
Banking sector says easing of US leverage rules could support Treasury market
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, May 13 (Reuters) - The banking industry is optimistic that U.S. regulators will soon move to change how much capital they set aside against typically safe investments, particularly after the turmoil in Treasury markets last month.
Such a move to revamp the "supplementary leverage ratio" could reduce the amount of cash banks must reserve, freeing them up for more lending or other activities, and could incentivize banks to play a larger role in intermediating Treasury markets.
"Current leverage-based capital requirements are outdated and at odds with financial stability and economic growth. Reform is needed quickly to better serve U.S. taxpayers, capital markets, consumers, businesses, and the economy," said Kevin Fromer, the president and CEO of the Financial Services Forum, which represents the nation's largest banks.
Regulators have flagged the SLR as meriting reconsideration and are mulling whether to tweak the rule's formula to reduce big banks' burdens or provide relief for extremely safe investments, like Treasury bonds. The debate is driving industry hopes that agencies could as soon as this summer propose an overhaul, according to three sources familiar with the matter. Bank lobby groups, including the Forum and the Bank Policy Institute, which also represents larger banks, have been pushing for the change.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers last week that a revamp was a "high priority" for the three regulatory bodies charged with the rule: the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Banks have argued for years that the SLR, established after the 2007-2009 financial crisis, should be reformed. They contend it was meant to serve as a baseline, requiring banks to hold capital against even very safe assets, but has grown over time to become a binding constraint on bank lending.
BPI President and CEO Greg Baer called reform "overdue and welcome" in a statement to Reuters.
When asked by Congress in February if the leverage requirements discouraged banks from helping intermediate the Treasury market, Fed Chair Jerome Powell agreed, and said it was time to revisit the issue.
Such reforms are on a long wishlist the banking industry hopes to advance with the Trump administration, which has made deregulation to spur economic growth a top priority.
Spokespeople for the Fed, FDIC and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which shares responsibility for the SLR, declined to comment.
Currently, all banks are required to hold 3% of their capital against their leverage exposure, which is their assets and other off-balance sheet items like derivatives. The largest global banks must hold an extra 2% as well in what is known as the "enhanced supplementary leverage ratio."
Regulators could provide relief by simply exempting Treasury bonds and central bank deposits from calculations of the SLR. That is the approach the Fed took when it provided temporary emergency relief during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Or, in what three industry sources believe is a more likely option, they could look at tweaking the "enhanced" SLR, which instead of exempting Treasuries broadly refines the formula, resulting in a lower ratio. Regulators tried to ease that requirement in 2018, during President Donald Trump's first term in the White House, setting the extra capital based on a bank's specific risk profile, but it ultimately failed to advance.
The largest banks, which are also the most prominent Treasury market participants, would stand to benefit most directly from the second option.
Banks hope any leverage relief coincides with a broader push to overhaul other capital requirements, including the so-called "GSIB surcharge" applied to the largest, most complex banks, and an ongoing effort to overhaul annual "stress tests" of big bank finances.
While discussing quarterly earnings last month, several bank executives touted SLR reform alongside other capital relief.
"The SLR requires us to hold capital to level against riskless assets and Treasuries and cash; that doesn't make a lot of sense," Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan said in April.
Proponents of the SLR argue it is critical to have a tool that is blind to risk as a key backstop, and a simple, direct requirement on leverage can help ensure no dangers are overlooked.
But such relief could potentially lend more liquidity to Treasury markets, which have struggled to function amid periods of intense stress.
The $29 trillion Treasury market, a cornerstone of the global financial system, saw an aggressive selloff in April, sending U.S. borrowing costs higher.
Market expectations about potential reform helped push the spread of swap rates over Treasuries higher in recent months, as Trump's victory in the November 5 presidential election fueled hopes of broader deregulation in financial markets.
Swap spreads, which reflect the gap between the fixed rate on an interest rate swap and the yield on a comparable Treasury security, are often used to hedge or bet on shifts in rates.
They tightened dramatically, however, during the bond selloff that followed Trump's April 2 "Liberation Day" tariff announcement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Citigroup drops July rate cut bets for US, trims forecast to 75 bps
June 9 (Reuters) - Citigroup has pushed back its U.S. rate cut forecast to September from July and now expects three cuts this year instead of four, after a stronger-than-expected May jobs report in an otherwise cooling labor market. The Wall Street brokerage anticipates 75 basis points (bps) of cuts this year in three equal tranches in September, October and December, revising its earlier forecast of 100 bps of cuts. The brokerage also forecast two rate cuts of 25 bps each in January and March of 2026. The Federal Reserve's last rate cut was in December 2024, when it reduced the key lending rate by 25 bps. U.S. non-farm payrolls increased by 139,000 jobs last month after a downwardly revised rise of 147,000 in April, data showed. Economists polled by Reuters had estimated May payrolls to rise by 130,000 jobs. The U.S. central bank is expected to keep interest rates unchanged at its meeting next week, while traders have priced in close to two 25-bps cuts by December. On Friday, Citi lifted its S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab year-end target to 6,300 from 5,800 earlier, expressing renewed optimism in corporate earnings resilience and the accelerating momentum of artificial intelligence-driven growth. The benchmark S&P 500 index closed above 6,000 for the first time since late February on Friday.


Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
House Speaker Reveals ‘Likely Decision' on Whether Congress Will Save $7,500 EV Tax Credit
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has shed light on whether the US will follow in the footsteps of countries like Germany and China by eliminating a significant EV subsidy. The fate of the U.S.'s popular $7,500 federal EV tax credit hangs in the balance House Speaker Mike Johnson has told Bloomberg, 'I think there is a better chance we kill it than save it,' when describing how Congress plans to handle the future of the $7,500 federal tax credit for qualifying new electric vehicle (EV) purchases. 'But we'll see how it comes out,' he added. While the credit hasn't expired, debate surrounding its future has been ongoing, with talks of eliminating the government subsidy accelerating since President Trump's re-election and a need to pay for his significant tax cut package. There isn't a clear indication that Congress is also considering eliminating tax credits of up to $4,000 and $1,000 for qualifying used EV purchases and home EV charging infrastructure installation, respectively. Congress is expected to decide on the $7,500 EV credit by the next budget resolution, which was supposed to be complete by April 15, but Congress often doesn't meet this deadline. The government is operating under a continuing resolution, extending funding through September 30, 2025. U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson — Source: Getty The Congressional Budget Office made a 2022 estimate that the $7,500 federal EV tax incentive would cost $12.5 billion over ten years, but an analysis by consulting firm Capital Alpha Partners in March noted that its cost could exceed $200 billion. Former President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, which included extending the federal EV subsidy through 2032. In 2024, the federal government is estimated to have spent about $2 billion in advance point-of-sale EV tax credit payments, according to Electrek. Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, said in December that he wants the government to eliminate all tax breaks for EV buyers, not just the $7,500 incentive, according to Politico. In July, Musk also posted on X, formerly Twitter: 'Take away the subsidies. It will only help Tesla.' Other countries like Germany and China have recently diminished EV incentives in recent years, as noted by InsideEVs. Congress has other EV matters on its mind On May 1, the House of Representatives voted and passed resolutions to block California's federal waivers allowing the state to enforce strict vehicle emission standards, including California's 2035 ban on sales of new gas-powered passenger vehicles. While next steps with the resolutions rest with the Senate, the Senate parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office have ruled that Congress doesn't have the authority to revoke California's waiver. The Senate parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office don't legally bind the Senate, but instances of the Senate ignoring the parliamentarian's advice are rare and can generate controversy. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Donald Trump exiting a Tesla Model S — Source: Getty Final thoughts Complications of the U.S. government cutting the $7,500 EV credit are compounded by the segment's growth. According to Cox Automotive, U.S. drivers bought almost 300,000 new EVs during Q1, an 11.4% year-over-year increase, and around 7.5% of new car purchases in the U.S. were EVs, a 7% increase from a year earlier. Subsidies like the $7,500 credit are naturally a significant reason consumers feel motivated to make an EV purchase, so eliminating the incentive will likely cause a major disruption within the automotive market, which is already occurring with President Trump's tariffs on vehicle and parts imports. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile


Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Tesla Loses Billions in Value as Musk-Trump Feud Heats Up Over EV Subsidies
Musk turns on Trump, triggering steep Tesla declines President Trump has threatened to end government subsidies and contracts to Elon Musk's companies, with Tesla facing billions of dollars in annual losses without various state and federal programs. Musk escalated the feud with a series of posts on X, formerly Twitter, attacking the president, erasing $150 billion in Tesla's market value on Thursday before a Friday rebound. After the market's close on Friday, Tesla's market cap stood at about $950 billion, down from roughly $1.1 trillion at the week's start. 0:02 / 0:09 2025 Audi S3: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More Elon Musk/President Trump — Source: Getty Musk's specific criticisms of Trump's bill include the entrepreneur saying: 'There is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar,' according to The Hill. The Tesla CEO also said on X: 'Abruptly discontinuing the energy tax incentives would jeopardize America's energy autonomy and the dependability of our power grid.' On Thursday, President Trump said on his Truth Social platform that the 'easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts,' Reuters reports. The president also posted on Truth Social: 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' How Trump's and Congress's initiatives impact Tesla The House of Representatives version of Trump's bill, passed in late May, proposes to largely end the federal $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicle (EV) purchases by the end of 2025. If passed by the Senate, eliminating the federal EV subsidy could erase $1.2 billion in Tesla's annual profits, according to Reuters. Separate Senate legislation that removes California's EV sales mandates could lower Tesla's yearly sales by another $2 billion. Tesla earned almost $2.8 billion last year by selling regulatory credits to other automakers, helping competitors meet government-established car emissions rules, many of which are in California. Since Tesla only makes all-electric vehicles, it earns a surplus of regulatory credits that it can sell to other automakers. Competitors who don't manufacture enough zero-emission vehicles face steep fines if they don't purchase regulatory credits from Tesla. Republicans in Congress are working to lower some of the federal waivers California needs for stricter emissions standards than the federal government, and if rolled back, Tesla's regulatory credit profits would take a significant hit. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Elon Musk and Donald Trump with a Tesla Model S — Source: Getty Tesla plans to launch its driverless robotaxi rideshare service in Austin, Texas, this month, subject to government oversight. Still, analysts don't believe Musk's feud with Trump will impact the autonomous Tesla fleet's debut. Gene Munster, Tesla investor and managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, said: 'In my view, the White House has little to gain in standing in front of autonomy, given autonomy is central to physical AI, and for the US to be a leader globally in AI, it also needs to be a leader in physical AI,' according to Business Insider. Autoblog contacted Tesla for comment but didn't receive a response. Final thoughts Elon Musk spent over $250 million to help re-elect Donald Trump, with Tesla's stock increasing after the President's victory. However, Musk's controversial time as a special government employee, most notably with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), triggered severe stock declines at Tesla, ultimately causing the entrepreneur to step away from politics and focus more on his company. Musk's decision to go on the offensive against Trump could further erase any benefits he and Tesla initially gained through their partnership, as reflected in this past week's stock market. Gene Munster estimated in a Friday report that eliminating EV tax credits could reduce Tesla's 2025 deliveries by 15%. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile