Trump drug tariffs ‘risk medicine shortages across Britain'
Ministers have been told to draw up plans to ensure patients can keep accessing vital medicines, after the US president on Tuesday threatened new tariffs of up to 200pc on pharmaceutical imports.
Mr Trump said the White House would be announcing 'something very soon on pharmaceuticals'.
Dr Leyla Hannbeck, the chief executive of the Independent Pharmacies Association, said any new levies would have 'direct consequences for our patients and the community pharmacies they rely on'.
The UK imports around £27bn worth of medicines and pharmaceutical products every year and exports £8.8bn of pharmaceutical products to the United States.
Although the UK may be able to negotiate a rapid exemption from new US levies on medicine imports following its trade deal with Mr Trump, any tariffs would be expected to send shockwaves through the drug supply chain.
Henry Gregg, chief executive of the National Pharmacy Association, said there were concerns over what would happen to drug prices in the UK if Trump followed through on his threats. He said the UK medicine supply chain was 'complex and dependent on many international factors, including events in the US'.
Dr Hannbeck said higher prices could make it harder for local pharmacies to keep stocking medicines, adding: 'New tariffs threaten to push up the price of many vital medicines way beyond the level at which the NHS currently reimburses pharmacies.
'That would be unsustainable, presenting a real and present danger to the viability of independent pharmacies across the country and exacerbate medicines shortages that many patients are currently experiencing.'
Price rise fears
Dr Hannbeck said ministers needed to be ready to take 'immediate and decisive action to protect pharmacies' ability to buy the medicines patients need' if Mr Trump imposed new tariffs. She added: 'The medicine shortage can't get worse, the Government needs a plan.'
It comes amid growing alarm at the high level of drug shortages in the UK after years of Britain being overly reliant on medicine ingredients manufactured abroad.
A poll conducted by the National Pharmacy Association in March found that all 500 pharmacies surveyed were unable to dispense a prescription at least once a day as a result of supply issues.
Earlier this week, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on pharmacy pointed to research suggesting shortages were a routine feature of daily practice for 84pc cent of pharmacists. MPs said shortages of medicines were becoming a 'permanent and escalating feature' of the UK healthcare system.
The UK currently pays more than three times less for its medicine supplies than the US. It has been a gripe of Mr Trump, who is understood to be pressing the NHS to pay more for innovative drugs under the terms of a UK-US trade deal.
Pharma bosses are currently locked in talks with the Government over an NHS spending cap, designed to keep the UK medicine bill down. However, both sides have yet to reach an agreement, delaying the Government's long-awaited life sciences strategy plan.
Mr Gregg said: 'Medicine shortages and problems in the supply chain can be devastating for patients whose health depends on a reliable and predictable supply of medication.'
Paul Callaghan, policy manager for patient group Healthwatch England, said: 'If supply issues risk worsening, it's more important than ever that action is taken... It is clear that many patients find current medicine shortages both frustrating and distressing.'
Shares in drugmakers AstraZeneca and GSK initially slumped following Mr Trump's warning over pharma tariffs on Tuesday night. However, both stocks later recovered as investors realised companies would have time to prepare.
Mr Trump said on Tuesday: 'We're going to give people a year, a year and a half to come in and after that they're going to be tariffed if they bring pharmaceuticals into the country.'
A government spokesman said: 'The UK has well-established ways of managing the cost of medicines and clear processes in place to protect against risks to supply. Our trade agenda would never stop this.
'We were the first country to agree a deal with the US that lowered tariffs on key sectors, protected jobs and received one of the lowest reciprocal tariff rates in the world. Conversations with the US are ongoing and we will work closely with them to implement the best deal for the public and our economy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's bold prediction about Zelensky-less Ukraine peace summit with Putin: ‘I'll know in the first two minutes'
Donald Trump claimed that he would know 'in the first two minutes' of his upcoming meeting with Vladimir Putin if a peace deal could be reached between Russia and Ukraine. 'We're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin, and at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made,' the president told reporters at a press conference Monday. Asked how he would know, the president replied: 'Because that's what I do. I make deals.' However, Trump later appeared to contradict himself, after saying that it was 'not up to him' if a deal was made or not. 'I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal. I think a deal should be made for both,' he said. The president is set to meet with the Russian president Friday in Alaska for the 'highly anticipated' meeting, during which the pair will discuss bringing an end to the conflict that has raged since the invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces in February 2022. Trump briefly appeared to forget the location of the meeting, telling reporters at the press conference that he would be travelling to Russia for the meeting, instead of The Last Frontier. He added that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky 'could' attend the bilateral, but also appeared to question if it would help a deal be reached. 'He wasn't a part of it,' Trump said, speaking about the setting up of the talks. 'I would say he could go, but he's been to a lot of meetings. You know, he's been there for three and a half years. Nothing happened.' He added that, should a 'fair' deal be reached, he would inform the European Union as well as Zelensky, who he would call first 'out of respect.' 'And I may say, 'lots of luck, keep fighting.' Or I may say 'we can make a deal,' he said. Either way, Trump said that a meeting between Putin and Zelensky would be necessary in the future. 'Ultimately, I'm going to put the two of them in a room. I'll be there, or I won't be there, and I think it'll get solved.' Friday's meeting will be the first between a U.S. president and Putin since 2021, when Joe Biden met him in Switzerland, and marks the first time the Russian president has set foot on American soil in a decade. His visit is due to go ahead as planned, despite the fact that he faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Critics have also noted that Alaska was once owned by Russia, who claimed it during the 1770s and sold it back to the U.S. in 1867. Russian traditionalists have long-since demanded the return of the territory.
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Chat show host blasts Trump as he explains why he got Italian citizenship
Talk show host Jimmy Kimmel has revealed he obtained Italian citizenship, expressing his dismay over Donald Trump 's potential second term in office. Kimmel, a long-standing critic of Donald Trump, shared this information on Sarah Silverman 's podcast, noting that many Americans disapproving of Trump are seeking citizenship elsewhere. He stated that he welcomes those who change their minds about supporting Donald Trump, emphasising the difficulty of admitting one was wrong. This comes after popular podcaster Joe Rogan, who previously endorsed Donald Trump, recently criticised the president's deportation policies, particularly concerning non-criminals. Donald Trump has reiterated his claim that Kimmel, along with Jimmy Fallon, will soon lose their jobs, suggesting that anti-Trump comedy is failing.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What will happen to people arrested on Palestine Action demonstration?
The consequences of being arrested for expressing support for Palestine Action could be 'life-changing', one of those detained during Saturday's protests, Sir Jonathon Porritt, has admitted. While the former government adviser said that he had carefully deliberated over a decision to take part, the road ahead for the more than 500 people arrested on Saturday involves possible criminal charges, court cases and convictions. Ultimately, custodial sentences of as much as 14 years could be imposed. Those whose details could be confirmed were released on bail to appear at a police station at a future date. The police will be sending case files to the Crown Prosecution Service, as it has already done in the case of at least 26 others who were arrested at previous protests in support of Palestine Action. All those arrested have now been released under police bail, with the main condition being not to attend any future demonstrations aiming to overwhelm the criminal justice system in protest at the proscription of Palestine Action by the British government. They will be asked how they plead and if it is not guilty they can elect for a trial before a magistrate or, more likely, a district judge. The majority of the 522 people arrested in Parliament Square – in most cases after displaying pieces of cardboard saying 'I opposed genocide, I support Palestine Action' – were detained under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. This is the 'lower level' part of the act, which means those who are charged will be tried in a magistrates court rather than a crown court. Some have been charged under the more serious section 12, which means they could seek to have their case heard in front of a jury of their peers at a crown court. The prosecution could also seek to have the trial heard there. Defend Our Juries, the organising group behind the protest, has said it won't be recommending what people do, as they have already participated 'at huge personal cost' but it will be 'providing the information'. There is a scenario in which court trials do not happen, if the co-founder of Palestine Action is successful in a legal challenge against the home secretary's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws. Given that most those arrested on Saturday will be investigated under section 13 of the terrorism act, they could well walk free from court. They face a maximum sentence of six months' imprisonment or a fine of up to £5,000 or both, while magistrates will also take into account factors such as good character. More than half of those arrested on Saturday were also aged 60 or over. Those arrested under the more serious section 12 of the Terrorism Act face a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison if convicted. However, such individuals could end up being tried before a jury in a crown court. In recent cases under section 13, people charged with supporting Hamas, including displaying pictures of hang gliders such as those used in the 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, were given absolute or conditional discharges. Will a jury drawn from their peers be more likely to sympathise with those arrested on Saturday? Those involved in organising the protest are confident that the British public is on the same page as them. The impact of such a conviction would be felt in everything from employment to travel. Many of those arrested are retired and, while they do not have a job to lose, the possibility of being unable to get a visa to go abroad might weigh. However, the consequences are starker for others arrested on Saturday including health workers and doctors. There was an organised 'health block' of 13 medical professionals – including an obstetrician and gynaecologist, three other working doctors, a number of nurses, and retired doctors. Alice Clack, a senior obstetrician and gynaecologist in the NHS, said: 'If doctors are charged with a crime we have to self-report to the GMC [General Medical Council], who then have a look at the crime in question and decide whether to refer it to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service. 'Then, someone could expect to be suspended or they could be erased from the register. That is the possibility.' As for seeking future employment, recent legislation largely reduced the period of time during which those convicted of most crimes must declare a conviction. However, while it reduced the period of time during which an individual must declare a conviction, it does not apply to terrorist offences – which never become spent.
