logo
Rare trial to begin in challenge to Trump-backed deportations of pro-Palestinian campus activists

Rare trial to begin in challenge to Trump-backed deportations of pro-Palestinian campus activists

Straits Times07-07-2025
FILE PHOTO: Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil speaks at a rally to welcome him home after being released from immigration custody, outside the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City, U.S., June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Caitlin Ochs/File Photo
BOSTON - Groups representing U.S. university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial.
A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government.
In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. But U.S. District Judge William Young in keeping with his long-standing practice instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the "best way to get at truth."
The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views.
Since then, the administration has canceled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student who was taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza.
In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association.
They allege the State Department and Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them as well.
That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to "vigorously" combat anti-Semitism.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for "these lunatics."
The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023.
Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it.
"We don't deport people based on ideology," Homeland Security Department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem "has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism - think again. You are not welcome here," McLaughlin said.
The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case.
Young has described the lawsuit as "an important free speech case" and said that as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, "it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practicing protected political speech."
The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan.
While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the "virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional.
Young last month after another non-jury trial delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants that were unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai trans woman arrested over walking topless in Sri Lanka
Thai trans woman arrested over walking topless in Sri Lanka

Straits Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Thai trans woman arrested over walking topless in Sri Lanka

Find out what's new on ST website and app. The 26-year-old pleaded guilty on July 15 to two charges of indecent exposure and causing distress to others at Arugam Bay. Colombo - Sri Lankan police arrested a Thai trans woman for walking topless at a surfing resort and causing a 'public nuisance', an officer said July 15. In largely conservative Sri Lanka, women going topless is an offence, while men are allowed to leave their torsos uncovered. The 26-year-old, whose Thai passport says she is male but who identifies as a woman, pleaded guilty on July 15 to two charges of indecent exposure and causing distress to others at Arugam Bay. A court handed her a suspended six-week sentence after social media posts showed her walking along a touristic beach strip on July 14. 'She was detained at the police station overnight and taken before the magistrate today following a lot of complaints from residents as well as on social media,' a local police officer told AFP. The magistrate had suspended the sentence for five years, meaning there will be no immediate imprisonment. Any repeat offence, however, would result in her having to serve the six-week term. Arugam Bay, nearly 400km from the capital Colombo, is a popular surfing destination. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Las Vegas Sands' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong Singapore 'Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction Business US tariffs may last well after Trump; crucial for countries to deepen trade ties: SM Lee Asia India foreign minister's China visit marks restart in relations amid capricious US trade policy Multimedia Telling the Singapore story for 180 years Life Walking for exercise? Here are tips on how to do it properly Singapore CDL's long-time director Philip Yeo to depart after boardroom feud Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years The local community, largely made up of minority Muslims, had complained to authorities in recent weeks about scantily clad foreigners. While Sri Lanka, a Buddhist-majority country of 22 million people, welcomes tourists, nudity is prohibited and the general population remains conservative in outlook. Tourism has long been a key source of foreign exchange for the country, which is still recovering from its worst-ever economic crisis in 2022. The economy has since stabilised, thanks to an International Monetary Fund bailout in 2023 and the return of tourists following the Covid pandemic. AFP

Russian drones, missiles hit Ukrainian cities, officials say
Russian drones, missiles hit Ukrainian cities, officials say

Straits Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Russian drones, missiles hit Ukrainian cities, officials say

Russian drones and missiles attacked widely separated areas of Ukraine, officials said early on Wednesday, with at least two people reported killed. National emergency services reported two deaths in drone strikes east of the northeastern city of Kharkiv near the town of Kupiansk, an area which has been under Russian attack for several months. In Kharkiv itself, also a frequent target of Russian attacks, regional Governor Oleh Syniehubov said at least 17 explosions were recorded in a 20-minute drone attack in which three people were injured. The head of the military administration in the southeastern town of Kryvyi Rih, Oleksander Vilkul, said Russian forces had deployed missiles and drones in an extended attack that knocked out power and water supplies. The regional governor said there had been an unspecified number of injuries. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said air defence units had gone into action for a time in the capital, but there were no reports of casualties or damage. Russian forces have stepped up air attacks on Ukrainian cities, with record numbers of drones being fired last week. Ukraine's military has also attacked Russian targets, often linked to the energy system. Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes during the war that Russia launched against Ukraine more than three years ago. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. REUTERS Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Las Vegas Sands' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong Singapore 'Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction Business US tariffs may last well after Trump; crucial for countries to deepen trade ties: SM Lee Asia India foreign minister's China visit marks restart in relations amid capricious US trade policy Multimedia Telling the Singapore story for 180 years Life Walking for exercise? Here are tips on how to do it properly Singapore CDL's long-time director Philip Yeo to depart after boardroom feud Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years

Europe E3 re-emerges as economic and political powerhouse
Europe E3 re-emerges as economic and political powerhouse

Business Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Europe E3 re-emerges as economic and political powerhouse

GERMAN Chancellor Friedrich Merz makes his first official visit to the United Kingdom on Thursday (Jul 17) to sign a landmark bilateral friendship deal. The agreement confirms not only warmer economic and political ties between London and Berlin, but also the post-Brexit re-emergence of the longstanding, so-called E3 group which includes France too. For much of the period since the UK's 2016 referendum on its European Union membership, relations between these top three European economies have been chilly. The ardently pro-Brussels French President Emmanuel Macron and his various German counterparts, including former chancellor Angela Merkel, still believe Brexit to be an act of political vandalism to the continent. So much so in fact that Poland, the largest economy in Central and Eastern Europe, has increasingly been perceived as a challenger for the third slot in Europe's post-Brexit E3 group. This Paris-Berlin-Warsaw trilateral relationship is sometimes called the Weimar Triangle. However, since the Ukraine war began, this German-French-Polish axis has had less prominence, important as it remains. The reasons behind this include Poland's cultivation of its economic and political relationship with the United States following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. So in the period since the pandemic – which saw the Ukraine conflict and Donald Trump become the US president for the second time – there has been a growing realisation in France and Germany of the need to collaborate more with the UK, and vice versa. This has seen the three G7 and G20 nations re-emerge as a triumvirate of regional powers, including in their quest to build Europe's relationship with Trump. This rejuvenated E3 dynamic has been evident on several high-profile platforms, including when then US president Joe Biden visited Berlin on Oct 18 last year. The European leaders he met for a quadrilateral meeting during his stay were UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Macron and then German chancellor Olaf Scholz. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The warmer ties between London and Berlin will be deepened on Thursday in a treaty that will cover defence, economic growth, and wider issues. It will reportedly include a mutual assistance clause specifying that a threat to one nation would be regarded as a threat to the other. This week's UK-German deal is key as it helps cement the E3 trilateral alliance. France is already linked to Germany via the Aachen Treaty and to the UK via the Lancaster House Treaty. The relationship between Starmer and Merz could be especially key for European and wider international relations in the coming years. Both are potentially key reformers whose periods in office may overlap with the next UK election probably in 2028 or 2029, and the next Germany ballot expected in 2029. At the same time as there are warming ties between Berlin and London, the relationship between Paris and London, as well as between Paris and Berlin, is warming up too. Of course, the Franco-German alliance has long been the motor of European integration in the post-World War II era and Macron enjoyed a generally positive relationship with Merkel, which allowed them to achieve much together on the international stage. However, cooperation between the two powers ebbs and flows depending upon the personalities of the office holders in Berlin and Paris. Merz's predecessor as chancellor, Scholz, and Macron, had an uneven relationship, but this may be changing in a positive direction under Merz. Meanwhile, warmer Franco-UK ties were showcased again last week with Macron making his first ever UK state visit, to London and Windsor Castle. The last such state trip by a French president to the UK was by Nicolas Sarkozy almost two decades ago in 2008. Whereas much of the UK-German bilateral relationship has centred on economics, security is key to UK-French ties as both are nuclear states with UN Security Council permanent membership, unlike other European partners. The Lancaster House deal between the two powers opened a window to jointly update nuclear arsenals which is as yet unfulfilled, and there is potential for broader military coordination. Positive as the re-emergence of the UK-French-German E3 relationship is for Europe, the ties will continue to have challenges in the post-Brexit era. This is especially so between the UK and France, and the UK and Germany. Take the example of the ties between Paris and London. Macron had one of the hardest stances on the UK's exit from the EU in the period from 2016. This reflects the complex, contradictory relationship that Paris has long had with London in the context of European affairs. Macron's Brexit positioning, including his robust stance on precluding future UK economic access to the single market, was reinforced by broader French plans to pitch Paris as a competing financial centre to London which began in earnest under the presidency of Francois Hollande. This saw former finance minister Michel Sapin and Hollande's Brexit special envoy Christian Noyer – a former Bank of France governor – openly promoting Paris with key financial firms. This has continued under Macron as he hailed the decision to relocate the European Banking Authority (EBA) to Paris from London as a 'recognition of France's attractiveness and European commitment'. French officials hope that the EBA's relocation will help bring still more UK banking jobs to France's capital city. What France's position on Brexit underlines is how each EU state has distinctive political, economic and social interests that have informed their stance on the UK's exit. Thus, while the EU-27 were, in general, remarkably unified in their negotiations with London, the positions of the individual countries varied according to factors such as trade and wider economic ties and patterns of migration with the UK, domestic election pressures, and levels of eurosceptic support within their populaces. While the position of Paris has now moderated, the two nations remain misaligned in some key areas, including fishing rights. Another example is migration, where Starmer is under growing pressure to stop people illegally crossing the English Channel from France. Last week, Starmer and Macron agreed a new 'one in, one out' returns scheme which would see the UK deporting to France undocumented people arriving in small boats, in return for accepting an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with UK family connections. However, only time will tell how successful this will be in halting illegal migrants making so-called small boat crossings. Taken together, all of these developments underline that the E3's re-emergence has significant potential to increase collaboration further between Europe's leading three economies. However, the distinctive post-Brexit interests of each state will continue to cause tensions from time to time, which will remain a barrier to the full resetting of the trilateral relations. The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store