Jersey politician creates website which ranks States Members on their contributions to the Assembly
This number is more than the 17 quietest politicians combined.
The data has been curated by Deputy Alex Curtis on a new website based off official records, revealing the highest and lowest contributing members in the States during this political period.
Whilst Deputy Tadier holds the top spot for talking the most, Deputy Richard Honeycombe ranks last, speaking just 1,109 words.
The website, 'digitalStates', was created by Deputy Curtis to make it easier for people to access and interpret public records.
As well as words spoken, it also ranks politicians in order of their contributions in the Assembly since the start of the political term in 2022 - the top ten are:
External Relations Minister, Deputy Ian Gorst, ranked 14th and says: "It is important that I'm held to account for my responsibilities as a minister and answer questions.
"I also like to contribute to those debates where I either have something unique or influential to say. But equally, one has to be mindful that one doesn't get so used to one's voice that we talk for the sake of talking."
The politicians who scored lowest on the contribution chart:
St Lawrence Connétable, Deidre Mezbourian: 148 contributions
Grouville and St Martin Deputy, Carolyn Labey: 142 contributions
St Mary Connétable, David Johnson: 131 contributions
St Helier South Deputy, Beatriz Porée: 99 contributions
St Clement Deputy, Barbara Ward: 91 contributions
St Clement Connétable, Marcus Troy: 80 contributions
Trinity Connétable, Phillip Le Sueur: 75 contributions
Grouville Connétable, Mark Labey: 38 contributions
Grouville and St Martin Deputy, Rose Binet: 14 contributions
St Ouen Connétable, Richard Honeycombe: 9 contributions
Connétable Le Sueur explains: "Quite clearly, if something has already been said, then there is no need to get up and say something, and therefore I only contribute when I feel my contribution will make an impact in the debate."
Analysing the data, Sir Mark Boleat, Senior Advisor at Jersey's Policy Centre, says: "I don't think the amount of minutes they have spoken for is a good test of how effective they are.
"There can be some people who can speak a lot and achieve a lot, some speak very little and achieve a great deal as well.
"And there are some who don't achieve a lot but go to enormous lengths. So it's not a good measure of effectiveness as to how many minutes they speak.
"People can chair a scrutiny panel that produces an excellent report and it doesn't require them to speak once.
"I think one of the problems with the Assembly is that people do think it is about passing laws, but we know what people are concerned about in Jersey, the cost of living, the health service; neither of those requires any laws to be passed, they simply require the services to be dealt with effectively.
"If there is going to be a league table on who speaks the most, then we are going to have much longer States' meetings with everyone feeling they have got to speak or they won't be in the league table."
The website also showcases propositions brought forward by different State Members with a breakdown of who has voted pour (for) and contre (against).
Deputies Steve Ahier, Malcolm Ferey and Max Andrews voted the most, while Lucy Stephenson, Philip Ozouf and Deidre Mezbourian voted the least.
Explaining his website, Deputy Curtis says: "There is a lot of content said in the States, hundreds of pages worth, sometimes almost every day.
"But it's not easy for us to go back and say, 'Well, what did so and so say?' or, 'I want to know every time Les Sablons or a development was mentioned'.
"Now I have built a way that people can do that. They can search for information in ways they haven't done before."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Britain is ‘poster child' for bad decision-making, bond investor claims
Britain has become the 'poster child' for bad decision-making, a leading bond investor has warned. A string of poor policy choices have pushed up government debt costs and left the UK more exposed to 'tantrums' in the market, said Jason Borbora-Sheen, a portfolio manager at Ninety One. Mr Borbora-Sheen pointed to the bond market reaction to Liz Truss's mini-Budget and Donald Trump's tariff onslaught as examples of how Britain's debt had a greater 'magnitude and likelihood' of what he called 'pinch points'. Borrowing costs surged in both cases, bringing down the Truss government and blowing a hole in Rachel Reeves's Budget. 'I'd almost see the UK as the poster child for poor historical monetary and fiscal policymaking,' he said. 'The way the UK is set up leaves it exposed to tantrums occurring more frequently and of the worst magnitude that you would typically feel comfortable with in a developed world sovereign bond market. That's what leaves us thinking that it's not particularly compelling.' Mr Borbora-Sheen said a failure to properly contain inflation, address high public debt and boost growth was to blame for the situation. Borrowing costs climbed earlier this year after a Labour backbench rebellion over reforms to disability benefits meant to cut spending and boost growth. Bond yields also jumped in January amid concerns that the Chancellor had not left herself enough fiscal headroom in her October Budget, despite raising taxes by £40bn. Mr Borbora-Sheen said ministers need to be prepared to make some 'hard choices' if they want to improve Britain's position in international debt markets. 'You would need to have a hit to growth and be willing to accept less politically-favourable policymaking in order to get your financial position back to something more compelling,' said Mr Borbora-Sheen. 'If you don't do that, you do get this quite unattractive cycle occurring of high yields, making decision-making around Budgets difficult, giving you little room to make more strident choices and that becoming re-enforcing. 'You're not getting your fiscal house in order and it's causing problems for your bond market again and again.' Ninety One, which manages £139.7bn in assets, was formed as Investec Asset Management in South Africa in 1991 before demerging and listing on the FTSE 250 in 2020. Long-term UK government borrowing costs have edged towards their highest level since 1997 as Britain grapples with a toxic combination of high inflation, high government spending and narrow fiscal headroom. The yield on 30-year UK gilts has climbed from 5.13pc at the turn of the year to 5.55pc today. Bonds usually become more attractive when yields – the return an issuer promises to a buyer of its debt – rise. Greater investor interest helps to limit or push down borrowing costs. However, Mr Borbora-Sheen said Britain's bond market was unattractive despite the high yields on offer as investors were unsettled by inflation, which rose to 3.6pc in June. He said: 'The reason you have higher rates in the UK is that inflation is sticky. So if you compare the UK's 10-year bond yield to the US's, it's 0.4pc higher. 'It sounds small but in the scheme of things is actually quite meaningful, particularly when you have a high interest rate burden too, as the UK does, with the need to keep financing those bonds. 'So [Britain] is not being given a lot of credit by those fixed-income markets.' Money markets suggest that the Bank of England is unlikely to come to the Chancellor's rescue. Traders on Monday reduced bets on another interest rate cut this year, with no action now seen as the most likely outcome for the rest of the year. The Bank of England cut interest rates to 4pc earlier this month – the fifth reduction in rates since August last year. However, inflation has been creeping up, with the next official data published on Wednesday. Anita Wright, of Ribble Wealth Management, said: 'Markets don't believe the UK has its long-term finances under control. 'Despite four rate cuts in the past year, the 30-year yield hasn't come down. Why? Because investors are worried about two things: inflation sticking around and the Government's addiction to borrowing.'
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
‘Dump it, or we'll dump you': secretive consultancy group sends Liberal MPs barrage of emails over net zero policy
Liberal MPs have been sent a barrage of emails demanding they drop net zero targets or 'risk losing our support' by a group connected to conservative right-wing lobby group Advance. The mass emails, seen by Guardian Australia, have been sent to multiple Liberals by Whitestone Strategic, a secretive political consultancy group and come as the Coalition reviews its energy policy. Coalition MPs began receiving the emails – which one described as looking as if they were sent by AI bots – on Monday night. Some MPs received more than 100 within 48 hours from the same address. Sign up: AU Breaking News email One of the emails reads: 'A message to the Liberal Party and Nationals: Net Zero is causing irreversible damage to our nation. Our economic health is declining … immediate action is required. Dump Net Zero policies now, or we will stop supporting your agenda.' Another reads: 'Net Zero is a dangerous joke. It's time to dump it, or we'll dump you.' The email sender appears to be Whitestone Strategic but the email address is listed as CiviClick – a US-based platform that describes itself as AI-Powered grassroots advocacy software, that allows users to 'reach elected officials with powerful policy messages'. A Guardian Australia investigation in October revealed Whitestone Strategic's close ties to Advance, the rightwing advocacy group behind the main organisation promoting a no vote in the Indigenous voice referendum, Fair Australia. A separate investigation also found Whitestone Strategic billed taxpayers almost $135,000 over two years for work providing media messaging for conservative politicians during the voice to parliament campaign. Whitestone Strategic's work for Coalition members has extended beyond the voice campaign. None of the emails, sent since Monday, are addressed directly to the politician, or signed off by a member of the public. Many of the dozens of emails received by MPs contain the same message and some contain what appears to be coding left in unintentionally. Advance announced on 8 August it would launch a campaign targeting 'weakling' Liberals, by pressuring them to drop their support for net zero by 2050. On 15 August, it said its supporters had sent 19,897 emails to coalition MPs and senators. Several members who received the emails expressed frustration over the tactic. One Liberal, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said they received at least 50 emails in 24 hours, none directly addressed to them. 'The policy review process is important, we must take the time to do it right,' they said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We cannot be distracted by external groups with their own agendas.' Another Liberal, who asked not to be named, derided the emails and said they looked like they had been sent by 'AI bots', due to multiple of the same message being sent. This MP, who said they were previously supportive of Whitestone's work, said 'Why can't Whitestone get this stuff right?'. Liberal Senator for South Australia, Andrew McLachlan, a vocal supporter of net zero and climate action, confirmed he'd received dozens of emails from Whitestone Strategic over the last 48 hours. He said maintaining emissions reduction targets is critical and said he would continue to advocate for the target. 'It is not 'weakness' to support targets to reduce pollution. You are not a 'weakling' to be committed to exploring every possible solution to respond to our changing climate,' he said. The Liberal party is reviewing its energy policies, led by the shadow energy minister, Dan Tehan. The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, hasn't committed to keeping net zero, but some vocal members of the Coalition – including Barnaby Joyce, Michael McCormack, Matt Canavan and Tony Pasin – have been publicly and privately lobbying against the target. In response to questions from Guardian Australia, Advance said they wouldn't comment on individual emails from supporters, but that 'it is no secret that we are campaigning against net zero and have asked our supporters to contact MPs to voice their opposition'.
The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
Climate wars are simmering among the NSW Liberals – and they could pose a problem for Mark Speakman
The never-ending war within the Coalition over energy policy and climate targets appears to have infected the New South Wales Liberals, as they struggle to restore the administration of their branch and get traction with voters. It's bad news for the NSW opposition leader, Mark Speakman, whose hold on the leadership is being increasingly questioned. Until now, the main battle ground for the renewed climate wars has been Canberra, where the right of the Liberal party and the Nationals from Queensland – aided and abetted by US president Donald Trump – have used every opportunity to foment discontent. The federal Coalition leader, Sussan Ley, has promised to review the Coalition's energy policy, but there will be no easy answers. She will need to juggle the demands of MPs such as Nationals senator Matt Canavan and Liberal Andrew Hastie that she drop the net zero target, with the views of her city MPs, who know they could go the way of their former colleagues who lost seats to teal independents. Let alone doing the right thing for the planet. For the NSW Coalition, energy policy has been an area of mostly bipartisan agreement – until now. In 2020, the then energy minister Matt Kean, a Liberal who now chairs the Climate Change Authority, released the energy roadmap that showed how NSW would meet its objective to deliver a 70% cut in emissions by 2035 compared to 2005 levels, and net zero by 2050. It was supported by both sides. But last week the first signs of an unravelling emerged. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Just before the NSW parliament rose for a long break, the Liberal MP for Goulburn, Wendy Tuckerman, resigned from the shadow ministry over her own party's failure to listen to her concerns about windfarms. Ostensibly, it was over a failure of the leadership to consult on the electricity infrastructure bill, which the government said was urgent. The bill gave the energy minister, Penny Sharpe, the power to fast-track investments in synchronous condensers, which are urgently needed for grid stability. According to her office, it did no more than broaden the definition of priority infrastructure to ensure investments in this critical infrastructure by the privately owned electricity distributors could proceed. Whether it did more than that depends on who you ask. The Minns government says it doesn't alter the planning and consultation process for major infrastructure such as transmission lines. But it was a bridge too far for Tuckerman, whose electorate is part of a renewable energy zone and has seen dozens of projects proposed. 'I have had countless calls, emails and comments from community members that feel like they have just been kicked while they are down. They are bearing the brunt of poor planning and by the government's lack of accountability. They are not being listened to,' she said. 'I can no longer in good conscience be a part of a process that sidelines the voices of constituents and regional communities, or which undermines my ability to represent the people that put me here.' There's no doubt that Tuckerman's electorate is concerned about the scale of windfarm development – as is the Orana region near Dubbo. But the concerns have been turbocharged and taken to a wider audience by the Daily Telegraph, which has run no fewer than five stories in the space of two weeks about the harm that windfarms were causing farmers in Tuckerman's electorate. These were then amplified across other News Corp platforms including and Sky News, who interviewed the Telegraph journalists about their coverage, and by 2GB. At the same time, the rightwing advocacy group Advance has announced a campaign to kill off 'weakling' Liberals who support the net zero climate target. Advance members are being bombarded with emails seeking donations, with the aim to raise $450,000 before the end of August. Most of Advance's efforts seem focused on the federal Liberals, but the anti-net zero sentiment has reached the NSW Nationals, at least in the grassroots party. At their conference in June in Coffs Harbour, they voted to drop support for net zero. The problem for Speakman is that the climate issue could quickly become a wedge that will be used by the right to further fuel the leadership speculation that is already bubbling. Speakman is undoubtedly under pressure. There's no immediate appetite to replace him, among the dominant moderate faction from which he comes. But there is concern about a lack of cut-through, particularly as a recent Resolve poll in July in the Sydney Morning Herald showed Labor with a commanding primary vote lead over the Coalition of 38% (up five points on the last result in April) to 32% (down four), with the Greens up two to 13%. The Poll Bludger estimated this would imply a two-party Labor lead of at least 57-43, compared with 54.3-45.7 at the March 2023 election. A 5% swing would see the Liberals lose another five seats and condemn them to a further two terms of opposition. 'People are starting to worry about saving the furniture,' one Liberal said. The Kiama byelection on 13 September will be a test for Speakman. If he puts in a good showing, the troops might calm down. But with an election due in March 2027, the window for leadership bloodletting is fast approaching. Both sides were claiming underdog status in the South Coast seat, which was most recently held by the Liberal turned Independent Gareth Ward, who resigned after being convicted of rape. Ward enjoyed enormous personal support even after the charges were laid, so it's difficult to say whether voters will chose to punish the Liberals or follow the conventional wisdom of byelections and give the government of the day a good kick. In the meantime, the climate wars are simmering again and they've reached the doors of Macquarie Street. A NSW parliamentary committee is due to release a report on the renewable energy zones and their impact on rural communities as early as next week. It will provide an opportunity for the opponents of net zero to target more 'weakling' Liberals – and it will test out Speakman's skill in managing a difficult issue for his troops.
