logo
Rare trial to begin in challenge to Trump-backed deportations of pro-Palestinian campus activists

Rare trial to begin in challenge to Trump-backed deportations of pro-Palestinian campus activists

Straits Times13 hours ago
FILE PHOTO: Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil speaks at a rally to welcome him home after being released from immigration custody, outside the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City, U.S., June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Caitlin Ochs/File Photo
BOSTON - Groups representing U.S. university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial.
A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government.
In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. But U.S. District Judge William Young in keeping with his long-standing practice instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the "best way to get at truth."
The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views.
Since then, the administration has canceled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student who was taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza.
In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association.
They allege the State Department and Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them as well.
That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to "vigorously" combat anti-Semitism.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for "these lunatics."
The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023.
Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it.
"We don't deport people based on ideology," Homeland Security Department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem "has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism - think again. You are not welcome here," McLaughlin said.
The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case.
Young has described the lawsuit as "an important free speech case" and said that as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, "it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practicing protected political speech."
The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan.
While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the "virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional.
Young last month after another non-jury trial delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants that were unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US: Stocks retreat from records on Trump tariff deluge
US: Stocks retreat from records on Trump tariff deluge

Business Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Business Times

US: Stocks retreat from records on Trump tariff deluge

[NEW YORK] Wall Street stocks fell on Monday, retreating from records after President Donald Trump announced fresh tariff threats, reviving anxiety about trade uncertainty. Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq had closed at records last week following solid US jobs data and passage of Trump's sprawling fiscal passage that extended tax cuts. But Trump announced plans for 25 per cent levies on Japan and South Korea if the countries don't reach a deal with Washington, while also warning of another 10 percent tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging Brics nations. The moves lifted investor anxiety at a time when some investors have expressed worries about swelling equity valuations. The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished down 0.9 per cent at 44,406.36. The broad-based S&P 500 declined 0.8 per cent to 6,229.98, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index shed 0.9 per cent to 20,412.52. The likelihood that Trump's statements are a bargaining tactic is one reason losses weren't 'even worse,' said Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'No one really wants to overreact negatively right now, which is why we're seeing a bit of a sell-off, but not a major sell-off,' he said. Trump's unresolved trade policy has received less attention in recent weeks as Congress weighed the president's fiscal package, which included controversial cuts to federal health care and other social service programmes. The clash between Iran and Israel had also overshadowed trade. But trade was always going to come back into focus after the White House set a July 9 deadline to reach agreements. The administration now says it will hike tariffs on August 1 on trading partners that don't strike a deal. Among individual companies, Tesla tumbled 6.3 per cent after Trump blasted CEO Elon Musk's plan to launch a new political party in opposition to the president's hallmark legislation, the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The back-and-forth escalated a conflict between the president and the world's richest man at a time when investors had hoped Musk would refocus on Tesla and his other ventures and shift attention from politics. AFP

Brics tariff to be applied only if they adopt policies deemed ‘anti-American', source says
Brics tariff to be applied only if they adopt policies deemed ‘anti-American', source says

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Brics tariff to be applied only if they adopt policies deemed ‘anti-American', source says

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Leaders of the BRICS group pose for the family photo during the BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil July 7, 2025. REUTERS/Pilar Olivares WASHINGTON - The Trump administration will not immediately impose a new 10% tariff against members of the developing nation BRICS bloc, but will proceed if countries take so-called "anti-American" policy actions, according to a source familiar with the matter. President Donald Trump said on Sunday that the United States will impose an additional 10% tariff on any countries aligning themselves with so-called "anti-American policies" of the BRICS group of developing nations, triggering sharp denials from its members that they were oriented against the United States. "A line is being drawn. If policy decisions are made that are anti-American, then the tariff will be charged," said the source, who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak on the matter. No executive order has been released by the White House. Trump's announcement, made on his Truth Social media platform, came as India, Indonesia and other countries within the BRICS group were negotiating last-minute trade deals with the U.S. government ahead of a July 9 deadline when tariff rates had been scheduled to go up. The effective date for those tariffs has now been postponed until August 1. Trade experts said the new tariff threat was aimed at maintaining and increasing pressure on countries seeking to avoid high tariffs proposed by Trump in April. Many BRICS members and partner countries are highly dependent on trade with the United States. Trump's posting came hours after BRICS leaders issued a 31-page statement in which they condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran, called for reforms to global institutions and warned that unilateral tariffs threatened global trade. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87 Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain The first BRICS summit in 2009 was attended by leaders from Brazil, China, India and Russia, with South Africa joining later. Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates were included last year, and Saudi Arabia, while accepted as a member, is participating as a partner country. Other partner countries include Bolivia, Nigeria, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Uganda. Trump has close ties to leaders of some of those countries, such as Saudi Arabia and UAE, and has been touting the prospect of a trade deal with India for weeks. His administration concluded a framework trade deal with Vietnam last week, and has been in talks about a similar agreement with Thailand. In the BRICS leaders Sunday statement, they condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran by Israel, a U.S. ally, and called for reforms to global institutions, warning that the rise in "unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures" threatened global trade. It was not immediately clear if Trump's latest tariff threat would derail trade talks underway with India, Indonesia and other BRICS nations. South Africa insisted it was not "anti-American" and said its talks with the U.S. government remained constructive. Indonesia, keen to avert a threatened 32% tariff rate, is due to sign a $34 billion pact with U.S. partners this week and has offered to cut duties on key imports from the United States to "near zero" and to buy $500 million worth of U.S. wheat. REUTERS

US stocks fall from records as tariff angst returns
US stocks fall from records as tariff angst returns

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US stocks fall from records as tariff angst returns

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A trader works on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange on July 7. NEW YORK - Wall Street stocks fell on July 7, retreating from records after President Donald Trump announced fresh tariff threats, reviving anxiety about trade uncertainty. Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq had closed at records last week following solid US jobs data and passage of Mr Trump's sprawling fiscal passage that extended tax cuts. But Mr Trump announced plans for 25 per cent levies on Japan and South Korea if the countries don't reach a deal with Washington, while also warning of another 10 per cent tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging Brics nations. The moves lifted investor anxiety at a time when some investors have expressed worries about swelling equity valuations. The Dow Jones Industrial Average finished down 0.9 per cent at 44,406.36. The broad-based S&P 500 declined 0.8 per cent to 6,229.98, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index shed 0.9 per cent to 20,412.52. The likelihood that Mr Trump's statements are a bargaining tactic is one reason losses weren't 'even worse,' said Mr Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87 Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain 'No one really wants to overreact negatively right now, which is why we're seeing a bit of a sell-off, but not a major sell-off,' he said. Mr Trump's unresolved trade policy has received less attention in recent weeks as Congress weighed the president's fiscal package, which included controversial cuts to federal health care and other social service programmes. The clash between Iran and Israel had also overshadowed trade. But trade was always going to come back into focus after the White House set a July 9 deadline to reach agreements. The administration now says it will hike tariffs on Aug 1 on trading partners that don't strike a deal. Among individual companies, Tesla tumbled 6.3 per cent after Mr Trump blasted CEO Elon Musk's plan to launch a new political party in opposition to the president's hallmark legislation, the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The back-and-forth escalated a conflict between the president and the world's richest man at a time when investors had hoped Mr Musk would refocus on Tesla and his other ventures and shift attention from politics. AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store