Europe E3 re-emerges as economic and political powerhouse
For much of the period since the UK's 2016 referendum on its European Union membership, relations between these top three European economies have been chilly. The ardently pro-Brussels French President Emmanuel Macron and his various German counterparts, including former chancellor Angela Merkel, still believe Brexit to be an act of political vandalism to the continent.
So much so in fact that Poland, the largest economy in Central and Eastern Europe, has increasingly been perceived as a challenger for the third slot in Europe's post-Brexit E3 group. This Paris-Berlin-Warsaw trilateral relationship is sometimes called the Weimar Triangle.
However, since the Ukraine war began, this German-French-Polish axis has had less prominence, important as it remains. The reasons behind this include Poland's cultivation of its economic and political relationship with the United States following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
So in the period since the pandemic – which saw the Ukraine conflict and Donald Trump become the US president for the second time – there has been a growing realisation in France and Germany of the need to collaborate more with the UK, and vice versa. This has seen the three G7 and G20 nations re-emerge as a triumvirate of regional powers, including in their quest to build Europe's relationship with Trump.
This rejuvenated E3 dynamic has been evident on several high-profile platforms, including when then US president Joe Biden visited Berlin on Oct 18 last year. The European leaders he met for a quadrilateral meeting during his stay were UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Macron and then German chancellor Olaf Scholz.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The warmer ties between London and Berlin will be deepened on Thursday in a treaty that will cover defence, economic growth, and wider issues. It will reportedly include a mutual assistance clause specifying that a threat to one nation would be regarded as a threat to the other.
This week's UK-German deal is key as it helps cement the E3 trilateral alliance. France is already linked to Germany via the Aachen Treaty and to the UK via the Lancaster House Treaty.
The relationship between Starmer and Merz could be especially key for European and wider international relations in the coming years. Both are potentially key reformers whose periods in office may overlap with the next UK election probably in 2028 or 2029, and the next Germany ballot expected in 2029.
At the same time as there are warming ties between Berlin and London, the relationship between Paris and London, as well as between Paris and Berlin, is warming up too. Of course, the Franco-German alliance has long been the motor of European integration in the post-World War II era and Macron enjoyed a generally positive relationship with Merkel, which allowed them to achieve much together on the international stage.
However, cooperation between the two powers ebbs and flows depending upon the personalities of the office holders in Berlin and Paris. Merz's predecessor as chancellor, Scholz, and Macron, had an uneven relationship, but this may be changing in a positive direction under Merz.
Meanwhile, warmer Franco-UK ties were showcased again last week with Macron making his first ever UK state visit, to London and Windsor Castle. The last such state trip by a French president to the UK was by Nicolas Sarkozy almost two decades ago in 2008.
Whereas much of the UK-German bilateral relationship has centred on economics, security is key to UK-French ties as both are nuclear states with UN Security Council permanent membership, unlike other European partners. The Lancaster House deal between the two powers opened a window to jointly update nuclear arsenals which is as yet unfulfilled, and there is potential for broader military coordination.
Positive as the re-emergence of the UK-French-German E3 relationship is for Europe, the ties will continue to have challenges in the post-Brexit era. This is especially so between the UK and France, and the UK and Germany.
Take the example of the ties between Paris and London. Macron had one of the hardest stances on the UK's exit from the EU in the period from 2016.
This reflects the complex, contradictory relationship that Paris has long had with London in the context of European affairs.
Macron's Brexit positioning, including his robust stance on precluding future UK economic access to the single market, was reinforced by broader French plans to pitch Paris as a competing financial centre to London which began in earnest under the presidency of Francois Hollande. This saw former finance minister Michel Sapin and Hollande's Brexit special envoy Christian Noyer – a former Bank of France governor – openly promoting Paris with key financial firms.
This has continued under Macron as he hailed the decision to relocate the European Banking Authority (EBA) to Paris from London as a 'recognition of France's attractiveness and European commitment'. French officials hope that the EBA's relocation will help bring still more UK banking jobs to France's capital city.
What France's position on Brexit underlines is how each EU state has distinctive political, economic and social interests that have informed their stance on the UK's exit.
Thus, while the EU-27 were, in general, remarkably unified in their negotiations with London, the positions of the individual countries varied according to factors such as trade and wider economic ties and patterns of migration with the UK, domestic election pressures, and levels of eurosceptic support within their populaces.
While the position of Paris has now moderated, the two nations remain misaligned in some key areas, including fishing rights. Another example is migration, where Starmer is under growing pressure to stop people illegally crossing the English Channel from France.
Last week, Starmer and Macron agreed a new 'one in, one out' returns scheme which would see the UK deporting to France undocumented people arriving in small boats, in return for accepting an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with UK family connections. However, only time will tell how successful this will be in halting illegal migrants making so-called small boat crossings.
Taken together, all of these developments underline that the E3's re-emergence has significant potential to increase collaboration further between Europe's leading three economies. However, the distinctive post-Brexit interests of each state will continue to cause tensions from time to time, which will remain a barrier to the full resetting of the trilateral relations.
The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
More than 220 UK MPs urge Starmer to recognise Palestinian state
Find out what's new on ST website and app. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is under pressure from more than 200 MPs - including dozens in his own party - to formally recognise a Palestinian state. LONDON - More than 220 British MPs, including dozens from the ruling Labour party, demanded on July 25 that the UK government formally recognise a Palestinian state, further increasing pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The call, in a letter signed by lawmakers from nine UK political parties, came less than 24 hours after French President Emmanuel Macron said that his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state at a UN meeting in September. France would be the first Group of 7 country – and the most powerful European nation to date – to make the move, already drawing condemnation from Israel and the United States. Mr Starmer has come under rising domestic and international pressure over recognising Palestinian statehood, as opposition intensifies to the ongoing war in Gaza amid fears of mass starvation there. 'We urge you to officially recognise the state of Palestine at the Conference next week,' the 221 UK lawmakers wrote in the joint letter, referring to a July 28-29 UN Conference co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia in New York. 'Whilst we appreciate the UK does not have it in its power to bring about a free and independent Palestine, UK recognition would have a significant impact,' it said. The signatories, from parties including the centre-right Conservatives and centrist Liberal Democrats, as well as regional parties in Scotland and Wales, cited Britain's 'historic connections and our membership on the UN Security Council'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore SMRT to pay lower fine of $2.4m for EWL disruption; must invest at least $600k to boost reliability Singapore MRT service changes needed to modify 3 East-West Line stations on Changi Airport stretch: LTA Singapore S'pore could have nuclear energy 'within a few years', if it decides on it: UN nuclear watchdog chief Life 'Do you kill children?': Even before independence, S'pore has always loved its over-the-top campaigns Singapore Lung damage, poor brain development, addiction: What vaping does to the body Singapore Tipsy Collective sues former directors, HR head; alleges $14m lost from misconduct, poor decisions Singapore Fine for couple whose catering companies owed $432,000 in salaries to 103 employees Singapore Kopi, care and conversation: How this 20-year-old helps improve the well-being of the elderly They also noted the country's role in helping to create the state of Israel through the 1917 Balfour Declaration. 'Responsibility' 'Since 1980, we have backed a two-state solution. Such a recognition would give that position substance as well as living up to a historic responsibility we have to the people,' they added. In the face of growing pressure on the issue, the UK government has maintained its longstanding stance that it supports a two-state solution to the conflict in the Middle East. But it has insisted that the conditions are currently not right for formal recognition of a Palestinian state. In a statement on July 25, following a call about Gaza with his counterparts in France and Germany, Mr Starmer said he was 'working on a pathway to peace in the region'. 'Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan,' he added. A number of factors could deter Mr Starmer from making the move, including wanting to avoid angering US President Donald Trump. The American leader, who lands later on July 25 in Scotland for a five-day visit, dismissed Mr Macron's announcement before departing Washington, saying it 'doesn't carry weight'. The pressure around recognising Palestinian statehood has been building on Mr Starmer's government, with nearly 60 Labour MPs reportedly urging Foreign Secretary David Lammy to make the move in a private letter earlier in July. Meanwhile, Mr Macron raised the issue during his UK state visit this month, publicly urging London to work with Paris on a formal recognition announcement. AFP

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Iran says it held ‘frank' nuclear talks with European powers
Find out what's new on ST website and app. A European delegation leaving the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul, following nuclear talks on July 25. ISTANBUL - Iranian diplomats said they held 'frank and detailed' nuclear talks on July 25 with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, who have threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran fails to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors. The meeting in Istanbul was the first since Israel launched an attack on Iran in June targeting key nuclear and military sites, sparking a 12-day war and leading Tehran to pull away from working with the UN watchdog. The European diplomats were seen leaving the Iranian consulate shortly before 1100 GMT (7pm in Singapore) after spending several hours inside. Israel's offensive – which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others and in which residential areas and military sites were struck – also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April. Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger a so-called 'snapback mechanism' under a moribund 2015 nuclear deal that would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August. The sanctions trigger expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Mr Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended the talks alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Mr Takht-Ravanchi, wrote on X that he had used the meeting to criticise the European stance on the 12-day conflict with Israel. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore SMRT to pay lower fine of $2.4m for EWL disruption; must invest at least $600k to boost reliability Singapore MRT service changes needed to modify 3 East-West Line stations on Changi Airport stretch: LTA Singapore S'pore could have nuclear energy 'within a few years', if it decides on it: UN nuclear watchdog chief Life 'Do you kill children?': Even before independence, S'pore has always loved its over-the-top campaigns Singapore Lung damage, poor brain development, addiction: What vaping does to the body Singapore Tipsy Collective sues former directors, HR head; alleges $14m lost from misconduct, poor decisions Singapore Fine for couple whose catering companies owed $432,000 in salaries to 103 employees Singapore Kopi, care and conversation: How this 20-year-old helps improve the well-being of the elderly He said the snapback mechanism had also been discussed, adding: 'It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue.' Mr Takht-Ravanchi told state news agency IRNA the Iranian side had demanded 'punitive sanctions' be lifted 'as soon as possible'. Before the talks, a European source said the three countries were preparing to trigger the mechanism 'in the absence of a negotiated solution'. The source urged Iran to make 'clear gestures' on uranium enrichment and resuming cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. 'Common ground' Mr Gharibabadi warned earlier in the week that triggering sanctions – which would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy – would be 'completely illegal'. He accused European powers of 'halting their commitments' under the 2015 deal, which the United States unilaterally withdrew from in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. 'We have warned them of the risks, but we are still seeking common ground to manage the situation,' said Mr Gharibabadi. Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if sanctions were reimposed. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European powers to trigger the mechanism. Israel's June 13 attack on Iran came two days before Tehran and Washington were scheduled to meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations. On June 22, the US joined Israel's offensive by striking Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Before the war, the US and Iran were divided over uranium enrichment – with Tehran describing it as a 'non-negotiable' right, while Washington called it a 'red line'. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 per cent purity – far above the 3.67 per cent cap under the 2015 deal and close to weapons-grade levels. Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium. A year after the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, Iran began rolling back its commitments, which had placed restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Israel and Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has repeatedly denied. 'New form' Iran insists it will not abandon its nuclear programme, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi describing the position as 'unshakable'. Though he claimed enrichment had come to a halt because of 'serious and severe' damage to nuclear sites caused by US and Israeli strikes, the full extent of the damage sustained in the US bombing remains unclear. Mr Trump claimed at the time the sites had been 'completely destroyed', but US media reports based on Pentagon assessments cast doubt on the scale of destruction . Since the 12-day war, Iran has suspended cooperation with the IAEA, accusing it of bias and failing to condemn the attacks. Inspectors have since left the country but a technical team is expected to return in the coming weeks after Iran said future cooperation would take a 'new form'. Israel has warned it may resume strikes if Iran rebuilds facilities or moves toward weapons capability. Iran has pledged a 'harsh response' to any future attacks. AFP


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Iran, European powers hold first direct nuclear talks since airstrikes as UN deadline nears
ISTANBUL: Iran and European powers held 'serious, frank, and detailed' talks on Friday (Jul 25) over Tehran's nuclear programme, as both sides seek to avoid a lapse of UN sanctions that could be automatically reimposed in October. The meeting in Istanbul marked the first direct contact between Iranian officials and Western diplomats since last month's Israeli and US airstrikes on Iran. It lasted about four hours at Iran's consulate and was attended by representatives from the European Union and the E3 group: France, Britain, and Germany. IRAN AND EUROPE EXCHANGE PROPOSALS Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said both sides presented specific ideas relating to nuclear inspections and sanctions relief. 'While seriously criticising their stances regarding the recent war of aggression against our people, we explained our principled positions, including on the so-called snapback mechanism,' he said. 'It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue.' The E3 nations, along with China and Russia, remain parties to the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States withdrew in 2018. That agreement had lifted international sanctions on Iran in exchange for curbs on its nuclear activities. SANCTIONS DEADLINE LOOMING The talks focused on the expiry of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, which underpins the 2015 nuclear deal and is due to lapse on Oct 18. If no action is taken by then, all UN sanctions on Iran will be lifted. However, the E3 could trigger the 'snapback' mechanism at least 30 days before that date, reimposing sanctions on sectors including energy, banking, and defence. To allow time for this process, European diplomats have set the end of August as a soft deadline to determine whether diplomacy with Iran can be revived. Officials say Tehran would need to make clear commitments, including eventual talks with Washington, renewed cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, and accounting for roughly 400 kg of near-weapons-grade uranium reportedly unaccounted for since last month's strikes. IRAN RESISTS PRESSURE TO EXTEND UN RESOLUTION Tehran has resisted the idea of extending Resolution 2231. A foreign ministry spokesperson called such suggestions 'meaningless and baseless' prior to the Istanbul meeting. Nevertheless, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi expressed cautious optimism. Speaking in Singapore, he said inspection visits could resume this year if technical arrangements are made. 'We need to agree on where to go, how to do it. We need to listen to Iran in terms of what they consider should be the precautions to be taken,' Grossi said. US STRIKES AND NUCLEAR FACILITIES The United States carried out five rounds of talks with Iran prior to June's military action, which President Donald Trump said had 'obliterated' Iran's alleged nuclear weapons ambitions. While Tehran maintains its programme is strictly civilian, NBC News has reported that a US intelligence review concluded that only one of the three targeted sites was heavily damaged, while the other two suffered less extensive harm. Iran has consistently denied it seeks to build a nuclear weapon.