logo
The S&P 500 flirts with it's all-time high, oil futures rise 1.4% after Middle East ceasefire

The S&P 500 flirts with it's all-time high, oil futures rise 1.4% after Middle East ceasefire

Yahoo5 hours ago

The S&P 500 closed the day at 6,092, just 51 points off its all-time high of 6,144 from February. Oil prices recovered from, rising 1.4% today, as tensions in the Middle East settled. Across the board other macro issues from tariffs to the looming spending bill also sat in limbo, easing uncertainty for markets.
Despite little change in the U.S. stocks on Wednesday, investors watched the markets closely.
The S&P 500 closed the day just 51 points off from its all-time high closing price of ​​6,144 on February 19.
The Dow Jones closed the day down about 106 points, but still higher than its mid-afternoon lows on Monday. Meanwhile, the tech-heavy Nasdaq finished up 0.3%, closing Tuesday at 19,974. It is also flirting with a return to its all-time high of 20,173 points from December 16, 2024.
The fact U.S. equities are not just recovering from their April rout, but rebounding to the record highs they saw before President Donald Trump's tariff policies, indicates markets may have started readjusting to the era of increased uncertainty investors find themselves in.
Overall levels of market uncertainty have declined compared to their peaks in the immediate aftermath of Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policy. (A point reiterated by Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell during congressional testimony on Tuesday). But market conditions have not returned to the humdrum routine that investors welcome.
On the other hand, the many issues that could roil markets—from the Middle East, to the looming inflationary impacts of tariffs, to an unprecedented government spending bill—are in a holding pattern. Yes, they haven't been solved but neither have they worsened.
The U.S. announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Trump stopped removing and reinstituting tariffs on a daily basis like he had been just a few weeks ago. The U.S. and China appear to be working on a trade deal but, there is nothing concrete other than the removal of the more than 100% tariffs they'd placed on each other. The spending bill, which would send the deficit skyrocketing, is for now, mired in the sandpits of the American legislative branch.
This week started with slumps in the equities market over fears the conflict in the Middle East would disrupt oil flows. But what a difference a couple of days can make.
On Wednesday oil futures were up 1.4% after falling earlier this week.
Stocks also saw a similar drop earlier this week. After Monday's initial shock, a muted and fairly surprising reaction followed, noted Jake Schurmeier, portfolio manager at Harbor Capital and a former member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Markets Group.
'The risk premium in markets lasted all of five hours,' Schurmeier told Fortune. 'I think the answer could be that markets are becoming more efficient in getting used to these geopolitical blips.'
The ups and downs of the last few days pointed to a reactionary market, Schurmeier said.
'The broader point is we've become so short term,' he said. 'It all strikes me as very cynical and short-term thinking at this point.'
With choppy markets, including in intraday trading, some investors keep an eye on the long game. Bob Robotti, president and chief investment officer of asset manager Robotti & Company, said he's focused on the structural risks facing the economy rather than short-term geopolitical volatility.
For instance, several major forces are going to drive inflation higher, he said. Key inflationary pressures such as 'all the aspects of tariffs, changing supply chains, extra frictional costs' aren't temporary but represent fundamental shifts in how the global economy operates, Robotti said. He sees the outcome from those shifts resulting in permanently higher prices.
'If inflation is a persistent event and higher interest rates are required, that means lower multiples on everything in the investable world,' Robotti told Fortune. 'This is particularly concerning given the concentration of capital in growth assets and private equity that have benefited from the low-rate environment, making the entire system more vulnerable to an inflationary regime change.'
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CareerBuilder + Monster job search board files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after revenue sinks nearly 40% post-pandemic
CareerBuilder + Monster job search board files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after revenue sinks nearly 40% post-pandemic

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CareerBuilder + Monster job search board files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after revenue sinks nearly 40% post-pandemic

CareerBuilder + Monster, an online job-hunting joint venture, announced on Tuesday that it had filed for bankruptcy in Delaware. Kroger is closing 60 stores: See the list of locations that are reportedly shuttering in 2025 so far Humans have irreversibly changed the planet. These photos prove it 10 mistakes leaders make in crisis that break team trust The company initiated the Chapter 11 process to facilitate a sale of its operations, with assets totaling between $50 million and $100 million and estimated liabilities amounting to between $100 million and $500 million, according to its bankruptcy filing. Fast Company has reached out to the company for comment. The bankruptcy plan calls for the assets to be divided up—with the sale of its jobs board business to JobGet Inc., the sale of Monster Media Properties to Valnet Inc. (which includes and and the sale of Monster Government Services to Valsoft Corp. However, the asset sale is subject to other higher offers, according to the press release. 'For over 25 years, we have been a proud global leader in helping job seekers and companies connect and empower employment across the globe,' Jeff Furman, CEO of CareerBuilder + Monster, said in a statement. 'However, like many others in the industry, our business has been affected by a challenging and uncertain macroeconomic environment. 'In light of these conditions, we ran a robust sale process and carefully evaluated all available options. We determined that initiating this court-supervised sale process is the best path toward maximizing the value of our businesses and preserving jobs.' Furman added that CareerBuilder + Monster also plans to restructure, which would include a reduction of its current workforce, and the company is in talks with Blue Torch Capital for up to $20 million of debtor-in-possession financing. Monster, which dominated the internet job search industry starting in the 1990s, merged with then-struggling CareerBuilder in 2024, with Dutch multinational human resource consulting firm Randstad NV taking a minority stake in that business. Owned by Apollo Global Management, CareerBuilder saw a decline in subscription renewals after the pandemic, from which it never recovered. Although the merger created one mega job board, sales continued to decline, with CareerBuilder's revenue falling to $49.2 million in 2024, a 40% drop compared with 2023, according to Moody's Ratings, as reported by Bloomberg. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What Advice Might Bob Dylan Give Today's Institutional Investors?
What Advice Might Bob Dylan Give Today's Institutional Investors?

Forbes

time29 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What Advice Might Bob Dylan Give Today's Institutional Investors?

American folk-rock singer-songwriter Bob Dylan performing at BBC TV Centre, London, 1st June 1965. ... More (Photo by Val Wilmer/Redferns) Iconic American musician and Nobel Laureate in Literature Bob Dylan's words from 1964 apply to today's markets: 'the times they are a-changin.' As political misalignment in the United States emerges as a material investment risk, investors and companies are increasingly risking their long-term sustainability by downplaying it. Let's examine the hidden cost of downplaying sustainability and why many are underestimating Times Are A-Changin, and Investors Must Change With Them What matters to investors changes over time. This concept of dynamic materiality, first demonstrated by TrueValue Labs (now part of FactSet), can be seen in both cyclical trends and acute shifts. For example, during expansions, when there are tighter labor markets, strong employee relations reduce new issue bond yields, perhaps because strong employee relations help with recruiting and retaining top talent. There is also no relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities as a proxy for social capital and bond spreads. By contrast, during recessions, employee relations scores are insignificant, and high-CSR firms are able to raise more debt at lower spreads, better credit ratings, and longer maturities. These effects are stronger for firms with higher expected costs of debt. In addition to these cyclical trends, there are also acute shifts in materiality, caused by exogenous shocks like COVID-19, which increased the materiality of the following COVID-19 related social issues between January and June 2020: access and affordability, customer privacy, data security, employee health and safety, labor practices, product quality and safety. Today's acute shift in materiality is caused by rapid legal and regulatory change. As of June 22, 2025, President Trump signed 165 executive orders so far this year—the most in a first year of office since President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed 568 executive orders in 1933. The 83 anti-DEI and 56 anti-ESG (ex-DEI) lawsuits only amplify the abrupt legal and regulatory Emergence of Political Misalignment as a Material Risk. Since 2023, anti-DEI and anti-ESG lawsuits have generated hundreds of millions of dollars in legal and settlement costs. This tangible cost is in addition to the intangible cost of management distraction during lawsuits. As a result, political misalignment in the United States is emerging as a material investment risk, and investors and companies are adjusting their public-facing language to minimize the perception of misalignment. Since adjusting language is easier than reversing initiatives or changing values, many investors and companies are more sustainable than their disclosure suggests. This phenomenon is so new that green-hushing, red-washing, and MAGA-washing are all contenders to describe it with no clear frontrunner. Sustainable investing legal expert and New York University Professor Deborah Burand is one of the first academics to research the harm this creates. Pinocchio with leaf. The Case Against Greenwashing Applies to the Case Against Green-Hushing. The sustainable finance industry long advocated against greenwashing (overstating the environmental benefits of an investment or company) and its analogs. This makes sense: transparency and disclosure are material to investing. And the Biden Administration rightly pursued enforcement actions against investors and companies for false and misleading claims, vague language, or failing to disclose material information about negative social or environmental impacts. Admit That the Waters Around You Have Grown CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE - FEBRUARY 16: In this handout provided by the Clarksville Fire Rescue, ... More Clarksville Fire Rescue members perform water rescues to evacuate trapped people during flooding on February 16, 2025 in Clarksville, Tennessee. Severe winter storms brought torrential rains causing intense flooding in Tennessee and parts of Florida and Georgia. (Photo by Clarksville Fire Rescue via Getty Images) Sustainable investors and companies must strike a fine balance. Organizations can mitigate the risk of legal and regulatory challenges from the Trump administration and its supporters—with their headlines, legal expenses, and management distraction—by green-hushing. Avoiding scrutiny may feel safer in this environment. At the same time, this green-hushing can obscure accountability, disperse management and board focus, prevent sharing best practices and lessons learned, and diminish the ability of other organizations to be transparent about their values. Research from Arshia Farzamfar, Pouyan Foroughi, Lilian Ng, and Linyang Yu shows that firms pressured to improve environmental performance do so at the expense of social status, committing more compliance violations related to employment, healthcare, workplace safety, and consumer protection. It is too early for peer-reviewed research linking pressure to reduce political misalignment with committing more violations of fiduciary duty or duty to the mission. Particularly for investors and companies where sustainability drives long-term value creation or aligns with the mission or stakeholder values, this remains a space to watch. Downplaying sustainability can also diminish trust with employees, investors, and other clients who struggle to understand how investors and companies who publicly touted their commitment to sustainability in 2021, 2022, and even 2023 can reverse course so quickly. For example, at least twelve lawyers resigned from law firms that made deals with the Trump administration; Danish pension fund Akademiker terminated an over $400 million 20-year relationship with State Street due to sustainability concerns; and several companies faced boycotts after rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Losing talent, assets, and revenues can slow long-term value creation. These harms extend beyond the organizations choosing to downplay sustainability. Law firms settling with the Trump administration weakened fundamental protections. And when the Gates Foundation extricated itself from the fire by pivoting a scholarship originally for racial and ethnic minorities to Pell Grants (which are based on income and primarily benefit minorities), it became more difficult for other investors and companies to pursue Alternative: Building Resilience And Building Communities A long line of concrete blocks stretches across the sandy beach, creating a visible boundary on the ... More shore. Before deciding to downplay their sustainability, investors and companies may instead consider how to build the resilience to withstand the legal and regulatory risks of preserving their narrative on sustainability. They may wish to form communities of practice to share best practices and lessons learned with similar institutions. Or they simply may wish to dedicate more time to comparing notes with peers one-on-one. Perhaps it's time for these investors and companies to take inspiration from Bob Dylan and 'admit that the waters…have grown…and start swimmin.'

Rocket Lab (RKLB) Jumps 9% on New Mission Launch
Rocket Lab (RKLB) Jumps 9% on New Mission Launch

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rocket Lab (RKLB) Jumps 9% on New Mission Launch

Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) is one of the . Rocket Lab extended its winning streak to a third straight day on Monday, jumping 9.12 percent to end at $32.78 apiece as investors repositioned portfolios ahead of the launch of the Symphony in the Stars mission. In a post on X, Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) said that its next launch attempt for the mission was scheduled for Tuesday, June 24th, at 7 PM NZT, or 3AM EDT. Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) attempted to launch the Symphony in the Stars on Friday but scrapped the plan due to strong winds. In other news, Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) received a higher price target from Cantor Fitzgerald—$35 versus the $29 previously. The latter also maintained its 'overweight' rating on the stock. A launch pad atop a grassy hill, smoke filled sky from a successful voyage to space. Cantor Fitzgerald said that its revision was based on Rocket Lab Corporation's (NASDAQ:RKLB) successful space launch track record, which positions it in the industry. While we acknowledge the potential of RKLB as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store