Opinion: What does the American dream mean?
My wife likes to tell the story of how, as a girl in the 1970s, she carefully saved money over a period of time to buy a pair of shoes she had been admiring in a local store.
Finally, the day came when she had exactly enough cash in hand. She eagerly went downtown — only to find that the price had gone up.
The story has two morals. First, people who are under 50 today can't comprehend the relentless inflation of the '70s; and second, Americans haven't always enjoyed an overabundance of cheap clothing. Our children are full-grown, but the memories of endless T-shirts, shorts and, yes, shoes strewn across their bedroom floors remain vivid.
So, when I read that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last month told the Economic Club of New York, 'Access to cheap goods is not the essence of the American dream,' I had to nod in agreement.
But then he went on to say, 'The American Dream is rooted in the concept that any citizen can achieve prosperity, upward mobility, and economic security. For too long, the designers of multilateral trade deals have lost sight of this.'
Which brought the subject back to tariffs and brought my nod to a halt. Upward mobility surely equates to home ownership and, perhaps, a car. Tariffs on Canadian lumber wouldn't make homes any cheaper, nor would tariffs on cars bring down what AAA says is the $39,000 average price of a new one.
Neither would tariffs help the many people I met on a recent assignment to Bangladesh, a country with 4,000 garment factories competing to sell cheap clothing to the United States. The tariffs President Trump put on a three-month pause Wednesday included 37% on Bangladesh, which would undoubtedly lead to layoffs and pay cuts for millions of workers in a tiny nation with a struggling economy, and then create bad will toward the United States.
Trump's 90-day pause this week may indicate an overriding aim to negotiate trade deals that eliminate the need to impose extra tariffs at all. Bangladesh, like many other nations, is anxious to do this.
And so, I am back to nodding in agreement about cheap goods — until I look around my own home office, that is.
The term 'American dream' was coined in 1930 by author and historian James Truslow Adams. According to the Jstor Daily, he defined this as 'a dream of a social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position.'
Note the absence of houses or cars, which were falling out of reach for many in 1930. Those things were added to the 'dream' by future generations of Americans.
An illustrated book simply titled 'The West,' by Geoffrey C. Ward, contains an intriguing photo of a family posing in 1887 with an elaborate pipe organ, outdoors, amid livestock and farming implements. The caption says the family matriarch insisted on situating the organ, the family's prized possession, in a spot where family back East could see it and not the unfortunate sod house they called home.
By contrast, several sources today estimate the average American home contains about 300,000 items. Which of them would we choose to pull outside to impress distant relatives?
NBC News reports that 84% believe their houses aren't clean or well-organized enough, and 55% say this causes a great deal of stress.
But those figures are eight years old, meaning we probably have a lot more now — both things and stress. More isn't always better, but we seem incapable of stopping ourselves.
The Wall Street Journal this week said the U.S. is home to about 80% of the world's storage facilities, and many people stuff them full of things they can't throw away, but can't keep at home, either. Many soon forget what they put there.
The Journal cites a survey by Storable that found 71% of Americans end up repurchasing things they own but can no longer find. It quotes Julie Hall, founder of an estate-clearance company, saying, 'We're battling a tsunami of stuff, and the stuff is winning.'
And many, myself included, struggle to absorb things passed on by deceased relatives.
I suspect I've touched on a problem here that's completely separate from any notion of the American dream.
In the end, my wife had to save a little longer before buying those shoes. Delayed gratification was a bigger part of life back then. We didn't know it, but that wasn't a bad thing, especially compared to the unsatisfying regrets many experience today from impulse buying and clutter.
Would a round of tariff-induced '70s-style inflation bring a return to those days and put a stop to our self-inflicted madness? I don't know, but I suspect the $1.21 trillion that Americans collectively owe in credit card debt offers a clue.
We probably don't need someone in Washington telling us we're not living the dream.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
‘Come and get me': Gavin Newsom has entered the meme war
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has found himself in the center of the internet's spotlight after squaring off with President Donald Trump on social media over the deployment of military troops to counter protesters in Los Angeles. While police deployed tear gas and shot at protesters in Los Angeles with rubber bullets on Monday, Newsom shared a screenshot on TikTok of a Washington Post headline reporting that California would sue Trump over the National Guard's presence, paired with a trending sound sampled from the movie 'Mean Girls. ' The video was captioned 'We will not stand while Donald Trump illegally federalizes the National Guard' and was liked more than 255,000 times.

Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.


Washington Post
22 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump-endorsed Jack Ciattarelli wins Republican primary for New Jersey governor
Jack Ciattarelli easily won the Republican nomination for New Jersey governor on Tuesday with President Donald Trump's endorsement, setting up a November general election expected to be an early national bellwether for voters' views in the first year of Trump's second term. Ciattarelli was projected the winner shortly after the polls closed, the Associated Press reported. The winner of the crowded Democratic primary was not immediately clear Tuesday night, with six candidates splitting the vote in the most expensive election in New Jersey history. Trump played a central role in the Democrats' contest, too, as the candidates vowed to fight the White House and questioned each others' anti-Trump credentials.