
New US tariffs cloud outlook for exporters in Asia and beyond
Trump has threatened tariffs of up to 200% on imports of pharmaceuticals and has ordered a 100% import tax on computer chips. Most U.S. imports of copper, steel and aluminum are subject to a 50% tariff.
There's still no agreement on what tariffs might apply to products shipped from China. India has no deal yet and faces a potential 50% tariff as Trump pressures it to stop buying oil from Russia.
Recent data shows uncertainty is clouding the outlook for exporters around the world as a rush to beat the tariffs during a pause for negotiation tapers off. Companies are reporting billions of dollars in higher costs or losses due to the higher import duties.
Global financial markets took Thursday's tariff adjustments in stride, with Asian shares and U.S. futures mostly higher.
Here's where things stand in what has proven to be a fast-changing policy landscape.
The tariffs taking effect this week
The tariffs announced on Aug. 1 apply to 66 countries, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands. They are a revised version of what Trump called " reciprocal tariffs," announced on April 2: import taxes of up to 50% on goods from countries that have a trade surplus with the United States, along with 10% 'baseline'' taxes on almost everyone else. That move triggered sell-offs in financial markets and Trump backtracked to allow time for trade talks.
The president has bypassed Congress, which has authority over taxes, by invoking a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency. That's being challenged in court, but the revised tariffs still took effect.
To keep their access to the huge American market, major trading partners have struck deals with Trump. The United Kingdom agreed to 10% tariffs and the European Union, South Korea and Japan accepted U.S. tariffs of 15%. Those are much higher than the low single-digit rates they paid last year, but down from the 30% Trump had ordered for the EU and the 25% he ordered for Japan.
Countries in Africa and Asia are mostly facing lower rates than the ones Trump decreed in April. Thailand, Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines cut deals with Trump, settling for rates of around 20%.
Indonesia views its 19% tariff deal as a leg up against exporters in other countries that will have to pay slightly more, said Fithra Faisal Hastiadi, a spokesperson in the Indonesian president's office.
'We were competing against Vietnam, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and China ... and they are all subject to higher reciprocal tariffs,' Hastiadi said. 'We believe we will stay competitive.'
The latest situation for China and India
Trump has yet to announce whether he will extend an Aug. 12 deadline for reaching a trade agreement with China that would forestall earlier threats of tariffs of up to 245%.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the president is deciding about another 90-day delay to allow time to work out details of an agreement setting tariffs on most products at 50%, including extra import duties related to illicit trade in fentanyl.
Higher import taxes on small parcels from China have hurt smaller factories and layoffs have accelerated, leaving some 200 million workers reliant on 'flexible work' — the gig economy — for their livelihoods, the government estimates.
India also has no broad trade agreement with Trump. On Wednesday, Trump he signed an executive order placing an extra 25% tariff for its purchases of Russian oil, bringing combined U.S. tariffs to 50%.
India's Foreign Ministry has stood firm, saying it began importing oil from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict, a 'necessity compelled by the global market situation.'
The hardest-hit countries
Struggling, impoverished Laos and war-torn Myanmar and Syria face 40-41% rates.
Trump whacked Brazil with a 50% import tax largely because he's unhappy with its treatment of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.
South Africa said the steep 30% rate Trump has ordered on the exporter of precious gems and metals has put 30,000 jobs at risk and left the country scrambling to find new markets outside the United States.
Even wealthy Switzerland is under the gun. Swiss officials were visiting Washington this week to try to stave off a whopping 39% tariff on U.S. imports of its chocolate, watches and other products. The rate is over 2 1/2 times the 15% rate on European Union goods exported to the United States.
Canada and Mexico have their own arrangements
Goods that comply with the 2020 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump negotiated during his first term are excluded from the tariffs.
Even though U.S. neighbor and ally Canada was hit by a 35% tariff after it defied Trump, a staunch supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, by saying it would recognize a Palestinian state, nearly all of its exports to the U.S. remain duty free.
Canada's central bank says 100% of energy exports and 95% of other exports are compliant with the agreement since regional rules mean Canadian and Mexico companies can claim preferential treatment.
The slice of Mexican exports not covered by the USMCA is subject to a 25% tariff, down from an earlier rate of 30%, during a 90-day negotiating period that began last week.
The outlook for businesses
Surveys of factory managers offer monthly insights into export orders, hiring and other indicators of how businesses are faring. The latest figures in the United States and globally mostly showed conditions deteriorating.
In Japan, factory output contracted in July, purchasing activity fell and hiring slowed, according to the S&P Global Manufacturing PMI. But the data were collected before Trump announced a trade deal that cut tariffs on Japanese exports to 15% from 25%.
Similar surveys show a deterioration in manufacturing conditions worldwide, as a boost from 'front loading' export orders to beat higher tariffs faded, S&P Global said. Similar measures for service industries have remained stronger, reflecting more domestic business activity. In Asia, that includes a rebound in tourism across the region.
Corporate bottom lines are also taking a hit. Honda Motor said Wednesday that it estimates the cost from higher tariffs at about $3 billion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
What to know as Trump's immigration crackdown strips tuition breaks from thousands of students
The tuition breaks once enjoyed wide bipartisan support but have increasingly come under criticism from Republicans in recent years. Advertisement Here's what to know about the tuition breaks: Texas' program was blocked first Texas' tuition policy was initially passed with sweeping bipartisan majorities in the Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for students without legal residency already living in the state. Supporters then and now say it boosted the state's economy by creating a better-educated and better-prepared workforce. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The law allowed students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they had lived in Texas for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They also had to sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. Texas now has about 73,000 qualifying students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the most recent estimate from the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The latest estimate is an increase over earlier projections because of a change in its methodology for identifying qualifying students. Advertisement Texas has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities. The difference in tuition rates is substantial. For example, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, a 34,000-student campus along the border with Mexico, a state resident will pay about $10,000 in basic tuition for a minimum full-time class schedule in the upcoming school year. A nonresident student will pay $19,000. Political pushback and a swift end Texas' law stood mostly unchallenged for years, but it came under fire as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry apologized after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.' The law withstood several repeal efforts in the Republican-dominated Legislature. During the legislative session that ended June 2, a repeal bill did not even get a vote. But the ax fell quickly. After the Trump administration filed a lawsuit calling the law unconstitutional, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a key Trump ally, chose not to defend the law in court and instead filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced. In Oklahoma, which the Presidents' Alliance estimates will have about 2,700 students affected, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, filed a similar motion. 'Rewarding foreign nationals who are in our country illegally with lower tuition costs that are not made available to out-of-state American citizens is not only wrong — it is discriminatory and unlawful," Drummond said in a statement. Advertisement Campuses nationwide feel the impact At least 21 states and the University of Michigan system have laws or policies allowing tuition breaks for the immigrant students, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones such as Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Nationwide, the Presidents' Alliance estimates more than 510,000 students without legal resident status are enrolled in colleges and universities, about 85 percent of them in undergraduate programs. Immigration lawyers and education advocates said they are assessing whether there are legal avenues to challenge the rulings.


UPI
a few seconds ago
- UPI
Trump order to broaden how colleges report admissions information
President Donald Trump stands with Education Secretary Linda McMahon as he shows an executive order during in a ceremony at the White House in Washington, D.C. in March. File Photo by Jim Lo Scalzo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 7 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order Thursday that will widen the requirements for colleges to report their admissions information. The order is intended to guarantee that universities turn in the information necessary to show they aren't basing any admissions on race, according to a senior White House official. The directive will allow U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon to overhaul the collection of higher education data, deepen the federal government's reporting requirements and increase penalties for schools that submit inaccurate information. Additionally, the order will make the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System the main national source for information on colleges and universities easier to access and understand. Any defiance of the directive from Trump could impede schools from receiving federal financial assistance. Trump has already pulled billions of dollars in funding from schools over admission requirements and alleged acts of prejudice. The Trump administration also announced Thursday it is investigating Baltimore City Public Schools in Baltimore, Maryland for purportedly allowing "numerous incidents of anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment by teachers and non-Jewish students against Jewish students." Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor said in a press release Thursday that alleged acts of anti-Semitism in the Baltimore schools include a teacher directing a Nazi salute toward a Jewish student and non-Jewish students bullying and harassing Jewish students.


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Dean Cain, 'Superman' and Trump: What the actor turned ICE agent said about the president
With the latest Warner Bros. 'Superman' movie in theaters, the actor who once portrayed the 'Man of Steel' in the '90s revealed he is now a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent. Dean Cain, who played the fictional hero in the TV series 'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman,' revealed the news in a Tuesday, Aug. 5 video posted across his social media platforms. 'I am a sworn law enforcement officer, as well as being a filmmaker, and I felt it was important to join with our first responders to help secure the safety of all,' Cain, 59, said. 'If you want to help save America, ICE is arresting the worst of the worst and removing them from America's streets. I like that. I voted for that.' Here's what he's previously said about President Donald Trump and the latest portrayal of 'Superman' starring David Corenswet, the most recent 'Man of Steel.' Opinion: Superman and the American flag once stood for same things. MAGA changed that. Latest 'woke' Superman Cain, whose comments come amid upped ICE scrutiny in recent months, recently criticized the direction Hollywood has taken Superman, calling its latest portrayal 'woke,' according to an interview with TMZ. The day the movie hit theaters, The White House released a photo of a fake movie poster depicting the president as Superman. 'I love President Trump. I've been friends with him forever,' Variety reported Cain said. 'Trump is actually one of the most empathetic, wonderful, generous people you'll ever meet.' During a June 10 interview on 'Piers Morgan Uncensored,' Cain called the new movie's recurring plot theme 'needs saving.' 'James Gunn and his decision to make Ma and Pa Kent the stupid rednecks. That's a choice,' Cain told Morgan. 'Superman has to be saved, like, repeatedly? Look, don't try and make it all woke and crazy. Keep that character as the way I like him as true justice and the American way.' USA TODAY has reached out to representatives for Cain and ICE for comment. Contributing: USA TODAY's Edward Segarra and Brian Truitt Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.