, a lawyer representing the plantiffs, told Reuters that Android users aren't arguing against data collection when the phones are on and the apps are fired up. Instead, he notes that "these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year." Googles usual tactic when it's caught nabbing data — to settle out of court for millions or sometimes billions of dollars — probably won't fly here, as the timeline reaches all the way back to 2016. With millions of defendants and unfathomable quantities of data at play, any sort of settlement is likely to run in the "tens of billions," according to Reuters. Time will tell whether that's less costly than if Google were to lose all that juicy data altogether. More on law: A Mother Says an AI Startup's Chatbot Drove Her Son to Suicide. Its Response: the First Amendment Protects "Speech Allegedly Resulting in Suicide"
