Europe's ‘Washington Syndrome' just got a lot worse
Trump's latest threat to slap 30% tariffs on EU goods, now slated for August 1 , has sent Europeans into a frenzy of appeasement, a strategy that resembles not so much realpolitik as it does a continental-scale case of Stockholm Syndrome.
For some Europeans, it could be tempting to think concessions are worth it to avoid the damage of a full-blown trade war. 'We will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests,' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said over the weekend, insisting that the EU has "always been very clear that we prefer a negotiated solution."
The European Commission drew up a list of potential countermeasures earlier this year – including duties on bourbon and Harley-Davidson's – yet these tools remain locked away amid Brussels' hope for a last-minute deal.
Von der Leyen on Sunday decided to postpone imposing retaliatory tariffs of up to 20% on some €21 billion of US exports, originally set to take effect on Tuesday.
While most EU member states support the EU executive's stance on trade and said they will not push for retaliation before the 1 August deadline, some are also growing sceptical of von der Leyen's wait-and-see approach, according to EU diplomats speaking amid emergency talks on Sunday.
Part of the problem is deeply differing views between EU member states, which have prevented the EU from standing up as an equal partner.
Ever since Trump took office, EU officials and leaders have struggled to secure even fleeting face time with the administration. On the rare occasions they did, outside of formal summit settings, they celebrated each encounter as though it were in itself a diplomatic triumph.
But as Trump wields tariffs as an extension of hard power rather than a mere tool of balancing his economy, Brussels looks towards a tough choice. France has clamoured for immediate retaliation, keen to show it will not be strong-armed. Denmark learned early with Greenland that confronting Trump head-on might avert worse outcomes and it has supported a tougher line.
Another bloc of countries, notably Germany and Italy, but also Poland, clings to hopes of a negotiated reprieve amid fear of further incurring Trump's wrath and imperilling their exports.
At the EU summit in June, some of the bloc's leaders, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, indicated that a 'quick and simple' deal, somewhere around the 10% base tariff, wouldn't be a bad deal
Underlying the messy approach is a grim truth: after decades of transatlantic co-dependency, Europe cannot imagine life without America's approval.
A key example came last month, when European leaders dutifully backed Trump's demand for NATO allies to spend at least 5% of GDP on defence.
True, most European capitals - perhaps with the exception of Spain - agree that Europe rightfully must shoulder more responsibility for its own security. But many saw the move as a veiled bribe to keep Trump from pulling the tariff-trigger.
The logic was painfully transparent: indulge the man militarily to win leniency economically. The strategy held for about an hour.
While Trump hailed NATO's spending boost as a 'monumental win,' he promptly turned on Spain for daring to seek an exemption, vowing to negotiate 'directly with Spain,' before presumably realising it is, inconveniently, part of the EU.
Europe's road to strategic autonomy on security remains more aspirational than practical. European NATO allies have begun private preparations for how the Western military alliance should handle a potential drawdown of US troops on the continent, despite Washington's limited indications of its plans.
Meanwhile, von der Leyen tried to curry favour by pivoting back to a more hawkish stance on China, after flip-flopping since the start of the year.
Brussels swung back in line with Trump's confrontational approach towards Beijing, perhaps also in the hope of staying in Washington's good books.
Europe's once-proud digital sovereignty agenda has similarly evaporated. Instead of slapping penalties on Elon Musk's X for its disinformation breaches and allegations of foreign influence, or advancing a long-discussed digital services tax, the EU has hesitated.
Despite these contortions, Trump remains unmoved - and the tariff threat stands.
(mk)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
9 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europeans to ask Trump how far he will back Ukraine security guarantees
In preparation for a meeting with Zelenskyy and Trump to discuss ways of ending Russia's war against Ukraine, European leaders have already made notes on security guarantees for Kyiv and other pressing issues. European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a Monday visit to Washington to see President Donald Trump in a collective bid to find a way to end Moscow's invasion, with the US offering security guarantees for Kyiv. The meeting follows a summit in Alaska between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that failed to yield any breakthrough on an immediate ceasefire that the US leader had been pushing for. The leaders heading to Washington on Monday to appear alongside Zelensky call themselves the 'coalition of the willing'. They include British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Also heading to Washington will be Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who get on well with Trump. Macron said on Sunday that the European leaders would ask Trump how far he would back security guarantees for Ukraine, adding he did not think Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted peace. The French leader emphasised Europe's will to present a united front with Ukrainians and ask the Americans 'to what extent' they are ready to contribute to the security guarantees that would be offered to Ukraine in a peace agreement. 'No country can accept the loss of territories unless it has security guarantees for its remaining territory,' Macron said, adding that if Europe appears weak today 'we will pay a heavy price tomorrow." Macron was speaking from his summer residence after joining a video conference with other European leaders to coordinate their joint position before the meeting with Trump in Washington on Monday. On Moscow's position, he commented: 'There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.' Peace deal without a ceasefire? After the Alaska meeting, Trump pivoted to say that he was now seeking a peace deal, even without a ceasefire. On Sunday, he posted 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. Stay tuned!' on his Truth Social platform but did not elaborate. Trump's Russia envoy Steve Witkoff said on Sunday on CNN that Trump and Putin had agreed in their summit on 'robust security guarantees' for Ukraine. But Zelenskyy, on a Brussels visit on Sunday hosted by European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, rejected the idea of Russia offering his country security guarantees. 'What President Trump said about security guarantees is much more important to me than Putin's thoughts, because Putin will not give any security guarantees,' he said. Von der Leyen hailed the US offer to provide security guarantees modelled on - but separate from - NATO's collective security arrangement, known as Article 5. 'We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine, and the coalition of the willing, including the European Union, is ready to do its share,' von der Leyen said. Territorial concessions? Trump's pivot to looking for a peace deal, not a ceasefire, aligns with the stance long taken by Putin, and which Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as Putin's way to buy time with the intent of making battlefield gains. Witkoff, in his CNN interview, elaborated that the United States was prepared to provide their 'game-changing' security guarantees as part of a process that would involve territorial "concessions". Zelenskyy reiterated that the Ukrainian constitution makes it impossible to cede any territory. 'We need real negotiations, which means they can start where the front line is now [...] Russia is still unsuccessful in the Donetsk region. Putin has been unable to take it for twelve years,' the Ukrainian leader said. However, he added that since the territorial issue is so important, 'it should be discussed only by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia at the trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the United States, and Russia.' 'So far, Russia has given no sign that such a trilateral meeting will happen', he said. According to an official briefed on a call Trump held with Zelenskyy and European leaders as he flew back from Alaska, the US leader supported a Putin proposal that Russia take full control of two eastern Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others. Putin 'de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas,' an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, which Russia currently only partly controls, the source said. In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control. Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them. 'The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas,' the source said. What sort of consequences? US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to NBC on Sunday, warned of 'consequences' - including the potential imposition of new sanctions on Russia - if no peace deal is reached on Ukraine. Von der Leyen also emphasised that 'this peace must be achieved through strength' and Europe was preparing one more sanction package: 'We have adopted 18 packages so far, and we are advancing preparation for the nineteenth. This package will be forthcoming in early September'. (bms, sm)
Euractiv
12 hours ago
- Euractiv
US mixes praise with pressure on Russia
While Trump and US Special Envoy Witkoff are claiming progress in the negotiations with Russia regarding Ukraine, US Secretary of State Rubio is threatening with sanctions. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday warned of 'consequences,' including the potential imposition of new sanctions on Russia, if no peace deal is reached on Ukraine ahead of a key meeting at the White House. 'If we're not going to be able to reach an agreement here at any point, then there are going to be consequences,' he told US broadcaster NBC. 'Not only the consequences of the war continuing, but the consequences of all those sanctions continuing - and potentially new sanctions on top of that as well,' he added. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump hailed progress on Russia, just days after a meeting with his Russian counterpart in Alaska. 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED!' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, without elaborating. 'The Russians made some concessions' Separately, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN that Trump and Putin had agreed to 'robust security guarantees' for Ukraine during their high-stakes summit in Alaska. He added that Russia had agreed to unspecified concessions regarding five Ukrainian regions central to the conflict, particularly the eastern Donetsk province. 'We agreed to robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing,' Witkoff said. 'The Russians made some concessions at the table with regard to all five of those regions. There is an important discussion concerning Donetsk and what would happen there - and that discussion will be detailed on Monday,' he added. At a press conference today in Brussels, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed Trump's willingness to work with Europe and provide NATO-like guarantees. However, he noted that the details regarding each party's role in these guarantees still need to be clarified. (sm, bms)
Euractiv
14 hours ago
- Euractiv
Zelenskyy: Territorial issue should be discussed ‘only' at trilateral meeting
The issue of a territorial swap, demanded by Russian President Vladimir Putin, should be discussed only between Ukraine and Russia at a trilateral meeting with the United States, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said. Speaking today at a press conference with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, Zelenskyy reiterated that the Ukrainian constitution makes it impossible to cede any territory. 'Russia is still unsuccessful in the Donetsk region. Putin has been unable to take it for twelve years,' the Ukrainian leader said. However, he added that since the territorial issue is so important, 'it should be discussed only by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia at the trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the United States, and Russia.' 'So far, Russia has given no sign that such a trilateral meeting will happen. And if Russia refuses, then new sanctions must follow,' he said. Russia currently occupies 20% of Ukraine's territory – Crimea excluded – which was annexed by Russia in 2014. Von der Leyen, for her part, reiterated the EU's position that international borders cannot be changed by force. 'These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone, and these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table,' she said. Asked about former US President Donald Trump's decision to focus on a peace deal instead of his initial objective of a ceasefire, von der Leyen replied that 'the term is not so important.' What matters most, she stressed, is stopping the killing. 'To achieve that, a trilateral meeting between the presidents of Ukraine, the United States, and Russia should happen as soon as possible,' she said, adding that any agreement should include 'clear timelines.' NATO-like guarantees She emphasised that 'this peace must be achieved through strength' and underscored the need for 'strong security guarantees to protect both Ukraine and Europe's vital security interests.' According to von der Leyen, there could be no limitations on the Ukrainian armed forces, whether in terms of cooperation with, or assistance from, third countries. Zelenskyy welcomed Trump's willingness to work with Europe and provide NATO-like guarantees. 'For everyone in Europe, this is a significant change, but there are no details on how it will work and what America's and Europe's role will be. And this is our main task,' he said. Regarding Ukraine's EU path, Zelenskyy stressed that there should be no division between Ukraine and Moldova. 'If such a division takes place, it will automatically mean that Europe is divided on Ukraine - that Europe does not have a common and strong position on guarantees. Many in Europe see that such a vision will only make things worse,' he warned.
