Standing Committee Finally Takes Shape
While Rafia Mahir, an AAP councillor from Bazar Sitaram, won a standing committee member seat from City-Sadar Paharganj, Jagmohan Mehlawat, a
BJP
councillor from Vasant Kunj, won the election from South zone.
The 18-member committee now has 17 elected representatives, with BJP holding 10 seats and AAP securing seven. The final member's election is scheduled during Tuesday's house meeting. BJP's councillor from Gautampuri and former mayor in the erstwhile east corporation, Satya Sharma, and AAP councillor from Jaitpur, Hema, filed nomination papers for the post.
BJP, already having secured a majority, is well-positioned to have its candidate elected as the standing committee chairman on June 12.
The formation of the standing committee has been pending for two and a half years for various reasons. "A proposal for the constitution of the standing committee on June 12 will be tabled in the house meeting on Tuesday... We will focus on improving healthcare, education, etc," said mayor Raja Iqbal Singh.
Several development projects over Rs 5 crore are waiting for the committee's nod. They include finalising an agency for door-to-door garbage collection in central and west zones, opening a dog park, engaging a new toll tax operator, and Shahjahanabad Interpretation Centre. The works for finalising the layout plan for projects belonging to various agencies are also pending.
BJP demonstrated its strength in the MCD ward committee elections on Monday by securing the chairman positions in eight wards: Central, South, Shahdara North, Keshavpuram, Civil Lines, Narela and Najafgarh.
AAP claimed the chairman's post in four zones: City-Sadar Paharganj, Karol Bagh, West and Rohini.
The results were disappointing for the newly formed Indraprastha Vikas Party (IVP), which contested for the chairman's posts in West and Rohini, and lost in both. Despite joining hands with BJP and having a majority in Rohini, it lost due to cross-voting. AAP councillor Amrit Jain got 11 votes while IVP got 10, despite the fact that IVP and BJP together had 11 members and AAP 10.
In the same zone, BJP's Narendra Kumar Singh, who fought for the deputy chairman's seat, received 11 votes and won by one vote.
Congress' two councillors boycotted the election.
In West zone, there were 25 members (councillors), including 13 from AAP and 12 for the combined BJP-IVP. But in the election, AAP's Nirmal Kumari managed to get 14 votes and IVP only 11. IVP's Mukesh Goel accepted that cross-voting happened.
"But we are not losing hope. The party was formed barely last month on May 17 and still contested and performed well," he said.
AAP Delhi convener Saurabh Bharadwaj posted on X, "In MCD, AAP has secured victories in four zones. Despite 15 councillors leaving the party to form a new faction with BJP's support, we have maintained control over four out of five zones. I am very proud to share that those who left AAP... and openly received BJP's support in the zone elections failed to win in any zone."
South zone witnessed cross-voting, too, resulting in BJP's victory despite AAP holding a majority. Umed Singh of BJP managed to get 10 votes, AAP's Sheetal Chaudhary eight, and one vote was invalid.
Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva said that winning the chairmanship in eight zones, along with an additional victory in the standing committee election and the deputy chairman's seat in Rohini, clearly reflected the growing dissatisfaction among AAP's councillors towards the party leadership. "The results have clearly established that AAP is a disintegrating party. Even its elected representatives and party office bearers are drifting away," said Sachdeva.
Denying any cross-voting, leader of the opposition Ankush Narag said, "We fought for the people's interests and will continue to do so."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
Mob vandalises tomb outside UP mausoleum, claims it is built on top of temple
Members of a Hindu organisation vandalised a tomb in Uttar Pradesh's Fatehpur on Monday, claiming that the structure was built on a temple. The district administration has deployed heavy police and PAC forces across the area and erected barricades around the disputed site to prevent further controversy centers around the structure located in Abu Nagar, Rediya locality of Sadar tehsil. The tomb, officially registered under Khasra number 753 in government records as Maqbara Mangi (National Property), has become a flashpoint after members of the Math Mandir Sanrakshan Sangharsh Samiti and other Hindu groups, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), declared it to be a temple dedicated to Thakurji and Lord Shiva, allegedly over a thousand years video from the scene shows a number of people, carrying saffron flags, chanting 'Jai Shree Ram' around the tomb. The controversy erupted after the district president of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Mukhlal Pal, who has been at the forefront of the movement, alleged that the tomb of Nawab Abdus Samad, located in the Sadar tehsil area, is not a tomb but a temple that was altered over time. He claimed it to be a thousand-year-old temple of Thakur ji and Lord Shiva, citing the presence of a lotus flower and a trident within the structure as evidence. Following the claim, members of a Hindu organisation entered the tomb premises and vandalised the area outside the mausoleum. Reports suggest that the group plans to perform a pooja at the site today, escalating the situation further.'The form of our temple has been converted into a mosque. We Sanatan Hindus will not tolerate this. There are clear signs like lotus flowers and tridents. Tomorrow, on August 11, we will offer prayers at the temple at any cost,' Mukhlal Pal said. He also called upon Sanatanis to gather at Puri Thakur Dak Bungalow at 9 am to march and perform emphasised that the administration has accepted the structure was once a temple and warned that if prevented from worshipping, the government would be held responsible. "We are peaceful people, but if we have to fight for our religion, we are ready in every way," he District Co-convenor of Bajrang Dal, Dharmendra Singh, also vowed to perform puja at the tomb, saying, "We will offer prayers here at noon. The administration will not be able to stop us." Virendra Pandey, State Vice President of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), also claimed the site to be a temple of Lord Bholenath and Shri Krishna. 'The structure is not a tomb. There are religious symbols, Parikrama Marg, and a temple well. We want it cleaned for Janmashtami celebrations on August 16. We had informed the administration ten days ago, but they are not taking it seriously,' Pandey said. He called the site a central place of faith for Hindus and vowed to reclaim response, Mo Naseem, National Secretary of the National Ulama Council, strongly condemned the incident, calling it an attempt to distort history and communal harmony. 'It is a centuries-old tomb with graves inside. The place is clearly recorded in government documents. Are we now going to look for temples under every mosque and tomb?' he questioned. Naseem warned that if the district administration fails to stop the program planned for August 11, the Ulama Council will launch criticised the administration for entertaining only one-sided narratives and allowing religious contractors to incite tensions under the guise of note of the situation, the district administration has imposed strict security measures by installing barricades around the site, along with police forces patrolling Pandey, Junior Engineer Nagar Palika Parishad, confirmed that the barricading is being done under the orders of the District Officer to ensure no one can cross into the disputed administration continues to maintain that the land is recorded as a national property tomb, and officials are monitoring the situation closely to prevent escalation.- EndsInputs from Nitish advertisement
The Print
21 minutes ago
- The Print
Air India rejects Venugopal's ‘plane on runway' claim after flight diversion, MP cites captain announcement
In its response to the Congress leader, Air India denied that the aircraft, AI 2455, was made to go-around due to the presence of another plane on the runway at Chennai airport. The party targeted Congress general secretary (organisation) K.C. Venugopal, who was on the flight, over his claim on social media that the aircraft was made to go around on its first attempt to land in Chennai because there was another plane on the runway. This was after Air India contradicted Venugopal in a statement. New Delhi: The diversion of a Delhi-bound Air India flight, having a number of Opposition leaders among other passengers on board, from Thiruvananthapuram to Chennai Sunday, has run into conflicting claims, with BJP taking note of 'extremely serious' issue. 'A go-around was instructed by Chennai ATC (Air Traffic Control) during the first attempted landing at Chennai airport, not because of the presence of another aircraft on the runway. Our pilots are well-trained to handle such situations, and in this case, they followed standard procedures throughout the flight,' Air India said on X. When contacted, Venugopal, who is the Lok Sabha MP from Kerala's Alappuzha, told ThePrint the announcement that the plane was making a go-around due to the presence of another aircraft on the runway 'was made by the captain himself'. He added that he has also raised the matter with the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). Earlier Sunday, Venugopal had posted on X: 'Air India flight AI 2455 from Trivandrum to Delhi – carrying myself, several MPs, and hundreds of passengers – came frighteningly close to tragedy today. What began as a delayed departure turned into a harrowing journey. Shortly after take-off, we were hit by unprecedented turbulence. About an hour later, the Captain announced a flight signal fault and diverted to Chennai.' 'For nearly two hours, we circled the airport awaiting clearance to land, until a heart-stopping moment during our first attempt – another aircraft was reportedly on the same runway. In that split second, the Captain's quick decision to pull up saved every life on board. The flight landed safely on the second attempt,' he added. BJP leader Amit Malviya, highlighting Air India's response, said that if the version of the airline was true, then Venugopal 'should face consequences, including being put on a no-fly list for spreading falsehoods'. ''This is extremely serious. If senior Congress leader K.C. Venugopal claims an Air India flight had to abort landing in Chennai because another aircraft was on the runway and the airline immediately contradicts him, then one of them is misrepresenting facts. Aviation safety is paramount, and social media posts from supposedly responsible people cannot go unscrutinised,' Malviya wrote on X Monday. 'If the allegation is true, Chennai ATC and Air India have much to answer for. If not, Mr Venugopal should face consequences, including being put on a no-fly list for spreading falsehoods,' he added. Apart from Venugopal, the other leaders on the flight were United Democratic Front convener Adoor Prakash, Congress chief whip in the Lok Sabha K. Suresh, party MP from Tamil Nadu Robert Bruce and CPI(M) MP K. Radhakrishnan. In its statement, Air India said the flight made a precautionary diversion to Chennai due to a suspected technical issue and given the weather conditions en route. 'The flight landed safely in Chennai, where the aircraft will undergo the necessary checks. We regret the inconvenience caused to the affected passengers,' it said. Sunday's is the second incident of a flight carrying political leaders getting hit by turbulence. In May, a Srinagar-bound Indigo flight from Delhi that had five Trinamool Congress leaders on board had run into intense turbulence, leading to the plane suffering some structural damage, before it landed safely. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: 'More careful than colourful'—ThePrint's reporting on the Air India crash put facts first
News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Kamal Haasan Receives Death Threat Over Comment On Sanatana Dharma
Kamal Haasan receives a death threat from actor Ravichandran after criticising Sanatana Dharma during an event, sparking political backlash. Kamal Haasan has found himself in hot water after his comment on Sanatana Dharma, and after calls for a boycott grew, he has now received a death threat. Small-screen actor Ravichandran has threatened to kill Haasan over his comments against Sanatana Dharma. It was during the 15-year celebration of Tamil star Suriya's NGO, Agaram Foundation that Kamal Haasan criticised the central government's National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), saying it has crushed the dreams of many MBBS aspirants and stating that it is an 'ill outcome of Sanatana Dharma." After this comment, Haasan faced severe backlash and boycott calls, and has now received a death threat. In a YouTube interview, Ravichandran, a television actor, called Haasan a 'naive politician" and went as far as to say he 'would slit his throat" for making anti-Sanatan comments. This has raised serious concerns for Kamal Haasan and his fans. What Kamal Haasan said about Sanatana Dharma Kamal, who is now a Rajya Sabha MP and founder of Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM), stated, 'In this war, only education has the power to change the nation. It's the only weapon that can break the chains of dictatorship and Sanatana. Do not take any other weapon in your hands. You can't win with any other weapon. Because you will be defeated by majoritarianism; ignorant majoritarians will defeat you." Aftermath of the comment The Tamil Nadu unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) recently called for a boycott of films featuring actor-politician Kamal Haasan, following his recent remarks on Sanatana Dharma. BJP state secretary Amar Prasad Reddy shared a video message on social media, saying, 'Earlier it was Udhayanidhi Stalin, and now it is Kamal Haasan who wants to destroy Sanatana Dharma. Let's teach them a lesson." He appealed to Hindus to avoid watching Haasan's movies, even on OTT platforms, stating, 'If we do this, they will stop making irresponsible comments that hurt the sentiments of millions of Hindus." Senior BJP leader Tamilisai Soundararajan also criticised Haasan, accusing him of insulting Hindu beliefs and condemning his statement. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
