logo
Trump might fire Jerome Powell, but it could spark a legal war like nothing America's seen before

Trump might fire Jerome Powell, but it could spark a legal war like nothing America's seen before

Time of India5 days ago
US President
Donald Trump
is once again questioning whether Federal Reserve Chairman
Jerome Powell
should continue in his position. However, removing Jerome Powell could result in a legal battle unlike any other in American history.
From Supreme Court precedents to agency independence, this potential battle is already taking shape behind the scenes. Donald Trump may want to fire Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, but doing so could spark a complicated legal battle. With only 10 months left in Powell's term, Trump may simply wait him out.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Digital Marketing
Data Science
Technology
PGDM
Artificial Intelligence
Product Management
Project Management
Public Policy
Leadership
Design Thinking
healthcare
Cybersecurity
Operations Management
Others
Finance
Degree
Management
Data Analytics
Healthcare
MBA
others
CXO
MCA
Data Science
Skills you'll gain:
Digital Marketing Strategy
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) & Content Marketing
Social Media Marketing & Advertising
Data Analytics & Measurement
Duration:
24 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Professional Certificate Programme in Digital Marketing
Starts on
Jun 26, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Digital Marketing Strategies
Customer Journey Mapping
Paid Advertising Campaign Management
Emerging Technologies in Digital Marketing
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Digital Marketing and Analytics
Starts on
May 14, 2024
Get Details
The Fed Chair has been clear about his intentions. His removal is "not permitted by law," he stated earlier this year, and he would not leave if Trump attempted to fire him.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think
Villas In Dubai | Search Ads
Get Quote
Undo
ALSO READ:
ESPN anchors go too far - shocking on-air stunt on Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and Kristin Cabot sparks outrage
The Wall Street Journal claims that Fed officials have been secretly preparing for a legal battle since Trump's first term, when the president also considered firing the chair.
Live Events
What makes firing Jerome Powell legally complicated?
Jerome Powell's case is strong because it relies on certain
Fed autonomy protections
that are already included in US law. The Federal Reserve Act, which established the central bank in 1913 and was revised in 1935, stipulates that each Fed board member will serve for a period of 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President,' as per a report.
Powell is protected under federal law unless he is removed "for cause," which has never been fully tested in court.
The "for cause" requirement was designed to increase the Fed's independence by making it more difficult for a president to remove its president-appointed board members.
Although the Supreme Court's stance on the matter is unclear, there are indications that the court would intervene if Trump took action, as per a report.
Just this week, a federal judge ruled that Trump's prior firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was illegal, citing a 1935 Supreme Court case, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, that limited the president's power to remove leaders of independent agencies.
The judge referenced a Supreme Court decision from ninety years ago that restricts the president's authority to fire independent agency board members unless there is negligence or misconduct. Powell has some protection from that precedent.
What does 'for cause' really mean in this context?
While the law says 'for cause,' it doesn't define exactly what that means in the context of firing the chair of the Fed, especially since the statute doesn't specifically reference the chair's role.
Historically, 'for cause' has been interpreted to mean serious misconduct, like inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. But so far, those standards haven't been tested in court for a Fed chair.
Now, Donald Trump and his allies are suggesting a potential reason: the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Washington headquarters. Trump recently claimed there might be fraud involved in the project, telling reporters, 'It's possible there's fraud,' and hinting that it 'sort of is' a fireable offense.
Although he clarified that he wasn't actively planning to remove Powell, Trump also said, 'I don't rule out anything.'
Kevin Hassett, former National Economic Council director and a rumored contender to replace Powell, said last weekend that the question of presidential firing authority is 'being looked into.' Still, he called it a 'highly uncertain legal matter.'
Behind the scenes, White House officials appear unsure of their legal footing. According to Politico, outside attorneys warned that firing Powell over the renovation project would likely not hold up in court. One anonymous official even admitted, 'Whether or not it's illegal, I don't know. But is it a good thing to point out to damage this guy's image? Yeah.'
Could Donald Trump actually pull it off before Powell's term ends?
While the legal challenges would be significant, time may actually be Trump's biggest obstacle. Powell's term ends in less than a year, in May 2026. Some legal scholars think Trump may ultimately decide to let the clock run out.
Eric Chaffee, a business law professor at Case Western Reserve University, said he believes Powell would win any court fight. But more importantly, Chaffee says Trump may not see the battle as worth it.
FAQs
Can Donald Trump legally remove Jerome Powell?
Not easy. U.S. law requires "cause" for firing a Fed board member, and Powell has stated that he will oppose any such move.
What does Donald Trump accuse Powell of?
To justify a potential dismissal, Trump and allies have cited a $2.5 billion Fed building renovation, raising unproven fraud concerns.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil to join South Africa's Gaza genocide case against Israel at ICJ
Brazil to join South Africa's Gaza genocide case against Israel at ICJ

The Hindu

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Brazil to join South Africa's Gaza genocide case against Israel at ICJ

Brazil is finalizing its submission to join South Africa's genocide case against Israel's actions in Gaza at the International Court of Justice, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Wednesday (July 23, 2025). South Africa filed a case in 2023 asking the ICJ to declare that Israel was in breach of its obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention. The case argues that in its war against Hamas militants Israel's military actions go beyond targeting Hamas alone by attacking civilians, with strikes on schools, hospitals, camps, and shelters. Other countries – including Spain, Turkey, and Colombia – have also sought to join the case against Israel. In its statement, the Brazilian government accused Israel of violations of international law "such as the annexation of territories by force" and expressed "deep indignation" at violence suffered by the civilian population. Israel denies deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians, saying its sole interest is to annihilate Hamas. Lawyers for Israel have dismissed South Africa's case as an abuse of the genocide convention. The Israeli embassy in Brasilia did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Brazil's National Israeli association CONIB said in a statement in response to Wednesday's decision that "the breaking of Brazil's long-standing friendship and partnership with Israel is a misguided move that proves the extremism of our foreign policy." Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has long been an outspoken critic of Israel's actions in Gaza, but Wednesday's decision carries added significance amid heightened tensions between Brazil and Israel's ally the United States. The Trump administration announced 50% tariffs on all Brazilian goods this month. A diplomat familiar with the thinking of the Lula administration told Reuters that Brazil does not believe its decision to join South Africa's case will impact its relationship with Washington, however. The United States has opposed South Africa's genocide case under both former President Joe Biden and Trump. In February, Trump signed an executive order to cut U.S. financial assistance to South Africa, citing in part its ICJ case.

House Speaker Johnson breaks with Trump, says Epstein scandal ‘not a hoax'
House Speaker Johnson breaks with Trump, says Epstein scandal ‘not a hoax'

First Post

time11 minutes ago

  • First Post

House Speaker Johnson breaks with Trump, says Epstein scandal ‘not a hoax'

Republican House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson said the Jeffrey Epstein scandal was 'not a hoax' in an interview released on Thursday, as the case continued to stoke turmoil within President Donald Trump's party. read more US House Speaker Mike Johnson said the Jeffrey Epstein scandal was 'not a hoax,' directly countering President Donald Trump's repeated attempts to downplay the issue as fresh disclosures continue to stir unrest within the Republican Party. 'It's not a hoax. Of course not,' Johnson said in an interview with CBS News, released on Thursday. Trump, who had known Epstein personally, has repeatedly dismissed the renewed scrutiny as 'the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' and called on Republicans to drop the matter. His efforts have so far failed to unite the party, which remains divided over how to proceed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Tuesday, Johnson said he would send lawmakers on their summer recess a day earlier than planned, partly to avoid a contentious debate over releasing more documents related to Epstein. Epstein died in a New York City jail in 2019, a death ruled as suicide by the city's chief medical examiner. Even so, a Republican-controlled subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday approved a subpoena seeking all Justice Department files on Epstein. Three Republicans joined five Democrats to back the effort, in a sign that Trump's party was not ready to move on from the issue. 'We want full transparency. We want everybody who is involved in any way with the Epstein evils — let's call it what it was — to be brought to justice as quickly as possible. We want the full weight of the law on their heads,' Johnson told CBS in the interview, conducted on Wednesday. A disclosure on Wednesday about Trump's appearance in the Justice Department's case records threatened to deepen a political crisis that has engulfed his administration for weeks. The Wall Street Journal reported that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump in May that his name appeared in investigative files related to Epstein. With inputs from agencies

Trump's diktat to Google, Microsoft, and other tech giants, asks them to stop Indian…, rules about H-1B visa might…
Trump's diktat to Google, Microsoft, and other tech giants, asks them to stop Indian…, rules about H-1B visa might…

India.com

time11 minutes ago

  • India.com

Trump's diktat to Google, Microsoft, and other tech giants, asks them to stop Indian…, rules about H-1B visa might…

New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has asked big tech companies of America like Google, Microsoft to stop hiring in India. Trump said in the AI Summit held in Washington DC on Wednesday, July 23, that America's biggest tech companies take advantage of our freedom, but set up factories in China and recruit people from India. What did Donald Trump say about Google and Microsoft? Donald Trump said that we want companies like Google, Microsoft to give priority to American workers as this is in the interest of the country. Trump criticized the globalist mind set of tech companies and said that Americans should get jobs first. According to Trump, companies are killing the rights of American talent by investing money on factories and employees abroad. Trump made these comments at the AI Summit held in Washington DC on 23 July. How will it affect India's tech sector? India's IT sector may be affected by this statement as Google, Microsoft and other tech companies have millions of employees in India. These companies run large offices in cities like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Pune. Apart from this, according to US Citizenship and Immigration Services, in 2023, 72% of H-1B visas were given to Indians, mostly in areas like data science, Artificial Intelligence, and cyber security. Trump's policy may make H-1B visa rules more stringent, making it difficult for Indian tech professionals to get jobs in the US. Also, due to less new recruitment in India, pressure on IT companies and startups will increase. When Trump threatened Apple CEO Tim Cook Earlier in May, Trump had threatened Apple about making iPhones in India as he said that iPhones sold in the USA should be manufactured in the US, not in India or any other country. Trump said that he has previously directly told Apple CEO Tim Cook that if Apple does not make iPhones in the US, a tariff of at least 25% will be imposed on the company. After this threat from Trump, Apple's stock fell 4% to $193. However, despite Trump's threat to Apple, 78% of iPhones sold in the USA are being made in India.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store