5 big Steelers storylines during OTAs
On Tuesday of this week, the Pittsburgh Steelers will kick off their organized team activities (OTAs), which lead into the team's first mandatory minicamp of the offseason on June 10. Even though OTAs are optional, the expectation with the Steelers has always been that if you are on the team, you show up. The Steelers roster is in such a state of flux right now that we will be keeping a close eye on every move.
Here are the five big storylines to watch over the course of OTAs.
T.J. Watt's contract
Will T.J. Watt show up for optional activities while he waits on a massive contract extension? We expect to see Watt and see him do a "hold-in" similar to what happened during his last contract negotiation.
Will Aaron Rodgers make an appearance?
No, we don't expect Rodgers to show up before June 10 if at all. But we do want to see how the team's other three quarterbacks respond, knowing the arrival of Rodgers could happen at any time and it's three quarterbacks fighting for two spots on the final 53-man roster.
The wide receiver rotation
DK Metcalf in the starting lineup is a given. But between the rest of the guys on the roster, namely Robert Woods, Calvin Austin III and Roman Wilson, who impresses the most and takes control of the No. 2 spot.
New offensive tackles in new spots
This will be the first look at Broderick Jones at left tackle and Troy Fautanu at right tackle. Fautanu was supposed to come in last year and help re-energize the offensive line, but a knee injury cost him his entire rookie season.
Arthur Smith 2.0
We will continue to hold onto hope that this year's version of the Arthur Smith offense will be less methodical, less predictable and more explosive than last year's version, even if the quarterback position isn't settled.
This article originally appeared on Steelers Wire: Steelers OTAs: 5 big Pittsburgh storylines
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
After hitting ‘rock bottom,' Braves can still salvage their season – if they snap out of it
The Atlanta Braves are 27-34, 11 games back in the NL East, 1 1/2 games behind rebuilding Washington and only 3 1/2 ahead of lowly Miami. After their latest misstep, a blown six-run lead in the ninth inning Thursday against Arizona, their broadcaster and Hall of Fame pitcher Tom Glavine said, 'If you were looking for rock bottom, this might be it.' Advertisement The tendency, in this age of overreaction, is to project the Braves as trade-deadline sellers and start listing potential landing spots for designated hitter Marcell Ozuna. But through the same date a year ago, the New York Mets were 27-35 and the Houston Astros 28-35, records nearly identical to the Braves' current mark. Both teams finished with nearly 90 wins and reached the postseason. If the Braves fail to ignite, it will be fair to question whether they lost too much of their fabric with the free-agent departures of first baseman Freddie Freeman, shortstop Dansby Swanson and left-hander Max Fried over a four-year span. Whether president of baseball operations Alex Anthopoulos created too comfortable an environment by awarding so many players extensions. Whether Anthopoulos last offseason should have done more to address his offense and bullpen. But more than 100 games remain. As poorly as the Braves are playing, the recoveries of the 2024 Mets and Astros are testaments to the dangers of passing judgment on a team too soon. So, for that matter, is the example of the 2021 World Series champion Braves, who at this stage of the season were 29-32. The 162-game marathon, combined with an expanded playoff format, allows teams to recover from a bad month or even three. The Braves are unlikely to even consider selling unless they are buried at the All-Star break. Their replacement of third-base coach Matt Tuiasosopo with former manager Fredi Gonzalez on Monday was not a warning shot at manager Brian Snitker, who has led the team to seven straight postseason appearances and is in his 49th year with the organization. No, it was simply a response to two seasons of Tuiasosopo making poor decisions. A change team officials deemed necessary. Snitker isn't blameless. The Braves aren't going to fire him after all he has achieved, but this sure looks like his last season. On Thursday alone, he could have stuck longer with right-hander Grant Holmes rather than start the bullpen carousel by lifting him after 3 1/3 innings. Still, the Braves took their six-run lead into the ninth. At some point, their disappointing performance is on the players, from center fielder Michael Harris II to second baseman Ozzie Albies to closer Raisel Iglesias. Advertisement By this time a year ago, the Mets already had started their turnaround. The Astros got going about two weeks later. But not every club reaches its desired destination. Another projected contender last season, the Texas Rangers, showed how some teams never recover from faulty starts, missing the playoffs one year after winning the World Series. The Braves, if they don't snap out of it, could be this year's Rangers. Their plus-6 run differential indicates their record should be above .500, yet they are seven games under. They have played a major-league-high 25 one-run games, and are only 9-16 in those contests. Even with the deadline offering an opportunity for improvement, an opportunity Anthopoulos seized to catapult his club to a championship in 2021, the strength of the NL this season adds to the degree of difficulty. The Braves need more from their offense, which, before their 10-run eruption Thursday, was tied with the Marlins for 22nd in runs per game. They also need to fix their bullpen, which underwent another shakeup after Thursday's shocking ninth-inning collapse — Daysbel Hernández to the injured list, Scott Blewett designated for assignment and Craig Kimbrel and Dylan Dodd up from Triple A. Yet, for all the Braves' middle-inning maneuvering, the biggest problem remains closer Raisel Iglesias, whose .956 opponents' OPS essentially means he is turning every hitter into Pete Alonso. Not even the highly anticipated returns of right-hander Spencer Strider and right fielder Ronald Acuña Jr. altered the Braves' trajectory. Strider is trying to regain his form after missing all of 2024 recovering from Tommy John surgery and nearly a month this season with a strained right hamstring. Acuña, coming off nearly a yearlong absence due to a torn ACL in his left knee, is performing better than the Braves could have expected, batting .333 with four home runs and a 1.056 OPS. Yet the team is 3-9 since his return. Bad breaks are part of this. The loss of right-hander Reynaldo López to shoulder inflammation after one start. The offseason knee surgery that might sideline setup man Joe Jiménez all season. The 80-game suspension to left fielder Jurickson Profar for testing positive for PEDs. Advertisement Well, all teams deal with injuries. The $42 million investment in Profar, based on his outlier campaign in 2024, was always going to be a gamble. And even the regressions of Harris (.590 OPS) and Albies (.658) reflect the volatility in individual performance that is part of the game. The Braves never expected catcher Drake Baldwin and outfielder Eli White to make such positive contributions, either. Early in the offseason, Anthopoulos orchestrated a series of moves to create payroll flexibility, trading designated hitter Jorge Soler, allowing catcher Travis d'Arnaud to depart as a free agent and restructuring the contracts of López and reliever Aaron Bummer. The Braves later lost Fried, right-hander Charlie Morton and reliever A.J. Minter to free agency as well. Profar turned out to be Anthopoulos' only significant addition. And the team, under its Liberty Media ownership, wound up with a lower payroll. Fried might win a Cy Young Award, but the Braves never were going to sign him to the $218 million contract he received from the New York Yankees, and their rotation isn't a problem. Anthopoulos non-tendered Griffin Canning, the pitcher he acquired from the Los Angeles Angels for Soler, and the Mets turned Canning into a potential All-Star. But none of the other players Anthopoulos lost is haunting him. His plan just isn't unfolding the way he envisioned. The way the Braves are constructed, an offense that set records in 2023 should be capable of succeeding with light-hitting Nick Allen at shortstop, just as the Astros once thrived with Martín Maldonado at catcher. A better version of outfielder Jarred Kelenic, an Anthopoulos acquisition from last offseason who earned a demotion at Triple A, surely would help. But the Braves shouldn't need to rely on him, either. Some seasons are like this. Some years it doesn't just work out. The Braves are talented enough to bounce back like they did in 2021, and like the Mets and Astros did last season. But at some point, they've got to show it. And they sure aren't showing it yet. (Top photo of Brian Snitker: Todd Kirkland / Getty Images)
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Indiana Pacers Come Back from Behind and Take First NBA Finals Game Against Oklahoma City Thunder
The Indiana Pacers come back from behind and take the first NBA Finals game against the Oklahoma City Thunder. #IndianaPacers #Pacers #OKCThunder #NBA #NBAFinals Learn more about your ad choices. Visit FOX News Radio
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
How the Thunder lost their way defensively late in Game 1 loss to Pacers
OKLAHOMA CITY — As Tyrese Haliburton's pull-up jumper caressed the bottom of the net and Aaron Nesmith met him near half court for a bear hug, the Indiana Pacers stormed the court — unconcerned with the 0.3 seconds left on the game clock. The Oklahoma City Thunder players, who attempted to wade through a sea of yellow back to their bench, were stunned, as was the rest of Paycom Arena. Advertisement Oklahoma City, like the rest of the NBA world, knew about Indiana's propensity for playoff comebacks. But witnessing it firsthand in a game and stage of this magnitude was different. 'The common denominator is them,' coach Mark Daigneault said following the Thunder's 111-110 loss in Game 1 of the NBA Finals. 'That's a really good team. Credit them for not only tonight but their run. They've had so many games like that that have seemed improbable. They just play with a great spirit, they keep coming, they made plays, made shots. They deserved to win by a point. We got to learn from it. Obviously, a lot of things we can clean up. Credit them, they went and got that game.' Oklahoma City's second-half defense — which gave up 31 and 35 points in the third and fourth quarters — indicated a larger issue with Indiana's offensive proficiency. But the Thunder should be worried about losing a game in which six different Pacers finished in double figures, despite none scoring more than 19 points. With 2:36 remaining on Thursday night, the Thunder were in control of the game with a 108-99 lead. But Oklahoma City's offense sputtered over the finish line, scoring just two points over the final 156 seconds of regulation. These Thunder, as talented as they are, have gone through offensive droughts during their postseason run — shot selection, execution issues, etc. Much more concerning is that the Thunder allowed their defense, the bedrock of their success, to fall apart in the game's most critical stretch, allowing the Pacers to slam the door with a 12-2 run. Game 1's fourth-quarter collapse was even more confusing considering how suffocating Oklahoma City's approach had been in the first half. For 24 mind-numbing minutes, the Pacers had nowhere to turn, no room to breathe. The Thunder's power, physicality, and pragmatism prevented Indiana, whose pace and precision have been the lifeblood of a team that has defied all odds this postseason — from getting into any sort of rhythm. The Thunder forced 19 Pacers turnovers, the most in a finals half in nearly three decades. Advertisement But in the second half, Indiana committed just six turnovers. It was a perfect storm of miscommunication, smart Pacers offense and coverage holes, especially in the final three minutes. Because of the Thunder's commitment to a compact defensive shell, which is loosely defined as the connective area around all five defenders on the floor, corner 3s are exposed. It's a simple concept; no defensive strategy is 100 percent foolproof, and elite teams can make even the most adept defenses suffer on occasion. According to tracking data, the Thunder give up the most corner 3s among playoff teams (12.6), but opponents were shooting a shade over 31 percent on such shots. Most teams will live with that math. But the Pacers aren't quite like other teams the Thunder have faced in these playoffs, especially not from a shot-profile standpoint. Indiana is a middle-of-the-pack team in terms of corner 3 quantity, but it is lethal when it takes them, hitting a whopping 48.5 percent of such shots. In Game 1, the Pacers shot 10-of-16 from the corners, good for 62.5 percent. Oklahoma City was guilty of some head-scratching decisions, such as in the possession below, in which there's no communication between Alex Caruso and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on approaching an Obi Toppin screen. Nesmith, who shot 43.1 percent from the perimeter during the regular season, is shooting 50 percent in the playoffs (on a slightly increased volume). Leaving him with airspace is asking for trouble. 'You have to eliminate the ones that we give up, that are out of rotation where we don't get there in time,' Caruso said, 'or in early transition where we're not matched up. I give them credit. They made big shots.' One prominent theme late in Game 1, which Thunder All-NBA forward Jalen Williams mentioned during his news conference, was the Thunder's rather slow offense, which carried over into their effort and aggression. And judging from the postgame appearances from Daigneault and multiple players, Indiana's pace played a part. Advertisement Pay attention to the lack of communication as Oklahoma City gets back in transition. Both Lu Dort and Cason Wallace are making different observations and, as a result, doing different things. Ideally, Dort would be matched up with Andrew Nembhard, not stationed with Toppin in the corner. In critical moments, the Pacers got favorable matchups on switches, keeping players like Caruso and Dort away. SGA is far from a defensive liability and had several solid possessions in Game 1, but he's the weakest link in their small-ball group and thus the target of any isolation play. This is a tough shot with a high degree of difficulty (multiple crossovers plus a stepback), but Gilgeous-Alexander shouldn't be in that position in the first place. Indiana's penultimate possession — a Pascal Siakam putback which set up Haliburton's eventual winner — was indicative of a Daigneault gamble gone awry and another momentary lapse by Gilgeous-Alexander. The Thunder's bold lineup change ahead of Game 1 — moving Isaiah Hartenstein to the bench in favor of Wallace— certainly had its benefits. It gave Oklahoma City more speed with the starters and prepared them for an expected track meet with Indiana. Hartenstein was still effective in his minutes, finishing with nine points and nine rebounds. But it also put the Thunder at a constant disadvantage on the boards. Hartenstein played just 17 minutes, with Caruso (essentially a sixth starter) logging 29 minutes. But the Pacers dominated in the rebounding department (56 to 39). Below, Wallace defends Nembhard well and contests the shot, but watch Gilgeous-Alexander's eyes. It only takes a second for him to ball watch to not notice Siakam creeping toward the restricted area for potential cleanup. 'Some of it is the cost of doing business,' Daigneault said of playing small. 'To be able to get perimeter speed on the court, get more switching in the game. It's obviously something that is a tradeoff. I thought the small lineup at the end of the first half looked pretty good. That's why I went back to it down the stretch. When we're small, we have to be pressure-oriented and contain the ball. I thought they got some cracks against us that hurt us a little bit more than the post-ups did.' Fortunately for the Thunder, this is a position they've been in before, in terms of letting go of a game they feel they should have won. Oklahoma City played below its standard in Game 1. Gilgeous-Alexander finished with a game-high 38 points but needed 30 shots to get there. The Thunder forced 25 turnovers but scored just 11 points off the Pacers' mistakes. The Thunder team reached this stage by being above the rest of the pack. We've seen this group finish off opponents on both ends of the floor with its connectivity. During the regular season, the Pacers committed 20 or more turnovers just eight times (and once in Game 5 of the Eastern Conference finals against the New York Knicks). Oklahoma City knows how to throw teams in disarray. The Thunder need to recalibrate themselves. It's easier said than done, though, against a brilliant, decisive Pacers group led by Rick Carlisle. But the Thunder are here for a reason. And it's time to prove why. Again. Advertisement 'We lost Game 1,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'We've lost Game 1 before. On the other side of that, we came out a better team. That's our goal. That's our mentality, to try to learn a lesson from the loss, like we always do, and move forward and be better.' (Photo of Pascal Siakam: Matthew Stockman / Getty Images)
