Nelspruit Regional Court postpones incitement case to June
A man accused of instigating violence on social media briefly appeared in the Nelspruit Regional Court today, Friday, May 9.
The case against Xolani Gregory Khoza (37) was postponed to June 20 as his docket needs to be sent to the senior public prosecutor for a decision on whether he can be tried or not.
Khoza was arrested shortly after the National Elections last year when he posted on social media calling for the country to be shut down and for President Cyril Ramaphosa to be removed from his position. He also allegedly challenged the Government of National Unity, saying it was not going to improve the quality of South Africans' lives.
Khoza is facing charges of incitement to commit terrorism, public violence and intimidation and is out on R2 000 bail, that was extended during his court appearance today.
ALSO READ: UPDATE: Violence instigator remanded in custody in Mbombela
The provincial Hawks' spokesperson, Colonel Dineo Sekgotodi, told Lowvelder that Khoza was charged with the contravention of Section 17 of the Riotous Assemblies Act 17 of 1965, Inciting Public Violence.
An investigation was initiated and the suspect was identified and arrested for further contravening Section 14 of the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020, which says that any person who discloses, by means of an electronic communication, a data message to a person or group of persons or the public in general with the intention to incite violence shall be guilty as charged,' Sekgotodi said at the time.
Khoza gained support from various organisations, some of them international, following his arrest. Spartacist South Africa, Marxist Feminist Youth of Azania, the EFF, International Bolshevik Tendency and others are some of the organisations forming part of what has been called 'United Front Protests to defend Xolani Khoza'.
ALSO READ: Tonga Magistrate's Court postpones Sonell Joubert's murder case yet again
Members of the above organisations staged a protest in support of Khoza outside the court today.
'When I look around, especially where I come from in the Nsikazi Region, there is no development. We still do not have water, health services, usable roads or consistent electricity. These are some of the challenges our communities are facing. I do not want to talk much because my matter is still in court,' said Khoza.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Former constable sentenced to six years for corruption
The Kuruman regional court in the Northern Cape on Friday sentenced former police constable Johannes Shuping to six years' imprisonment after convicting him of corruption. The conviction on two counts of corruption involved R10,000 that Shuping solicited from a member of the public. 'The charges relate to a 2018 incident in which Shuping, then a detective at Kathu police station, rearrested the complainant, Buti Moepadira, despite the case already being before the court,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Mojalefa Senokoatsane said. After his arrest, Shuping offered to 'make the docket disappear' in exchange for a payment of R11,000. 'Moepadira, who was detained at Kathu police station due to a lack of accommodation in Kuruman, was allowed by Shuping to use his cellphone to arrange the payment. A R6,000 cash payment was delivered to the accused by the complainant's brother.' Shuping continued to demand the outstanding R5,000, prompting Moepadira to report the matter to the Hawks. 'A sting operation was then conducted using marked banknotes provided by the investigating officer. During the operation, the complainant's brother handed over the remaining R4,000 to the accused. Shuping fled the scene but was arrested a week later at his workplace.' At the time of his arrest, he was found in possession of marked R200 notes, which matched the serial numbers recorded during the operation. Prosecutor Kagontle Redemption Barnett took over the case after the original prosecutor was appointed to the bench. In aggravation of sentence, she argued that Shuping had grossly abused his position of authority and violated public trust. As a law enforcement officer, he was duty-bound to uphold the law, but instead chose to betray his oath and the constitution. Barnett emphasised that a strong sentence would deter similar conduct and reinforce public confidence in the criminal justice system. The court concurred and sentenced Shuping to six years' imprisonment on each count, with the sentences ordered to run concurrently. 'The NPA welcomes the conviction and sentence. This outcome reaffirms that no one is above the law and underscores the importance of protecting the integrity of the criminal justice system by holding those who abuse their power accountable,' Senokoatsane said. TimesLIVE
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Institute of Race Relations slams unclear expropriation law
The Institute of Race Relations (IRR) calls on Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson to disclose all state bodies empowered under the Expropriation Act. The Expropriation Act allows property to be seized below market value, raising concerns about property rights in South Africa. Makone Maja of the IRR says more than 400 state entities may already hold expropriation powers. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni residents to face new tariff hikes IRR polling shows 68% of South Africans oppose the Expropriation Act. The IRR will this week write to Macpherson, seeking clarity on how many public entities have been granted the power to expropriate property under the recently enacted Expropriation Act. The act grants expropriating authorities broad powers to seize property, including land, homes, and business assets, potentially at below-market value. It provides limited legal recourse for owners to challenge such actions in court. The IRR has raised concerns over the lack of transparency about the number of government bodies authorised to carry out expropriations. Makone Maja, the IRR's strategic engagements manager, said the law is unpopular among South Africans and poses a significant threat to property rights. 'Our polling conducted in March and April shows that 68% of registered voters oppose the Expropriation Act,' said Maja. 'The act is so broadly worded that all forms of property – including savings and pensions – are now vulnerable.' According to the IRR, at least 426 public entities currently have the authority to expropriate property under the Act. However, the organisation believes the actual number may be closer to 1 000. ALSO READ: Issues plaguing Edenvale tackled in a heated meeting 'It is the height of policy recklessness for such vast powers to be granted to an unknown number of authorities,' said Maja. 'If the number is unclear, how can citizens have confidence that these powers will not be abused?' The IRR argues that uncertainty around expropriation powers could undermine investment, economic growth and food security. In its Blueprint for Growth policy series, the institute emphasises the importance of secure property rights as a foundation for economic empowerment. Maja added that South Africa's history of corruption and abuse of power makes the lack of oversight especially troubling. ALSO READ: Court orders the removal of illegal billboard on Gillooly's 'We have seen how state power can be misused,' she said. 'It is deeply irresponsible to empower a vast and unaccountable network of officials to take property without clear safeguards. 'The minister must urgently disclose which entities have been given this authority and explain how abuse will be prevented.' The IRR has called on the government to publish a full list of authorised expropriating entities and to provide clarity on how the act will be implemented to protect constitutional property rights. For more information, visit At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
The Citizen
11 hours ago
- The Citizen
Bribe-taking NC police officer sentenced to six years
Ex-constable Johannes Shuping was sentenced to six years for soliciting bribes to tamper with a police docket. The Kuruman Regional Court in Northern Cape has sentenced a former police officer to six years' imprisonment for soliciting R10 000 to make a court docket disappear. Ex-constable Johannes Shuping was sentenced after the court convicted him on two counts of corruption from an incident that dates back to 2018. Shuping, then a detective at Kathu police station, re-arrested the complainant, Buti Moepadira, despite his case already being before the court. Former Saps officer jailed for corruption After Shuping arrested Moepadira, the accused offered to 'make the docket disappear' in exchange for R11 000. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Mojalefa Senokoatsane said the complainant was detained at the Kathu police station due to lack of accommodation in Kuruman. ALSO READ: Police sergeant abuses power, gets 20 years for raping victim inside police station While in detention, Shuping allowed Moepadira to use his cellphone to arrange the payment. 'A R6 000 cash payment was delivered to the accused by the complainant's brother. Shuping continued to demand the outstanding R5 000, prompting Moepadira to report the matter to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (the Hawks),' Senokoatsane said. In response, the investigating officer launched a sting operation using marked banknotes, as permitted by Section 252A of the Criminal Procedure Act. Caught in Hawks sting after demanding R11k bribe During the operation, Moepadira's brother handed over the remaining R4 000 to the accused. Although the former officer fled the scene, police arrested him a week later at his workplace. 'At the time of his arrest, he was found in possession of marked R200 notes, which matched the serial numbers recorded during the operation,' Senokoatsane said. ALSO READ: Bodies of three missing constables identified by families In aggravation of the sentence, Prosecutor Kagontle Redemption Barnett argued that Shuping had grossly abused his position of authority and violated the public trust. As a law enforcement official, he had a duty to uphold the law, but he chose to violate both the Constitution and his oath. A severe punishment will deter similar misconduct and help restore public confidence in the criminal justice system, Barnett emphasised. Six year direct imprisonment The Kuruman Regional Court agreed and sentenced Shuping to six years' direct imprisonment on each count. The court ordered the sentences to run concurrently, resulting in an effective six-year prison term. The NPA welcomed the conviction and sentence. ALSO READ: Drunken argument over being called 'inkwenkwe' ends in cop getting 15 years for murder 'This outcome reaffirms that no one is above the law and underscores the importance of protecting the integrity of the criminal justice system by holding those who abuse their power accountable,' Senokoatsane said.
